Commons:Deletion requests/2024/05/20

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

May 20

[edit]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of film distribution company. Exceeds COM:TOO IagoQnsi (talk) 04:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:16, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Files in Category:Emblems and Flags of Palestinian Political Parties

[edit]

The files listed above could potentially violate copyright as they are representations of the emblems of the political parties, which may be protected by copyright under Palestinian law. This still applies even if they are represented in a different style, but still convey the same meaning. There is no indication that the emblems are under public domain in the country. Also see Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Hamas and the non-free symbol template on Wikipedia. --Bambobee (talk) 05:24, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly the Hamas ones but since the PLO/Fatah are considered the legitimate government of Palestine it's in public domain (in Palestine at least), read this PD template:
Public domain The work or image is in the public domain because the copyright term expired in the State of Palestine (Details). According to the Copyright Ordinance of 1924 where the Palestinian Copyright Act of 1911 applies too, the Arab Copyright Treaty of 1981, and the "Basic Law" of governmental Palestine which uses the old acts, all occupied territories of Palestine use Israeli copyright laws so it is also included, it states:
  • The copyright of anonymous and pseudonymous works shall be protected for 70 years after the date of their publication
  • It is a statute, regulation, Knesset protocol or court decision and therefore ineligible for copyright protection according to §6 of the Israel's copyright statute from 2007 (translation)
To uploader: Please provide where the image was first published and who created it.

You must also include a United States public domain tag to indicate why this work is in the public domain in the United States.
State of Palestine
State of Palestine

RowanJ LP (talk) 00:26, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment: Fatah is a government organization recognized by the Palestinian government, while Hamas and PIJ are not recognized by the government, so the flags, emblems and logos used by the latter two are likely to be protected by Palestinian copyright law, although their copyright is in a "de facto seizure state". The Fatah logo can be retained, while the Hamas and PIJ logos should be removed and re-uploaded on other Wikimedia projects under fair use. Fumikas Sagisavas (talk) 23:45, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep with symbols, flags of Fatah. Per @Fumikas Sagisavas, Fatah is a Palestinian governmental organization, and led by Palestinian president, Mahmoud Abbas. There isn't proof that fair use is OK, so all files related to Fatah's symbols, flags and emblems should be kept under public domain. while others have copyrights seized under de facto. Kys5g talk! 12:56, 27 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep In heraldry the flag designs are mostly not copyrighted, but specific files depicting COAs might be, with the artist who created the file being the copyright owner. Most files in the above set, are SVG files claiming to be created by the uploaders. If that is true, than unless someone can show that the concept of given emblem or flag is copyrighted, than I think those are fine. Now if individual files, were copied from elsewhere or we have a reason to believe that the uploader did not created them than those individual files should be nominated. --Jarekt (talk) 23:12, 31 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep peer nomination AbchyZa22 (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Le ragioni da te menzionate non stanno in piedi perché de facto la Striscia di Gaza, parte dei territori palestinesi, è governata da Hamas. 109.118.122.42 21:42, 7 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

COM:TOO Switzerland John123521 (talk) 14:42, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Non-notable person, out of scope.

