Abstract
Fission-fusion systems can have the group or the individual as their primary unit. In group-based fission-fusion systems, predation risk reduction is the major benefit to grouping, in the individual-based ones the benefits are likely to be primarily social. Orangutans, like chimpanzees, are examples of an individual-based fission-fusion species. The orangutans inhabiting a Sumatran swamp forest (Suaq Balimbing) are more likely than elsewhere to form travel parties. As elsewhere, the main benefits of grouping are social: mating opportunities, protection from harassment and socialization of infants. Most animals also incur costs, but these are relatively low at Suaq Balimbing due to the high productivity of the swamp. Costs seem to be disproportionately high for females with mid-sized infants, who avoid parties.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Austad, S. N.;Fischer, K. E. 1991. Mammalian aging, metabolism, and ecology: evidence from the bats and marsupials.J. Gerontol. Biol. Sci., 46: B47–53.
Boesch, C. 1996. Social grouping in Tai chimpanzees. InGreat Ape Societies,McGrew,W. C.;Marchant,L. F.;Nishida,T. (eds.). Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 101–113.
Chapman, C. A. 1990a. Ecological constraints on group size in three species of Neotropical primates.Folia Primatol., 55: 1–9.
Chapman, C. A. 1990b. Association patterns of spider monkeys: the influence of ecology and sex on social organization.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 26: 409–414.
Chapman, C. A.;Wrangham, R. W.;Chapman, L. J. 1995. Ecological constraints on group size: an analysis of spider monkey and chimpanzee subgroups.Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol., 36: 59–70.
Clutton-Brock, T. H.;Parker, G. A. 1995. Punishment in animal societies.Nature, 373: 209–216.
Dunbar, R. I. M. 1988.Primate Social Systems, Cornell Univ. Press, Ithaca.
Fox, E. A. 1998. The function of female mate choice in the Sumatran orangutan (Pongo pygmaeus abelii). Ph.D. thesis. Duke Univ., North Carolina.
Galdikas, B. M. F. 1979. Orangutan adaptation at Tanjung Puting Reserve: mating and ecology. InThe Great Apes,Hamburg,D. A.;McCown,E. R. (eds.), Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California, pp. 195–232.
Galdikas, B. M. F. 1984. Adult female sociality among wild orangutans at Tanjung Puting Reserve. In:Female Primates: Studies by Women Primatologists,Small,M. F. (ed.), Alan R. Liss, New York, pp. 217–235.
Galdikas, B. M. F. 1985. Orangutan sociality at Tanjung Puting.Amer. J. Primatol., 9: 101–119.
Galdikas, B. M. F. 1988. Orangutan diet, range, and activity at Tanjung Puting, Central Borneo.Int. J. Primatol. 9: 1–35.
Galdikas, B. M. F.;Teleki, G. 1981. Variations in subsistence activities of female and male pongids: new perspectives on the origins of hominid labor division.Cur. Anthropol., 22: 241–256.
Janson, C. H. 1992. Evolutionary ecology of primate social structure. In:Evolutionary Ecology and Human Behavior,Smith,E. A.;Winterhalder,B. (eds.), Aldine de Gruyter, New York, pp. 95–130.
MacKinnon, J. 1979. Reproductive behavior in wild orangutan populations. In:The Great Apes,Hamburg,D. A.;McCown,E. R. (eds.), Benjamin/ Cummings, Menlo Park, California, pp. 257–273.
Mitani, J. C. 1985. Mating behaviour of male orangutans in the Kutai Game Reserve, Indonesia.Anim. Behav., 33: 392–402.
Mitani, J. C. 1989. Orangutan activity budgets: monthly variations and the effects of body size, parturition, and sociality.Amer. J. Primatol., 18: 87–100.
Mitani, J. C.;Grether, G. F.;Rodman, P. S.;Priatna, D. 1991. Associations among wild orang-utans: sociality, passive aggregations or chance?Anim. Behav., 42: 33–46.
Noe, R.;Bshary, R. 1997. The formation of red colobus-diana monkey associations under predation pressure from chimpanzees.Proc. Roy. Soc. Lond., B., 264: 253–259.
Promislow, D. E. L.;Harvey, P. H. 1990. Living fast and dying young: a comparative analysis of lifehistory variation among mammals.J. Zool. Lond., 220: 417–437.
Rijksen, H. D. 1978.A Fieldstudy on Sumatran Orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus abelii Lesson 1827). H. Veenman & Zonen, B. V., Wageningen.
Rijksen, H. D.; Meijaard, E.; Yanuar, A.; van Schaik, C. P. in press.Our Vanishing Relative?. The Orangutan at the End of 20th Century? Tropenbos Publ., Wageningen.
Rodman, P. S. 1973. Population composition and adaptive organisation among orang-utans of the Kutai Reserve. In:Comparative Ecology and Behaviour of PrimatesCrook, H. J. (ed.), Academic Press, London, pp. 171–209.
Rodman, P. S. 1979. Individual activity patterns and the solitary nature of orangutans. In:The Great Apes,Hamburg,D. A.;McCown,E. R. (eds.) Benjamin/Cummings, Menlo Park, California, pp. 235–255.
Sokal, R. R.;Rohlf, F. J. 1995.Biometry: The Principles and Practice of Statistics in Biological Research (3rd ed.), W. J. Freeman, San Francisco.
Sugardjito, J. 1983. Selecting nest-sites by Sumatran orang-utans,Pongo pygmaeus abelii in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Indonesia,Primates, 24: 467–474.
Sugardjito, J.;te Boekhorst, I. J. A.;van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. 1987. Ecological constraints on the grouping of wild orang-utans (Pongo pygmaeus) in the Gunung Leuser National Park, Sumatra, Indonesia,Int. J. Primatol., 8: 17–41.
Suzuki, A. 1989. Socio-ecological studies of orangutans and primates in Kutai National Park, East Kalimantan in 1988–1989,Kyoto Univ. Overseas Res. Rep. Stu. Asian Non-human Primates, 7: 1–42.
van Schaik, C. P. 1983. Why are diurnal primates living in groups?Behaviour, 87: 120–144.
van Schaik, C. P. in press. Social counterstrategies against infanticide by males in primates and other mammals. In:The Socioecology of Primate males,Kappeler, P. M. (ed.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
van Schaik, C. P.; Deaner, R. O.; Merrill, M. Y. in press. The conditions for tool use in primates: implications for the evolution of material culture.J. Human Evolution.
van Schaik, C. P.;Fox, E. A.;Sitompul, A. F. 1996. Manufacture and use of tools in wild Sumatran orangutans,Naturwiss., 83: 186–188.
van Schaik, C. P.;Griffiths, M. 1996. Activity periods of Indonesian rain forest mammals.Biotropica, 28: 105–112.
van Schaik, C. P.;van Hooff, J. A. R. A. M. 1996. Towards an understanding of the orangutan's social system. In:Great Ape Societies,McGrew,W. C.;Marchant,L. F.;Nishida,T. (eds.) Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 3–15.
van Schaik, C. P.;van Noordwijk, M. A. 1985. Interannual variability in fruit abundance and reproductive seasonality in Sumatran long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis).Z. Zool., Lond., 206: 533–549.
van Schaik, C. P.;van Noordwijk, M. A. 1986. The hidden costs of sociality: intra-group variation in feeding strategies in Sumatran long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis).Behaviour, 99: 296–315.
van Schaik, C. P.;van Noordwijk, M. A. 1988. Scramble and contest in feeding competition among female long-tailed macaques (Macaca fascicularis).Behaviour, 105: 77–98.
Wrangham, R. W. 1986. Ecology and social relationships in two species of chimpanzee. In:Ecological Aspects of Social Evolution: Birds and Mammals,Rubenstein,D. I.;Wrangham,R. W. (eds.), Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, pp. 352–378.
Wrangham, R. W. 1987. Evolution of social structure. In:Primate Societies,Smuts,B. B.;Cheney,D. L.;Seyfarth,R. M.;Wrangham,R. W.;Struhsaker,T. T. (eds.), Univ. of Chicago Press, Chicago, pp. 282–297.
Wrangham, R. W. in press. Reverse sexual dimorphism in primate sociality: a cost of motherhood? In:The Socioecology of Primate Males,Kappeler, P. M. (ed.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge.
Wrangham, R. W.;Chapman, C. A.;Clark-Arcadi, A. P.;Isabirye-Basuta, G. 1996. Social ecology of Kanyawara chimpanzees: implications for understanding the costs of great ape groups In:Great Ape Societies,McGrew,W. C.;Marchant,L. F.;Nishida,T. (eds.), Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, pp. 45–57.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
About this article
Cite this article
van Schaik, C.P. The socioecology of fission-fusion sociality in Orangutans. Primates 40, 69–86 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557703
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02557703