research-article

Open access

Debiasing Desire: Addressing Bias & Discrimination on Intimate Platforms

Authors:

Jevan A. Hutson,

Jessie G. Taft,

Karen LevyAuthors Info & Claims

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, Volume 2, Issue CSCW

Article No.: 73, Pages 1 - 18

https://doi.org/10.1145/3274342

Published: 01 November 2018 Publication History

Abstract

Designing technical systems to be resistant to bias and discrimination represents vital new terrain for researchers, policymakers, and the anti-discrimination project more broadly. We consider bias and discrimination in the context of popular online dating and hookup platforms in the United States, which we call intimate platforms. Drawing on work in social-justice-oriented and Queer HCI, we review design features of popular intimate platforms and their potential role in exacerbating or mitigating interpersonal bias. We argue that focusing on platform design can reveal opportunities to reshape troubling patterns of intimate contact without overriding users' decisional autonomy. We identify and address the difficult ethical questions that nevertheless come along with such intervention, while urging the social computing community to engage more deeply with issues of bias, discrimination, and exclusion in the study and design of intimate platforms.

References

[1]

Samantha Allen. 2015. 'No Blacks is not a sexual preference. It's racism. The Daily Beast (2015). https://www. thedailybeast.com/no-blacks-is-not-a-sexual-preference-its-racism

[2]

AppAnnie. 2018. Top grossing dating apps for iOS. appannie.com

[3]

George Ayala, Trista Bingham, Junyeop Kim, Darrell P Wheeler, and Gregorio A Millett. 2012. Modeling the impact of social discrimination and financial hardship on the sexual risk of HIV among Latino and Black men who have sex with men. Am J Public Health 102, S2 (2012), S242--S249.

[4]

James A Bany, Belinda Robnett, and Cynthia Feliciano. 2014. Gendered black exclusion: The persistence of racial stereotypes among daters. Race Soc Problems 6, 3 (2014), 201--213.

[5]

Sonu Bedi. 2015. Sexual racism: Intimacy as a matter of justice. J Politics 77, 4 (2015), 998--1011.

[6]

Lauren Berlant. 1998. Intimacy: A Special Issue. Crit Inquiry 24, 2 (1998), 281--288.

[7]

Lauren Berlant and Michael Warner. 1998. Sex in public. Critical inquiry 24, 2 (1998), 547--566.

[8]

David G. Blanchflower and Andrew J. Oswald. 2004. Money, sex and happiness: An empirical study. Scandinavian J Econ 106, 3 (Oct. 2004), 393--415.

[9]

Geoffrey C Bowker and Susan Leigh Star. 2000. Sorting things out: Classification and its consequences. MIT press.

Digital Library

[10]

Stacy M. Branham, Anja Thieme, Lisa P. Nathan, Steve Harrison, Deborah Tatar, and Patrick Olivier. 2014. Co-creating & identity-making in CSCW: revisiting ethics in design research. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing (CSCW '14). 305--308.

Digital Library

[11]

Ashley Brown. 2018. 'Least desirable'? How racial discrimination plays out in online dating. NPR.org. https://www. npr.org/2018/01/09/575352051/least-desirable-how-racial-discrimination-plays-out-in-online-dating.

[12]

Gustaf Bruze. 2015. Male and female marriage returns to schooling. Internat Econ Rev 56, 1 (Feb. 2015), 207--234.

[13]

BusinessWire. 2010. eHarmony, Inc. settles class action lawsuit over same-sex matching. BusinessWire (2010).

[14]

John T. Cacioppo, Stephanie Cacioppo, Gian C. Gonzaga, Elizabeth L. Ogburn, and Tyler J. VanderWeele. 2013. Marital satisfaction and break-ups differ across on-line and off-line meeting venues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 25 (June 2013), 10135--10140.

[15]

Denton Callander, Martin Holt, and Christy E Newman. 2012. Just a preference: Racialised language in the sex-seeking profiles of gay and bisexual men. Cult Health Sexual 14, 9 (2012), 1049--1063.

[16]

Denton Callander, Martin Holt, and Christy E Newman. 2016. 'Not everyone's gonna like me': Accounting for race and racism in sex and dating web services for gay and bisexual men. Ethnicities 16, 1 (2016), 3--21.

[17]

Denton Callander, Christy E. Newman, and Martin Holt. 2015. Is sexual racism really racism? Distinguishing attitudes toward sexual racism and generic racism among gay and bisexual men. Archive Sex Behav 44, 7 (Oct. 2015), 1991--2000.

[18]

Gilbert Caluya et al. 2006. The (gay) scene of racism: Face, shame and gay Asian males. Aust Crit Race Whiteness Studies Assoc J 2, 2 (2006), 1--14.

[19]

Pat Caplan. 2013. The cultural construction of sexuality. Routledge.

[20]

Matthew Chalmers and Ian MacColl. 2003. Seamful and seamless design in ubiquitous computing. In Workshop at the crossroads: The interaction of HCI and systems issues in UbiComp, Vol. 8.

[21]

Kat Chow and Elise Hu. 2013. Odds Favor White Men, Asian Women On Dating App. https://www.npr.org/sections/ codeswitch/2013/11/30/247530095/are-you-interested-dating-odds-favor-white-men-asian-women. NPR.org (2013).

[22]

Kent Chuang. 1999. Using chopsticks to eat steak. J Homosexuality 36, 3--4 (1999), 29--41.

[23]

KC Clements. 2017. 14 messages trans people want you to stop sending on dating apps. Into More (2017). https: //intomore.com/you/14-messages-trans-people-want-you-to-stop-sending-on-dating-apps/16a135a468014409

[24]

DaddyHunt. 2017. About DaddyHunt. https://www.daddyhunt.com/about-us

[25]

Dominic DiFranzo, Samuel Hardman Taylor, Franccesca Kazerooni, Olivia D Wherry, and Natalya N Bazarova. 2018. Upstanding by design: Bystander intervention in cyberbullying. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM.

Digital Library

[26]

Gail Dines. 2010. Pornland: How porn has hijacked our sexuality. Beacon Press.

[27]

Carl DiSalvo, Jonathan Lukens, Thomas Lodato, Tom Jenkins, and Tanyoung Kim. 2014. Making public things: how HCI design can express matters of concern. In Proceedings of the 17th ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work & social computing. 2397--2406.

Digital Library

[28]

Carl DiSalvo, Phoebe Sengers, and Hrönn Brynjarsdóttir. 2010. Mapping the landscape of sustainable HCI. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems. 1975--1984.

Digital Library

[29]

Lynn Dombrowski, Ellie Harmon, and Sarah Fox. 2016. Social justice-oriented interaction design: Outlining key design strategies and commitments. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM Conference on Designing Interactive Systems (DIS '16). 656--671.

Digital Library

[30]

John F Dovidio and Samuel L Gaertner. 2004. On the nature of contemporary prejudice. Race, class, and gender in the United States: An integrated study 6 (2004), 132--142.

[31]

Elizabeth F. Emens. 2008. Intimate discrimination: The state's role in the accidents of sex and love. Harvard L Rev (2008), 1307.

[32]

William N Eskridge. 2008. Dishonorable passions: Sodomy laws in America, 1861--2003. Penguin.

[33]

Eli J Finkel, Paul W Eastwick, Benjamin R Karney, Harry T Reis, and Susan Sprecher. 2012. Online dating: A critical analysis from the perspective of psychological science. Psychol Sci Public Interest 13, 1 (2012), 3--66.

[34]

San Francisco AIDS Foundation. {n. d.}. Building Healthy Online Communities Meeting Report, September 2014. http://sfaf.org/hiv-info/hot-topics/from-the-experts/building-healthy-online-communities-report.pdf

[35]

Tanja M Gerlach, Ruben C Arslan, Thomas Schultze, Selina K Reinhard, and Lars Penke. 2017. Predictive validity and adjustment of ideal partner preferences across the transition into romantic relationships. J Pers Soc Psychol (2017).

[36]

Tarleton Gillespie. 2010. The politics of 'platforms'. New Media Soc 12, 3 (2010), 347--364.

[37]

Adam Isaiah Green. 2008. The social organization of desire: The sexual fields approach. Sociol Theory 26, 1 (2008), 25--50.

[38]

Adam I. Green. 2016. Sexual capital and social inequality: The study of sexual fields. In Introducing the New Sexuality Studies, Nancy L. Fischer and Steven Seidman (Eds.). Routledge, London, 272--281.

[39]

Jeremy Greenwood, Nezih Guner, Georgi Kocharov, and Cezar Santos. 2015. Technology and the changing family: A unified model of marriage, divorce, educational attainment, and married female labor-force participation. In Institute for the Study of Labor Discussion Paper Series.

[40]

Graham Gremore. 2018. Jack'd to Grindr: Admit it! You promote racism and it needs to stop! https://www.queerty. com/jackd-grindr-admit-promote-racism-needs-stop-20171027. Queerty (2018).

[41]

Grindr. 2018. IntoMore. https://intomore.com/

[42]

Match Group. 2017. Match Group Overview. http://iac.com/brand/match-group.

[43]

Alan Han. 2006. I think you're the smartest race I've ever met: Racialised economies of queer male desire. Aust Crit Race Whiteness Studies Assoc J 2, 2 (2006), 1--14.

[44]

Chong-suk Han. 2007. They don't want to cruise your type: Gay men of color and the racial politics of exclusion. Social Identities 13, 1 (2007), 51--67.

[45]

Chong-suk Han. 2008. A qualitative exploration of the relationship between racism and unsafe sex among Asian Pacific Islander gay men. Archive Sex Behav 37, 5 (Oct. 2008), 827--837.

[46]

Chong-suk Han, George Ayala, Jay P Paul, Ross Boylan, Steven E Gregorich, and Kyung-Hee Choi. 2015. Stress and coping with racism and their role in sexual risk for HIV among African American, Asian/Pacific Islander, and Latino men who have sex with men. Archiv Sex Behav 44, 2 (2015), 411--420.

[47]

Mike Harding, Bran Knowles, Nigel Davies, and Mark Rouncefield. 2015. HCI, civic engagement & trust. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM, 2833--2842.

Digital Library

[48]

Jean Hardy and Silvia Lindtner. 2017. Constructing a desiring user: Discourse, rurality, and design in location-based social networks. ACM Press, 13--25.

Digital Library

[49]

Hornet. {n. d.}. Hornet Usage Guidelines. https://love.hornet.com/usage-guidelines/

[50]

Samantha Joel, Paul W Eastwick, and Eli J Finkel. 2017. Is romantic desire predictable? Machine learning applied to initial romantic attraction. Psychol Sci 28, 10 (2017), 1478--1489.

[51]

Norman J Johnson, Eric Backlund, Paul D Sorlie, and Catherine A Loveless. 2000. Marital Status and Mortality: The National Longitudinal Mortality Study. Annals of Epidemiology 10, 4 (May 2000), 224--238.

[52]

Owen Jones. 2016. No Asians, no black people. Why do gay people tolerate blatant racism? https://www.theguardian. com/commentisfree/2016/nov/24/no-asians-no-blacks-gay-people-racism. The Guardian (2016).

[53]

Gopinaath Kannabiran, Shaowen Bardzell, and Jeffrey Bardzell. 2012. Designing (for) desire: a critical study of technosexuality in HCI. In Proceedings of the 7th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction: Making Sense Through Design. ACM, 655--664.

Digital Library

[54]

Sally L Kitch. 2016. Anti-Miscegenation Laws. The Wiley Blackwell Encyclopedia of Gender and Sexuality Studies (2016).

[55]

Matthias Korn and Amy Voida. 2015. Creating friction: infrastructuring civic engagement in everyday life. In Proceedings of The Fifth Decennial Aarhus Conference on Critical Alternatives. Aarhus University Press, 145--156.

Digital Library

[56]

Robert E Kraut, Paul Resnick, Sara Kiesler, Moira Burke, Yan Chen, Niki Kittur, Joseph Konstan, Yuqing Ren, and John Riedl. 2012. Building successful online communities: Evidence-based social design. MIT Press.

Digital Library

[57]

Natasha Lennard. 2016. Can these pornographers end 'MILFs', 'Teens', and 'Thugs'? https://www.thenation.com/ article/can-changing-our-porn-vocabulary-change-porn-itself/. The Nation (2016).

[58]

Nancy Leong and Aaron Belzer. 2016. The new public accommodations: race discrimination in the platform economy. Geo. LJ 105 (2016), 1271.

[59]

Karen Levy and Solon Barocas. 2017. Designing against discrimination in online markets. Berkeley Tech L J 32, 3 (2017), 1183--1237.

[60]

Kevin Lewis. 2013. The limits of racial prejudice. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110, 47 (2013), 18814--18819. arXiv:http://www.pnas.org/content/110/47/18814.full.pdf

[61]

Ann Light. 2011. HCI as heterodoxy: Technologies of identity and the queering of interaction with computers. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (Sept. 2011), 430--438.

Digital Library

[62]

Ken-Hou Lin and Jennifer Lundquist. 2013. Mate selection in cyberspace: The intersection of race, gender, and education. Am J Sociol 119, 1 (2013), 183--215.

[63]

Ollie Locke and Jack Rogers. 2018. How one gay app is fighting racist body-shamers. https://www.advocate.com/ commentary/2018/1/04/how-one-gay-app-fighting-racist-body-shamers. The Advocate (2018).

[64]

Andrea Marshall. 2016. User agency as a feminist frame in human computer interaction and information science. IConference 2016 Proceedings (2016).

[65]

Gerald A Mendelsohn, Lindsay Shaw Taylor, Andrew T Fiore, and Coye Cheshire. 2014. Black/White dating online: Interracial courtship in the 21st century. Psychol Popular Media Culture 3, 1 (2014), 2.

[66]

Mike Miksche. 2017. Meet 9MONSTERS, the gay app where Grindr meets Tamagotchi. Slate (2017). http://www.slate. com/blogs/outward/2017/05/19/meet_9monsters_the_gay_hook_up_app_where_grindr_meet_tamagotchi.html

[67]

Don Norman. 2013. The design of everyday things: Revised and expanded edition. Constellation.

[68]

Katie Notopoulos. 2017. The dating app that knows you secretly aren't into guys from other races. Buzzfeed. https: //www.buzzfeed.com/katienotopoulos/coffee-meets-bagel-racial-preferences

[69]

Josue Ortega and Philipp Hergovich. 2017. The strength of absent ties: Social integration via online dating. arXiv preprint arXiv:1709.10478 (2017).

[70]

Natalie Oswin and Eric Olund. 2010. Governing intimacy. Environ Plann D 28 (2010), 60--67.

[71]

Erdman B. Palmore. 1982. Predictors of the longevity difference: A 25-Year follow-up. Gerontologist 22, 6 (Dec. 1982), 513--518.

[72]

Jay P Paul, George Ayala, and Kyung-Hee Choi. 2010. Internet sex ads for MSM and partner selection criteria: the potency of race/ethnicity online. J Sex Res 47, 6 (2010), 528--538.

[73]

Kavita Philip, Lilly Irani, and Paul Dourish. 2012. Postcolonial computing: A tactical survey. Sci Technol Human Values 37, 1 (2012), 3--29.

[74]

Voon Chin Phua and Gayle Kaufman. 2003. The crossroads of race and sexuality: Date selection among men in internet "personal" ads. J Family Issues 24, 8 (2003), 981--994.

[75]

Mary Dianne Plummer. 2007. Sexual racism in gay communities: Negotiating the ethnosexual marketplace. Ph.D. Dissertation.

[76]

Russell K Robinson. 2007. Structural dimensions of romantic preferences. Fordham L. Rev. 76 (2007), 2787.

[77]

Belinda Robnett and Cynthia Feliciano. 2011. Patterns of racial-ethnic exclusion by internet daters. Social Forces 89, 3 (2011), 807--828.

[78]

Michael J. Rosenfeld and Reuben J. Thomas. 2012. Searching for a mate: The rise of the Internet as a social intermediary. Am Sociol Rev 77, 4 (Aug. 2012), 523--547.

[79]

Christian Rudder. 2014. Dataclysm: Who we are (when we think no one's looking). Random House Canada.

Digital Library

[80]

Christian Rudder. 2014. We experiment on human beings. http://blog.okcupid.com/index.php/ we-experiment-on-human-beings. OK Trends: Dating Research from OKCupid (Blog) (2014).

[81]

Christine R Schwartz. 2013. Trends and variation in assortative mating: Causes and consequences. Annu Rev Sociol 39 (2013), 451--470

[82]

Jon Shadel. 2018. Are gay dating apps doing enough to respond to user discrimination? Vice (2018). https://www.vice. com/en_us/article/3k7bjy/are-gay-dating-apps-doing-enough-to-respond-to-user-discrimination

[83]

Aaron Smith. 2016. 15% of American adults have used online dating sites or mobile dating apps. Pew Research Center. http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/02/11/ 15-percent-of-american-adults-have-used-online-dating-sites-or-mobile-dating-apps/.

[84]

Hannah Smothers. 2016. This controversial new dating app feature allows yYou to choose which ethnicities you see. http://www.cosmopolitan.com/sex-love/a7204682/hinge-ethnicity-preference/

[85]

Ann Laura Stoler. 2010. Carnal knowledge and imperial power: Race and the intimate in colonial rule. Univ of California Press.

[86]

Patrick Strudwick. 2017. The founders of this gay dating app won't stop you searching by race. https://www.buzzfeed. com/patrickstrudwick/this-is-how-gay-dating-app-bosses-defend-racial-filtering

[87]

Samuel Hardman Taylor, Jevan Alexander Hutson, and Tyler Richard Alicea. 2017. Social consequences of Grindr use: Extending the Internet-enhanced self-disclosure hypothesis. In Proceedings of the 2017 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, 6645--6657.

Digital Library

[88]

Omer Tene and Jules Polonetsky. 2017. Taming the Golem: Challenges of ethical algorithmic decision-making. NCJL & Tech. 19 (2017), 125.

[89]

Stephanie T Tong, Jeffrey T Hancock, and Richard B Slatcher. 2016. Online dating system design and relational decision making: Choice, algorithms, and control. Pers Relation 23, 4 (2016), 645--662.

[90]

TrenchcoatX. 2018. About TrenchcoatX. https://trenchcoatx.com/tour/about/

[91]

Glenn T Tsunokai, Allison R McGrath, and Jillian K Kavanagh. 2014. Online dating preferences of Asian Americans. J Soc Pers Relat 31, 6 (2014), 796--814.

[92]

Chad Van De Wiele and Stephanie Tom Tong. 2014. Breaking boundaries: The uses & gratifications of Grindr. In Proceedings of the 2014 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous computing. ACM, 619--630.

Digital Library

[93]

Saúl Vargas and Pablo Castells. 2011. Rank and relevance in novelty and diversity metrics for recommender systems. In Proceedings of the fifth ACM conference on Recommender systems. ACM, 109--116.

Digital Library

[94]

Heather M Whitney. 2017. The autonomy defense of private discrimination. (2017).

[95]

Molly Wood. 2014. OKCupid plays With love in user experiments. https://www.nytimes.com/2014/07/29/technology/ okcupid-publishes-findings-of-user-experiments.html. The New York Times (2014).

[96]

Brian D Zamboni and Isiaah Crawford. 2007. Minority stress and sexual problems among African-American gay and bisexual men. Archiv Sex Behav 36, 4 (2007), 569--578.

Cited By

Jeong SWashispack SChen XWu CHatton MWang Y(2024)Asu Om Review Vol ISSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4744191Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4744191
Lustig CKaneko MGupta MDattani KDesjardins ARosner D(2024)Porous by Design: How Childcare Platforms Impact Worker Personhood, Safety, and ConnectionProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661552(1336-1349)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661552
Gunturi UKumar ADing XRho E(2024)Linguistically Differentiating Acts and Recalls of Racial Microaggressions on Social MediaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373668:CSCW1(1-36)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637366
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

Debiasing Desire: Addressing Bias & Discrimination on Intimate Platforms
1. Human-centered computing
  1. Interaction design
    1. Interaction design theory, concepts and paradigms

Recommendations

Disambiguating Algorithmic Bias: From Neutrality to Justice
AIES '23: Proceedings of the 2023 AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society

As algorithms have become ubiquitous in consequential domains, societal concerns about the potential for discriminatory outcomes have prompted urgent calls to address algorithmic bias. In response, a rich literature across computer science, law, and ...
Love me Tinder

First study to explore emerging adults' motivation to use the dating app Tinder.Motivations included Love, Casual Sex, Ease of Communication, Thrill of Excitement.Tinder motivations meaningfully related to offline encounters with Tinder matches.Tinder ...
Racial microaggressions and perceptions of Internet memes

Although more blatant forms of discrimination have declined, racial prejudice continues to manifest itself in subtle ways. For example, People of Color experience racial microaggressions (i.e., subtle slights or 'put downs') in their face-to-face ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction

Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction Volume 2, Issue CSCW

November 2018

4104 pages

EISSN:2573-0142

DOI:10.1145/3290265

Editors:
Karrie Karahalios
University of Illinois & Adobe
,
Andrés Monroy-Hernández
Snap Inc.
,
Airi Lampinen
Stockholm University
,
Geraldine Fitzpatrick
Vienna University of Technology

Issue’s Table of Contents

Copyright © 2018 Owner/Author.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike International 4.0 License.

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 01 November 2018

Published in PACMHCI Volume 2, Issue CSCW

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

46
Total Citations
View Citations
4,288
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)1,152
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)135

Reflects downloads up to 14 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Jeong SWashispack SChen XWu CHatton MWang Y(2024)Asu Om Review Vol ISSRN Electronic Journal10.2139/ssrn.4744191Online publication date: 2024
https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4744191
Lustig CKaneko MGupta MDattani KDesjardins ARosner D(2024)Porous by Design: How Childcare Platforms Impact Worker Personhood, Safety, and ConnectionProceedings of the 2024 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3643834.3661552(1336-1349)Online publication date: 1-Jul-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3643834.3661552
Gunturi UKumar ADing XRho E(2024)Linguistically Differentiating Acts and Recalls of Racial Microaggressions on Social MediaProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36373668:CSCW1(1-36)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3637366
Smith JSatwani ABurke RFiesler C(2024)Recommend Me? Designing Fairness Metrics with ProvidersProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3659044(2389-2399)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3630106.3659044
Alkhathlan MCachel KShrestha HHarrison LRundensteiner E(2024)Balancing Act: Evaluating People’s Perceptions of Fair Ranking MetricsProceedings of the 2024 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency10.1145/3630106.3659018(1940-1970)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3630106.3659018
Ma ZMei YLong YSu ZGajos K(2024)Evaluating the Experience of LGBTQ+ People Using Large Language Model Based Chatbots for Mental Health SupportProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642482(1-15)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3613904.3642482
Pendse SKumar NDe Choudhury M(2023)Marginalization and the Construction of Mental Illness Narratives Online: Foregrounding Institutions in Technology-Mediated CareProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101957:CSCW2(1-30)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610195
Domínguez Hernández ARamokapane KDas Chowdhury PMichalec OJohnstone EGodwin ECork ARashid A(2023)Co-creating a Transdisciplinary Map of Technology-mediated Harms, Risks and Vulnerabilities: Challenges, Ambivalences and OpportunitiesProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36101797:CSCW2(1-21)Online publication date: 4-Oct-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3610179
Biggs HMarcotte ABardzell S(2023)TikTok as a Stage: Performing Rural #farmqueer Utopias on TikTokProceedings of the 2023 ACM Designing Interactive Systems Conference10.1145/3563657.3596038(946-956)Online publication date: 10-Jul-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3563657.3596038
Choi DKim SLee SLim HYoo HHong H(2023)Love on the Spectrum: Toward Inclusive Online Dating Experience of Autistic IndividualsProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3544548.3581341(1-15)Online publication date: 19-Apr-2023
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3544548.3581341
Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Article

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Issue’s Table of Contents