skip to main content
10.5555/1944566.1944594dlproceedingsArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescolingConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Free access

Enhanced sentiment learning using Twitter hashtags and smileys

Published: 23 August 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Automated identification of diverse sentiment types can be beneficial for many NLP systems such as review summarization and public media analysis. In some of these systems there is an option of assigning a sentiment value to a single sentence or a very short text.
In this paper we propose a supervised sentiment classification framework which is based on data from Twitter, a popular microblogging service. By utilizing 50 Twitter tags and 15 smileys as sentiment labels, this framework avoids the need for labor intensive manual annotation, allowing identification and classification of diverse sentiment types of short texts. We evaluate the contribution of different feature types for sentiment classification and show that our framework successfully identifies sentiment types of untagged sentences. The quality of the sentiment identification was also confirmed by human judges. We also explore dependencies and overlap between different sentiment types represented by smileys and Twitter hashtags.

References

[1]
Akkaya, Cem, Janyce Wiebe, and Rada Mihalcea. 2009. Subjectivity word sense disambiguation. In EMNLP.
[2]
Andreevskaia, A. and S. Bergler. 2006. Mining wordnet for fuzzy sentiment: Sentiment tag extraction from wordnet glosses. In EACL.
[3]
Balog, Krisztian, Gilad Mishne, and Maarten de Rijke. 2006. Why are they excited? identifying and explaining spikes in blog mood levels. In EACL.
[4]
Bloom, Kenneth, Navendu Garg, and Shlomo Argamon. 2007. Extracting appraisal expressions. In HLT/NAACL.
[5]
Davidov, D. and A. Rappoport. 2006. Efficient unsupervised discovery of word categories using symmetric patterns and high frequency words. In COLING-ACL.
[6]
Davidov, D. and A. Rappoport. 2008. Unsupervised discovery of generic relationships using pattern clusters and its evaluation by automatically generated sat analogy questions. In ACL.
[7]
Davidov, D., O. Tsur, and A. Rappoport. 2010. Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in twitter and amazon. In CoNLL.
[8]
Esuli, Andrea and Fabrizio Sebastiani. 2006. Senti-wordnet: A publicly available lexical resource for opinion mining. In LREC.
[9]
Jansen, B. J., M. Zhang, K. Sobel, and A. Chowdury. 2009. Twitter power: Tweets as electronic word of mouth. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology.
[10]
Kim, S. M. and E. Hovy. 2004. Determining the sentiment of opinions. In COLING.
[11]
McDonald, Ryan, Kerry Hannan, Tyler Neylon, Mike Wells, and Jeff Reynar. 2007. Structured models for fine-to-coarse sentiment analysis. In ACL.
[12]
Melville, Prem, Wojciech Gryc, and Richard D. Lawrence. 2009. Sentiment analysis of blogs by combining lexical knowledge with text classification. In KDD. ACM.
[13]
Mihalcea, Rada and Hugo Liu. 2006. A corpus-based approach to finding happiness. In In AAAI 2006 Symposium on Computational Approaches to Analysing Weblogs. AAAI Press.
[14]
Mishne, Gilad. 2005. Experiments with mood classification in blog posts. In Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Stylistic Analysis Of Text.
[15]
Riloff, Ellen. 2003. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In EMNLP.
[16]
Strapparava, Carlo and Rada Mihalcea. 2008. Learning to identify emotions in text. In SAC.
[17]
Titov, Ivan and Ryan McDonald. 2008a. A joint model of text and aspect ratings for sentiment summarization. In ACL/HLT, June.
[18]
Titov, Ivan and Ryan McDonald. 2008b. Modeling online reviews with multi-grain topic models. In WWW, pages 111--120, New York, NY, USA. ACM.
[19]
Tsur, Oren, Dmitry Davidov, and Ari Rappoport. 2010. Icwsm - a great catchy name: Semi-supervised recognition of sarcastic sentences in product reviews. In AAAI-ICWSM.
[20]
Turney, Peter D. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In ACL '02, volume 40.
[21]
Whitelaw, Casey, Navendu Garg, and Shlomo Argamon. 2005. Using appraisal groups for sentiment analysis. In CIKM.
[22]
Wiebe, Janyce and Rada Mihalcea. 2006. Word sense and subjectivity. In COLING/ACL, Sydney, AUS.
[23]
Wiebe, Janyce M. 2000. Learning subjective adjectives from corpora. In AAAI.
[24]
Wilson, Theresa, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase-level sentiment analysis. In HLT/EMNLP.
[25]
Wilson, Theresa, Janyce Wiebe, and Paul Hoffmann. 2009. Recognizing contextual polarity: An exploration of features for phrase-level sentiment analysis. Computational Linguistics, 35(3):399--433.
[26]
Yu, Hong and Vasileios Hatzivassiloglou. 2003. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In EMNLP.

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Emoji-powered Sentiment and Emotion Detection from Software Developers’ Communication DataACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/342430830:2(1-48)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2021
  • (2020)Twitter Data Collection and ExtractionProceedings of the 2020 the 4th International Conference on Information System and Data Mining10.1145/3404663.3404686(71-76)Online publication date: 15-May-2020
  • (2020)Weakly Supervised Attention for Hashtag Recommendation using Graph DataProceedings of The Web Conference 202010.1145/3366423.3380182(1038-1048)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2020
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image DL Hosted proceedings
COLING '10: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Computational Linguistics: Posters
August 2010
1588 pages

Publisher

Association for Computational Linguistics

United States

Publication History

Published: 23 August 2010

Qualifiers

  • Research-article

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 1,537 of 1,537 submissions, 100%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)33
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)11
Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2021)Emoji-powered Sentiment and Emotion Detection from Software Developers’ Communication DataACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/342430830:2(1-48)Online publication date: 27-Jan-2021
  • (2020)Twitter Data Collection and ExtractionProceedings of the 2020 the 4th International Conference on Information System and Data Mining10.1145/3404663.3404686(71-76)Online publication date: 15-May-2020
  • (2020)Weakly Supervised Attention for Hashtag Recommendation using Graph DataProceedings of The Web Conference 202010.1145/3366423.3380182(1038-1048)Online publication date: 20-Apr-2020
  • (2020)Subword Attentive Model for Arabic Sentiment AnalysisACM Transactions on Asian and Low-Resource Language Information Processing10.1145/336001619:2(1-17)Online publication date: 13-Feb-2020
  • (2019)A review of social media posts from UniCredit bank in EuropeProceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Business and Information Management10.1145/3361785.3361814(74-79)Online publication date: 12-Sep-2019
  • (2019)Sentiment Analysis on Twitter DataProceedings of the 7th International Conference on Computer and Communications Management10.1145/3348445.3348466(91-95)Online publication date: 27-Jul-2019
  • (2019)SEntiMoji: an emoji-powered learning approach for sentiment analysis in software engineeringProceedings of the 2019 27th ACM Joint Meeting on European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering10.1145/3338906.3338977(841-852)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2019
  • (2019)Emoji-Powered Representation Learning for Cross-Lingual Sentiment ClassificationThe World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3308558.3313600(251-262)Online publication date: 13-May-2019
  • (2019)Language in Our Time: An Empirical Analysis of HashtagsThe World Wide Web Conference10.1145/3308558.3313480(2378-2389)Online publication date: 13-May-2019
  • (2018)Semantic emotion-topic model in social media environmentJournal of Web Engineering10.5555/3370048.337005217:1-2(73-92)Online publication date: 1-Mar-2018
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media