Queering/Cripping Technologies of Productivity
Authors: 
Sylvia Janicki, Alexandra Teixeira Riggs, 
Noura Howell, Anne Sullivan, Abigale StanglAuthors Info & Claims
Article No.: 563, Pages 1 - 12
Abstract
In this paper, we contribute three design manifestos that start from our queer, crip experiences to resist dominant designs and practices of productivity. Through our manifestos, we explore tensions in glitching three technologies of productivity (Mendeley, Figma, and ChatGPT) by reorienting their intended uses and design scripts. By sharing our perspectives and design processes, we invite new ways of relating to technologies of productivity, offer design provocations for queering and cripping technologies in HCI, and call for building intersectional coalitions that contribute towards a slow, non-linear resistance.
Supplemental Material
MP4 File
Talk Video
- Download
- 28.61 MB
- Transcript
References
[1]
Muhammad Sadi Adamu. 2023. No More “Solutionism” or “Saviourism” in Futuring African HCI: A Manyfesto. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 30, 2, Article 21 (apr 2023), 42 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3571811
[2]
Stacy Alaimo. 2010. Bodily Natures: Science, Environment, and the Material Self. Indiana University Press, Bloomington, IN.
[3]
Adriana Alvarado Garcia, Juan F. Maestre, Manuhuia Barcham, Marilyn Iriarte, Marisol Wong-Villacres, Oscar A Lemus, Palak Dudani, Pedro Reynolds-Cuéllar, Ruotong Wang, and Teresa Cerratto Pargman. 2021. Decolonial Pathways: Our Manifesto for a Decolonizing Agenda in HCI Research and Design. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 10, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450365
[4]
Robin Angelini, Sabrina Burtscher, Felix Fussenegger, Kay Kender, Katta Spiel, Franz Steinbrecher, and Oliver Suchanek. 2023. Criptopias: Speculative Stories Exploring Worlds Worth Wanting. In Extended Abstracts of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Hamburg, Germany, ) (CHI EA ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 412, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544549.3582743
[5]
Mariam Asad, Lynn Dombrowski, Sasha Costanza-Chock, Sheena Erete, and Christina Harrington. 2019. Academic Accomplices: Practical Strategies for Research Justice. In Companion Publication of the 2019 on Designing Interactive Systems Conference 2019 Companion. ACM, San Diego CA USA, 353–356. https://doi.org/10.1145/3301019.3320001
[6]
Jeffrey Bardzell and Shaowen Bardzell. 2013. What is "Critical" about Critical Design?. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3297–3306. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466451
[7]
Shaowen Bardzell. 2010. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Atlanta, Georgia, USA) (CHI ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1301–1310. https://doi.org/10.1145/1753326.1753521
[8]
Shaowen Bardzell and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2011. Towards a Feminist HCI Methodology: Social Science, Feminism, and HCI(CHI ’11). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 675–684. https://doi.org/10.1145/1978942.1979041
[9]
Ruha Benjamin. 2019. Race after Technology: Abolitionist Tools for the New Jim Code. Polity, Oxford, England.
[10]
Cynthia L. Bennett, Erin Brady, and Stacy M. Branham. 2018. Interdependence as a Frame for Assistive Technology Research and Design. In Proceedings of the 20th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Galway, Ireland) (ASSETS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 161–173. https://doi.org/10.1145/3234695.3236348
[11]
Cynthia L. Bennett, Cole Gleason, Morgan Klaus Scheuerman, Jeffrey P. Bigham, Anhong Guo, and Alexandra To. 2021. “It’s Complicated”: Negotiating Accessibility and (Mis)Representation in Image Descriptions of Race, Gender, and Disability. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Yokohama, Japan, ) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 375, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445498
[12]
Cynthia L Bennett, Daniela K Rosner, and Alex S Taylor. 2020. The care work of access. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–15.
[13]
Heidi R. Biggs and Audrey Desjardins. 2020. High Water Pants: Designing Embodied Environmental Speculation. In Proceedings of the 2020 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Honolulu, HI, USA) (CHI ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376429
[14]
Susanne Bødker. 2015. Third-Wave HCI, 10 Years Later—Participation and Sharing. Interactions 22, 5 (aug 2015), 24–31. https://doi.org/10.1145/2804405
[15]
Geoffrey Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. MIT Press.