Quick1984 (talk) 15:52, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

That's a Russian jazz singer who got some media coverage (e.g. in the renowned weekly newspaper Argumenty i Fakty [1] and others [2][3]) and is the sister of the musician Pierre Narcisse. Nakonana (talk) 21:14, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
So what? Deleted in 2020 as not notable. --Quick1984 (talk) 13:39, 1 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, Commons' rules are less strict than Wikipedias'. The rule here is not notability but COM:Project scope. These can stay; no indication of images being used to advertise or promote the subject. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:32, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be speedily deleted as the person in this image is no more with the political party and has requested to remove images displaying him from Wikimedia commons. Failure to this would cause a legal issue for us. Hence please delete. AAPPilibhit (talk) 16:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - we rarely remove images at the request of the subject and never at the request of a third party. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be speedily deleted as the person in this image is no more with the political party and has requested to remove images displaying him from Wikimedia commons. Failure to this would cause a legal issue for us. Hence please delete. AAPPilibhit (talk) 16:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be speedily deleted as the person in this image is no more with the political party and has requested to remove images displaying him from Wikimedia commons. Failure to this would cause a legal issue for us. Hence please delete. AAPPilibhit (talk) 16:10, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be speedily deleted as the person in this image is no more with the political party and has requested to remove images displaying him from Wikimedia commons. Failure to this would cause a legal issue for us. Hence please delete. AAPPilibhit (talk) 16:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be speedily deleted as the person in this image is no more with the political party and has requested to remove images displaying him from Wikimedia commons. Failure to this would cause a legal issue for us. Hence please delete. AAPPilibhit (talk) 16:11, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:19, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Subjects of a Digestion Study - NARA - 5729291 (page 1).jpg TheImaCow (talk) 17:27, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:20, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of File:Subject Reading in Respiration Calorimeter - NARA - 5729290 (page 1).jpg TheImaCow (talk) 17:28, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:21, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

拍攝者提到自己拍攝的新聞類照片均採CC BY-SA-NC 4.0--KOKUYO (talk) 18:49, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

我當日有向拍攝者徵詢同意,而他也於昨日向官方寄送授權信 Kanshui0943 (talk) 23:32, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
現在的問題是這張照片授權有NC,但你的上傳條款不合。-- Subscriptshoe9 (talk) 08:16, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
但是作者另外再給官方授權也不行嗎 Kanshui0943 (talk) 02:52, 25 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
在提供授權後,會有VRT志工審查並儲存在許可檔案中,但到目前都沒有。在遲遲沒有授權的情況下,這張照片就應當被視為違反著作權,而應該刪除。 KOKUYO (talk) 06:38, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
請儘快確認著作權,並投遞至VRT隊列,以便志工審核。—— Eric LiuTalk 20:58, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Fujifilmuser Taiwan Kanshui0943 (talk) 06:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
我作為相片拍攝者,願意提供所有授權給任何放上維基百科、由我拍攝的照片,採CC-BY-SA-NC條款主要是因為當時threads等平台不斷出現有人未經授權使用本人圖片與二創等,才下此宣告 2401:E180:8C30:4F6A:5155:5A34:EEA7:3F32 07:34, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]
問題在於維基政策拒絕CC-BY-SA-NC條款。維基圖片庫允許其他人二創改圖--北極企鵝觀賞團 (talk) 04:09, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
若您不允許「二次創作」,則通常亦不適合投稿至維基共享資源。—— Eric LiuTalk 18:26, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot find a death date for "Phototypie J. Bienaimé Reims", name possibly being Jean Bienaimé. 1910 postcard is too young for PD-old-assumed. Abzeronow (talk) 21:33, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour, je suis bien content que vous attribuiez cette carte postale à "Phototypie J. Bienaimé Reims". Quelle est votre source ? Sur l'image ? Cordialement Gérald Garitan (talk) 06:56, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oui, sur l'image, dans le coin inférieur gauche. Abzeronow (talk) 17:04, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Une carte postale publié en France en 1910, trop jeune ? Une autre licence ou sous droit ? Merci
Yes, too young for our guidelines when there is a named author. File:1910 M Labouchère sur Antoinette 102187.jpg may be by the same photographer. Was definitely published in Reims. Abzeronow (talk) 23:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Leyo as no source (No source since) Sandra Hanbo (talk) 22:30, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I have edited the file, adding the picture date to be before 1979 (time of death of this actress, thus her pictures are now in the Public domain). — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎ Sandra Hanbo (talk • contribs) 18:31, May 20, 2024 (UTC)

Possible copyvio: Already in 2022 on the Internet according to TinEye, Ghost from Call of Duty CoffeeEngineer (talk) 22:51, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Y si no fuera copyvio qué? Cuál es el "scope"? 191.125.21.194 23:38, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
¿Tiene derecho a publicar esta imagen? ¿Es usted el creador? Si es así, ¿podría rellenar este formulario? https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Wikimedia_VRT_release_generator CoffeeEngineer (talk) 16:02, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]