skip to main content
research-article

You’re Hired! A Phenomenographic Study of Undergraduate Students’ Pathways to Job Attainment in Computing

Published: 14 January 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Although there is a great demand for graduates in computing fields, companies frequently struggle to find enough workers. They may also grapple with obtaining racial, ethnic, and gender diversity in representation. It has been suggested that the hiring process further contributes to these inequities. This study examined undergraduate computing students’ experiences with technical interviews and their pathways to job attainment, focusing on men and women who identify as Black or African American, Hispanic or Latinx, Asian, and mixed-race. We applied the community cultural wealth framework and employed the methodology of phenomenography to investigate the different assets that students leveraged to succeed in obtaining a position. Our investigation centered around the conceptions of sixteen computing students, all of whom completed at least one technical interview and received at least one job offer. We conducted semi-structured interviews to explore their interpretations of the hiring process, the resources they utilized, and their perceptions of inclusivity in the field. The findings illustrated that students’ support mechanisms included the following categories of description: intrinsic characteristics, capitalizing on experience, community, preparation, and organizational. They relied heavily on distinct forms of capital, particularly social and navigational, to attain a job in computing. Peers and clubs or groups were essential for students to learn about what to expect during the hiring process, to help them prepare, and to make connections with employers. They also helped the students cope with the discrimination they faced throughout their professional trajectories. By investigating the various experiences students have, we contribute to the understanding of how hiring practices may be viewed as well as possible ways to provide support. While students must study for technical interviews and refine their skills and pertinacity in the face of obstacles, industry and academia should consider their role in hiring and its impact. Transparency in what to expect and enhanced preparation opportunities could serve to make the process more equitable for all job candidates.

References

[1]
Gerlese S. Åkerlind. 2005. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development 24, 4 (2005), 321–334.
[2]
Gerlese S. Åkerlind. 2012. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. Higher Education Research & Development 31, 1 (2012), 115–127.
[3]
Gerlese S. Åkerlind. 2018. What future for phenomenographic research? On continuity and development in the phenomenography and variation theory research tradition. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research 62, 6 (2018), 949–958.
[4]
Gerlese S. Åkerlind. 2022. Critique of the article, ‘Theoretical foundations of phenomenography: A critical review’. Higher Education Research & Development 42, 6 (2022), 1299–1308.
[5]
Lena Armstrong, Jayne Everson, and Amy J. Ko. 2023. Navigating a black box: Students’ experiences and perceptions of automated hiring. In Proceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research V.1 (ICER’23 V1) (Chicago, IL, USA). 148–158.
[6]
Peter Ashworth and Ursula Lucas. 2000. Achieving empathy and engagement: A practical approach to the design, conduct and reporting of phenomenographic research. Studies in Higher Education 25, 3 (2000), 295–308.
[7]
Mahnaz Behroozi, Chris Parnin, and Titus Barik. 2019. Hiring is broken: What do developers say about technical interviews?. In 2019 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC). IEEE, 1–9.
[8]
Mahnaz Behroozi, Shivani Shirolkar, Titus Barik, and Chris Parnin. 2020. Does stress impact technical interview performance?. In Proceedings of the 28th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference and Symposium on the Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE’20). ACM New York, NY, USA, Virtual Event, USA, 481–492.
[9]
Catherine G. P. Berdanier. 2022. A hard stop to the term “soft skills”. Journal of Engineering Education 111, 1 (2022), 14–18.
[10]
Pierre Bourdieu. 1986. The forms of capital. In Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education, John G. Richardson (Ed.). Greenwood New York, NY, 241–258.
[11]
Pierre Bourdieu. 2002. The Social Structure of the Economy. Polity, New York.
[12]
John Bowden. 2005. Reflections on the phenomenographic team research process. RMIT University Press, Melbourne, Chapter 2, 11–31.
[13]
John A. Bowden and Pamela J. Green. 2010. Relationality and the myth of objectivity in research involving human participants. In Researching Practice. Brill, 105–112.
[14]
John A. Bowden and Eleanor Walsh. 2000. Phenomenography. RMIT University Press.
[15]
André Brock, Lynette Kvasny, and Kayla Hales. 2010. Cultural appropriations of technical capital: Black women, weblogs, and the digital divide. Information, Communication & Society 13, 7 (2010), 1040–1059.
[16]
Gregory Bucks and William C. Oakes. 2011. Phenomenography as a tool for investigating understanding of computing concepts. In 2011 ASEE Annual Conference & Exposition. 1–21.
[17]
LaVar J. Charleston, Phillis L. George, Jerlando F. L. Jackson, Jonathan Berhanu, and Mauriell H. Amechi. 2014. Navigating underrepresented STEM spaces: Experiences of Black women in U.S. computing science higher education programs who actualize success. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education 7, 3 (2014), 166–176.
[18]
Marlene Chavez. 2018. Examining the Experiences of Latinx STEM Baccalaureates. Ph.D. Dissertation. Loyola University Chicago.
[19]
Phoebe K. Chua, Hillary Abraham, and Melissa Mazmanian. 2021. Playing the hiring game: Class-based emotional experiences and tactics in elite hiring. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 5, CSCW2 (2021), 1–27.
[20]
Phoebe K. Chua and Melissa Mazmanian. 2020. Are you one of us?: Current hiring practices suggest the potential for class biases in large tech companies. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 3, CSCW2 (2020), 1–20.
[21]
Phoebe K. Chua and Melissa Mazmanian. 2022. The substance of style: How social class-based styles of interpersonal interaction shape hiring assessments at large technology companies. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 6, CSCW2 (2022), 1–22.
[22]
Trish L. Clokie and Elna Fourie. 2016. Graduate employability and communication competence: Are undergraduates taught relevant skills? Business and Professional Communication Quarterly 79, 4 (2016), 442–463.
[23]
Deborah A. Cobb-Clark. 2015. Locus of control and the labor market. IZA Journal of Labor Economics 4 (2015), 1–19.
[24]
Kimberle Crenshaw. 1993. Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review 43, 6 (1993), 1241–1299.
[25]
Israel Mbekezeli Dabengwa, Sarah Young, and Patrick Ngulube. 2023. Rigour in phenomenological and phenomenography studies: A scoping review of library and information science research. Library & Information Science Research 45, 1 (2023), 101219.
[26]
Maya Denton and Maura Borrego. 2021. Navigational capital of Latinx engineering transfer students: A qualitative study. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering 27, 2 (2021).
[27]
Maya Denton, Maura Borrego, and Audrey Boklage. 2020. Community cultural wealth in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics education: A systematic review. Journal of Engineering Education 109, 3 (2020), 556–580.
[28]
Remy Dou, Zahra Hazari, Katherine Dabney, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip Sadler. 2019. Early informal STEM experiences and STEM identity: The importance of talking science. Science Education 103, 3 (2019), 623–637.
[29]
Michael J. Dumas and Kihana Miraya Ross. 2016. “Be real Black for me”’: Imagining BlackCrit in education. Urban Education 51, 4 (2016), 415–442.
[30]
Sheena Erete, Yolanda A. Rankin, and Jakita O. Thomas. 2021. I can’t breathe: Reflections from Black women in CSCW and HCI. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 4, CSCW3 (2021), 1–23.
[31]
Marisa Exter, Secil Caskurlu, and Todd Fernandez. 2018. Comparing computing professionals’ perceptions of importance of skills and knowledge on the job and coverage in undergraduate experiences. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 18, 4 (2018), 1–29.
[32]
Sally Fincher and Janet Finlay. 2016. Computing Graduate Employability: Sharing Practice. Project report. Council of Professors and Heads of Computing, Kent, UK. http://kar.kent.ac.uk/53848/
[33]
Guadalupe Garibay. 2016. Self-efficacy Beliefs of Underrepresented Minorities in Science, Technology, Engineering, and Math. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Southern California.
[34]
Carla D. Goar. 2007. Social identity theory and the reduction of inequality: Can cross-cutting categorization reduce inequality in mixed-race groups? Social Behavior and Personality 35, 4 (2007), 537–550.
[35]
Pam Green. 2005. A rigorous journey into phenomenography: From a naturalistic inquirer standpoint. RMIT University Press, Melbourne, Chapter 3, 32–46.
[36]
Jean Griffin, Legand Burge, Sally Goldman, Diego Aguierre, Juan Alonso Cruz, April Alvarez, Albert Cervantes, Shameeka Emanuel, Ann Gates, Daniel Gillick, Christopher Hogan, Jeremy Hurwitz, Janaki Lahorani, Mary Jo Madda, Olumid Malomo, Jenn Marroquin, Nisha Masharani, Alycia Onowho, Angela Pablo, and Jason Randolph. 2022. Innovative courses that broaden awareness of CS careers and prepare students for technical interviews. Journal of Computing Sciences in Colleges 38, 5 (2022), 54–64.
[37]
Kris Gutiérrez, Patricia Baquedano-López, and Myrna Gwen Turner. 1997. Putting language back into language arts: When the radical middle meets the third space. Language Arts 74, 5 (1997), 368–378.
[38]
Kris D. Gutierrez. 1995. Unpackaging academic discourse. Discourse Processes 19, 1 (1995), 21–37.
[39]
Mark Guzdial, Barbara J. Ericson, Tom McKlin, and Shelly Engelman. 2012. A statewide survey on computing education pathways and influences: Factors in broadening participation in computing. In Proceedings of the Ninth Annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research. 143–150.
[40]
Biörn Hasselgren and Dennis Beach. 1997. Phenomenography - A “good-for-nothing brother” of phenomenology? Outline of an analysis. Higher Education Research & Development 16, 2 (1997), 191–202.
[41]
Hendra Hidayat, Boy Yendra Tamin, Susi Herawati, Zadrian Ardi, and Anggarda Paramita Muji. 2020. The contribution of internal locus of control and self-concept to career maturity in engineering education. International Journal on Advanced Science, Engineering and Information Technology 10, 6 (2020), 2282–2289.
[42]
Apriel K. Hodari, Maria Ong, Lily T. Ko, and Rachel R. Kachchaf. 2014. New enactments of mentoring and activism: U.S. women of color in computing education and careers. In Proceedings of the Tenth Annual Conference on International Computing Education Research. 83–90.
[43]
Matthew T. Hora, Ross J. Benbow, and Bailey B. Smolarek. 2018. Re-thinking soft skills and student employability: A new paradigm for undergraduate education. Change: The Magazine of Higher Learning 50, 6 (2018), 30–37.
[44]
Roxanne Hughes, Jennifer Schellinger, and Kari Roberts. 2021. The role of recognition in disciplinary identity for girls. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 58, 3 (2021), 420–455.
[45]
Nuria Jaumot-Pascual, Maria Ong, Christina Silva, and Audrey Martínez-Gudapakkam. 2021. Women of color leveraging community cultural wealth to persist in computing and tech graduate education: A qualitative meta-synthesis. Education Sciences 11, 797 (2021), 1–21.
[46]
Anders Johansson. 2015. Uniformity in Physics Courses and Student Diversity: A Study of Learning to Participate in Physics. Ph.D. Dissertation. Uppsala University.
[47]
Amanpreet Kapoor and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2019. Understanding CS undergraduate students’ professional identity through the lens of their professional development. In Proceedings of 24th Annual ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE’19). ACM, 9–15.
[48]
Amanpreet Kapoor, Sajani Panchal, and Christina Gardner-McCune. 2023. Implementation and evaluation of technical interview preparation activities in a data structures and algorithms course. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1 (SIGCSE 2023). ACM, Toronto, ON, Canada, 1–7.
[49]
Marguerite Koole. 2023. Phenomenography. In Varieties of Qualitative Research Methods: Selected Contextual Perspectives. Springer, 371–376.
[50]
Jan Larsson and Inger Holmström. 2007. Phenomenographic or phenomenological analysis: Does it matter? Examples from a study on anaesthesiologists’ work. International Journal of Qualitative Studies on Health and Well-being 2, 1 (2007), 55–64.
[51]
Kathleen J. Lehman, Julia Rose Karpicz, Veronika Rozhenkova, Jamelia Harris, and Tomoko M. Nakajima. 2021. Growing enrollments require us to do more: Perspectives on broadening participation during an undergraduate computing enrollment boom. In Proceedings of the 52nd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 809–815.
[52]
Terri Lenox, Gayle Jesse, and Charles Robert Woratschek. 2012. Factors influencing students’ decisions to major in a computer-related discipline. Information Systems Education Journal 10, 6 (2012), 63–71.
[53]
Jan Lönnberg. 2012. Understanding and Debugging Concurrent Programs Through Visualisation. Ph.D. Dissertation.
[54]
Gunhild M. Lundberg, Birgit R. Krogstie, and John Krogstie. 2020. Becoming fully operational: Employability and the need for training of computer science graduates. In 2020 IEEE Global Engineering Education Conference (EDUCON). IEEE, 644–651.
[55]
Stephanie Lunn and Monique Ross. 2021. Methodology matters: Employing phenomenography to investigate experiences in computing fields and the application of theoretical frameworks. In 2021 IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference (FIE). IEEE, 1–9.
[56]
Stephanie Lunn and Monique Ross. 2021. Unnecessary hurdles: A systematic literature review examining the hiring process in computing. In 17th International Conference on Frontiers in Education: Computer Science & Computer Engineering (FECS’21). 2021 Springer Nature - Book Series: Transactions on Computational Science & Computational Intelligence.
[57]
Stephanie Lunn, Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Mark Allen Weiss, Michael Georgiopoulos, and Kenneth Christensen. 2021. How do educational experiences predict computing identity? ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 22, 2 (2021), 1–28.
[58]
Stephanie Lunn, Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Mark Allen Weiss, Michael Georgiopoulos, and Kenneth Christensen. 2021. The impact of technical interviews, and other professional and cultural experiences on students’ computing identity. In Proceedings of the 26th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education V. 1. 415–421.
[59]
Stephanie Lunn, Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Mark Allen Weiss, Tiana Solis, Michael Georgiopoulos, and Ken Christensen. 2021. Uneven playing field: Examining preparation for technical interviews in computing and the role of cultural experiences. In Proceedings of the 2021 American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) Annual Conference.
[60]
Stephanie Lunn, Leila Zahedi, Monique Ross, and Matthew Ohland. 2021. Exploration of intersectionality and computer science demographics: Understanding the historical context of shifts in participation. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 21, 2 (2021), 1–30.
[61]
Dillon Mahmoudi. 2017. Making Software, Making Regions: Labor Market Dualization, Segmentation, and Feminization in Austin, Portland and Seattle. Ph.D. Dissertation. Portland State University.
[62]
Ference Marton. 1981. Phenomenography - Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science 10, 2 (1981), 177–200.
[63]
Ference Marton. 1986. Phenomenography: A research approach to investigating different understandings of reality. Journal of Thought (1986), 28–49.
[64]
Ference Marton. 1988. Phenomenography: Exploring different conceptions of reality. Qualitative Approaches to Evaluation in Education: The Silent Scientific Revolution (1988), 176–205.
[65]
Ference Marton. 2000. The structure of awareness. Phenomenography 10216 (2000), 102–116.
[66]
Ference Marton and Shirley Booth. 1997. Learning and Awareness. Routledge, New York.
[67]
Ference Marton and Wing Yan Pong. 2005. On the unit of description in phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development 24, 4 (2005), 335–348.
[68]
Gayle Laakmann McDowell. 2015. Cracking the Coding Interview: 189 Programming Questions and Solutions. CareerCup, LLC.
[69]
Kihana Miraya Ross. 2020. Black space in education: Fugitive resistance in the afterlife of school segregation. In The Future is Black: Afropessimism, Fugitivity, and Radical Hope in Education, Carl A. Grant, Ashley N. Woodson, and Michael J. Dumas (Eds.). Routledge, 47–54.
[70]
Srivalli Vilapakkam Nagarajan. 2011. Professional Work Experiences of Recent Australian Information Technology Graduates. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Technology, Sydney.
[71]
Terry Ng-Knight and Ingrid Schoon. 2017. Can locus of control compensate for socioeconomic adversity in the transition from school to work? Journal of Youth and Adolescence 46, 10 (2017), 2114–2128.
[72]
Alannah Oleson, Benjamin Xie, Jean Salac, Jayne Everson, F. Megumi Kivuva, and Amy J. Ko. 2022. A decade of demographics in computing education research: A critical review of trends in collection, reporting, and use. In Proceedings of the 2022 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research-Volume 1. 323–343.
[73]
Maria Ong, Janet M. Smith, and Lily T. Ko. 2018. Counterspaces for women of color in STEM higher education: Marginal and central spaces for persistence and success. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 55, 2 (2018), 206–245.
[74]
Funda Ornek. 2008. An overview of a theoretical framework of phenomenography in qualitative education research: An example from physics education research. In Asia-Pacific Forum on Science Learning and Teaching, Vol. 9.
[75]
Ilias O. Pappas, Michail N. Giannakos, and Letizia Jaccheri. 2016. Investigating factors influencing students’ intention to dropout computer science studies. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education. 198–203.
[76]
Lorraine Dacre Pool and Peter Sewell. 2007. The key to employability: Developing a practical model of graduate employability. Education + Training (2007).
[77]
Blanca E. Rincón and Sarah Rodriguez. 2021. Latinx students charting their own STEM pathways: How community cultural wealth informs their STEM identities. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education 20, 2 (2021), 149–163.
[78]
Jane Ritchie, Jane Lewis, Carol McNaughton Nicholls, and Rachel Ormston (Eds.). 2013. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. SAGE.
[79]
Sarah Rodriguez, Kelly Cunningham, and Alec Jordan. 2019. STEM identity development for Latinas: The role of self-and outside recognition. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education 18, 3 (2019), 254–272.
[80]
Adam Rosenstein, Aishma Raghu, and Leo Porter. 2020. Identifying the prevalence of the impostor phenomenon among computer science students. In Proceedings of the 51st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 30–36.
[81]
Monique Ross, Zahra Hazari, Gerhard Sonnert, and Philip Sadler. 2020. The intersection of being Black and being a woman: Examining the effect of social computing relationships on computer science career choice. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE) 20, 2 (2020), 1–15.
[82]
Monique S. Ross, James L. Huff, and Allison Godwin. 2021. Resilient engineering identity development critical to prolonged engagement of Black women in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 110, 1 (2021), 92–113.
[83]
Julian B. Rotter. 1954. Social Learning and Clinical Psychology. Prentice-Hall, Inc.
[84]
Noah Salzman. 2014. A Phenomenographic Study of Students’ Experiences with Transition from Pre-college Engineering Programs to First-year Engineering. Ph.D. Dissertation. Purdue University.
[85]
Cate C. Samuelson and Elizabeth Litzler. 2016. Community cultural wealth: An assets-based approach to persistence of engineering students of color. Journal of Engineering Education 105, 1 (2016), 93–117.
[86]
Daniel Solórzano, Miguel Ceja, and Tara Yosso. 2000. Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate: The experiences of African American college students. Journal of Negro Education 69, 1/2 (2000), 60–73.
[87]
Daniel G. Solórzano and Octavio Villalpando. 1998. Critical race theory, marginality, and the experience of students of color in higher education. Sociology of Education: Emerging Perspectives 21 (1998), 211–222.
[88]
Daniel G. Solórzano, Octavio Villalpando, and Leticia Oseguera. 2005. Educational inequities and Latina/o undergraduate students in the United States: A critical race analysis of their educational progress. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education 4, 3 (2005), 272–294.
[89]
Chiara Succi and Magali Canovi. 2020. Soft skills to enhance graduate employability: Comparing students and employers’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education 45, 9 (2020), 1834–1847.
[90]
Lennart Svensson. 1997. Theoretical foundations of phenomenography. Higher Education Research & Development 16, 2 (1997), 159–171.
[91]
Burcin Tamer and Jane G. Stout. 2016. Recruitment and retention of undergraduate students in computing: Patterns by gender and race/ethnicity. Computing Research Association. Available online: https://cra.org/cerp/research-findings/ (accessed on 18 July 2018) (2016).
[92]
DeLean Tolbert Smith. 2022. “They are here to support me”: Community cultural wealth assets and precollege experiences of undergraduate Black men in engineering. Journal of Engineering Education 111, 4 (2022), 750–769.
[93]
Keith Trigwell. 2000. A phenomenographic interview on phenomenography. Phenomenography 1 (2000), 62–82.
[94]
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2021. Labor Force Statistics from the Current Population Survey. https://www.bls.gov/cps/cpsaat11.pdf
[95]
U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. 2022. Computer and Information Technology Occupations, 2022. https://www.bls.gov/ooh/computer-and-information-technology/home.htm
[96]
U.S. Census Bureau. 2019. 2019: ACS 1-Year Estimate Data Profiles. https://data.census.gov/cedsci/
[97]
U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. 2016. Diversity in High Tech. https://www.eeoc.gov/special-report/diversity-high-tech
[98]
Joachim Walther, Nicola W. Sochacka, and Nadia N. Kellam. 2013. Quality in interpretive engineering education research: Reflections on an example study. Journal of Engineering Education 102, 4 (2013), 626–659.
[99]
Normaz Wana Ismail. 2013. Innovation and high-tech trade in Asian countries. In Proceedings from International Conference on Recent Developments in Asian Trade Policy and Integration. 1–19.
[100]
David C. Webb, Alexander Repenning, and Kyu Han Koh. 2012. Toward an emergent theory of broadening participation in computer science education. In Proceedings of the 43rd ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education. 173–178.
[101]
Kyla Windley and Edith Pan. 2020. Diversity in Tech: The Endpoint Problem. https://medium.com/swlh/diversity-in-tech-the-endpoint-problem-77f3265b6aab
[102]
Tara Yosso, William Smith, Miguel Ceja, and Daniel Solórzano. 2009. Critical race theory, racial microaggressions, and campus racial climate for Latina/o undergraduates. Harvard Educational Review 79, 4 (2009), 659–691.
[103]
Tara J. Yosso. 2005. Whose culture has capital?: A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth. Race Ethnicity and Education 8, 1 (2005), 69–91.
[104]
Jia Zhu, Stephanie J. Lunn, and Monique Ross. 2023. Characterizing women’s alternative pathways to a computing career using content analysis. In Proceedings of the 54th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 1. 158–164.
[105]
C. S. Zygmont and A. V. Naidoo. 2022. Phenomenography-an avant-garde approach to extend the psychology methodological repertoire. Qualitative Research in Psychology 19, 1 (2022), 1–19.

Index Terms

  1. You’re Hired! A Phenomenographic Study of Undergraduate Students’ Pathways to Job Attainment in Computing

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Transactions on Computing Education
      ACM Transactions on Computing Education  Volume 24, Issue 1
      March 2024
      412 pages
      EISSN:1946-6226
      DOI:10.1145/3613506
      • Editor:
      • Amy J. Ko
      Issue’s Table of Contents

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 14 January 2024
      Online AM: 09 December 2023
      Accepted: 16 November 2023
      Revised: 28 August 2023
      Received: 20 February 2023
      Published in TOCE Volume 24, Issue 1

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. Computing education
      2. hiring process in computing
      3. computing profession
      4. race
      5. ethnicity
      6. gender
      7. equity
      8. inclusivity
      9. technical interview preparation

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • 0
        Total Citations
      • 298
        Total Downloads
      • Downloads (Last 12 months)298
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)22
      Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      Full Access

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Full Text

      View this article in Full Text.

      Full Text

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media