skip to main content
10.1145/2339530.2339665acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageskddConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: a case study of stack overflow

Published: 12 August 2012 Publication History

Abstract

Question answering (Q&A) websites are now large repositories of valuable knowledge. While most Q&A sites were initially aimed at providing useful answers to the question asker, there has been a marked shift towards question answering as a community-driven knowledge creation process whose end product can be of enduring value to a broad audience. As part of this shift, specific expertise and deep knowledge of the subject at hand have become increasingly important, and many Q&A sites employ voting and reputation mechanisms as centerpieces of their design to help users identify the trustworthiness and accuracy of the content.
To better understand this shift in focus from one-off answers to a group knowledge-creation process, we consider a question together with its entire set of corresponding answers as our fundamental unit of analysis, in contrast with the focus on individual question-answer pairs that characterized previous work. Our investigation considers the dynamics of the community activity that shapes the set of answers, both how answers and voters arrive over time and how this influences the eventual outcome. For example, we observe significant assortativity in the reputations of co-answerers, relationships between reputation and answer speed, and that the probability of an answer being chosen as the best one strongly depends on temporal characteristics of answer arrivals. We then show that our understanding of such properties is naturally applicable to predicting several important quantities, including the long-term value of the question and its answers, as well as whether a question requires a better answer. Finally, we discuss the implications of these results for the design of Q&A sites.

Supplementary Material

JPG File (306_t_talk_9.jpg)
MP4 File (306_t_talk_9.mp4)

References

[1]
L. A. Adamic, J. Zhang, E. Bakshy, and M. S. Ackerman. Knowledge sharing and Yahoo Answers: everyone knows something. WWW, 2008.
[2]
E. Agichtein, Y. Liu, and J. Bian. Modeling information-seeker satisfaction in community question answering. ACM Trans. Knowl. Discov. Data, 3(2009).
[3]
A. Anderson, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg, and J. Leskovec. Effects of user similarity in social media. WSDM, 2012.
[4]
C. Aperjis, B. A. Huberman, and F. Wu. Human speed-accuracy tradeoffs in search. HICSS, 2011.
[5]
C. Danescu-Niculescu-Mizil, G. Kossinets, J. Kleinberg, L. Lee. How opinions are received by online communities: a case study on Amazon.com helpfulness votes. WWW, 2009.
[6]
S. Fortunato, A. Flammini, F. Menczer, A. Vespignani. Topical interests and the mitigation of search engine bias. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103(34):12684--12689, 2006.
[7]
R. Guha, R. Kumar, P. Raghavan, and A. Tomkins. Propagation of trust and distrust. WWW, 2004.
[8]
F. M. Harper, D. Raban, S. Rafaeli, and J. A. Konstan. Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. CHI, 2008.
[9]
J. Jeon, W. Croft, J. Lee, S. Park. A framework to predict the quality of answers with non-textual features. SIGIR, 2006.
[10]
P. Jurczyk E. Agichtein. Discovering authorities in question answer communities by using link analysis. CIKM, 2007.
[11]
R. Kumar, Y. Lifshits, and A. Tomkins. Evolution of two-sided markets. WSDM, 2010.
[12]
J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg. Governance in social media: A case study of the Wikipedia promotion process. ICWSM, 2010.
[13]
J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, J. Kleinberg. Predicting positive and negative links in online social networks. WWW, 2010.
[14]
J. Leskovec, D. Huttenlocher, and J. Kleinberg. Signed networks in social media. CHI, 2010.
[15]
Q. Liu, E. Agichtein, G. Dror, E. Gabrilovich, Y. Maarek, D. Pelleg, I. Szpektor. Predicting web searcher satisfaction with existing community-based answers. SIGIR, 2011.
[16]
Y. Liu, J. Bian, E. Agichtein. Predicting information seeker satisfaction in community question answering. SIGIR, 2008.
[17]
K. K. Nam, M. S. Ackerman, and L. A. Adamic. Questions in, knowledge in?: A study of naver's question answering community. CHI, 2009.
[18]
H. Oktay, B. J. Taylor, and D. Jensen. Causal discovery in social media using Quasi-Experimental designs. SIGKDD Wkshp Soc. Media Analytics, 2010.
[19]
J. Preece, B. Nonnecke, D. Andrews. The top five reasons for lurking: Improving community experiences for everyone. Computers in Human Behavior, 20(2004).
[20]
J. Ratkiewicz, S. Fortunato, A. Flammini, F. Menczer, A. Vespignani. Characterizing and modeling the dynamics of online popularity. Phys. Rev. Lett., 105(2010).
[21]
C. Shah, J. Pomerantz. Evaluating and predicting answer quality in community QA. SIGIR, 2010.
[22]
G. Szabo and B. A. Huberman. Predicting the popularity of online content. CACM, 53(2010).
[23]
Y. R. Tausczik and J. W. Pennebaker. Predicting the perceived quality of online mathematics contributions from users' reputations. CHI, 2011.
[24]
F. Wu and B. A. Huberman. Novelty and collective attention. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci., 104(45):17599--17601, Nov. 2007.
[25]
J. Yang, L. Adamic, M. Ackerman. Crowdsourcing and knowledge sharing: Strategic user behavior on taskcn. EC, 2008.
[26]
J. Zhang, M. Ackerman, L. Adamic. Expertise networks in online communities: Structure and algorithms. WWW, 2007.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)How to Analyze and Enhance Participation in Electronic Networks of PracticeFoundations of Management10.2478/fman-2024-000716:1(103-126)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Interactive Question Answering Systems: Literature ReviewACM Computing Surveys10.1145/365763156:9(1-38)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Engage Wider Audience or Facilitate Quality Answers? a Mixed-methods Analysis of Questioning Strategies for Research Sensemaking on a Community Q&A SiteProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373278:CSCW1(1-31)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Discovering value from community activity on focused question answering sites: a case study of stack overflow

