Work in Progress

Investigating the Use of Hints in Online Problem Solving

Authors:

Alastair R. Beresford,

Andrew RiceAuthors Info & Claims

L@S '16: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale

Pages 105 - 108

https://doi.org/10.1145/2876034.2893379

Published: 25 April 2016 Publication History

Get Access

Abstract

We investigate the use of hints as a form of scaffolding for 4,652 eligible users on a large-scale online learning environment called Isaac, which allows users to answer physics questions with up to five hints. We investigate user behaviour when using hints, users' engagement with fading (the process of gradually becoming less reliant on the hints provided), and hint strategies including Decomposition, Correction, Verification, or Comparison. Finally, we present recommendations for the design and development of online teaching tools that provide open access to hints, including a mechanism that may improve the speed at which users begin fading.

References

[1]

S. Cummins, I. Davies, A. Rice, and A. R. Beresford. 2015. Equality: A tool for free-form equation editing. In ICALT, July 6--9, 2015, Hualien, Taiwan.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[2]

A. Devolder, J. van Braak, and J. Tondeur. 2012. Supporting self-regulated learning in computer-based learning environments: systematic review of effects of scaffolding in the domain of science education. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 28, 6 (Dec. 2012), 557--573.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[3]

UK Government. 2015. What different qualification levels mean: Compare different qualifications. (2015).https://www.gov.uk/what-different-qualification-levels-mean/compare-different-qualification-levels

Google Scholar

[4]

Julio Guerra, Shaghayegh Sahebi, Yu-Ru Lin, and Peter Brusilovsky. 2014. The Problem Solving Genome: Analyzing Sequential Patterns of Student Work with Parameterized Exercises. In Educational Data Mining conference, July 4th - July 7th, London. 84--91.

Google Scholar

[5]

Michael Hannafin, Susan Land, and Kevin Oliver. 1999. Open learning environments: Foundations, methods, and models. Instructional-design theories and models: A new paradigm of instructional theory 2 (1999), 115--140.

Google Scholar

[6]

Paul A. Kirschner, John Sweller, and Richard E. Clark. 2006. Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational Psychologist 41, 2 (June 2006), 75--86.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[7]

Anton Machacek, Jennifer Crowter, and Lisa Jardine-Wright. 2015. Isaac Physics Skills, 2nd edition: Mastering Essential Pre-University Physics & Developing Problem-Solving Skills. Periphyseos Press.

Google Scholar

[8]

Henk J. Pol, Egbert G. Harskamp, Cor J. M. Suhre, and Martin J. Goedhart. 2008. The Effect of Hints and Model Answers in a Student-Controlled Problem-Solving Program for Secondary Physics Education. Journal of Science Education and Technology 17, 4 (May 2008), 410--425.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[9]

S.M. Ross and J.P.R. Bolton. 2002. Physica: A Computer Environment for Physics Problem-Solving. Interactive Learning Environments 10, 2 (Aug. 2002), 157--175.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[10]

A.H. Schoenfeld. 1992. Learning to Think Mathematically: Problem Solving, Metacognition, and Sense Making in Mathematics Handbook of Research on Mathematics Teaching and Learning: A Project of the National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. MacMillan Publishing, New York. 334--370 pages.

Google Scholar

[11]

Janneke van de Pol, Monique Volman, and Jos Beishuizen. 2010. Scaffolding in Teacher-Student Interaction: A Decade of Research. Educational Psychology Review 22, 3 (April 2010), 271--296.

Crossref

Google Scholar

[12]

Jeroen J.G. van Merrienboer. 2013. Perspectives on problem solving and instruction. Computers & Education 64 (May 2013), 153--160.

Digital Library

Google Scholar

[13]

Jeroen J.G. van Merrienboer and Paul A. Kirschner. 2012. Ten Steps to Complex Learning: A Systematic Approach to Four-Component Instructional Design (2 ed.). Routledge.

Google Scholar

Cited By

View all

Inventado PScupelli PYip J(2016)Patterns for learning-support design in math online learning systemsProceedings of the 23rd Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs10.5555/3158161.3158183(1-13)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3158161.3158183

Index Terms

Investigating the Use of Hints in Online Problem Solving
1. Applied computing
  1. Education
    1. Distance learning
    2. E-learning

Recommendations

Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice

With the expanding availability and capability of varied technologies, classroom-based problem solving has become an increasingly attainable, yet still elusive, goal. Evidence of technology-enhanced problem-solving teaching and learning in schools has ...
A Comparison of Hints vs. Scaffolding in a MOOC with Adult Learners
Artificial Intelligence in Education
Abstract
Scaffolding and providing feedback on problem-solving activities during online learning has consistently been shown to improve performance in younger learners. However, less is known about the impacts of feedback strategies on adult learners. This ...
Hints: is it better to give or wait to be asked?
ITS'10: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems - Volume Part I

Many tutoring systems allow students to ask for hints when they need help solving problems, and this has been shown to be helpful. However, many students have trouble knowing when to ask for help or they prefer to guess rather than ask for and read a ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

L@S '16: Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale

April 2016

446 pages

ISBN:9781450337267

DOI:10.1145/2876034

General Chair:
Jeff Haywood
The University of Edinburgh, UK
,
Program Chairs:
Vincent Aleven
Carnegie Mellon University, USA
,
Judy Kay
University of Sydney, Australia
,
Ido Roll
University of British Columbia, Canada

Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 25 April 2016

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Work in progress

Conference

L@S 2016

Sponsor:

L@S 2016: Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale

April 25 - 26, 2016

Scotland, Edinburgh, UK

Acceptance Rates

L@S '16 Paper Acceptance Rate 18 of 79 submissions, 23%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 117 of 440 submissions, 27%

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

1
Total Citations
View Citations
237
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)10
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)1

Reflects downloads up to 04 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all

Inventado PScupelli PYip J(2016)Patterns for learning-support design in math online learning systemsProceedings of the 23rd Conference on Pattern Languages of Programs10.5555/3158161.3158183(1-13)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2016
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3158161.3158183

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Cited By

Index Terms

Recommendations

Scaffolding problem solving in technology-enhanced learning environments (TELEs): Bridging research and theory with practice

A Comparison of Hints vs. Scaffolding in a MOOC with Adult Learners

Hints: is it better to give or wait to be asked?