research-article

Public Access

Understanding Factors that Influence Research Computing and Data Careers

Authors:

Shafaq Chaudhry,

Patrick Schmitz,

Elizabett Hillery,

Kerk KeeAuthors Info & Claims

PEARC '22: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2022: Revolutionary: Computing, Connections, You

Article No.: 25, Pages 1 - 9

https://doi.org/10.1145/3491418.3530292

Published: 08 July 2022 Publication History

All formats PDF

Abstract

Research Computing and Data (RCD) professionals play a crucial role in supporting and advancing research that involve data and/or computing, however, there is a critical shortage of RCD workforce, and organizations face challenges in recruiting and retaining RCD professional staff. It is not obvious to people outside of RCD how their skills and experience map to the RCD profession, and staff currently in RCD roles lack resources to create a professional development plan. To address these gaps, the CaRCC RCD Career Arcs working group has embarked upon an effort to gain a deeper understanding of the paths that RCD professionals follow across their careers. An important step in that effort is a recent survey the working group conducted of RCD professionals on key factors that influence decisions in the course of their careers. This survey gathered responses from over 200 respondents at institutions across the United States. This paper presents our initial findings and analyses of the data gathered. We describe how various genders, career stages, and types of RCD roles impact the ranking of these factors, and note that while there are differences across these groups, respondents were broadly consistent in their assessment of the importance of these factors. In some cases, the responses clearly distinguish RCD professionals from the broader workforce, and even other Information Technology professionals.

Supplemental Material

PDF File

Extended data and graphs

Download
5.33 MB

References

[1]

Amy Adkins and Brandon Rigoni. 2016. Millennials want jobs to be development opportunities. Gallup, Inc. Retrieved May 26, 2022 from http://news.gallup.com/businessjournal/193274/millennials-jobs-development-opportunities.aspx

[2]

National Security Agency and the Department of Energy. 2016. U.S. Leadership in High Performance Computing (HPC) A Report from the NSA-DOE Technical Meeting on High Performance Computing. Technical Report. NITRD. https://www.nitrd.gov/nitrdgroups/images/b/b4/NSA_DOE_HPC_TechMeetingReport.pdf

[3]

Lisa Arafune, Dana Brunson, Thomas Hacker, and Preston Smith. 2021. Building the research innovation workforce: a workshop to identify new insights and directions to advance the research computing community. Technical Report. https://www.rcac.purdue.edu/files/ciworkforce2020/report.pdf

[4]

Catherine Ashcraft, Brad McLain, and Elizabeth Eger. 2016. WOMEN IN TECH: THE FACTS 2016 Update. Technical Report. NCWIT Research. https://wpassets.ncwit.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/05/13193304/ncwit_women-in-it_2016-full-report_final-web06012016.pdf

[5]

Lindsay Barone, Jason Williams, and David Micklos. 2017. Unmet needs for analyzing biological big data: A survey of 704 NSF principal investigators. PLOS Computational Biology 13, 10 (10 2017), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005755

[6]

L.A. Baxter and R. Babbie. 2003. The Basics of Communication Research. Cengage Learning. https://books.google.com/books?id=PTE9AAAAQBAJ

[7]

Michela Bello and Fernando Galindo-Rueda. 2020. Charting the digital transformation of science: Findings from the 2018 OECD International Survey of Scientific Authors (ISSA2). OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working PapersNo. 2020/03 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1787/1b06c47c-en

[8]

Nicholas Berente, James Howison, Joel Cutcher-Gershenfeld, John L. King, Stephen R. Barley, and John Towns. 2017. Professionalization in Cyberinfrastructure. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3138592. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3138592

[9]

Nicholas Berente, James Howison, John L. King, Stanley Ahalt, and Susan Winter. 2018. Organizing and the Cyberinfrastructure Workforce. SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3260715. Social Science Research Network, Rochester, NY. https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3260715

[10]

Christopher Brooks, Joseph Galanek, Dana Gierdowski, and Mark McCormack. 2019. The IT Workforce in Higher Education. Technical Report. EDUCAUSE Research. https://library.educause.edu/resources/2019/2/the-it-workforce-in-higher-education-2019

[11]

Ruolian Fang, Michelle K. Duffy, and Jason D. Shaw. 2011. The Organizational Socialization Process: Review and Development of a Social Capital Model. Journal of Management 37, 1 (Jan. 2011), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310384630 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.

[12]

Athina Frantzana. 2019. Women’s Representation and Experiences in the High Performance Computing Community. Ph.D. Dissertation. The University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, Scotland. https://era.ed.ac.uk/bitstream/handle/1842/36127/Frantzana2019.pdf

[13]

John Goodhue, Julie Ma, Adrian Del Maestro, Sia Najafi, Bruce Segee, Scott Valcourt, and Ralph Zottola. 2020. Northeast Cyberteam Program–A Workforce Development Strategy for Research Computing. The Journal of Computational Science Education 11, 1 (Jan. 2020), 8–11.

[14]

Sylvia Hewlett, Carolyn Luce, Lisa Servon, Laura Sherbin, Peggy Shiller, Eytan Sosnovich, and Karen Sumberg. 2008. The Athena Factor: Reversing the Brain Drain in Science, Engineering, and Technology. Harvard Business Review Research Report (May 2008), 108 pages.

[15]

Dawn Kawamoto. 2016. Parity for Some, But Tech Women’s Pay Lags Overall. https://insights.dice.com/2013/03/22/it-salaries-for-women/

[16]

M. Kramer and M.W. Kramer. 2010. Organizational Socialization: Joining and Leaving Organizations. Wiley.

[17]

LinkedIn Learning. 2022. 2022 Workplace Learning Report. Technical Report. LinkedIn. https://learning.linkedin.com/resources/workplace-learning-report

[18]

Christina Maimone, Scott Yockel, Timothy Middelkoop, Ashley Stauffer, and Chris Reidy. 2022. Characterizing the US Research Computing and Data (RCD) Workforce. In Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing (PEARC ’22). ACM, Boston, MA, USA. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491418.3530289

Digital Library

[19]

Lucas Mearian. 2022. No end in sight for the Great Resignation; workers keep quitting for better pay, benefits. Retrieved May 26, 2022 from https://www.computerworld.com/article/3646390/no-end-in-sight-for-the-great-resignation-workers-keep-quitting-for-better-pay-benefits.html

[20]

National Science Foundation. 2021. Research Infrastructure Guide. https://www.nsf.gov/pubs/2021/nsf21107/nsf21107.pdf

[21]

Henry Neeman, Hussein M. Al-Azzawi, Aaron Bergstrom, Zoe K. Braiterman, Dana Brunson, Dirk Colbry, Eduardo Colmenares, Akilah N. Fuller, Sandra Gesing, Maria Kalyvaki, Claire Mizumoto, Jeho Park, Anita Z. Schwartz, Jason L. Simms, and Rustomji Vania. 2018. Progress Update on the Development and Implementation of the Advanced Cyberinfrastructure Research & Education Facilitators Virtual Residency Program. In Proceedings of the Practice and Experience on Advanced Research Computing (Pittsburgh, PA, USA) (PEARC ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 71, 7 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3219104.3219117

Digital Library

[22]

Sushil S. Nifadkar. 2020. Filling in the “Blank Slate”: Examining Newcomers’ Schemas of Supervisors During Organizational Socialization. Journal of Management 46, 5 (May 2020), 666–693. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206318807288 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.

[23]

Patrick Schmitz, Shafaq Chaudhry, and Arman Pazouki. 2022. Extended data and graphs for the 2022 Career Arcs survey. Technical Report. CaRCC. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6503005

[24]

Alan M. Saks and Blake E. Ashforth. 1997. Organizational Socialization: Making Sense of the Past and Present as a Prologue for the Future. Journal of Vocational Behavior 51, 2 (Oct. 1997), 234–279. https://doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1997.1614

[25]

Patrick Schmitz, Scott Yockel, Claire Mizumoto, Thomas Cheatham, and Dana Brunson. 2021. Advancing the Workforce That Supports Computationally and Data Intensive Research. Computing in Science & Engineering 23, 5 (Sept. 2021), 19–27. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCSE.2021.3098421 Computing in Science & Engineering.

[26]

Paola Spagnoli. 2020. Organizational Socialization Learning, Organizational Career Growth, and Work Outcomes: A Moderated Mediation Model. Journal of Career Development 47, 3 (June 2020), 249–265. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894845317700728 Publisher: SAGE Publications Inc.

Cited By

Brashear WPerez LLeake ENite SPennings MStebenne SLiu HChakravorty D(2024)Cultivating Cyberinfrastructure Careers through Student Engagement at Texas A&M University High Performance Research ComputingPractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2024: Human Powered Computing10.1145/3626203.3670544(1-6)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626203.3670544
Lauer ACordes Galbraith MWolff MHart D(2023)The Inclusive Conferences Survey: Analysis and validation of inclusivity at HPC conferencesPractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2023: Computing for the Common Good10.1145/3569951.3597580(363-366)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569951.3597580
Middelkoop TMizumoto CStrachan SBalamurugan DDelinger SFosso Tande JMcCaffrey DMyatt James AReddy DSchmitz P(2023)Career Phases in Research Computing and DataPractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2023: Computing for the Common Good10.1145/3569951.3597562(374-377)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569951.3597562
Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Characterizing the US Research Computing and Data (RCD) Workforce
PEARC '22: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2022: Revolutionary: Computing, Connections, You

A growing share of computationally and data-intensive research, both inside and outside of academia, requires the involvement and support of computing and data professionals. Yet little is known about the composition of the research computing and data (...
Compensation of Academic Research Computing and Data Professionals
PEARC '23: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2023: Computing for the Common Good

Previous work identified low compensation levels as a barrier to recruitment and retention in the Research Computing and Data (RCD) field. In order to better understand the characteristics of RCD compensation, a 2021 survey of RCD professionals in the ...
Onboarding Research Computing and Data Professionals
PEARC '24: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2024: Human Powered Computing

Research and researchers have become more dependent upon the support of Research Computing and Data (RCD) Professionals throughout the entire research lifecycle as technologies, infrastructure, and services grow in technical complexity with increased ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

PEARC '22: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2022: Revolutionary: Computing, Connections, You

July 2022

455 pages

ISBN:9781450391610

DOI:10.1145/3491418

Editors:
Julie Wernert
Indiana University
,
Alan Chalker
Ohio Supercomputer Center
,
Shava Smallen
San Diego Supercomputer Center, University of California, San Diego
,
Tabitha Samuel
University of Tennessee, Knoxville
,
JP Navarro
Argonne National Laboratory

Copyright © 2022 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 08 July 2022

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Badges

Best Paper

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Funding Sources

NSF (National Science Foundation)

Conference

PEARC '22

Sponsor:

PEARC '22: Practice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing

July 10 - 14, 2022

MA, Boston, USA

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 133 of 202 submissions, 66%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

7
Total Citations
View Citations
583
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)237
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)31

Reflects downloads up to 06 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Brashear WPerez LLeake ENite SPennings MStebenne SLiu HChakravorty D(2024)Cultivating Cyberinfrastructure Careers through Student Engagement at Texas A&M University High Performance Research ComputingPractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2024: Human Powered Computing10.1145/3626203.3670544(1-6)Online publication date: 17-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626203.3670544
Lauer ACordes Galbraith MWolff MHart D(2023)The Inclusive Conferences Survey: Analysis and validation of inclusivity at HPC conferencesPractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2023: Computing for the Common Good10.1145/3569951.3597580(363-366)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569951.3597580
Middelkoop TMizumoto CStrachan SBalamurugan DDelinger SFosso Tande JMcCaffrey DMyatt James AReddy DSchmitz P(2023)Career Phases in Research Computing and DataPractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2023: Computing for the Common Good10.1145/3569951.3597562(374-377)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569951.3597562
Cutcher-Gershenfeld JBattelle TBrunson DCheatham TFosso Tande JJennewein DMa JMichael LMiddelkoop TNeeman HSchmitz P(2023)Professionalization of Research Computing and Data: An Expanded AgendaPractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2023: Computing for the Common Good10.1145/3569951.3593610(129-136)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569951.3593610
Maimone CBrown CGrash KReidy CStauffer A(2023)Compensation of Academic Research Computing and Data ProfessionalsPractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2023: Computing for the Common Good10.1145/3569951.3593599(145-152)Online publication date: 23-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3569951.3593599
Maimone CYockel SMiddelkoop TStauffer AReidy C(2022)Characterizing the US Research Computing and Data (RCD) WorkforcePractice and Experience in Advanced Research Computing 2022: Revolutionary: Computing, Connections, You10.1145/3491418.3530289(1-7)Online publication date: 8-Jul-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3491418.3530289
Mundt MBeattie KBisila JFerenbaugh CGodoy WGupta RGuyer JKiran MMalviya-Thakur AMilewicz RSims BSochat VTeves J(2022)For the Public Good: Connecting, Retaining, and Recognizing Current and Future RSEs at U.S. National Research Laboratories and AgenciesComputing in Science and Engineering10.1109/MCSE.2023.325675924:6(6-13)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/MCSE.2023.3256759

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents