research-article

Competence-confidence gap: a threat to female developers' contribution on github

Authors:

David RedmilesAuthors Info & Claims

ICSE-SEIS '18: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society

Pages 81 - 90

https://doi.org/10.1145/3183428.3183437

Published: 27 May 2018 Publication History

Abstract

On GitHub, contributing to a new project is crucial for a developer to gain personal growth and maximize impact in the community. It is known that female developers are often hesitant to explore the opportunities to contribute to new projects even when they possess the competence to make valuable contributions. Drawing from the literature of the competence-confidence gap, we develop a fresh explanation for this phenomenon. We validate the theoretical explanation through an empirical study using GitHub's historical data. In this study, we identify all female developers ranking in top 5,000 GitHub users. Using the Granger Causality Test, we find that, for the majority of identified female developers, initiating a pull request to a new repository is "Granger" caused by the quick increase of followers in the preceding couple of weeks. For most male developers, our observations show that their new pull requests have no relationship with the dynamics of follower numbers. The results indicate that the competence-confidence gap is a threat to female developers' contribution on GitHub. The research suggests that helping female developers to overcome the competence-confidence gap is critical for encouraging female's contribution open source development, as well as growing their reputations and impacts in the community.

References

[1]

Joop Aué, Michiel Haisma, Kristín Fjóla Tómasdóttir, and Alberto Bacchelli. 2016. Social Diversity and Growth Levels of Open Source Software Projects on GitHub. In Proceedings of the 10th ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement (ESEM '16). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 41, 6 pages.

Digital Library

[2]

Paul G Bain, Leon Mann, and Andrew Pirola-Merlo. 2001. The innovation imperative: The relationships between team climate, innovation, and performance in research and development teams. Small group research 32, 1 (2001), 55--73.

[3]

Manuela Ed Barreto, Michelle K Ryan, and Michael T Schmitt. 2009. The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. American Psychological Association.

[4]

Laura Beckwith and Margaret Burnett. 2004. Gender: An important factor in end-user programming environments?. In Visual Languages and Human Centric Computing, 2004 IEEE Symposium on. IEEE, 107--114.

Digital Library

[5]

Carlo Berzuini, Philip Dawid, and Luisa Bernardinell. 2012. Causality: Statistical Perspectives and Applications. John Wiley & Sons.

[6]

Wiebe E Bijker, Thomas P Hughes, Trevor Pinch, and Deborah G Douglas. 2012. The Social Construction of Technological Systems: New Directions in the Sociology and History of Technology. MIT press.

[7]

Christian Bird, Peter C. Rigby, Earl T. Barr, David J. Hamilton, Daniel M. German, and Prem Devanbu. 2009. The Promises and Perils of Mining Git. In Proceedings of the 2009 6th IEEE International Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR '09). IEEE Computer Society, Washington, DC, USA, 1--10.

Digital Library

[8]

Margaret Burnett, Robin Counts, Ronette Lawrence, and Hannah Hanson. 2017. Gender HCI and Microsoft: Highlights from a Longitudinal Study. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE Symposium on Visual Languages and Human-Centric Computing (VL/HCC 2017). 139--143.

[9]

Margaret Burnett, Simone Stumpf, Jamie Macbeth, Stephann Makri, Laura Beckwith, Irwin Kwan, Anicia Peters, and William Jernigan. 2016. GenderMag: A method for evaluating software's gender inclusiveness. Interacting with Computers 28, 6 (2016), 760--787.

[10]

Tomas Chamorro-Premuzic. 2013. Why Do So Many Incompetent Men Become Leaders? Available at https://hbr.org/2013/08/why-do-so-many-incompetent-men. (2013). {Online; accessed 09/26/2017}.

[11]

Sapna Cheryan, Victoria C Plaut, Paul G Davies, and Claude M Steele. 2009. Ambient belonging: how stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of personality and social psychology 97, 6 (2009), 1045.

[12]

J. McGrath Cohoon. 2001. Toward Improving Female Retention in the Computer Science Major. Commun. ACM 44, 5 (May 2001), 108--114.

Digital Library

[13]

James Damore. 2017. Google's Ideological Echo Chamber-How bias clouds our thinking about diversity and inclusion. Available at https://goo.gl/sH4soj. (2017). {Online; accessed 09/26/2017}.

[14]

datausa.io. 2015. Demographics of Software Developers (2015). https://datausa.io/profile/soc/15113X/. (2015). {Online; accessed 09/26/2017}.

