skip to main content
10.1145/1753326.1753373acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

Why pay?: exploring how financial incentives are used for question & answer

Published: 10 April 2010 Publication History

Abstract

Electronic commerce has enabled a number of online pay-for-answer services. However, despite commercial interest, we still lack a comprehensive understanding of how financial incentives support question asking and answering. Using 800 questions randomly selected from a pay-for-answer site, along with site usage statistics, we examined what factors impact askers' decisions to pay. We also explored how financial rewards affect answers, and if question pricing can help organize Q&A exchanges for archival purposes. We found that askers' decisions are two-part--whether or not to pay and how much to pay. Askers are more likely to pay when requesting facts and will pay more when questions are more difficult. On the answer side, our results support prior findings that paying more may elicit a higher number of answers and answers that are longer, but may not elicit higher quality answers (as rated by the askers). Finally, we present evidence that questions with higher rewards have higher archival value, which suggests that pricing can be used to support archival use.

References

[1]
Aggarwal, P. 2004. The Effects of Brand Relationship Norms on Consumer Attitudes and Behavior, Journal of Consumer Research, 31 (June), 87--101.
[2]
Anderson, J.C., & Moore, L. 1978. The motivation to volunteer. Journal of Voluntary Action Research, 51--60.
[3]
Batson, C.D., & Powell, A.A. 2003. Altruism and prosocial behavior. In T. Millon & M. J. Lerner (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Volume 5: Personality and social psychology. 463--484.
[4]
Chen, Y., Ho, T., Kim, Y. 2008 Knowledge Market Design: A field Experiment at Google Answers. Journal of Public Economics Theory. To Appear.
[5]
Chiang, J. 1991. A Simultaneous Approach to the Whether, What, and How Much to Buy Questions. Marketing Science, Vol. 10, 4. 297--315.
[6]
Clark, M.S. and Mills, J. 1993, The Difference Between Communal and Exchange Relationships: What It Is and Is Not, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 684--691.
[7]
Deci, E.L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R.M. 1999. A Meta-Analytic Review of Experiments Examining the Effects of Extrinsic Rewards on Intrinsic Motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 627--668.
[8]
DePaulo, B.M., & Fisher, J.D. 1980. The costs of asking for help. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1, 23--35.
[9]
Edelman, B. 2004. Earnings and Ratings at Google Answers. Unpublished Manuscript.
[10]
Fehr, E. and Gaechter, S., Do Incentive Contracts Crowd out Voluntary Cooperation?, IEW -- Working Papers iewwp034, Institute for Empirical Research in Economics -- IEW.
[11]
Fisher, J.D., DePaulo, B.M., & Nadler, A. Extending Altruism beyond the Altruistic Act: The effects of Aid on the Help Recipient. In Altruism and Helping behavior.
[12]
Greenberg, M.S. & Shapiro S.P. 1971. Indebtedness: An Adverse Aspect of Asking for and Receiving Help. Sociometry, Vol. 34, No. 2, 290--301.
[13]
Harper, F.M., Moy, D., and Konstan, J.A. 2009. Facts or Friends?: Distinguishing Informational and Conversational Questions in Social Q&A Sites. In Proc. of the SIGCHI '09, 759--768.
[14]
Harper, F.M., Raban, D., Rafaeli, S., and Konstan, J.A. 2008. Predictors of answer quality in online Q&A sites. In Proc. of the SIGCHI '08, 865--874.
[15]
Heyman, J. & Ariely, D. 2004. Effort for Payment: A Tale of Two markets, Psychological Science, 15 (11) 787--793.
[16]
Hsieh, G. and Counts, S. 2009. mimir: A Market-Based Real-Time Question and Answer Service. In Proc.s of the SICHI '09, 769--778.
[17]
Ipeirotis, P. 2008. Mechanical Turk: The Demographics. http://behind-the-enemy-lines.blogspot.com/2008/03/mechanical-turk-demographics.html
[18]
Kraut, R.E., Sunder, S., Telang, R., & Morris, J. 2005. Pricing electronic mail to solve the problem of spam. Human Computer Interaction, 20, 195--223.
[19]
Landis, J.R. and Koch, G.G. 1977. The Measurement of Observer Agreement for Categorical Data. Biometrics. Vol. 33, 159--174.
[20]
Leibenluft, J. 2007. A Librarian's Worst Nightmare. Yahoo! Answers, where 120 Million Users Can be Wrong. Slate Magazine, Dec. 7, 2007.
[21]
Mahalo Answers. www.mahalo.com/answers
[22]
Nam, K.K., Ackerman, M.S., and Adamic, L.A. 2009. Questions in, knowledge in?: a study of naver's question answering community. In Proc. of the SIGCHI '09. ACM, New York, NY, 779--788.
[23]
Raban, D.R. 2008. The Incentive Structure in an Online Information Market. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 59(14): 2284--2295.
[24]
Rafaeli, S., Raban, D., Ravid, G. 2007. How Social Motivation Enhances Economic Activity and Incentives in the Google Answers Knowledge Sharing Market. International Journal of Knowledge and Learning 3, 1, 1--11.
[25]
Regner, T. 2005. Why Voluntary Contributions? Google Answer! CMPO Working Paper Series.
[26]
Snow, R., O'Connor, B., Jurafsky, D., Ng, A. 2008. Cheap and Fast -- But is it Good? Evaluation Non-Expert Annotations for Natural Language Tasks. In Proc. of EMNLP, 254--263.
[27]
Wentzel, K.R. 1991. Social Competence at School: Relation Between Social Responsibility and Academic Achievement. Review of Educational Research, 1991; 61: 1--24.
[28]
Wills, T.A. 1976. Perceptual Consequences of Helping Another Person. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, Washington, D.C., September 1976.
[29]
Wills T.A. 1978. Perceptions of Clients by Professional Helpers. Psychological Bulletin, 85, 968--1000.
[30]
Zelizer, V.A. 1994. The Social Meaning of Money. Basic Books, New York, NY.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)What Constitutes a Helpful Health-Related Answer?Journal of Global Information Management10.4018/JGIM.34404432:1(1-35)Online publication date: 23-May-2024
  • (2024)After Online Innovators Receive Performance-Contingent Material Rewards: A Study Based on an Open Innovation PlatformBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1408072314:8(723)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Strategic Content Generation and Monetization in Financial Social MediaInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2022.0482Online publication date: 20-Feb-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. Why pay?: exploring how financial incentives are used for question & answer

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CHI '10: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
    April 2010
    2690 pages
    ISBN:9781605589299
    DOI:10.1145/1753326
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 10 April 2010

    Permissions

    Request permissions for this article.

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. market
    2. pay-for-answer
    3. q&a
    4. question and answer
    5. social computing

    Qualifiers

    • Research-article

    Conference

    CHI '10
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)31
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)2
    Reflects downloads up to 04 Sep 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)What Constitutes a Helpful Health-Related Answer?Journal of Global Information Management10.4018/JGIM.34404432:1(1-35)Online publication date: 23-May-2024
    • (2024)After Online Innovators Receive Performance-Contingent Material Rewards: A Study Based on an Open Innovation PlatformBehavioral Sciences10.3390/bs1408072314:8(723)Online publication date: 19-Aug-2024
    • (2024)Strategic Content Generation and Monetization in Financial Social MediaInformation Systems Research10.1287/isre.2022.0482Online publication date: 20-Feb-2024
    • (2024)Monetization for Content Generation and User Engagement on Social Media Platforms: Evidence from Paid Q&AIEEE Transactions on Engineering Management10.1109/TEM.2022.320953471(4022-4034)Online publication date: 2024
    • (2024)What drives users’ knowledge payment behaviour? The moderating role of knowledge expertise and social identityBehaviour & Information Technology10.1080/0144929X.2024.2320213(1-21)Online publication date: 27-Feb-2024
    • (2024)An empirical study of code reuse between GitHub and stack overflow during software developmentJournal of Systems and Software10.1016/j.jss.2024.111964210(111964)Online publication date: Apr-2024
    • (2023)Sponsorship Funding in Open-Source Software: Incentivize or Crowd-Out Motivations to Create, Maintain and Share?SSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4484403Online publication date: 2023
    • (2023)Understanding Peer-to-Peer Instructional Support in an Online Community for Blind Audio ProducersProceedings of the 25th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility10.1145/3597638.3608399(1-15)Online publication date: 22-Oct-2023
    • (2023)Do Subjectivity and Objectivity Always Agreeƒ A Case Study with Stack Overflow Questions2023 IEEE/ACM 20th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR)10.1109/MSR59073.2023.00060(389-401)Online publication date: May-2023
    • (2023)Monetary income as opportunity cost: exploring the negative effect on free knowledge contribution of knowledge suppliersJournal of Knowledge Management10.1108/JKM-09-2022-069428:2(440-462)Online publication date: 12-Jun-2023
    • Show More Cited By

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media