research-article

Plagiarism in Take-home Exams: Help-seeking, Collaboration, and Systematic Cheating

Authors:

Petri IhantolaAuthors Info & Claims

ITiCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

Pages 238 - 243

https://doi.org/10.1145/3059009.3059065

Published: 28 June 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Due to the increased enrollments in Computer Science education programs, institutions have sought ways to automate and streamline parts of course assessment in order to be able to invest more time in guiding students' work.

This article presents a study of plagiarism behavior in an introductory programming course, where a traditional pen-and-paper exam was replaced with multiple take-home exams. The students who took the take-home exam enabled a software plugin that recorded their programming process. During an analysis of the students' submissions, potential plagiarism cases were highlighted, and students were invited to interviews.

The interviews with the candidates for plagiarism highlighted three types of plagiarism behaviors: help-seeking, collaboration, and systematic cheating. Analysis of programming process traces indicates that parts of such behavior are detectable directly from programming process data.

References

[1]

Cheryl L Aasheim, Paige S Rutner, Lixin Li, and Susan R Williams. 2012. Plagiarism and programming: A survey of student attitudes. Journal of Information Systems Education 23, 3 (2012), 297.

[2]

Alireza Ahadi, Raymond Lister, Heikki Haapala, and Arto Vihavainen. 2015. Exploring machine learning methods to automatically identify students in need of assistance. In Proceedings of the eleventh annual International Conference on International Computing Education Research. ACM, 121--130.

Digital Library

[3]

Jens Bennedsen and Michael E. Caspersen. 2007. Assessing Process and Product. Innovation in Teaching and Learning in Information and Computer Sciences 6, 4 (2007), 183--202.

[4]

Kevin W Bowyer and Lawrence O Hall. 1999. Experience using" MOSS" to detect cheating on programming assignments. In Frontiers in Education Conference, 1999. FIE'99. 29th Annual, Vol. 3. IEEE, 13B3--18.

[5]

Georgina Cosma and Mike Joy. 2008. Towards a definition of source-code plagiarism. IEEE Transactions on Education 51, 2 (2008), 195--200.

Digital Library

[6]

Fintan Culwin, Anna MacLeod, and Thomas Lancaster. 2001. Source code pla- giarism in UK HE computing schools. Issues, Attitudes and Tools, South Bank University Technical Report SBU-CISM-01-02 (2001).

[7]

Jurriaan Hage, Peter Rademaker, and Nikè van Vugt. 2011. Plagiarism Detection for Java: A Tool Comparison. In Computer Science Education Research Conference (CSERC '11). Open Universiteit, Heerlen, Open Univ., Heerlen, The Netherlands, The Netherlands, 33--46.

Digital Library

[8]

Frederik Hattingh, Albertus AK Buitendag, and Jacobus S Van Der Walt. 2013. Presenting an alternative source code plagiarism detection framework for improving the teaching and learning of programming. Journal of Information Technology Education 12 (2013), 45--58.

[9]

Petri Ihantola, Tuukka Ahoniemi, Ville Karavirta, and Otto Seppälä. 2010. Review of recent systems for automatic assessment of programming assignments. In Proceedings of the 10th Koli Calling International Conference on Computing Education Research. ACM, 86--93.

Digital Library

[10]

Petri Ihantola, Arto Vihavainen, Alireza Ahadi, Matthew Butler, Jürgen Börstler, Stephen H Edwards, Essi Isohanni, Ari Korhonen, Andrew Petersen, Kelly Rivers, and others. 2015. Educational data mining and learning analytics in programming: Literature review and case studies. In Proceedings of the 2015 ITiCSE on Working Group Reports. ACM, 41--63.

Digital Library

[11]

Mike Joy, Georgina Cosma, Jane Yin-Kim Yau, and Jane Sinclair. 2011. Source code plagiarism--a student perspective. IEEE Transactions on Education 54, 1 (2011), 125--132.

Digital Library

[12]

Thomas Lancaster and Fintan Culwin. 2004. A comparison of source code plagiarism detection engines. Computer Science Education 14, 2 (2004), 101--112.

[13]

Juho Leinonen, Krista Longi, Arto Klami, Alireza Ahadi, and Arto Vihavainen. 2016. Typing Patterns and Authentication in Practical Programming Exams. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 160--165.

Digital Library

[14]

Vítor T Martins, Daniela Fonte, Pedro Rangel Henriques, and Daniela da Cruz. 2014. Plagiarism detection: A tool survey and comparison. In OASIcs-OpenAccess Series in Informatics, Vol. 38. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fuer Informatik.

[15]

Merriam-Webster Online. 2016. Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary. (2016). http://www.merriam-webster.com

[16]

Saul B Needleman and Christian D Wunsch. 1970. A general method applicable to the search for similarities in the amino acid sequence of two proteins. Journal of molecular biology 48, 3 (1970), 443--453.

[17]

Lutz Prechelt, Guido Malpohl, and Michael Philippsen. 2002. Finding plagiarisms among a set of programs with JPlag. J. UCS 8, 11 (2002), 1016.

[18]

Bernard Rosner. 1975. On the detection of many outliers. Technometrics 17, 2 (1975), 221--227.

[19]

Chanchal K Roy, James R Cordy, and Rainer Koschke. 2009. Comparison and evaluation of code clone detection techniques and tools: A qualitative approach. Science of Computer Programming 74, 7 (2009), 470--495.

Digital Library

[20]

Jose A. Ruiperez-Valiente, Giora Alexandron, Zhongzhou Chen, and David E. Pritchard. 2016. Using Multiple Accounts for Harvesting Solutions in MOOCs. In Proceedings of the Third (2016) ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale (L@S '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 63--70.

Digital Library

[21]

Johannes Schneider, Avi Bernstein, Jan Vom Brocke, Kostadin Damevski, and David C Shepherd. 2016. Detecting Plagiarism based on the Creation Process. arXiv preprint arXiv:1612.09183 (2016).

[22]

Judy Sheard, Martin Dick, Selby Markham, Ian Macdonald, and Meaghan Walsh. 2002. Cheating and Plagiarism: Perceptions and Practices of First Year IT Students. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '02). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 183--187.

Digital Library

[23]

Simon and Judy Sheard. 2016. Academic Integrity and Computing Assessments. In Proceedings of the Australasian Computer Science Week Multiconference (ACSW '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 3, 8 pages.

Digital Library

[24]

Esko Ukkonen. 1985. Algorithms for approximate string matching. Information and control 64, 1--3 (1985), 100--118.

Digital Library

[25]

Arto Vihavainen, Thomas Vikberg, Matti Luukkainen, and Martin Pärtel. 2013. Scaffolding Students' Learning Using Test My Code. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education (ITiCSE '13). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 117--122.

Digital Library

[26]

Tim West, Sue Ravenscroft, and Charles Shrader. 2004. Cheating and moral judgment in the college classroom: A natural experiment. Journal of Business Ethics 54, 2 (2004), 173--183.

[27]

Michael Yudelson, Roya Hosseini, Arto Vihavainen, and Peter Brusilovsky. 2014. Investigating automated student modeling in a Java MOOC. In Educational Data Mining 2014.

Cited By

Shin JWang BPinto Junior WGierl M(2024)An engagement-aware predictive model to evaluate problem-solving performance from the study of adult skills' (PIAAC 2012) process dataLarge-scale Assessments in Education10.1186/s40536-024-00194-y12:1Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-024-00194-y
Cui CHung JMalhotra VGoel HApoorv RStarner TJoyner DKim MWang XXia M(2024)Examinator v4.0 : Cheating Detection in Online Take-Home ExamsProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3664659(330-334)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3657604.3664659
Richards MWaugh KSlaymaker MPetre MWoodthorpe JGooch D(2024)Bob or Bot: Exploring ChatGPT's Answers to University Computer Science AssessmentACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363328724:1(1-32)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3633287
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Plagiarism in Take-home Exams: Help-seeking, Collaboration, and Systematic Cheating
1. Social and professional topics
  1. Professional topics
    1. Computing education

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ITiCSE '17: Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

June 2017

412 pages

ISBN:9781450347044

DOI:10.1145/3059009

Conference Chairs:
Renzo Davoli
University of Bologna, Italy
,
Michael Goldweber
Xavier University, USA
,
Program Chairs:
Guido Rößling
Technische Universität Darmstadt, Germany
,
Irene Polycarpou
University of Central Lancashire, Cyprus

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

Sponsors

SIGCSE: ACM Special Interest Group on Computer Science Education

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 28 June 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ITiCSE '17

Sponsor:

SIGCSE

ITiCSE '17: Innovation and Technology in Computer Science Education

July 3 - 5, 2017

Bologna, Italy

Acceptance Rates

ITiCSE '17 Paper Acceptance Rate 56 of 175 submissions, 32%;

Overall Acceptance Rate 552 of 1,613 submissions, 34%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

41
Total Citations
View Citations
692
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)59
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)8

Reflects downloads up to 13 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Shin JWang BPinto Junior WGierl M(2024)An engagement-aware predictive model to evaluate problem-solving performance from the study of adult skills' (PIAAC 2012) process dataLarge-scale Assessments in Education10.1186/s40536-024-00194-y12:1Online publication date: 1-Mar-2024
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40536-024-00194-y
Cui CHung JMalhotra VGoel HApoorv RStarner TJoyner DKim MWang XXia M(2024)Examinator v4.0 : Cheating Detection in Online Take-Home ExamsProceedings of the Eleventh ACM Conference on Learning @ Scale10.1145/3657604.3664659(330-334)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3657604.3664659
Richards MWaugh KSlaymaker MPetre MWoodthorpe JGooch D(2024)Bob or Bot: Exploring ChatGPT's Answers to University Computer Science AssessmentACM Transactions on Computing Education10.1145/363328724:1(1-32)Online publication date: 14-Jan-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3633287
Parthasarathy PKapoor IJoshi SThomas S(2024)Influence of Personality Traits on Plagiarism Through Collusion in Programming AssignmentsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3632620.3671121(143-153)Online publication date: 12-Aug-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3632620.3671121
Liut MLy AXu JBanson JVrbik PHardin CStephenson BStone JBattestilli LRebelsky SShoop L(2024)"I Didn't Know": Examining Student Understanding of Academic Dishonesty in Computer ScienceProceedings of the 55th ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education V. 110.1145/3626252.3630753(757-763)Online publication date: 7-Mar-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3626252.3630753
Pirzado FAhmed AMendoza-Urdiales RTerashima-Marin H(2024)Navigating the Pitfalls: Analyzing the Behavior of LLMs as a Coding Assistant for Computer Science Students—A Systematic Review of the LiteratureIEEE Access10.1109/ACCESS.2024.344362112(112605-112625)Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3443621
Ahmad Zaini AWahid JGui HTookey J(2023)Why Do Students Plagiarise? An empirical study on Built Environment Students Amidst Covid-19Environment-Behaviour Proceedings Journal10.21834/ebpj.v8i24.46288:24(143-147)Online publication date: 19-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.21834/ebpj.v8i24.4628
Prather JReeves BDenny PBecker BLeinonen JLuxton-Reilly APowell GFinnie-Ansley JSantos E(2023)“It’s Weird That it Knows What I Want”: Usability and Interactions with Copilot for Novice ProgrammersACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction10.1145/361736731:1(1-31)Online publication date: 29-Nov-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3617367
Hellas ALeinonen JSarsa SKoutcheme CKujanpää LSorva J(2023)Exploring the Responses of Large Language Models to Beginner Programmers’ Help RequestsProceedings of the 2023 ACM Conference on International Computing Education Research - Volume 110.1145/3568813.3600139(93-105)Online publication date: 7-Aug-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3568813.3600139
Oltra-Massuet IAlvarez-Morera GFullana C(2022)Flipped Exams as a Reliable and Formative Assessment Tool in Higher EducationHandbook of Research on Teacher and Student Perspectives on the Digital Turn in Education10.4018/978-1-6684-4446-7.ch012(237-263)Online publication date: 24-Jun-2022
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-4446-7.ch012
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents