skip to main content
10.1145/3580585.3607160acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesautomotiveuiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

How to Make Reading in Fully Automated Vehicles a Better Experience? Effects of Active Seat Belt Retractions and a 2-Step Driving Profile on Subjective Motion Sickness, Ride Comfort and Acceptance

Published: 18 September 2023 Publication History

Abstract

The paper presents a study on motion sickness mitigation while driving with a fully automated vehicle on a test track. 31 participants who were susceptible to motion sickness experienced a 25-minuntes drive with multiple motion sickness provoking decelerations and accelerations while reading a text on a tablet. The participants experienced three different conditions in separate sessions: 1) control condition without countermeasure, 2) drive with active seat belt tensioner, 3) drive with a two-step driving profile. The participants rated their motion sickness on the MSTT Scale (during the drive) [1] and on the MSAQ (pre and post drive) [2]. After each drive, drivers rated their subjective experience of vehicle behavior and the countermeasures. On MSTT, the results showed no significant differences in the development of motion sickness across the three conditions. However, the two-step driving profile reduced the development of motion sickness assessed via MSAQ. Furthermore, both countermeasures seem to have the potential to positively influence the perception of the automation as safer, more trustworthy and more reliable.

References

[1]
Kaß, C., Short assessment scale to assess motion sickness in automated driving: Motion Sickness Task Tolerance (MSTT) Scale. 2022 29 March 2023]; Available from: https://projekt-rumba.de/wp-content/uploads/2022/07/MotionSickness_homepage_website_en.pdf.
[2]
Gianaros, P.J., A questionnaire for the assessment of the multiple dimensions of motion sickness. Aviat Space Environ Med, 2001. 72(2): p. 115-9.
[3]
Diels, C. and J.E. Bos, Self-driving carsickness. Appl Ergon, 2016. 53 Pt B: p. 374-82.
[4]
Kato, K. and S. Kitazaki, Improvement of Ease of Viewing Images on an In-vehicle Display and Reduction of Carsickness. SAE Technical Paper 2008-01-0565, 2008.
[5]
Kuiper, O.X., J.E. Bos, and C. Diels, Looking forward: In-vehicle auxiliary display positioning affects carsickness. Appl Ergon, 2018. 68: p. 169-175.
[6]
Sivak, M. and B. Schoettle, Motion Sickness in Self Driving Vehicles. 2015, University of Michigang.
[7]
Graybiel, A., Diagnostic criteria for grading the severity of acute motion sickness. Aerosp Med, 1968. 39(5): p. 453-5.
[8]
Bos, J.E., S.N. MacKinnon, and A. Patterson, Motion sickness symptoms in a ship motion simulator: effects of inside, outside, and no view. Aviat Space Environ Med, 2005. 76(12): p. 1111-8.
[9]
Mühlbacher, D., Methodological Considerations Concerning Motion Sickness Investigations during Automated Driving. Information, 2020. 11(5): p. 265.
[10]
Wada, T. Motion sickness in automated vehicles. in Advanced Vehicle Control: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Advanced Vehicle Control (AVEC’16). 2016.
[11]
Smyth, J., Motion sickness and human performance–exploring the impact of driving simulator user trials. in 9th International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. 2018. Florida, USA: Springer.
[12]
Smyth, J., Too sick to drive: How motion sickness severity impacts human performance. in 21st International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC). 2018. Maui, Hawaii, USA: IEEE.
[13]
Reason, J.T. and J.J. Brand, Motion sickness. 1975, London: Academic Press.
[14]
Reason, J.T., Motion sickness adaptation: a neural mismatch model. J R Soc Med, 1978. 71(11): p. 819-29.
[15]
Konno, H., Analysis of Driver's Head Movement by Motion Sickness Model. in Proceedings of the 12th Korea and Japan Joint Ergonomics Symposium. 2010. May, Daejeon, Korea.
[16]
Wada, T., S. Fujisawa, and S. Doi, Analysis of driver's head tilt using a mathematical model of motion sickness. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2018. 63: p. 89-97.
[17]
Brietzke, A., Head motion as indicator for visual anticipation in the context of car sickness. Preprint, 2020.
[18]
Wada, T., Can passengers' active head tilt decrease the severity of carsickness? Effect of head tilt on severity of motion sickness in a lateral acceleration environment. Hum Factors, 2012. 54(2): p. 226-34.
[19]
Wada, T., N. Kamij, and S. Doi. A Mathematical Model of Motion Sickness in 6DOF Motion and Its Application to Vehicle Passengers. in 2nd International Symposium on Digital Human Modeling. 2015.
[20]
Wada, T. and K. Yoshida, Effect of passengers' active head tilt and opening/closure of eyes on motion sickness in lateral acceleration environment of cars. Ergonomics, 2016. 59(8): p. 1050-9.
[21]
Brietzke, A., Influence of dynamic stimulation, visual perception and individual susceptibility to car sickness during controlled stop-and-go driving. Forschung im Ingenieurwesen, 2021. 85(1).
[22]
Zikovitz, D.C. and L.R. Harris, Head tilt during driving. Ergonomics, 1999. 42(5): p. 740-6.
[23]
Riccio, G.E. and T.A. Stoffregen, An ecological theory of motion sickness und postural instability. Ecological Psychology, 1991. 3: p. 195-240.
[24]
Jones, M.L., Motion sickness in passenger vehicles during test track operations. Ergonomics, 2019. 62(10): p. 1357-1371.
[25]
Joseph, J.A. and M.J. Griffin, Motion sickness: effect of changes in magnitude of combined lateral and roll oscillation. Aviat Space Environ Med, 2008. 79(11): p. 1019-27.
[26]
Jurisch, M., C. Holzapfel, and C. Buck, The influence of active suspension systems on motion sickness of vehicle occupants, in IEEE ITSC. 2020.
[27]
O'Hanlon, J.F. and M.E. McCauley, Motion sickness incidence as a function of the frequency and acceleration of vertical sinusoidal motion. Aerosp Med, 1974. 45(4): p. 366-9.
[28]
de Winkel, K.N., Standards for passenger comfort in automated vehicles: Acceleration and jerk. Applied Ergonomics, 2023. 106: p. 103881.
[29]
Irmak, T., Amplitude and Temporal Dynamics of Motion Sickness. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 2022. 16.
[30]
Ekchian, J., A high-bandwidth active suspension for motion sickness mitigation in autonomous vehicles. 2016, SAE Technical Paper.
[31]
Kato, K. and S. Kitazaki, A Study for understanding carsickness based on a sensory conflict theory, in SAE Technical Paper. 2006.
[32]
Bohrmann, D., Kinetosis as a Challenge of Future Mobility Concepts and Highly Automated Vehicles in 27th Aachen Colloquium Automobile and Engine Technology. 2018: Aachen.
[33]
Kremer, C., Using Active Seat Belt Retractions to Mitigate Motion Sickness in Automated Driving. Vehicles, 2022. 4(3): p. 825-842.
[34]
Vanholme, B., Highly automated driving on highways based on legal safety. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, 2012. 14(1): p. 333-347.
[35]
Mercedes-Benz Group. The front number in automated driving and safety technologies. 2022 April 06, 2022 June 17, 2022]; Available from: https://group.mercedes-benz.com/innovation/case/autonomous/drive-pilot-2.html.
[36]
Schmidt, E.A., An international survey on the incidence and modulating factors of carsickness. Transportation research part F: traffic psychology and behaviour, 2020. 71: p. 76-87.
[37]
Hartmann, A., Effect of Horizontal Acceleration and Seat Orientation on Motion Sickness in Passenger Cars, in AVEC'22. 2022: Kanagawa, Japan.
[38]
Htike, Z., Fundamentals of motion planning for mitigating motion sickness in automated vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Vehicular Technology, 2021. 71(3): p. 2375-2384.
[39]
Golding, J.F., Predicting individual differences in motion sickness susceptibility by questionnaire. Personality and Individual Differences, 2006. 41(2): p. 237–248.
[40]
Lamb, S. and K.C. Kwok, MSSQ-Short Norms May Underestimate Highly Susceptible Individuals: Updating the MSSQ-Short Norms. Human Factors, 2015. 57(4): p. 622-33.
[41]
ISO, 2631-1: Mechanical vibration and shock-evaluation of human exposure to whole-body vibration-Part 1: General requirements. Geneva, Switzerland: ISO, 1997. 42: p. 43-44.
[42]
ZF, ZF Releases New Active Control Retractor Seat Belt System. 2018, ZF Friedrichshafen AG: Friedrichshafen. p. 1-3.
[43]
Neukum, A., ACC-Stop&Go: Fahrerverhalten an funktionalen Systemgrenzen. in 5. Workshop Fahrerassistenzsysteme-FAS. 2008. fmrt Karlsruhe.
[44]
Irmak, T., D.M. Pool, and R. Happee, Objective and subjective responses to motion sickness: the group and the individual. Experimental Brain Research, 2021. 239: p. 515-531.
[45]
Butler, C.A. and M.J. Griffin, Motion sickness during fore-and-aft oscillation: effect of the visual scene. Aviat Space Environ Med, 2006. 77(12): p. 1236-43.
[46]
Holm, S., A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian journal of statistics, 1979: p. 65-70.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Does the visual input matter? Influence of non-driving related tasks on car sickness in an open road settingTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour10.1016/j.trf.2024.06.002104(234-248)Online publication date: Jul-2024
  • (2024)User evaluation of comfortable deceleration profiles for highly automated driving: Findings from a test track studyTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour10.1016/j.trf.2024.05.025105(206-221)Online publication date: Aug-2024

Index Terms

  1. How to Make Reading in Fully Automated Vehicles a Better Experience? Effects of Active Seat Belt Retractions and a 2-Step Driving Profile on Subjective Motion Sickness, Ride Comfort and Acceptance

            Recommendations

            Comments

            Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

            Information & Contributors

            Information

            Published In

            cover image ACM Conferences
            AutomotiveUI '23: Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications
            September 2023
            352 pages
            ISBN:9798400701054
            DOI:10.1145/3580585
            Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

            Sponsors

            Publisher

            Association for Computing Machinery

            New York, NY, United States

            Publication History

            Published: 18 September 2023

            Permissions

            Request permissions for this article.

            Check for updates

            Badges

            • Honorable Mention

            Author Tags

            1. 2-step driving profile
            2. Fully automated driving
            3. active seat belt retractions
            4. countermeasures
            5. motion sickness

            Qualifiers

            • Research-article
            • Research
            • Refereed limited

            Funding Sources

            Conference

            AutomotiveUI '23
            Sponsor:

            Acceptance Rates

            Overall Acceptance Rate 248 of 566 submissions, 44%

            Contributors

            Other Metrics

            Bibliometrics & Citations

            Bibliometrics

            Article Metrics

            • Downloads (Last 12 months)306
            • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4
            Reflects downloads up to 10 Nov 2024

            Other Metrics

            Citations

            Cited By

            View all
            • (2024)Does the visual input matter? Influence of non-driving related tasks on car sickness in an open road settingTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour10.1016/j.trf.2024.06.002104(234-248)Online publication date: Jul-2024
            • (2024)User evaluation of comfortable deceleration profiles for highly automated driving: Findings from a test track studyTransportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour10.1016/j.trf.2024.05.025105(206-221)Online publication date: Aug-2024

            View Options

            Get Access

            Login options

            View options

            PDF

            View or Download as a PDF file.

            PDF

            eReader

            View online with eReader.

            eReader

            HTML Format

            View this article in HTML Format.

            HTML Format

            Media

            Figures

            Other

            Tables

            Share

            Share

            Share this Publication link

            Share on social media