[15]

Sergio Cozzetti B. de Souza, Nicolas Anquetil, and Káthia M. de Oliveira. 2005. A Study of the Documentation Essential to Software Maintenance. In Proceedings of the 23rd Annual International Conference on Design of Communication: Documenting & Designing for Pervasive Information (SIGDOC '05). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 68--75.

Digital Library

[16]

Steve Easterbrook, Janice Singer, Margaret-Anne Storey, and Daniela Damian. 2008. Selecting empirical methods for software engineering research. Guide to advanced empirical software engineering (2008), 285--311.

Digital Library

[17]

Nancy Eisenberg, Randy Lennon, and Karlsson Roth. 1983. Prosocial development: A longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology 19, 6 (1983), 846.

[18]

Casey Fiesler, Shannon Morrison, R. Benjamin Shapiro, and Amy S. Bruckman. 2017. Growing Their Own: Legitimate Peripheral Participation for Computational Learning in an Online Fandom Community. In Proceedings of the 2017 ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work and Social Computing (CSCW '17). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 1375--1386.

Digital Library

[19]

Alyssa Frazee. 2014. Exploring the data on gender and GitHub repo ownership. Available at http://alyssafrazee.com/2014/06/04/gender-and-github-code.html. (2014). {Online; accessed 09/26/2017}.

[20]

Sainyam Galhotra, Yuriy Brun, and Alexandra Meliou. 2017. Fairness Testing: Testing Software for Discrimination. In Proceedings of the 2017 11th Joint Meeting on Foundations of Software Engineering (ESEC/FSE 2017). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 498--510.

Digital Library

[21]

Yaping Gong, Jia-Chi Huang, and Jiing-Lih Farh. 2009. Employee learning orientation, transformational leadership, and employee creativity: The mediating role of employee creative self-efficacy. Academy of management Journal 52, 4 (2009), 765--778.

[22]

Cecilia M. Gorriz and Claudia Medina. 2000. Engaging Girls with Computers Through Software Games. Commun. ACM 43, 1 (Jan. 2000), 42--49.

Digital Library

[23]

Georgios Gousios. 2013. The GHTorent Dataset and Tool Suite. In Proceedings of the 10th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR '13). IEEE Press, Piscataway, NJ, USA, 233--236.

Digital Library

[24]

Clive WJ Granger. 1969. Investigating causal relations by econometric models and cross-spectral methods. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society 37, 3 (1969), 424--438.

[25]

Clive WJ Granger. 1980. Testing for causality: a personal viewpoint. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control 2 (1980), 329--352.

[26]

Clive W.J. Granger. 2004. Time Series Analysis, Cointegration, and Applications. American Economic Review 94, 3 (June 2004), 421--425.

[27]

Laura Guillén, Margarita Mayo, and Natalia Karelaia. 2016. The competence-confidence gender gap: Being competent is not (always) enough for women to appear confident. Journal of Applied Psychology, In Submission (2016).

[28]

Gahgene Gweon, Jane Ngai, and Jenica Rangos. 2005. Exposing Middle School Girls to Programming via Creative Tools. In Proceedings of the 2005 IFIP TC13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT'05). Springer-Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 431--442.

Digital Library

[29]

John Harvey, David Golightly, and Andrew Smith. 2014. HCI As a Means to Prosociality in the Economy. In Proceedings of the 32Nd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '14). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2955--2964.

Digital Library

[30]

Carl Hempel. 2009. Scientific Explanation. Philosophy of Science: An Historical Anthology (2009), 344.

[31]

Claudia Hilderbrand, Charles Hill, Anita Sarma, Amber Horvath, Logan Simpson, Nupoor Patil, Zoe Steine-Hanson, Hema Susmita Pedala, Christopher Mendez, and Margaret Burnett. 2017. Open Source barriers to entry, revisited: A tools perspective. Technical report (Oregon State University. Dept. of Computer Science) (2017).

[32]

Michael A Hogg and Elizabeth A Hardie. 1991. Social Attraction, Personal Attraction, and Self-Categorization-, A Field Study. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 17, 2 (1991), 175--180.

[33]

James Howison, Andrea Wiggins, and Kevin Crowston. 2011. Validity issues in the use of social network analysis with digital trace data. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 12, 12 (2011), 767.

[34]

Nicole Immorlica, Greg Stoddard, and Vasilis Syrgkanis. 2015. Social Status and Badge Design. In Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW'15). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee, Republic and Canton of Geneva, Switzerland, 473--483.

Digital Library

[35]

Daniel Kahneman and Amos Tversky. 1979. Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica: Journal of the econometric society (1979), 263--291.

[36]

Eirini Kalliamvakou, Georgios Gousios, Kelly Blincoe, Leif Singer, Daniel M. German, and Daniela Damian. 2014. The Promises and Perils of Mining GitHub. In Proceedings of the 11th Working Conference on Mining Software Repositories (MSR 2014). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 92--101.

Digital Library

[37]

Katty Kay and Claire Shipman. 2014. The Confidence Gap. https://www.theatlantic.com/magazine/archive/2014/05/the-confidence-gap/359815/. (2014). {Online; accessed 20-October-2017}.

[38]

Mary Kirk. 2009. Language as Social Institution: The Male-Centered IT Culture. In Gender and Information Technology: Moving Beyond Access to Co-Create Global Partnership. IGI Global, 119--142.

[39]

Barbara A. Kitchenham, Shari Lawrence Pfleeger, Lesley M. Pickard, Peter W. Jones, David C. Hoaglin, Khaled El Emam, and Jarrett Rosenberg. 2002. Preliminary Guidelines for Empirical Research in Software Engineering. IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng. 28, 8 (Aug. 2002), 721--734.

Digital Library

[40]

Balachander Krishnamurthy, Phillipa Gill, and Martin Arlitt. 2008. A Few Chirps About Twitter. In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Online Social Networks (WOSN '08). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 19--24.

Digital Library

[41]

Min Kyung Lee, Sara Kiesler, and Jodi Forlizzi. 2011. Mining Behavioral Economics to Design Persuasive Technology for Healthy Choices. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '11). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 325--334.

Digital Library

[42]

Elinor M. Madigan, Marianne Goodfellow, and Jeffrey A. Stone. 2007. Gender, Perceptions, and Reality: Technological Literacy Among First-year Students. In Proceedings of the 38th SIGCSE Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education (SIGCSE '07). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 410--414.

Digital Library

[43]

Meredith Meyer, Andrei Cimpian, and Sarah-Jane Leslie. 2015. Women are underrepresented in fields where success is believed to require brilliance. Frontiers in Psychology 6, Article 235 (2015).

[44]

Paul Miller. 2013. Most active GitHub users. Available at https://gist.github.com/paulmillr/2657075. (2013). {Online; accessed 09/26/2017}.

[45]

Muriel Niederle and Lise Vesterlund. 2007. Do women shy away from competition? Do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics 122, 3 (2007), 1067--1101.

[46]

Karine Nyborg, John M Anderies, Astrid Dannenberg, Therese Lindahl, Caroline Schill, Maja Schlüter, W Neil Adger, Kenneth J Arrow, Scott Barrett, Stephen Carpenter, et al. 2016. Social norms as solutions. Science 354, 6308 (2016), 42--43.

[47]

Greg R Oldham and Anne Cummings. 1996. Employee creativity: Personal and contextual factors at work. Academy of management journal 39, 3 (1996), 607--634.

[48]

Judea Pearl. 2009. Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. Cambridge university press.

[49]

Dewayne E Perry. 2015. A framework for exploring unifying theories of empirical software engineering. Science of Computer Programming 101 (2015), 99--123.

[50]

Eva M Pomerantz, Ellen Rydell Altermatt, and Jill L Saxon. 2002. Making the grade but feeling distressed: Gender differences in academic performance and internal distress. Journal of Educational Psychology 94, 2 (2002), 396.

[51]

R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. http://www.R-project.org ISBN 3-900051-07-0.

[52]

P. Ralph. 2018. Toward Methodological Guidelines for Process Theories and Taxonomies in Software Engineering. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering (2018), To Appear.

[53]

Esther Ruiz Ben. 2007. Defining expertise in software development while doing gender. Gender, Work & Organization 14, 4 (2007), 312--332.

[54]

Brian Skyrms and William L Harper. 2012. Causation, Chance and Credence: Proceedings of the Irvine Conference on Probability and Causation. Vol. 1. Springer Science & Business Media.

[55]

Anne-Marie Slaughter. 2015. Why Women Still Can't Have It All. OneWorld.

