skip to main content
research-article

A pattern-based approach to a cell tracking ontology.

Published: 01 January 2019 Publication History

Abstract

Time-lapse microscopy has thoroughly transformed our understanding of biological motion and developmental dynamics from single cells to entire organisms. The increasing amount of cell tracking data demands the creation of tools to make extracted data searchable and interoperable between experiment and data types. In order to address that problem, the current paper reports on the progress in building the Cell Tracking Ontology (CTO): An ontology framework for describing, querying and integrating data from complementary experimental techniques in the domain of cell tracking experiments. CTO is based on a basic knowledge structure: the cellular genealogy serving as a backbone model to integrate specific biological ontologies into tracking data. As a first step we integrate the Phenotype and Trait Ontology (PATO) as one of the most relevant ontologies to annotate cell tracking experiments. The CTO requires both the integration of data on various levels of generality as well as the proper structuring of collected information. Therefore, in order to provide a sound foundation of the ontology, we have built on the rich body of work on top-level ontologies and established three generic ontology design patterns addressing three modeling challenges for properly representing cellular genealogies, i.e. representing entities existing in time, undergoing changes over time and their organization into more complex structures such as situations.

References

[1]
HC Berg, “How to track bacteria.”, Rev Sci Instrum 42 (1971) 868–871.
[2]
J Huisken, J Swoger, F Del Bene, J Wittbrodt, EHK Stelzer, “Optical sectioning deep inside live embryos by selective plane illumination microscopy.”, Science 305 (2004) 1007–1009.
[3]
PJ Keller, AD Schmidt, J Wittbrodt, EHK Stelzer, “Reconstruction of zebrafish early embryonic development by scanned light sheet microscopy.”, Science 322 (2008) 1065–1069.
[4]
McDole K, Guignard L, Amat F, Berger A, Malandain G, Royer LA, Turaga SC, Branson K, Keller PJ (2018) “In Toto Imaging and Reconstruction of Post-Implantation Mouse Development at the Single-Cell Level.” Cell.
[5]
I Glauche, R Lorenz, D Hasenclever, I Roeder, “A novel view on stem cell development: analysing the shape of cellular genealogies.”, Cell Prolif 42 (2009) 248–263.
[6]
T Schroeder, “Imaging stem-cell-driven regeneration in mammals.”, Nature 453 (2008) 345–351.
[7]
N Scherf, J Huisken, “The smart and gentle microscope.”, Nat Biotechnol 33 (2015) 815–818.
[8]
G Myers, “Why bioimage informatics matters.”, Nat Methods 9 (2012) 659–660.
[9]
M Maška, V Ulman, D Svoboda, et al., “A benchmark for comparison of cell tracking algorithms.”, Bioinformatics 30 (2014) 1609–1617.
[10]
V Ulman, M Maška, KEG Magnusson, et al., “An objective comparison of cell-tracking algorithms.”, Nat Methods 14 (2017) 1141–1152.
[11]
Farrell JA, Wang Y, Riesenfeld SJ, Shekhar K, Regev A, Schier AF (2018) “Single-cell reconstruction of developmental trajectories during zebrafish embryogenesis.” Science.
[12]
PS Hoppe, M Schwarzfischer, D Loeffler, et al., “Early myeloid lineage choice is not initiated by random PU.1 to GATA1 protein ratios.”, Nature 535 (2016) 299–302.
[13]
N Scherf, M Herberg, K Thierbach, T Zerjatke, T Kalkan, P Humphreys, A Smith, I Glauche, I Roeder, “Imaging, quantification and visualization of spatio-temporal patterning in mESC colonies under different culture conditions.”, Bioinformatics 28 (2012) i556–i561.
[14]
R Sunyer, V Conte, J Escribano, et al., “Collective cell durotaxis emerges from long-range intercellular force transmission.”, Science 353 (2016) 1157–1161.
[15]
Leonelli S (2019) “The challenges of big data biology.” Elife.
[16]
N Guarino, D Oberle, S Staab, “What Is an Ontology?” In: Staab R., Studer Handbook on Ontologies, Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009, pp. 1–17.
[17]
Cyganiak R, Wood D, Lanthaler M, Klyne G, Carroll JJ, McBride B (2014) “RDF 1.1 concepts and abstract syntax.” W3C recommendation 25:
[18]
W3C OWL Working Group (2012) “OWL 2 Web Ontology Language Document Overview (Second Edition).” In: W3C Recommendation. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-overview/.
[19]
Prud’hommeaux E, Seaborne A, Others (2017) “SPARQL query language for RDF. W3C Recommendation (2008).”
[20]
B Smith, M Ashburner, C Rosse, et al., “The OBO Foundry: coordinated evolution of ontologies to support biomedical data integration.”, Nat Biotechnol 25 (2007) 1251–1255.
[21]
Bandrowski A, Brinkman R, Brochhausen M, et al (2016) “The Ontology for Biomedical Investigations.” PLoS One 11:e0154556
[22]
Diehl AD, Meehan TF, Bradford YM, et al (2016) “The Cell Ontology 2016: enhanced content, modularization, and ontology interoperability.” J Biomed Semantics 7:44
[23]
Gkoutos G (2019) “Phenotype and Trait Ontology.” http://purl.obolibrary.org/obo/pato.owl.
[24]
JP Sluka, A Shirinifard, M Swat, A Cosmanescu, RW Heiland, JA Glazier, “The cell behavior ontology: describing the intrinsic biological behaviors of real and model cells seen as active agents.”, Bioinformatics 30 (2014) 2367–2374.
[25]
N Scherf, M Kunze, K Thierbach, T Zerjatke, P Burek, H Herre, I Glauche, I Roeder, “Assisting the Machine Paradigms for Human-Machine Interaction in Single Cell Tracking.” In: Meinzer H-P, Deserno TM, Handels H, Tolxdorff T (eds) Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2013, pp. 116–121. 2013.
[26]
Herre H (2019) “Towards a New Foundational Ontology of Properties, Attributives and Data.” In: Ontology Makes Sense - Essays in honor of Nicola Guarino. pp 194–210
[27]
S Staab, R Studer, Handbook on Ontologies, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2009.
[28]
V Presutti, A Gangemi, “Content Ontology Design Patterns as Practical Building Blocks for Web Ontologies.” In: Conceptual Modeling - ER, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, pp. 128–141. 2008.
[29]
Herre H, Heller B, Burek P, Hoehndorf R, Loebe F, Michalek H (2006) “General Formal Ontology (GFO): A Foundational Ontology Integrating Objects and Processes. Part I: Basic Principles (Version 1.0).” Research Group Ontologies in Medicine (Onto-Med), University of Leipzig
[30]
R Arp, B Smith, AD Spear, Building Ontologies with Basic Formal Ontology., MIT Press, 2015.
[31]
Sowa JF (1999) Knowledge Representation: Logical, Philosophical, and Computational Foundations. Brooks Cole Publishing Co., Pacific Grove, CA
[32]
S Schulz, M Boeker, H Stenzhorn, “How Granularity Issues Concern Biomedical Ontology Integration.” In:, eHealth Beyond the Horizon - Get IT There, Proceedings of MIE2008, The XXIst International Congress of the European Federation for Medical Informatics, Göteborg, Sweden, (2008) 863–868. May 25-28, 2008.
[33]
Burek P, Loebe F, Herre H (2015) “A UML profile for functional modeling applied to the Molecular Function Ontology.” In: Proceedings ICBO. pp 12–16
[34]
Falbo RA, Guizzardi G, Gangemi A, Presutti V (2013) “Ontology patterns: clarifying concepts and terminology.” In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Ontology and Semantic Web Patterns - Volume 1188. CEUR-WS.org, pp 14–26
[35]
Johnson R, Gamma E, Vlissides J, Helm R (1995) Design Patterns: Elements of Reusable Object-Oriented Software. Addison-Wesley
[36]
Gangemi A, Presutti V (2009) “Ontology Design Patterns.” Handbook on Ontologies 221–243
[37]
Blomqvist E, Gangemi A, Presutti V (2009) “Experiments on Pattern-based Ontology Design.” In: Proceedings of the Fifth International Conference on Knowledge Capture. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp 41–48
[38]
Gruber TR, “A translation approach to portable ontology specifications.”, Knowledge Acquisition 5 (1993) 199–220.
[39]
H Herre, “The Ontology of Mereological Systems: A Logical Approach.” In: Poli R, Seibt J (eds) Theory and Applications of Ontology: Philosophical Perspectives, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2010, pp. 57–82.
[40]
Burek P, Scherf N, Herre H (2014) “OWL Patterns for Modeling the Change over Time exemplified by the Cell Tracking Ontology.” ONTOLOGIES AND DATA IN LIFE SCIENCES (ODLS 2014)
[41]
Barwise J (1987) “Situations and small worlds.” In: The Situation in Logic. pp 79–92
[42]
Cox S, Little C (2017) “Time ontology in OWL.” In: W3C Recommendation. https://www.w3.org/TR/owl-time/.
[43]
Kan A (2017) “Machine learning applications in cell image analysis.” Immunology and Cell Biology
[44]
KW Eliceiri, MR Berthold, IG Goldberg, et al., “Biological imaging software tools.”, Nat Methods 9 (2012) 697–710.
[45]
Wolff C, Tinevez J-Y, Pietzsch T, et al (2018) “Multi-view light-sheet imaging and tracking with the MaMuT software reveals the cell lineage of a direct developing arthropod limb.” Elife.
[46]
T Pietzsch, S Saalfeld, S Preibisch, P Tomancak, “BigDataViewer: visualization and processing for large image data sets.”, Nat Methods 12 (2015) 481–483.
[47]
E Meijering, AE Carpenter, H Peng, FA Hamprecht, J-C Olivo-Marin, “Imagining the future of bioimage analysis.”, Nat Biotechnol 34 (2016) 1250–1255.
[48]
J Starruß, W de Back, L Brusch, A Deutsch, “Morpheus: a user-friendly modeling environment for multiscale and multicellular systems biology.”, Bioinformatics 30 (2014) 1331–1332.

Cited By

View all

Index Terms

  1. A pattern-based approach to a cell tracking ontology.
    Index terms have been assigned to the content through auto-classification.

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image Procedia Computer Science
    Procedia Computer Science  Volume 159, Issue C
    2019
    2653 pages
    ISSN:1877-0509
    EISSN:1877-0509
    Issue’s Table of Contents

    Publisher

    Elsevier Science Publishers B. V.

    Netherlands

    Publication History

    Published: 01 January 2019

    Author Tags

    1. Semantic-Based Systems
    2. Knowledge Representation
    3. Management
    4. Semantic annotation of images
    5. videos
    6. Ontologies

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all

    View Options

    View options

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media