[16]
Caterina Buizza, César Quilodrán Casas, Philip Nadler, Julian Mack, Stefano Marrone, Zainab Titus, Clémence Le Cornec, Evelyn Heylen, Tolga Dur, Luis Baca Ruiz, 2022. Data learning: Integrating data assimilation and machine learning. Journal of Computational Science 58 (2022), 101525.
[17]
Judith Butler. 2015. Performative agency. In The Limits of Performativity. Routledge, 10–24.
[18]
William Cain. 2023. Prompting Change: Exploring Prompt Engineering in Large Language Model AI and Its Potential to Transform Education. TechTrends (2023), 1–11.
[19]
Richard Campanella. 2017. People-Mapping Through Google Street View. Places JournalNov 2017 (2017). https://doi.org/10.22269/210302
[20]
Mel Y. Chen. 23. Chronic Illness, Slowness, and the Time of Writing. New York University Press, Chapter 2.
[21]
Marika Cifor, Patricia Garcia, TL Cowan, Jasmine Rault, Tonia Sutherland, Anita Say Chan, Jennifer Rode, Anna Lauren Hoffamn, Niloufar Salehi, and Lisa Nakamura. 2019. Feminist Data Manifest-no. (2019).
[22]
Patricia Hill Collins. 1986. Learning From the Outsider Within: The Sociological Significance of Black Feminist Thought. Social Problems 33, 6 (1986), 14–32.
[23]
Sasha Costanza-Chock. 2020. Design justice: community-led practices to build the worlds we need. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
[24]
Kimberle Williames Crenshaw. 1991. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43, 6 (1991), 1241–99.
[25]
Luna Dolezal and Vela Oikkonen. 2021. Self-Tracking, Embodied Differences, and Intersectionality. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 6, 1 (2021), 1–15.
[26]
Kristie Dotson. 2011. Tracking Epistemic Violence, Tracking Practices of Silencing. Hypatia 26, 2 (Spring 2011) (2011), 265–286.
[27]
Katie Ellis, Rosemarie Garland-Thomson, Mike Kent, and Rachel Robertson (Eds.). 2019. Manifestos for the Future of Critical Disability Studies. Vol. 1. Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
[28]
Virginia Eubanks. 2017. Automating Inequality. St Martin’s Press.
[29]
Laura Forlano. 2017. Data Rituals in Intimate Infrastructures: Crip Time and the Disabled Cyborg Body as an Epistemic Site of Feminist Science. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 3, 2 (2017), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v3i2.28843
[30]
Laura Forlano. 2017. Maintaining, Repairing and Caring for the Multiple Subject. Continent 6 (2017). Issue 1.
[31]
Elizabeth Freeman. 2010. Time binds: queer temporalities, queer histories. Duke University Press, Durham.
[32]
Paulo Freire. 2021. Pedagogy of hope: Reliving pedagogy of the oppressed. Bloomsbury Publishing.
[33]
Jacob Gaboury. 2018. Critical Unmaking: Toward a Queer Computation. In The Routledge companion to media studies and digital humanities, Jentery Sayers (Ed.). Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group, New York.
[34]
Patricia Garcia, Tonia Sutherland, Niloufar Salehi, Marika Cifor, and Anubha Singh. 2022. No! Re-Imagining Data Practices Through the Lens of Critical Refusal. Proc. ACM Hum.-Comput. Interact. 6, CSCW2, Article 315 (nov 2022), 20 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3557997
[35]
Rosemary Garland-Thomas. 2011. Misfits: A Feminist Materialist Disability Concept. Hypatia 26, 3 (2011).
[36]
William Gaver, John Bowers, Tobie Kerridge, Andy Boucher, and Nadine Jarvis. 2009. Anatomy of a Failure: How We Knew When Our Design Went Wrong, and What We Learned from It. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Boston, MA, USA) (CHI ’09). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2213–2222. https://doi.org/10.1145/1518701.1519040
[37]
William W. Gaver, John Bowers, Andrew Boucher, Hans Gellerson, Sarah Pennington, Albrecht Schmidt, Anthony Steed, Nicholas Villars, and Brendan Walker. 2004. The Drift Table: Designing for Ludic Engagement. In CHI ’04 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Vienna, Austria) (CHI EA ’04). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 885–900. https://doi.org/10.1145/985921.985947
[38]
Louie Giray. 2023. Prompt Engineering with ChatGPT: A Guide for Academic Writers. Annals of Biomedical Engineering (2023), 1–5.
