research-article

Challenges in Software Ecosystems Research

Authors:

Alexander Serebrenik,

Tom MensAuthors Info & Claims

ECSAW '15: Proceedings of the 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops

Article No.: 40, Pages 1 - 6

https://doi.org/10.1145/2797433.2797475

Published: 07 September 2015 Publication History

Abstract

The paper is a meta-analysis of the research field of software ecosystems, by method of surveying 26 authors in the field. It presents a relevant list of literature and six themes in which challenges for software ecosystems can be grouped: Architecture and Design, Governance, Dynamics and Evolution, Data Analytics, Domain-Specific Ecosystems Solutions, and Ecosystems Analysis. As such, it provides a roadmap for future research in the field.

References

[1]

A. Aryani, F. Perin, M. Lungu, A. N. Mahmood, and O. Nierstrasz. Predicting dependences using domain-based coupling. J. Software Evolution and Process, 26(1):50--76, 2014.

[2]

A. Baars and S. Jansen. A framework for software ecosystem governance. In Software Business, volume 114 of Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pages 168--180. Springer, 2012.

[3]

O. Barbosa and C. Alves. A systematic mapping study on software ecosystems. In Int'l Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO), pages 15--26. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2011.

[4]

G. Bavota, G. Canfora, M. Di Penta, R. Oliveto, and S. Panichella. The evolution of project inter-dependencies in a software ecosystem: the case of Apache. In Int'l Conf. Software Maintenance, 2013.

Digital Library

[5]

B. Bazelli, A. Hindle, and E. Stroulia. On the personality traits of StackOverflow users. In Int'l Conf. Software Maintenance. IEEE, 2013.

Digital Library

[6]

A. Begel, K. Y. Phang, and T. Zimmermann. Codebook: Discovering and exploiting relationships in software repositories. In Int'l Conf. Software Engineering, pages 125--134, 2010.

Digital Library

[7]

A. Bessi, A. Scala, L. Rossi, Q. Zhang, and W. Quattrociocchi. The economy of attention in the age of (mis)information. Journal of Trust Management, 1(1):12, 2014.

[8]

C. Bird, P. C. Rigby, E. T. Barr, D. J. Hamilton, D. M. Germán, and P. T. Devanbu. The promises and perils of mining Git. In Working Conf. Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pages 1--10, 2009.

Digital Library

[9]

S. A. Bohner and R. S. Arnold. Software Change Impact Analysis. IEEE Computer Society, 1996.

Digital Library

[10]

J. Bosch. From software product lines to software ecosystems. In Int. Software Product Line Conf., pages 111--119, 2009.

Digital Library

[11]

J. Bosch. Architecture challenges for software ecosystems. In European Conf. Software Architecture, pages 93--95. ACM, 2010.

Digital Library

[12]

J. Bosch and P. Bosch-Sijtsema. From integration to composition: on the impact of software product lines, global development and ecosystems. In Int'l Conf. Software Product Lines. Springer, 2009.

[13]

J. Businge, A. Serebrenik, and M. G. J. van den Brand. Survival of Eclipse third-party plug-ins. In Int'l Conf. Software Maintenance, pages 368--377, 2012.

Digital Library

[14]

J. Businge, A. Serebrenik, and M. G. J. van den Brand. Analyzing the Eclipse API usage: Putting the developer in the loop. In European Conf. Software Maintenance and Reengineering, pages 37--46. IEEE Computer Society, 2013.

Digital Library

[15]

M. Caneill and S. Zacchiroli. Debsources: Live and historical views on macro-level software evolution. In Int'l Symp. Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pages 1--10. ACM, 2014.

Digital Library

[16]

M. Cataldo and J. D. Herbsleb. Architecting in software ecosystems: Interface translucence as an enabler for scalable collaboration. In European Conf. Software Architecture, pages 65--72. ACM, 2010.

Digital Library

[17]

M. Claes, T. Mens, R. Di Cosmo, and J. Vouillon. A historical analysis of Debian package incompatibilities. In Working Conf. Mining Software Repositories (MSR), 2015.

[18]

M. Claes, T. Mens, and P. Grosjean. On the maintainability of CRAN packages. In Int'l Conf. on Software Maintenance, Reengineering, and Reverse Engineering (CSMR-WCRE), pages 308--312, 2014.

[19]

E. de Almeida, A. Alvaro, V. Garcia, L. Nascimento, S. Meira, and D. Lucredio. Designing domain-specific software architecture (DSSA): Towards a new approach. In Working Conf. Software Architecture, page 30, Jan 2007.

Digital Library

[20]

Y. Demchenko, P. Grosso, C. De Laat, and P. Membrey. Addressing big data issues in scientific data infrastructure. In Collaboration Technologies and Systems, pages 48--55, May 2013.

Digital Library

[21]

D. Dreyfus and B. Iyer. Managing architectural emergence: A conceptual model and simulation. Decision Support Systems, 46(1):115--127, 2008.

Digital Library

[22]

S. Ducasse, M. Lanza, and S. Tichelaar. Moose: an extensible language-independent environment for reengineering object-oriented systems. In Int'l Symp. Constructing Software Engineering Tools (CoSET), June 2000.

[23]

J. Duenas, H. Parada G., F. Cuadrado, M. Santillan, and J. Ruiz. Apache and Eclipse: Comparing open source project incubators. IEEE Software, 24(6):90--98, 2007.

Digital Library

[24]

N. Economides and E. Katsamakas. Linux vs. Windows: A comparison of application and platform innovation incentives for open source and proprietary software platforms. Working Papers 05--07, NET Institute, 2005.

[25]

U. Eklund and J. Bosch. Architecture for embedded open software ecosystems. J. Systems and Software, 92(0):128--142, 2014.

[26]

T. Fritz, A. Begel, S. C. Müller, S. Yigit-Elliott, and M. Züger. Using psycho-physiological measures to assess task difficulty in software development. In Int'l Conf. Software Engineering, pages 402--413, 2014.

Digital Library

[27]

D. M. Germán, B. Adams, and A. E. Hassan. The evolution of the R software ecosystem. In European Conf. Software Maintenance and Reengineering, pages 243--252, 2013.

Digital Library

[28]

J. M. Gonzalez-Barahona, G. Robles, M. Michlmayr, J. J. Amor, and D. M. German. Macro-level software evolution: a case study of a large software compilation. Empirical Software Engineering, 14(3):262--285, Mar. 2009.

Digital Library

[29]

M. Harman, Y. Jia, and Y. Zhang. App store mining and analysis: MSR for app stores. In Working Conf. Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pages 108--111, June 2012.

Digital Library

[30]

D. Hilkert, C. M. Wolf, A. Benlian, and T. Hess. The as-a-service paradigm and its implications for the software industry: Insights from a comparative case study in CRM software ecosystems. In Software Business, volume 51 of Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pages 125--137. Springer, 2010.

[31]

B. A. Huberman and T. Hogg. The emergence of computational ecologies. In Lectures in Complex Systems, pages 185--205. Addison-Wesley, 1993.

[32]

S. Hyrynsalmi, T. Mäkilä, A. Järvi, A. Suominen, M. Seppänen, and T. Knuutila. App Store, Marketplace, Play! An analysis of multi-homing in mobile software ecosystems. In Int'l Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO), volume 879 of CEUR Workshop Proceedings, pages 59--72, 2012.

[33]

A. Israeli and D. G. Feitelson. The Linux kernel as a case study in software evolution. J. Systems and Software, 83(3):485--501, 2010.

Digital Library

[34]

S. Jansen, A. Finkelstein, and S. Brinkkemper. A sense of community: A research agenda for software ecosystems. In Int'l Conf. Software Engineering, pages 187--190, May 2009.

[35]

H. Kaindl. Difficulties in the transition from OO analysis to design. IEEE Softw., 16(5):94--102, Sept. 1999.

Digital Library

[36]

F. Khomh, T. Dhaliwal, Y. Zou, and B. Adams. Do faster releases improve software quality? An empirical case study of Mozilla Firefox. In Working Conf. Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pages 179--188. IEEE, 2012.

Digital Library

[37]

E. Kouters, B. Vasilescu, A. Serebrenik, and M. G. J. van den Brand. Who's who in Gnome: using LSA to merge software repository identities. In Int'l Conf. Software Maintenance, pages 592--595. IEEE, 2012.

Digital Library

[38]

B. H. Krogh. From analysis to design. In Formal Modeling and Analysis of Timed Systems, volume 4763 of Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pages 4--4. Springer, 2007.

Digital Library

[39]

M. Lungu. Towards reverse engineering software ecosystems. In Int'l Conf. Software Maintenance, pages 428--431, 2008.

[40]

M. Lungu and M. Lanza. The small project observatory: a tool for reverse engineering software ecosystems. In Int'l Conf. Software Engineering, pages 289--292, 2010.

Digital Library

[41]

J. I. Maletic and A. Marcus. Data cleansing: Beyond integrity analysis. In B. D. Klein and D. F. Rossin, editors, Fifth Conference on Information Quality (IQ 2000), pages 200--209. MIT, 2000.

[42]

K. Manikas and K. M. Hansen. Software ecosystems---A systematic literature review. J. Systems and Software, 86(5):1294--1306, 2013.

Digital Library

[43]

T. Mens, J. Fernández-Ramil, and S. Degrandsart. The evolution of Eclipse. In Int'l Conf. Software Maintenance, pages 386--395, 2008.

[44]

T. Mens and M. Goeminne. Analysing the evolution of social aspects of open source software ecosystems. In Int'l Workshop on Software Ecosystems (IWSECO), pages 1--14. CEUR Workshop Proccedings, June 2011.

[45]

T. Mens, A. Serebrenik, and A. Cleve. Evolving Software Systems. Springer, 2014.

Digital Library

[46]

D. Messerschmitt and C. Szyperski. Software ecosystem: Understanding and indispensable technology and industry. MIT Press, 2003.

Digital Library

[47]

I. Mistrîk, J. Grundy, A. Hoek, and J. Whitehead. Collaborative software engineering: Challenges and prospects. In Collaborative Software Engineering, pages 389--403. Springer, 2010.

[48]

E. Mitleton-Kelly. Ten Principles of Complexity and Enabling Infrastructures, pages 23--50. Pergamon, 2003.

[49]

A. Mockus, R. Fielding, and J. Herbsleb. Two case studies of open source software development: Apache and Mozilla. ACM Trans. Software Engineering and Methodology, 11(3):309--346, 2002.

Digital Library

[50]

K. Mordal, N. Anquetil, J. Laval, A. Serebrenik, B. Vasilescu, and S. Ducasse. Software quality metrics aggregation in industry. J. Software Evolution and Process, 25(10):1117--1135, 2013.

[51]

O. Nierstrasz and M. Lungu. Agile software assessment (invited paper). In Int'l Conf. Program Comprehension, pages 3--10, 2012.

[52]

F. S. Parreiras, G. Gröner, D. Schwabe, and F. de Freitas Silva. Towards a marketplace of open source software data. In Hawaii Int'l Conf. System Sciences (HICSS), pages 3651--3660. IEEE, 2015.

Digital Library

[53]

F. Pérez, B. E. Granger, and J. D. Hunter. Python: An ecosystem for scientific computing. Computing in Science & Engineering, 13(2):13--21, 2011.

Digital Library

[54]

J. Pérez, R. Deshayes, M. Goeminne, and T. Mens. SECONDA: software ecosystem analysis dashboard. In CSMR, pages 527--530, 2012.

Digital Library

[55]

E. S. Raymond. The cathedral and the bazaar: musings on Linux and open source by an accidental revolutionary. O'Reilly & Associates, Inc., 2001.

Digital Library

[56]

R. Robbes, M. Lungu, and D. Röthlisberger. How do developers react to API deprecation? the case of a Smalltalk ecosystem. In Int'l Symp. Foundations of Software Engineering, pages 56:1--56:11. ACM, 2012.

Digital Library

[57]

G. Robles. Replicating MSR: A study of the potential replicability of papers published in the mining software repositories proceedings. In Working Conf. Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pages 171--180. IEEE, 2010.

[58]

G. Robles, L. Arjona Reina, A. Serebrenik, B. Vasilescu, and J. M. González-Barahona. FLOSS 2013: a survey dataset about free software contributors: challenges for curating, sharing, and combining. In Working Conf. Mining Software Repositories (MSR), pages 396--399. ACM, 2014.

Digital Library

[59]

G. Robles, J. Gonzalez-Barahona, D. Izquierdo-Cortazar, and I. Herraiz. Tools for the study of the usual data sources found in libre software projects. Int'l Journal of Open Source Software and Processes, 1(1):24--45, 2009.

[60]

I. Samoladas, L. Angelis, and I. Stamelos. Survival analysis on the duration of open source projects. Information & Software Technology, 52(9):902--922, 2010.

Digital Library

[61]

F. Shull, J. C. Carver, S. Vegas, and N. J. Juzgado. The role of replications in empirical software engineering. Int'l Conf. Empirical Software Engineering, 13(2):211--218, 2008.

Digital Library

[62]

D. Socha and J. D. Tenenberg. Sketching software in the wild. In Int'l Conf. Software Engineering, pages 1237--1240, 2013.

Digital Library

[63]

G. Timbrell and G. Gable. The SAP ecosystem: A knowledge perspective. In F. F.-H. Nah, editor, Enterprise Resource Planning: Solutions and Management, pages 209--220. IGI Global, 2002.

[64]

J. van Angeren, V. Blijleven, and S. Jansen. Relationship intimacy in software ecosystems: a survey of the dutch software industry. In Int'l Conf. Management of Emergent Digital EcoSystems (MEDES), pages 68--75, 2011.

Digital Library

[65]

A. van Deursen, P. Klint, and J. Visser. Domain-specific languages: An annotated bibliography. SIGPLAN Not., 35(6):26--36, June 2000.

Digital Library

[66]

B. Vasilescu, A. Capiluppi, and A. Serebrenik. Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study of StackOverflow. In SocialInformatics, pages 332--338, 2012.

Digital Library

[67]

B. Vasilescu, A. Capiluppi, and A. Serebrenik. Gender, representation and online participation: A quantitative study. Interacting with Computers, 26(5):488--511, 2014.

[68]

B. Vasilescu, D. Posnett, B. Ray, M. G. J. van den Brand, A. Serebrenik, P. T. Devanbu, and V. Filkov. Gender and tenure diversity in GitHub teams. In Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), pages 3789--3798. ACM, 2015.

Digital Library

[69]

B. Vasilescu, A. Serebrenik, P. T. Devanbu, and V. Filkov. How social Q&A sites are changing knowledge sharing in open source software communities. In Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW), pages 342--354, 2014.

Digital Library

[70]

B. Vasilescu, A. Serebrenik, M. Goeminne, and T. Mens. On the variation and specialisation of workload: A case study of the GNOME ecosystem community. J. Empirical Software Engineering, 19(4):955--1008, 2014.

Digital Library

[71]

M. Viljainen and M. Kauppinen. Software ecosystems: A set of management practices for platform integrators in the telecom industry. In Software Business, volume 80 of Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, pages 32--43. Springer, 2011.

[72]

R. Wettel and M. Lanza. CodeCity: 3D visualization of large-scale software. In Int'l Conf. Software Engineering, pages 921--922, 2008.

Digital Library

[73]

Q. Xuan, M. Gharehyazie, P. T. Devanbu, and V. Filkov. Measuring the effect of social communications on individual working rhythms: A case study of open source software. In SocialInformatics, pages 78--85, 2012.

Digital Library

Cited By

Peng YHu RWang RGao CLi SLyu MRoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey M(2024)Less is More? An Empirical Study on Configuration Issues in Python PyPI EcosystemProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3597503.3639077(1-12)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597503.3639077
Ghimire BLi ZDamian D(2024)Understanding User Feedback in Software Ecosystems: A Study on Challenges and Mitigation StrategiesSoftware Business10.1007/978-3-031-53227-6_10(132-147)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53227-6_10
Zheng XWan ZZhang YChang RLo D(2023)A Closer Look at the Security Risks in the Rust EcosystemACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/362473833:2(1-30)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3624738
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Challenges in Software Ecosystems Research
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Management of computing and information systems
      1. Project and people management
      2. Software management
        Software maintenance
2. Software and its engineering
  1. Software creation and management
    1. Software development process management
  2. Software notations and tools
    1. Software configuration management and version control systems