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    KDD '12: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD international conference on Knowledge discovery and data mining
    August 2012
    1616 pages
    ISBN:9781450314626
    DOI:10.1145/2339530
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 12 August 2012

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. question-answering
    2. reputation
    3. value prediction

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    KDD '12
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,133 of 8,635 submissions, 13%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)125
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)10
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)How to Analyze and Enhance Participation in Electronic Networks of PracticeFoundations of Management10.2478/fman-2024-000716:1(103-126)Online publication date: 2-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Interactive Question Answering Systems: Literature ReviewACM Computing Surveys10.1145/365763156:9(1-38)Online publication date: 11-Apr-2024
    • (2024)Engage Wider Audience or Facilitate Quality Answers? a Mixed-methods Analysis of Questioning Strategies for Research Sensemaking on a Community Q&A SiteProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373278:CSCW1(1-31)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
    • (2024)MR${}^{2}$ 2-KG: A Multi-Relation Multi-Rationale Knowledge Graph for Modeling Software Engineering Knowledge on Stack OverflowIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2024.340310850:7(1867-1887)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
    • (2024)Automatic bi-modal question title generation for Stack Overflow with prompt learningEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-024-10466-429:3Online publication date: 3-May-2024
    • (2024)Decoding the Diversity of the German Software Developer Community: Insights from an Exploratory Cluster AnalysisHuman Interface and the Management of Information10.1007/978-3-031-60125-5_19(275-295)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2024
    • (2023)Word-level dual channel with multi-head semantic attention interaction for community question answeringElectronic Research Archive10.3934/era.202330631:10(6012-6026)Online publication date: 2023
    • (2023)Poverty Traps in Online Knowledge-Based Peer-Production CommunitiesInformatics10.3390/informatics1003006110:3(61)Online publication date: 13-Jul-2023
    • (2023)Online Information Filtering: The Role of Contextual Cues in Electronic Networks of PracticeACM SIGMIS Database: the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems10.1145/3631341.363134754:4(77-106)Online publication date: 30-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Machine Learning practices and infrastructuresProceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society10.1145/3600211.3604689(466-481)Online publication date: 8-Aug-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media