skip to main content
10.1145/3511808.3557599acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagescikmConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

Expressions Causing Differences in Emotion Recognition in Social Networking Service Documents

Published: 17 October 2022 Publication History

Abstract

It is often difficult to correctly infer a writer's emotion from text exchanged online, and differences in recognition between writers and readers can be problematic. In this paper, we propose a new framework for detecting sentences that create differences in emotion recognition between the writer and the reader and for detecting the kinds of expressions that cause such differences. The proposed framework consists of a bidirectional encoder representations from transformers (BERT)-based detector that detects sentences causing differences in emotion recognition and an analysis that acquires expressions that characteristically appear in such sentences. The detector, based on a Japanese SNS-document dataset with emotion labels annotated by both the writer and three readers of the social networking service (SNS) documents, detected "hidden-anger sentences" with AUC = 0.772; these sentences gave rise to differences in the recognition of anger. Because SNS documents contain many sentences whose meaning is extremely difficult to interpret, by analyzing the sentences detected by this detector, we obtained several expressions that appear characteristically in hidden-anger sentences. The detected sentences and expressions do not convey anger explicitly, and it is difficult to infer the writer's anger, but if the implicit anger is pointed out, it becomes possible to guess why the writer is angry. Put into practical use, this framework would likely have the ability to mitigate problems based on misunderstandings.

Supplementary Material

MP4 File (CIKM22-sp0515.mp4)
Presentation video

References

[1]
Saima Aman and Stanisaw Szpakowicz. 2007. Identifying Expressions of Emotion in Text. In TSD.
[2]
Laura Ana Maria Bostan and Roman Klinger. 2018. An Analysis of Annotated Corpora for Emotion Classification in Text. In COLING.
[3]
Sven Buechel and Udo Hahn. 2017. Readers vs. Writers vs. Texts: Coping with Different Perspectives of Text Understanding in Emotion Annotation. In LAW@ACL.
[4]
Ying Chen, Sophia Yat-Mei Lee, Shoushan Li, and Chu-Ren Huang. 2010. Emotion Cause Detection with Linguistic Constructions. In COLING.
[5]
Jacob Devlin, Ming-Wei Chang, Kenton Lee, and Kristina Toutanova. 2019. BERT: Pre-training of Deep Bidirectional Transformers for Language Understanding. In NAACL. 4171--4186.
[6]
Paul Ekman. 1992. An Argument for Basic Emotions. Cognition & Emotion, Vol. 6 (1992), 169--200.
[7]
Xing Fang and Justin Zhijun Zhan. 2015. Sentiment Analysis Using Product Review Data. Journal of Big Data, Vol. 2 (2015), 1--14.
[8]
Mauajama Firdaus, Hardik Chauhan, Asif Ekbal, and Pushpak Bhattacharyya. 2020. EmoSen: Generating Sentiment and Emotion Controlled Responses in a Multimodal Dialogue System. IEEE Transactions on Affective Computing (2020), 1--1.
[9]
Tomoyuki Kajiwara, Chenhui Chu, Noriko Takemura, Yuta Nakashima, and Hajime Nagahara. 2021. WRIME: A New Dataset for Emotional Intensity Estimation with Subjective and Objective Annotations. In NAACL.
[10]
Diederik P. Kingma and Jimmy Ba. 2015. Adam: A Method for Stochastic Optimization. CoRR, Vol. abs/1412.6980 (2015).
[11]
Bing Liu. 2012. Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining. In Synthesis Lectures on Human Language Technologies.
[12]
Saif M. Mohammad and Felipe Bravo-Marquez. 2017. Emotion Intensities in Tweets. In *SEMEVAL.
[13]
Saif M. Mohammad and Svetlana Kiritchenko. 2018. Understanding Emotions: A Dataset of Tweets to Study Interactions between Affect Categories. In LREC.
[14]
Laura Ana Maria Oberl"ander, Evgeny Kim, and Roman Klinger. 2020. GoodNewsEveryone: A Corpus of News Headlines Annotated with Emotions, Semantic Roles, and Reader Perception. In LREC. 1554--1566.
[15]
W. Gerrod Parrott. 2001. Emotions in Social Psychology: Essential Readings.
[16]
Robert Plutchik. 1980. A General Psychoevolutionary Theory of Emotion. In Theories of emotion. Elsevier, 3--33.
[17]
Richard Socher, Alex Perelygin, Jean Wu, Jason Chuang, Christopher D. Manning, Andrew Y. Ng, and Christopher Potts. 2013. Recursive Deep Models for Semantic Compositionality over a Sentiment Treebank. In EMNLP.
[18]
Carlo Strapparava and Rada Mihalcea. 2007. SemEval-2007 Task 14: Affective Text. In Fourth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluations (SemEval-2007).
[19]
Yi-jie Tang and Hsin-Hsi Chen. 2011. Emotion Modeling from Writer/Reader Perspectives Using a Microblog Dataset. In SAAIP. 11--19.
[20]
Theresa Wilson, Janyce Wiebe, and Rebecca Hwa. 2004. Just How Mad Are You? Finding Strong and Weak Opinion Clauses. In AAAI.
[21]
Rui Xia and Zixiang Ding. 2019. Emotion-Cause Pair Extraction: A New Task to Emotion Analysis in Texts. In ACL. 1003--1012.
[22]
Changhua Yang, Kevin Hsin-Yih Lin, and Hsin-Hsi Chen. 2009. Writer Meets Reader: Emotion Analysis of Social Media from Both the Writer's and Reader's Perspectives. 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology, Vol. 1 (2009), 287--290.

Cited By

View all
  • (2023)Weighted cluster-level social emotion classification across domainsInternational Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics10.1007/s13042-022-01769-314:7(2385-2394)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2023

Index Terms

  1. Expressions Causing Differences in Emotion Recognition in Social Networking Service Documents

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Conferences
    CIKM '22: Proceedings of the 31st ACM International Conference on Information & Knowledge Management
    October 2022
    5274 pages
    ISBN:9781450392365
    DOI:10.1145/3511808
    • General Chairs:
    • Mohammad Al Hasan,
    • Li Xiong
    This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

    Sponsors

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 17 October 2022

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. natural language processing
    2. sentiment analysis
    3. text mining

    Qualifiers

    • Short-paper

    Conference

    CIKM '22
    Sponsor:

    Acceptance Rates

    CIKM '22 Paper Acceptance Rate 621 of 2,257 submissions, 28%;
    Overall Acceptance Rate 1,861 of 8,427 submissions, 22%

    Upcoming Conference

    CIKM '25

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • Downloads (Last 12 months)154
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)21
    Reflects downloads up to 05 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2023)Weighted cluster-level social emotion classification across domainsInternational Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics10.1007/s13042-022-01769-314:7(2385-2394)Online publication date: 5-Jan-2023

    View Options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    Get Access

    Login options

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media