Fiscal Multiplier: Definition, Formula, and Example

Person using contactless payment credit card Person using contactless payment credit card

Tim Robberts / Getty Images 

What Is the Fiscal Multiplier?

The fiscal multiplier measures the effect that increases in fiscal spending will have on a nation's economic output, or gross domestic product (GDP). In general, economists define fiscal multipliers as the ratio of a change in output to a change in tax revenue or government spending. Fiscal multipliers are important because they can help guide a government's policies during an economic crisis and help set the stage for economic recovery.

Key Takeaways

  • The fiscal multiplier measures the effect that increases in fiscal spending will have on a nation's economic output or gross domestic product (GDP).
  • At the core of fiscal multiplier theory lies the idea of the marginal propensity to consume (MPC), which quantifies the increase in consumer spending, as opposed to saving, due to an increase in the income of an individual, household, or society.
  • Evidence suggests that lower-income households have a higher MPC than higher-income households.

Understanding the Fiscal Multiplier

The fiscal multiplier is a Keynesian idea first proposed by John Maynard Keynes's student Richard Kahn in a 1931 paper and is depicted as a ratio to show the causality between the controlled variable (changes in fiscal policy) and the outcome (GDP).

At the core of fiscal multiplier theory lies the idea of the marginal propensity to consume (MPC), which quantifies the increase in consumer spending, as opposed to saving, due to an increase in the income of an individual, household, or society.

Fiscal multiplier theory posits that as long as a country's overall MPC is greater than zero, then an initial infusion of government spending should lead to a disproportionately larger increase in national income.

The fiscal multiplier expresses how much greater or, if stimulus turns out to be counterproductive, the smaller the overall gain in national income is when compared with the amount of extra spending. The formula for the fiscal multiplier is as follows:

Fiscal Multiplier = 1 1 MPC where: MPC = marginal propensity to consume \begin{aligned} &\text{Fiscal Multiplier} = \frac { 1 }{ 1 - \text{MPC} } \\ &\textbf{where:} \\ &\text{MPC} = \text{marginal propensity to consume} \\ \end{aligned} Fiscal Multiplier=1MPC1where:MPC=marginal propensity to consume

Example of the Fiscal Multiplier

Let's say that a national government enacts a $1 billion fiscal stimulus and that its consumers' MPC is 0.75. Consumers who receive the initial $1 billion will save $250 million and spend $750 million, effectively initiating another, smaller round of stimulus. The recipients of that $750 million will spend $562.5 million, and so on. 

The total change in national income is the initial increase in government, or "autonomous," spending times the fiscal multiplier. Since the marginal propensity to consume is 0.75, the fiscal multiplier would be four. Keynesian theory would thus predict an overall boost to the national income of $4 billion as a result of the initial $1 billion fiscal stimulus.

In addition to the fiscal multiplier, economists use other multipliers to study the behavior of the economy, including the earnings multiplier and the investment multiplier.

The Fiscal Multiplier in the Real World

Empirical evidence suggests that the actual relationship between spending and growth is messier than the theory would suggest. Not all members of society have the same MPC. For instance, lower-income households tend to spend a much greater share of a windfall than higher-income ones.

MPC also depends on the form in which fiscal stimulus is received. Different policies can, therefore, have drastically different fiscal multipliers.

In 2009, Mark Zandi, then chief economist of Moody's, estimated the following fiscal multipliers for different policy options, expressed as the one-year dollar increase in real GDP per dollar increase in spending or decrease in federal tax revenue.

Tax cuts  
Nonrefundable lump-sum tax rebate 1.01
Refundable lump-sum tax rebate 1.22
Temporary tax cuts  
Payroll tax holiday 1.29
Across-the-board tax cut 1.02
Accelerated depreciation 0.25
Loss carryback 0.21
Housing tax credit 0.90
Permanent tax cuts  
Extend alternative minimum tax patch 0.51
Make Bush income tax cuts permanent 0.32
Make dividend and capital gains tax cuts permanent 0.37
Cut corporate tax rate 0.32
Spending increases  
Extend unemployment insurance benefits 1.61
Temporarily increase food stamps 1.74
Temporary federal financing of work-share programs 1.69
Issue general aid to state governments 1.41
Increase infrastructure spending 1.57

By far the most effective policy options, according to this analysis, are temporarily increasing food stamps (1.74), temporary federal financing of work-share programs (1.69), and extending unemployment insurance benefits (1.61).

These policies target groups with low incomes and, as a result, high marginal propensities to consume. Permanent tax cuts benefiting mostly higher-income households, by contrast, have fiscal multipliers below 1: for every dollar "spent" (given up in tax revenue), only a few cents are added to real GDP. 

Special Considerations

The idea of the fiscal multiplier has seen its influence on policy wax and wane. Keynesian theory was extremely influential in the 1960s, but a period of stagflation, which Keynesians were largely unable to explain, caused faith in fiscal stimulus to wane.

Beginning in the 1970s, many policymakers began to favor monetarist policies, believing that regulating the money supply was at least as effective as government spending.

Following the 2008 financial crisis, however, the fiscal multiplier has regained some of its lost popularity. The U.S. invested heavily in fiscal stimulus and saw a robust recovery.

What Is the Difference Between the Fiscal Multiplier and the Money Multiplier?

The fiscal multiplier looks at how an increase in government spending boosts the economy while the money multiplier assesses the effects of a change in the money supply on economic output.

Why Is the Fiscal Multiplier Less Than 1?

In normal economic times, meaning no boom or bust, the fiscal multiplier is low, usually less than one. This is because increased government spending would need to be financed which has a negative wealth effect. Additionally, increased fiscal spending would result in increased inflation and output, which would cause central banks to raise interest rates, which would ultimately erode some of the expansionary gains.

Can a Fiscal Multiplier Be Negative?

Yes, a fiscal multiplier can be negative. This means that increased fiscal spending would decrease GDP. This can happen when increased government spending crowds out private investment and consumption or when a nation's debt levels are high where increased government spending signals there will be fiscal tightening coming up, which may lead to a contractionary outcome.

The Bottom Line

The fiscal multiplier assesses how government spending affects GDP based on the concept that when people have more income, they spend more. The effectiveness of fiscal policies varies, but targeted spending, particularly for low-income groups, can boost the economy. The fiscal multiplier is especially useful in helping with economic recovery.

Article Sources
Investopedia requires writers to use primary sources to support their work. These include white papers, government data, original reporting, and interviews with industry experts. We also reference original research from other reputable publishers where appropriate. You can learn more about the standards we follow in producing accurate, unbiased content in our editorial policy.
  1. Economics Observatory. "What Is the Size of the Fiscal Multiplier?"

  2. Mark Zandi. "The Impact of the Recovery Act on Economic Growth." Page 3.

  3. University of Minnesota Libraries. "32.2 Keynesian Economics in the 1960s and 1970s."

  4. International Monetary Fund. "What Is Monetarism?"

  5. Brookings Institution. "Nine Facts About the Great Recession and Tools for Fighting the Next Downturn."