Recommendations

Software ecosystems: a software ecosystem strategy assessment model
ECSA '10: Proceedings of the Fourth European Conference on Software Architecture: Companion Volume

Software companies and organizations increasingly open up their business to other software companies and as a consequence they find themselves in an ecosystem of software companies, developers and partners. These actors, and especially the software ...
Revisiting software ecosystems Research

We review the literature of software ecosystems up to date consisted of 231 papers.Identify a field rapidly evolving and growing both in volume and empirical focus.We note signs of field maturity in the evolution of the field.Identify issues inhibiting ...
Software ecosystems architectural health: challenges x practices
ECSAW '16: Proccedings of the 10th European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops

Over time many software ecosystems have achieved success. Several organizations are opening their software projects for external businesses, creating an multi-organizational government to development their software platform The software architecture has ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

ECSAW '15: Proceedings of the 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops

September 2015

364 pages

ISBN:9781450333931

DOI:10.1145/2797433

General Chair:
Ivica Crnkovic

Copyright © 2015 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 07 September 2015

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

ECSAW '15

ECSAW '15: 2015 European Conference on Software Architecture Workshops

September 7 - 11, 2015

Cavtat, Dubrovnik, Croatia

Acceptance Rates

ECSAW '15 Paper Acceptance Rate 51 of 77 submissions, 66%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 80 of 120 submissions, 67%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

25
Total Citations
View Citations
432
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)21
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)4

Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Peng YHu RWang RGao CLi SLyu MRoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey M(2024)Less is More? An Empirical Study on Configuration Issues in Python PyPI EcosystemProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3597503.3639077(1-12)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597503.3639077
Ghimire BLi ZDamian D(2024)Understanding User Feedback in Software Ecosystems: A Study on Challenges and Mitigation StrategiesSoftware Business10.1007/978-3-031-53227-6_10(132-147)Online publication date: 9-Feb-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-53227-6_10
Zheng XWan ZZhang YChang RLo D(2023)A Closer Look at the Security Risks in the Rust EcosystemACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/362473833:2(1-30)Online publication date: 16-Sep-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3624738
Li HCogo FBezemer C(2023)An Empirical Study of Yanked Releases in the Rust Package RegistryIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2022.315214849:1(437-449)Online publication date: 1-Jan-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2022.3152148
Xavier BViana DSantos R(2023)Business Model for Indie Studios in Game Software EcosystemsGrand Research Challenges in Games and Entertainment Computing in Brazil - GranDGamesBR 2020–203010.1007/978-3-031-27639-2_3(47-66)Online publication date: 10-Mar-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-27639-2_3
Di Ruscio DIovino LPierantonio A(2023)AMINO: A quality assessment framework for modeling ecosystemsJournal of Software: Evolution and Process10.1002/smr.2603Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
https://doi.org/10.1002/smr.2603
Vegendla ADuc AGao SSindre G(2021)A Systematic Mapping Study on Requirements Engineering in Software EcosystemsResearch Anthology on Recent Trends, Tools, and Implications of Computer Programming10.4018/978-1-7998-3016-0.ch056(1202-1226)Online publication date: 2021
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-3016-0.ch056
Tran VCheng CPetrillo FGueheneuc Y(2021)Analyzing and Visualizing Projects and their Relations in Software Ecosystems2021 Working Conference on Software Visualization (VISSOFT)10.1109/VISSOFT52517.2021.00020(105-109)Online publication date: Sep-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/VISSOFT52517.2021.00020
Cogo FOliva GHassan A(2021)An Empirical Study of Dependency Downgrades in the npm EcosystemIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2019.295213047:11(2457-2470)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2019.2952130
Osman KBaysal O(2021)Health is Wealth: Evaluating the Health of the Bitcoin Ecosystem in GitHub2021 IEEE/ACM 4th International Workshop on Software Health in Projects, Ecosystems and Communities (SoHeal)10.1109/SoHeal52568.2021.00007(1-8)Online publication date: May-2021
https://doi.org/10.1109/SoHeal52568.2021.00007
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents