skip to main content
article

Information visualization on large, high-resolution displays: issues, challenges, and opportunities

Published: 01 October 2011 Publication History

Abstract

Larger, higher-resolution displays are becoming accessible to a greater number of users as display technologies decrease in cost and software for the displays improves. The additional pixels are especially useful for information visualization where scalabitity has typically been limited by the number of pixels available on a display. But how will visualizations for larger displays need to fundamentally differ from visualizations on desktop displays? Are the basic visualization design principles different? With this potentially new design paradigm comes questions such as whether the relative effectiveness of various graphical encodings are different on large displays, which visualizations and datasets benefit the most, and how interaction with visualizations on large, high-resolution displays wit[ need to change. As we explore these possibilities, we shift away from the technical limitations of scalability imposed by traditional displays [e.g. number of pixels] to studying the human abilities that emerge when these limitations are removed. There is much potential for information visualizations to benefit from large, high-resolution displays, but this potential wit[ only be realized through understanding the interaction between visualization design, perception, interaction techniques, and the display technology. In this paper we present critical design issues and outline some of the challenges and future opportunities for designing visualizations for large, high-resolution displays. We hope that these issues, challenges, and opportunities will provide guidance for future research in this area.

References

[1]
Fekete JD and Plaisant C. Interactive information visualization of a million items. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization (InfoVis), IEEE Computer Society, Boston, MA, 2002; 117- 124.
[2]
Huber P. Huge data sets. Compstat '94, Physica: Vienna, Austria, 1994; 3-13.
[3]
Ball R, North C and Bowman D. Move to improve: Promoting physical navigation to increase user performance with large displays. CHI 2007, ACM: San Jose, CA, 2007; 3: 191-200.
[4]
Yost B, Haciahmetoglu Y and North C. Beyond visual acuity: The perceptual scalability of information visualizations for large displays. CHI 2007. San Jose, CA: ACM, 2007, pp. 101-110.
[5]
Shupp L, et al. Shaping the display of the future: The effects of display size and curvature on user performance and insights. Hum Comput Interact 2009; 24(1): 230-272.
[6]
Ni T, Bowman D and Chen J. Increased display size and resolution improve task performance in information-rich virtual environments. Graph Interface. Canadian Information Processing Society, Canada: Quebec City, 2006, pp. 139-146.
[7]
Czerwinski M, Tan D and Robertson G. Women take a wider view. CHI '02. Minneapolis, MN: ACM, 2002, pp. 195-202.
[8]
Andrews C, Endert A and North C. Space to think: Large, high-resolution displays for sensemaking. CHI ACM, 2010; 55-64.
[9]
Tan DS, Gergle D, Scupelli P and Pausch R. Physically large displays improve performance on spatial tasks. ACM Trans Comput Hum Interact 2006; 13(1): 71-99.
[10]
Bi X and Balakrishnan R. Comparing usage of a large highresolution display to single or dual desktop displays for daily work. Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, ACM: Boston, M_A, 2009; 1005-1014.
[11]
Ni T, et al. A survey of large high-resolution display technologies, techniques, and applications. IEEE Virtual Reality, IEEE Computer Society, Alexandria, VA, 2006; 223-234.
[12]
Ware C. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. Morgan Kaufmann, 2000.
[13]
Eick SG and Karr AF. Visual scalability. J Comput Graph Stat 2002; 11(1): 22-43.
[14]
Swaminathan K and Sato S. Interaction design for large displays. Interactions 1997; 4(1): 15-24.
[15]
Ball R and North C. Effects of tiled high-resolution die,plays on basic visualization and navigation tasks. Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '05), ACM: Portland, OR, 2005; 1196-1199.
[16]
Ball R, et al. Evaluating the benefits of tiled displays for navigating maps. IASTED-HCI '05, ACTA Press: Phoenix, AZ, 2005; 66-71.
[17]
Yost B and North C. The perceptual scalability of visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2006; 12(5): 837-844.
[18]
Polys N, Kim S and Bowman D. Effects of information layout, screen size, and field of view on user performance in information-rich virtual environments. Virtual Reality Software and Technology. Monetery, CA: ACM, 2005, pp. 46-55.
[19]
Endert A, Fink GA and North C. Visual analytics for cyber security: Observations and opportunities for large display workspaces. Technical Report, Virginia Tech, Blacksburg, Virginia. 2009.
[20]
Fink G, et al. Visualizing cyber security: Usable workspaces. VizSec, 2009.
[21]
Ball R and North C. An analysis of user behavior on high-resolution tiled displays. Tenth IFIP Ini:ernational Conference on Human-Computer Interaction (INTERACT 2005), ACM, 2005; 14.
[22]
Alphonse GA and Lubin J. Psychophysical requirements for tiled large screen displays. High-Resolution Displays and Projection Systems. San Jose, CA: SPIE, 1992, pp. 230-240.
[23]
Sawant AP and Healey CG. A Survey of Display Device Properties and Visual Acuity for Visualization. Raleigh: Department of Computer Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina, 2005.
[24]
Wigdor D, et al. Perception of elementary graphical elements in tabletop and multi-surface environments. CHI 2007. San Jose, CA: ACM, 2007, pp. 473482.
[25]
Endert A, Andrews C and North C. Visual Encodings that Support Physical Navigation on Large Displays. Graphics Interface (GI), Canadian Information Processing Society, St. John's, NL, 2011.
[26]
Ware C. Information Visualization: Perception for Design. The Morgan Kaufmann series in interactive technologies. San Francisco, CA: Morgan Kaufman, 2000.
[27]
Mackinlay JD and Heer J. Wideband displays: Mitigating multiple monitor seams. Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM: Vienna, Austria, 2004; 1521-1524.
[28]
Mackinlay JD, et al. City lights: Contextual views in minimal space. Extended Abstracts of Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM, Ft. Lauderdale, FL, 2003; 838-839.
[29]
Ebert A, et al. Tiled++: An enhanced tiled hi-res display wall. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2010; 16(1): 120-132.
[30]
Cleveland WS and McGill R. Graphical perception: Theory, experimentation and application to the development of graphical methods. J Am Star Assoc 1984; 79(387): 531-554.
[31]
Mackinlay JD. Automating the design of graphical presentations. ACM Trans Graph 1986; 5(2): 110-141.
[32]
Tessendorf D, et al. An ordering of secondary task display attributes. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM: Minneapolis, MN, 2002; 600-601.
[33]
Furnas GW and Bederson BB. Space-scale diagrams: Understanding muhiscale interfaces. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI '95), ACM, Denver, Colorado, 1995; 234-241.
[34]
Inselberg A. The plane with parallel coordinates. Vis Comput 1985; 1: 69-91.
[35]
Vogt K, et al. Co-located collaborative sensemaking on a large, high-resolution display with multiple input devices. INTERACT 2011.
[36]
Sandstrom TA, Henze C and Levit C. The hyperwall. Coordinated and Multiple Views in Exploratory Visualization (CMV). London: IEEE, 2003, pp. 124-133.
[37]
Stasko J, et al. Jigsaw: Supporting investigative analysis through interactive visualization. Inform Visual 2008; 7(2): 118-132.
[38]
Yost B and North C. The perceptual scalability of visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph (Proceedings Visualization/ Information Visualization 2006) 2006; 12(5): 837-844.
[39]
Robinson AC. Design for Synthesis in Geovisualization. University Park: Pennsylvannia State University, 2008.
[40]
Shipman F, et al. Emergent structure in analytic workspaces: Design and use of the visual knowledge builder. Proceedings of IFIP INTERACT'01 : Human-Computer Interaction, ACM, 2001; 132-139.
[41]
Robertson G, et al. The large-display user experience. IEEE Comput Graph Appl 2005; 25 (4): 44-51.
[42]
Guimbretiere F, Stone M and Winograd T. Fluid interaction with high-resolution wall size displays. ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, ACM: Orlando, FL, 2001; 11-14.
[43]
Baudisch P. Interacting with large displays. IEEE Comput 2006; 39(3): 96-97.
[44]
Isenberg P and Carpendale S. Interactive tree comparison for co-located collaborative information visualization. IEEE Trans Visual Comput Graph 2007; 13(6): 1232-1239.
[45]
Peck SM, North C and Bowman D. A multiscale interaction technique for large, high-resolution displays. Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE Symposium on 3D User Interfaces, IEEE Computer Society, Lafayette, Louisiana, 2009; 31-38.
[46]
Nowell L, Netzler E and Tanasse T. Change blindness in information visualization: A case study. IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, IEEE, San Diego, California, 2001; 15-22.
[47]
Bartram L, Ware C and Calvert T. Filtering and integrating visual information with motion. Inform Visual 2002; 1(1): 66-79.
[48]
Baudisch P, et al. Phosphor: Explaining transitions in the user interface using afterglow effects. User Interface Software and Technology (UIST), ACM, Montreux, Switzerland, 2006.
[49]
Myers B, et al. Interacting at a distance: Measuring the performance of laser pointers and other devices. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM, Minneapolis, Minnesota, 2002; 33-40.
[50]
Cheng K and Pulo K. Direct interaction with large-scale display systems using infrared laser tracking devices. Asia-Pacific Symposium on Information Visualization, Australian Computer Society: Adelaide, Australia, 2003; 67-74.
[51]
Benko H, Wilson A and Baudisch P. Precise selection techniques for multi-touch screens. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM: Montreal, Canada, 2006; 1263-1272.
[52]
Bezerianos A and Balakrishnan R. The vacuum: Facilitating the manipulation of distant objects. Human Factors in Computing Systems (CHI), ACM: Portland, OR, 2005; 361-370.
[53]
Collomb M, et al. Improving drag-and-drop on wall-size displays. Graphics Interface (GI), Canadian Information Processing Society, Victoria, BC, 2005; 25-32.
[54]
Sabri A, et al. High-resolution gaming: Interfaces, notifications and the user experience. Interact Comput.
[55]
Buennemeyer T, et al. Intelligence analysis using high resolution displays. IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI), Springer, San Diego, CA, 2006; 652-653.
[56]
Andrews C, et al. Cardtable: An embodied tool for analysis of historical information. IEEE Tabletop 2007, 2007.
[57]
Dourish P. Where the Action Is: The Foundations of Embodied Interaction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001.
[58]
Vogel D and Balakrishnan R. Distant freehand pointing and clicking on very large, high resolution displays. Proceedings of the 18th annual ACM symposium on User interface software and technology, ACM: Seattle, WA, 2005; 33-42.
[59]
North C, et al. Understanding multi-touch manipulation for surface computing. Proceedings of the 12th IFIP TC 13 International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction:Part II, Springer-Verlag: Uppsala, Sweden, 2009; 236-249.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Elephant in the Room: Expert Experiences Designing, Developing and Evaluating Data Visualizations on Large DisplaysProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981398:ISS(301-329)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Exploring Pointer Enhancement Techniques for Target Selection on Large Curved DisplayProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981358:ISS(214-235)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Impact of Display Field-of-view and Display Type on Text Readability and Visual Text Search on Large Displays in Virtual Reality: Impact of Display Field-of-view and Type on Text Readability and Search in Large VR DisplaysProceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference10.1145/3670947.3670984(1-11)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image Information Visualization
Information Visualization  Volume 10, Issue 4
Special issue on State of the Field and New Research Directions
October 2011
103 pages

Publisher

Palgrave Macmillan

Publication History

Published: 01 October 2011

Author Tags

  1. high-resolution displays
  2. information visualization
  3. interaction
  4. large
  5. visualization design guidelines

Qualifiers

  • Article

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • Downloads (Last 12 months)0
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0
Reflects downloads up to 05 Nov 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)The Elephant in the Room: Expert Experiences Designing, Developing and Evaluating Data Visualizations on Large DisplaysProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981398:ISS(301-329)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Exploring Pointer Enhancement Techniques for Target Selection on Large Curved DisplayProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36981358:ISS(214-235)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
  • (2024)Exploring the Impact of Display Field-of-view and Display Type on Text Readability and Visual Text Search on Large Displays in Virtual Reality: Impact of Display Field-of-view and Type on Text Readability and Search in Large VR DisplaysProceedings of the 50th Graphics Interface Conference10.1145/3670947.3670984(1-11)Online publication date: 3-Jun-2024
  • (2024)A Wall I Enjoy: Motivating Gentle Full-Body Movements Through Touchwall Interaction Compared to Standing and Sitting Smartphone UsageProceedings of the 2024 ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences10.1145/3639701.3656302(201-218)Online publication date: 7-Jun-2024
  • (2024)Embodied Machine LearningProceedings of the Eighteenth International Conference on Tangible, Embedded, and Embodied Interaction10.1145/3623509.3633370(1-12)Online publication date: 11-Feb-2024
  • (2023)Exploring Users' Pointing Performance on Virtual and Physical Large Curved DisplaysProceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology10.1145/3611659.3615710(1-11)Online publication date: 9-Oct-2023
  • (2023)Drawing Connections: Designing Situated Links for Immersive MapsProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36042527:MHCI(1-26)Online publication date: 13-Sep-2023
  • (2023)Submerse: Visualizing Storm Surge Flooding Simulations in Immersive Display EcologiesIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.333251130:9(6365-6377)Online publication date: 15-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Exploring Users Pointing Performance on Large Displays with Different Curvatures in Virtual RealityIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2023.332024229:11(4535-4545)Online publication date: 1-Nov-2023
  • (2023)Exploring the Evolution of Sensemaking Strategies in Immersive Space to ThinkIEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics10.1109/TVCG.2022.320735729:12(5294-5307)Online publication date: 1-Dec-2023
  • Show More Cited By

View Options

View options

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media