[39]
Melissa Gregg. 2018. Counterproductive: Time management in the knowledge economy. Duke University Press, Durham, NC.
[40]
Barbara Grosse-Hering, Jon Mason, Dzmitry Aliakseyeu, Conny Bakker, and Pieter Desmet. 2013. Slow Design for Meaningful Interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Paris, France) (CHI ’13). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3431–3440. https://doi.org/10.1145/2470654.2466472
[41]
Elizabeth Grosz. 1994. Volatile Bodies: Toward a Corporeal Feminism. Indiana University Press.
[42]
Elizabeth Guffey. 2021. Active Exclusion. Places JournalMarch 2021 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22269/210302
[43]
Jack Halberstam. 2005. In a Queer Time and Place: Transgender Bodies, Subcultural Lives. New York University Press.
[44]
Jack Halberstam. 2011. The Queer Art of Failure. Duke University Press, Durham.
[45]
Aimi Hamraie. 2017. Building Access: Universal Design and the Politics of Disability. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
[46]
Aimi Hamraie and Kelly Fritsch. 2019. Crip Technoscience Manifesto. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 5, 1 (2019), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29607
[47]
Julian Hanna, Simone Ashby, Sónia Matos, Alexis Faria, and Ricardo Rodrigues. 2019. Dissent by Design: A Manifesto for CHI Manifestos. In Extended Abstracts of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI EA ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290607.3310423
[48]
Donna Haraway. 1988. Situated Knowledges: The Science Question in Feminism and the Privilege of Partial Perspective. Feminist Studies 14, 3 (1988), 575–599.
[49]
Sandra Harding. 1993. Rethinking Standpoint Epistemology: What Is Strong Objectivity?Routledge, 49–82.
[50]
Jean Hardy, Caitlin Geier, Stefani Vargas, Riley Doll, and Amy Lyn Howard. 2022. LGBTQ Futures and Participatory Design: Investigating Visibility, Community, and the Future of Future Workshops. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (Nov. 2022), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1145/3555638
[51]
Kristin Margrethe Heggen and Henrik Berg. 2021. Epistemic injustice in the age of evidence-based practice: The case of fibromyalgia. Humanit Soc Sci Commun 8, 235 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1057/s41599-021-00918-3
[52]
Sara Hendren. 2017. All Technology Is Assistive: Six Design Rules on Disability. In Making Things and Drawing Boundaries: Experiments in the Digital Humanities. University of Minnesota Press.
[53]
Sara Hendren. 2020. Clock. Riverhead Books, New York.
[54]
Sara Hendren. 2020. What Can a Body Do? : How We Meet the Built World. Riverhead Books, New York.
[55]
Tricia Hersey. 2022. Rest is Resistance. Little, Brown Spark.
[56]
Megan Hofmann, Devva Kasnitz, Jennifer Mankoff, and Cynthia L Bennett. 2020. Living Disability Theory: Reflections on Access, Research, and Design. In Proceedings of the 22nd International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Virtual Event, Greece) (ASSETS ’20). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 4, 13 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3373625.3416996
[57]
Sarah Homewood. 2023. Self-Tracking to Do Less: An Autoethnography of Long COVID That Informs the Design of Pacing Technologies. In Proceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Hamburg, Germany, ) (CHI ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 656, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3544548.3581505
[58]
bell hooks. 2014. Are You Still a Slave? Liberating the Black Female Body. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rJk0hNROvzs
[59]
bell hooks. 2014. Teaching to transgress. Routledge.
[60]
Lara Houston, Jennifer Gabrys, and Helen Pritchard. 2010. Breakdown in the Smart City: Exploring Workarounds with Urban-Sensing Practices and Technologies. Science, Technology, & Human Values 44, 5 (2010), 843–70.
[61]
Noura Howell, Audrey Desjardins, and Sarah Fox. 2021. Cracks in the Success Narrative: Rethinking Failure in Design Research through a Retrospective Trioethnography. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 28, 6, Article 42 (nov 2021), 31 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3462447
[62]
Noura Howell, Britta F. Schulte, Amy Twigger Holroyd, Rocío Fatás Arana, Sumita Sharma, and Grace Eden. 2021. Calling for a Plurality of Perspectives on Design Futuring: An Un-Manifesto. In Extended Abstracts of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI EA ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 31, 10 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411763.3450364
[63]
Noura Howell, Greg Niemeyer, and Kimiko Ryokai. 2019. Life-Affirming Biosensing in Public: Sounding Heartbeats on a Red Bench. In Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Glasgow, Scotland Uk) (CHI ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300910
[64]
Hsuan L. Hsu. 2020. The Smell of Risk: Environmental Disparities and Olfactory Aesthetics. New York University Press, Chapter Chapter 1 - “Every Crime Has Its Peculiar Odor”: Detection, Deodorization, and Intoxication In.
[65]
Isa Inuwa-Dutse. 2023. FATE in AI: Towards Algorithmic Inclusivity and Accessibility(EAAMO ’23). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 13, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3617694.3623233
[66]
Nassim JafariNaimi and Anne Pollock. 2018. Heart Sense: experiments in design as a catalyst for feminist reflections on embodiment. (2018).
[67]
Sophia Jaworski. 2017. Tracing Chemical Intimacies. Engagement (2017). https://aesengagement.wordpress.com/2017/11/01/tracing-chemical-intimacies/
[68]
Sophia Jaworski. 2022. Chemical Disability and Technoscientific Experimental Subjecthood : Reimagining the Canary in the Coal Mine Metaphor Keywords. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 8, 2 (2022), 1–20.
[69]
Alison Kafer. 2013. Feminist, Queer, Crip. Indiana University Press.
[70]
Alison Kafer. 2019. Crip Kin, Manifesting. Catalyst: Feminism, Theory, Technoscience 5, 1 (2019). https://doi.org/10.28968/cftt.v5i1.29618
[71]
Kara Keeling. 2014. Queer OS. Cinema Journal 53, 2 (2014), 152–157. https://doi.org/10.1353/cj.2014.0004
[72]
Leslie Kern. 2019. Feminist city: A field guide. Between the Lines.
[73]
Catherine Kudlick. 2006. A History profession for every Body. Journal of Women’s History 18, 1 (2006), 163–164.
[74]
Richard N Landers and Tara S Behrend. 2023. Auditing the AI auditors: A framework for evaluating fairness and bias in high stakes AI predictive models.American Psychologist 78, 1 (2023), 36.
[75]
Susan Leavy, Eugenia Siapera, and Barry O’Sullivan. 2021. Ethical data curation for ai: An approach based on feminist epistemology and critical theories of race. In Proceedings of the 2021 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society. 695–703.
[76]
Gilly Leshed. 2012. Slowing down with Personal Productivity Tools. Interactions 19, 1 (jan 2012), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1145/2065327.2065339
[77]
Max Liboiron, Manuel Tironi, and Nerea Calvillo. 2018. Toxic politics: Acting in a permanently polluted world. Social Studies of Science 48, 3 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1177/0306312718783087
[78]
Anne Light. 2011. HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (September 2011) (2011), 430–438. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intcom.2011.02.002
[79]
Cindy Lin and Silvia Margot Lindtner. 2021. Techniques of Use: Confronting Value Systems of Productivity, Progress, and Usefulness in Computing and Design. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Yokohama, Japan, ) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 595, 16 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445237
[80]
Conor Linehan and Ben Kirman. 2014. Never Mind the Bollocks, i Wanna Be AnarCHI: A Manifesto for Punk HCI(CHI EA ’14). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 741–748. https://doi.org/10.1145/2559206.2578880
[81]
Jen Liu, Daragh Byrne, and Laura Devendorf. 2018. Design for Collaborative Survival: An Inquiry into Human-Fungi Relationships. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Montreal QC, Canada, ) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173614
[82]
Heather Love. 2009. Feeling backward: loss and the politics of queer history (first harvard university press paperback edition ed.). Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts London, England.
[83]
Kristina Lyons. 2018. Commentary: Toxic Bodies, Part II. Engagement (2018). https://aesengagement.wordpress.com/2018/05/08/commentary-toxic-bodies-part-ii/
[84]
Jennifer Mankoff, Gillian R. Hayes, and Devva Kasnitz. 2010. Disability studies as a source of critical inquiry for the field of assistive technology. In Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility (Orlando, Florida, USA) (ASSETS ’10). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/1878803.1878807
[85]
Cait McKinney. 2020. Information activism: a queer history of lesbian media technologies. Duke University Press, Durham.
[86]
Federico Monaco. 2022. Color blind accessibility manifesto. Commun. ACM 65, 8 (jul 2022), 7. https://doi.org/10.1145/3543881
[87]
Janet H. Murray. 2018. Research into Interactive Digital Narrative: A Kaleidoscopic View. In Interactive Storytelling, Rebecca Rouse, Hartmut Koenitz, and Mads Haahr (Eds.). Vol. 11318. Springer International Publishing, Cham, 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-04028-4_1 Series Title: Lecture Notes in Computer Science.
[88]
William Odom, Siân Lindley, Larissa Pschetz, Vasiliki Tsaknaki, Anna Vallgårda, Mikael Wiberg, and Daisy Yoo. 2018. Time, Temporality, and Slowness: Future Directions for Design Research. In Proceedings of the 2018 ACM Conference Companion Publication on Designing Interactive Systems (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18 Companion). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 383–386. https://doi.org/10.1145/3197391.3197392
[89]
William Odom, Ron Wakkary, Ishac Bertran, Matthew Harkness, Garnet Hertz, Jeroen Hol, Henry Lin, Bram Naus, Perry Tan, and Pepijn Verburg. 2018. Attending to Slowness and Temporality with Olly and Slow Game: A Design Inquiry Into Supporting Longer-Term Relations with Everyday Computational Objects. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Montreal QC, Canada, ) (CHI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173651
[90]
Santiago Ojeda-Ramirez, Sina Rismanchian, and Shayan Doroudi. 2023. Learning About AI to Learn About Learning: Artificial Intelligence as a Tool for Metacognitive Reflection. (2023).
[91]
Whitney (Whit) Pow. 2021. A Trans Historiography of Glitches and Errors. Feminist Media Histories 7, 1 (2021), 197–230. https://doi.org/10.1525/fmh.2021.7.1.197
[92]
Larissa Pschetz. 2015. Isn’t It Time to Change the Way We Think about Time?Interactions 22, 5 (aug 2015), 58–61. https://doi.org/10.1145/2809502
[93]
Jennifer Rode. 2011. A theoretical agenda for feminist HCI. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 393–400.
[94]
Stephanie S. Rosen. 23. Disability in the Library and Librianship. New York University Press, Chapter 27.
[95]
Robert Rosenberger. 2018. Callous Objects: Design Against the Homeless. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, MN.
[96]
Robert Rosenberger. 2020. On Hostile Design: Theoretical and Empirical Prospects. Urban Studies 57, 4 (2020), 883–893.
[97]
Nicole E. Rosner and Daniela K. Rosner. 2020. Designs on solidarity. Interactions 27, 4 (July 2020), 76–77. https://doi.org/10.1145/3407787
[98]
Legacy Russell. 2020. Glitch Feminism: A Manifesto. Verso.
[99]
Anastasia Salter, Bridget Blodgett, and Anne Sullivan. 2018. "Just because it’s gay?": transgressive design in queer coming of age visual novels. In Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on the Foundations of Digital Games. ACM, Malmö Sweden, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1145/3235765.3235778
[100]
Ellen Samuels. 2003. My Body, My Closet: Invisible Disability and the Limits of Coming-Out Discourse. GLQ: A Journal of Lesbian and Gay Studies 9, 1 (2003), 233–255.
[101]
Ellen Samuels. 2017. Six ways of looking at Crip Time. Disability Studies Quarterly 37, 3 (2017).
[102]
Phoebe Sengers, Kirsten Boehner, Shay David, and Joseph ’Jofish’ Kaye. 2005. Reflective Design. In Proceedings of the 4th Decennial Conference on Critical Computing: Between Sense and Sensibility (Aarhus, Denmark) (CC ’05). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1145/1094562.1094569
[103]
Sarah Sharma. 2014. Temporality and Cultural Politics. Duke University Press.
[104]
Ashley Shew. 2020. Ableism, Technoableism, and Future AI. IEEE Technology and Society Magazine 39, 1 (2020), 40–85. https://doi.org/10.1109/MTS.2020.2967492
[105]
Ashley Shew. 2023. Against Technoalism: Rethinking Who Needs Improvement. W. W. Norton & Company.
[106]
Jan Smits and Tijn Borghuis. 2022. Generative AI and Intellectual Property Rights. In Law and Artificial Intelligence: Regulating AI and Applying AI in Legal Practice. Springer, 323–344.
[107]
Katta Spiel. 2021. The Bodies of TEI – Investigating Norms and Assumptions in the Design of Embodied Interaction. In Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction (Salzburg, Austria) (TEI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 32, 19 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3430524.3440651
[108]
Katta Spiel, Fares Kayali, Louise Horvath, Michael Penkler, Sabine Harrer, Miguel Sicart, and Jessica Hammer. 2018. Fitter, Happier, More Productive? The Normative Ontology of Fitness Trackers. In Extended Abstracts of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (, Montreal QC, Canada, ) (CHI EA ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1145/3170427.3188401
[109]
Sophy Strand. 2021. I Will Not Be Purified. https://www.artpapers.org/i-will-not-be-purified
[110]
Cella M Sum, Rahaf Alharbi, Franchesca Spektor, Cynthia L Bennett, Christina N Harrington, Katta Spiel, and Rua Mae Williams. 2022. Dreaming Disability Justice in HCI. In Extended Abstracts of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (New Orleans, LA, USA) (CHI EA ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 114, 5 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3491101.3503731
[111]
Jordan Taylor, Ellen Simpson, Anh-Ton Tran, Jed Brubaker, Sarah Fox, and Haiyi Zhu. 2024. Cruising Queer HCI on the DL: A Literature Review of LGBTQ+ People in HCI. http://arxiv.org/abs/2402.07864 arXiv:2402.07864 [cs].
[112]
Cesar Torres, Sarah Sterman, Molly Nicholas, Richard Lin, Eric Pai, and Eric Paulos. 2018. Guardians of Practice: A Contextual Inquiry of Failure-Mitigation Strategies within Creative Practices. In Proceedings of the 2018 Designing Interactive Systems Conference (Hong Kong, China) (DIS ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1259–1267. https://doi.org/10.1145/3196709.3196795
[113]
Rachael Wakefield-Rann. 2017. Chemical Showers: How Daily Routines Structure Our Exposures to Toxicants. Engagement (2017). https://aesengagement.wordpress.com/2017/11/21/chemical-showers-how-daily-routines-structure-our-exposures-to-toxicants/
[114]
Elizabet Woyke. 2019. Smart cities could be lousy to live in if you have a disability. MIT Technology Review (2019).
Index Terms
- Queering/Cripping Technologies of Productivity
Recommendations
Measuring productivity in agile software development process: a scoping study
ICSSP 2015: Proceedings of the 2015 International Conference on Software and System ProcessAn agile software development process is often claimed to increase productivity. However, productivity measurement in agile software development is little researched. Measures are not explicitly defined nor commonly agreed upon. In this paper, we ...
Intersectionality and cyberbullying
Display Omitted Our paper applies an intersectional approach to the study of cyberbullying.We explore the conditional impact of race, gender, and sexuality on victimization.We conducted an original survey of students in a Midwestern high school (N=752)...
The Influence of Gender-Ethnic Intersectionality on Gender Stereotypes about IT Skills and Knowledge
One line of investigation in attempting to better understand the gender imbalance in the information technology (IT) field is to examine gender stereotypes about the skills and knowledge in the IT profession. A survey of 4046 university students in the ...
Comments
Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.Information & Contributors
Information
Published In
May 2024
4761 pages
ISBN:9798400703317
DOI:10.1145/3613905
Copyright © 2024 Owner/Author.
Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.
Sponsors
Publisher
Association for Computing Machinery
New York, NY, United States
Publication History
Published: 11 May 2024
Check for updates
Author Tags
Qualifiers
- Extended-abstract
- Research
- Refereed limited
Data Availability
Conference
Acceptance Rates
Overall Acceptance Rate 6,164 of 23,696 submissions, 26%
Contributors
Other Metrics
Bibliometrics & Citations
Bibliometrics
Article Metrics
- 0Total Citations
- 317Total Downloads
- Downloads (Last 12 months)317
- Downloads (Last 6 weeks)79
Reflects downloads up to 14 Aug 2024
Other Metrics
Citations
View Options
Get Access
Login options
Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.
Sign inFull Access
View options
View or Download as a PDF file.
PDFeReader
View online with eReader.
eReaderFull Text
View this article in Full Text.
Full TextHTML Format
View this article in HTML Format.
HTML Format