[56]

Igor Steinmacher, Tayana Conte, Marco Aurélio Gerosa, and David F. Redmiles. 2015. Social Barriers Faced by Newcomers Placing Their First Contribution in Open Source Software Projects. In Proceedings of the 18th ACM Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work & Social Computing, CSCW 2015, Vancouver, BC, Canada, March 14 - 18, 2015. 1379--1392.

Digital Library

[57]

Loulou Storey. 2017. The Confidence Gap: A Guide To It And How To Reduce It. Available at http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/loulou-storey/the-confidence-gap-a-guid_b_18171592.html. (2017). {Online; accessed 09/26/2017}.

[58]

Margaret E Tankard and Elizabeth Levy Paluck. 2016. Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Social Issues and Policy Review 10, 1 (2016), 181--211.

[59]

Cheryl Tay, Soon Ang, and Linn Van Dyne. 2006. Personality, biographical characteristics, and job interview success: a longitudinal study of the mediating effects of interviewing self-efficacy and the moderating effects of internal locus of causality. Journal of Applied Psychology 91, 2 (2006), 446.

[60]

Josh Terrell, Andrew Kofink, Justin Middleton, Clarissa Rainear, Emerson Murphy-Hill, Chris Parnin, and Jon Stallings. 2017. Gender differences and bias in open source: Pull request acceptance of women versus men. PeerJ Computer Science 3 (2017), e111.

[61]

Jason Tsay, Laura Dabbish, and James Herbsleb. 2014. Influence of Social and Technical Factors for Evaluating Contribution in GitHub. In Proceedings of the 36th International Conference on Software Engineering (ICSE 2014). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 356--366.

Digital Library

[62]

Jason Tsay, Laura Dabbish, and James Herbsleb. 2014. Let's Talk About It: Evaluating Contributions Through Discussion in GitHub. In Proceedings of the 22Nd ACM SIGSOFT International Symposium on Foundations of Software Engineering (FSE 2014). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 144--154.

Digital Library

[63]

Bogdan Vasilescu, A. Capiluppi, and A. Serebrenik. 2012. Gender, Representation and Online Participation: A Quantitative Study of StackOverflow. In 2012 International Conference on Social Informatics (SocialInfo. 12). OUP, 332--338.

Digital Library

[64]

Bogdan Vasilescu, Daryl Posnett, Baishakhi Ray, Mark G.J. van den Brand, Alexander Serebrenik, Premkumar Devanbu, and Vladimir Filkov. 2015. Gender and Tenure Diversity in GitHub Teams. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 3789--3798.

Digital Library

[65]

Ronald L. Wasserstein and Nicole A. Lazar. 2016. The ASA's Statement on p-Values: Context, Process, and Purpose. The American Statistician 70, 2 (2016), 129--133.

[66]

James Wolf. 2011. A Reexamination of Gender-based Attitudes Toward Group Projects: Evidence from the Google Online Marketing Challenge. Comput. Hum. Behav. 27, 2 (March 2011), 784--792.

Digital Library

[67]

Lynne Zarbatany, Donald P Hartmann, Donna M Gelfand, and Paul Vinciguerra. 1985. Gender differences in altruistic reputation: Are they artifactual? Developmental Psychology 21, 1 (1985), 97.

[68]

Yunfeng Zhang, Rachel K.E. Bellamy, and Wendy A. Kellogg. 2015. Designing Information for Remediating Cognitive Biases in Decision-Making. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '15). ACM, New York, NY, USA, 2211--2220.

Digital Library

Cited By

Jamieson JYamashita NFoong ERoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey M(2024)Predicting open source contributor turnover from value-related discussions: An analysis of GitHub issuesProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3597503.3623340(1-13)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597503.3623340
Simmonds JBastarrica MHitschfeld NMascaró PWistuba La Torre DMontenegro JCárdenas M(2024)Rethinking Gender Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives for CS and SE in a University SettingEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_23(399-412)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_23
Gama KPaganini LPrado RFerraz CCoutinho DMendes WPinto GValença G(2024)Toward More Gender-Inclusive Game Jams and HackathonsEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_16(275-294)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_16
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Competence-confidence gap: a threat to female developers' contribution on github

Recommendations

Gender and Tenure Diversity in GitHub Teams
CHI '15: Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

Software development is usually a collaborative venture. Open Source Software (OSS) projects are no exception; indeed, by design, the OSS approach can accommodate teams that are more open, geographically distributed, and dynamic than commercial teams. ...
Investigating the effects of gender bias on GitHub
ICSE '19: Proceedings of the 41st International Conference on Software Engineering

Diversity, including gender diversity, is valued by many software development organizations, yet the field remains dominated by men. One reason for this lack of diversity is gender bias. In this paper, we study the effects of that bias by using an ...
Child Problem Behavior and Parent Factors Impacting Parent Engagement and Children’s Social Competence During Head Start

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences

ICSE-SEIS '18: Proceedings of the 40th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society

May 2018

108 pages

ISBN:9781450356619

DOI:10.1145/3183428

Conference Chairs:
Valerie Issarny
Inria, France
,
Schahram Dustdar
TU Wien, Austria

Copyright © 2018 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

Sponsors

SIGSOFT: ACM Special Interest Group on Software Engineering
IEEE-CS: Computer Society

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 27 May 2018

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Conference

ICSE '18

Sponsor:

SIGSOFT
IEEE-CS

ICSE '18: 40th International Conference on Software Engineering

May 27 - June 3, 2018

Gothenburg, Sweden

Upcoming Conference

ICSE 2025

2025 IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering

April 26 - May 3, 2025

Ottawa , ON , Canada

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

38
Total Citations
View Citations
358
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)41
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)3

Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Jamieson JYamashita NFoong ERoychoudhury APaiva AAbreu RStorey M(2024)Predicting open source contributor turnover from value-related discussions: An analysis of GitHub issuesProceedings of the IEEE/ACM 46th International Conference on Software Engineering10.1145/3597503.3623340(1-13)Online publication date: 20-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3597503.3623340
Simmonds JBastarrica MHitschfeld NMascaró PWistuba La Torre DMontenegro JCárdenas M(2024)Rethinking Gender Diversity and Inclusion Initiatives for CS and SE in a University SettingEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_23(399-412)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_23
Gama KPaganini LPrado RFerraz CCoutinho DMendes WPinto GValença G(2024)Toward More Gender-Inclusive Game Jams and HackathonsEquity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_16(275-294)Online publication date: 21-Sep-2024
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4842-9651-6_16
Yue YWang YRedmiles D(2023)Off to a Good Start: Dynamic Contribution Patterns and Technical Success in an OSS Newcomer’s Early CareerIEEE Transactions on Software Engineering10.1109/TSE.2022.315607149:2(529-548)Online publication date: 1-Feb-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/TSE.2022.3156071
Chadbourne PEisty N(2023)Applications of Causality and Causal Inference in Software Engineering2023 IEEE/ACIS 21st International Conference on Software Engineering Research, Management and Applications (SERA)10.1109/SERA57763.2023.10197835(47-52)Online publication date: 23-May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/SERA57763.2023.10197835
Santos IPimentel JWiese ISteinmacher ISarma AGerosa M(2023)Designing for Cognitive Diversity: Improving the GitHub Experience for Newcomers2023 IEEE/ACM 45th International Conference on Software Engineering: Software Engineering in Society (ICSE-SEIS)10.1109/ICSE-SEIS58686.2023.00007(1-12)Online publication date: May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSE-SEIS58686.2023.00007
Paganini LGama KNolte ASerebrenik A(2023)Opportunities and constraints of women-focused online hackathons2023 IEEE/ACM 4th Workshop on Gender Equity, Diversity, and Inclusion in Software Engineering (GEICSE)10.1109/GEICSE59319.2023.00009(33-40)Online publication date: May-2023
https://doi.org/10.1109/GEICSE59319.2023.00009
Sedhain ALeon SRaasch RKuttal S(2023)Developers Foraging Behavior in Code Hosting Sites: A Gender PerspectiveHuman Interface and the Management of Information10.1007/978-3-031-35129-7_42(575-593)Online publication date: 9-Jul-2023
https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35129-7_42
Seker ADiri BArslan HAmasyalı M(2022)Open Source Software Development ChallengesResearch Anthology on Agile Software, Software Development, and Testing10.4018/978-1-6684-3702-5.ch102(2134-2164)Online publication date: 2022
https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-6684-3702-5.ch102
McCosker A(2022)Making sense of deepfakes: Socializing AI and building data literacy on GitHub and YouTubeNew Media & Society10.1177/1461444822109394326:5(2786-2803)Online publication date: 5-May-2022
https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448221093943
Show More Cited By

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents