research-article

The Lives and Deaths of Open Source Code Forges

Author:

Megan SquireAuthors Info & Claims

OpenSym '17: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration

Article No.: 15, Pages 1 - 8

https://doi.org/10.1145/3125433.3125468

Published: 23 August 2017 Publication History

Abstract

Code forges are third party software repositories that also provide various tools and facilities for distributed software development teams to use, including source code control systems, mailing lists and communication forums, bug tracking systems, web hosting space, and so on. The main contributions of this paper are to present some new data sets relating to the technology adoption lifecycles of a group of six free, libre, and open source software (FLOSS) code forges, and to compare the lifecycles of the forges to each other and to the model presented by classical Diffusion of Innovation (DoI) theory. We find that the observed adoption patterns of code forges rarely follow the DoI model, especially as larger code forges are beset by spam and abuse. The only forge exhibiting a DoI-like lifecycle was a smaller, community-managed, special-purpose forge whose demise was planned in advance. The results of this study will be useful in explaining adoption trajectories, both to practitioners building collaborative FLOSS ecosystems and to researchers who study the evolution and adoption of socio-technical systems.

References

[1]

GitHub. About. 2017. Retrieved April 18, 2017 from http://github.com/about

[2]

Everett Rogers. 2003. Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition. Simon & Shuster.

[3]

James Howison, Megan Conklin, Kevin Crowston. 2006. FLOSSmole: A collaborative repository for FLOSS research data and analyses. Int. J. Info. Tech. and Web Engr 1, 3: 17--26.

[4]

Yongqin Gao, Matthew Van Antwerp, Scott Christley, Gregory Madey. 2007. A Research Collaboratory for Open Source Software Research. In Proc of the Int Workshop on Emerging Trends in FLOSS Research and Dev. (FLOSS 2007).

Digital Library

[5]

Georgios Gousios. 2013. The GHTorrent Dataset and Tool Suite. Proc. of the 10th Int. Conf. on Mining Software Repositories. (MSR 2013). 233--236.

Digital Library

[6]

Megan Squire. 2016. Data Sets: The Circle of Life in Ruby Hosting, 2003--2015. Proc of the 13th Int. Conf. on Mining Software Repositories. (MSR 2016). 452--455.

Digital Library

[7]

FLOSSmole's Google Code data, http://flossdata.syr.edu/data/gc/2017.

[8]

Google Project Hosting. 2013. A Change to Google Code Download Service. Google Open Source Blog. May 20. Retrieved April 18, 2017 from https://opensource.googleblog.com/2013/05/a-change-to-google-code-download-service.html

[9]

Chris DiBona. 2015. Bidding farewell to Google Code. Google Open Source Blog. March 12. Retrieved April 18, 2017 from https://opensource.googleblog.com/2015/03/farewell-to-google-code.html

[10]

Kasey Uhlenhuth. 2015. We're Moving to GitHub! C# Frequently Asked Questions Blog. January 10. Retrieved April 19, 2017 from https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/csharpfaq/2015/01/10/were-moving-to-github/

[11]

Brian Harry. 2017. Shutting Down CodePlex. Brian Harry's Blog. March 31. Retrieved April 18, 2017 from https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/bharry/2017/03/31/shutting-down-codeplex/

[12]

SourceForge Research Data Archive Wiki. All Tables. Retrieved April 18, 2017 from http://srda.cse.nd.edu/mediawiki/index.php/All_tables

[13]

SourceForge Research Data Archive Wiki. Finding Data, Downloads. Retrieved April 20, 2017 from http://srda.cse.nd.edu/mediawiki/index.php/Finding_data

[14]

Roberto Gallopini. 2013. Today We Offer DevShare (Beta), A Sustainable Way To Fund Open Source Software. SourceForge Blog. July 1. Retrieved April 18, 2017 from https://sourceforge.net/blog/today-we-offer-devshare-beta-a-sustainable-way-to-fund-open-source-software/l

[15]

Ben Balter. 2015. Open source license usage on GitHub.com. GitHub Blog. March 9. Retrieved April 20, 2017 from https://github.com/blog/1964-open-source-license-usage-on-github-com

[16]

GitHub Choose-A-License Service, https://choosealicense.com/

Cited By

Wolter TBarcomb ARiehle DHarutyunyan N(2022)Open Source License Inconsistencies on GitHubACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/357185232:5(1-23)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3571852
Patiño Toro OCorrea YValencia-Arias ABenjumea-Arias M(2020)A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE IN EDUCATIONAL CONTEXTSProblems of Education in the 21st Century10.33225/pec/20.78.11478:1(114-128)Online publication date: 12-Feb-2020
https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.114
Pietri ASpinellis DZacchiroli S(2020)The Software Heritage Graph DatasetProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories10.1145/3379597.3387510(1-5)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3379597.3387510
Show More Cited By

Index Terms

The Lives and Deaths of Open Source Code Forges

Recommendations

Open source software licenses: Strong-copyleft, non-copyleft, or somewhere in between?

Studies on open source software (OSS) have shown that the license under which an OSS is released has an impact on the success or failure of the software. In this paper, we model the relationship between an OSS developer's utility, the effort that goes ...
In the News

The first story, "CodePlex: Microsoft's Latest Entry into Code Sharing," describes Microsoft's new environment for developers to create, host, and manage projects throughout the development cycle. The second story, "New Funding for Open Source ...
The Debsources Dataset: two decades of free and open source software

We present the Debsources Dataset: source code and related metadata spanning two decades of Free and Open Source Software (FOSS) history, seen through the lens of the Debian distribution. The dataset spans more than 3 billion lines of source code as ...

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Other conferences

OpenSym '17: Proceedings of the 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration

August 2017

218 pages

ISBN:9781450351874

DOI:10.1145/3125433

General Chair:
Lorraine Morgan
National University of Ireland Galway

Copyright © 2017 ACM.

Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than the author(s) must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected].

In-Cooperation

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 23 August 2017

Permissions

Request permissions for this article.

Request Permissions

Check for updates

Author Tags

Qualifiers

Research-article
Research
Refereed limited

Conference

OpenSym '17

OpenSym '17: The 13th International Symposium on Open Collaboration

August 23 - 25, 2017

Galway, Ireland

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 108 of 195 submissions, 55%

Contributors

Other Metrics

View Article Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

6
Total Citations
View Citations
100
Total Downloads

Downloads (Last 12 months)6
Downloads (Last 6 weeks)0

Reflects downloads up to 12 Sep 2024

Other Metrics

View Author Metrics

Citations

Cited By

Wolter TBarcomb ARiehle DHarutyunyan N(2022)Open Source License Inconsistencies on GitHubACM Transactions on Software Engineering and Methodology10.1145/357185232:5(1-23)Online publication date: 8-Dec-2022
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3571852
Patiño Toro OCorrea YValencia-Arias ABenjumea-Arias M(2020)A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF THE USE OF OPEN SOURCE SOFTWARE IN EDUCATIONAL CONTEXTSProblems of Education in the 21st Century10.33225/pec/20.78.11478:1(114-128)Online publication date: 12-Feb-2020
https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/20.78.114
Pietri ASpinellis DZacchiroli S(2020)The Software Heritage Graph DatasetProceedings of the 17th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories10.1145/3379597.3387510(1-5)Online publication date: 29-Jun-2020
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3379597.3387510
Rousseau GDi Cosmo RZacchiroli S(2020)Software provenance tracking at the scale of public source codeEmpirical Software Engineering10.1007/s10664-020-09828-5Online publication date: 29-May-2020
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09828-5
Pietri ASpinellis DZacchiroli SStorey MAdams BHaiduc S(2019)The software heritage graph datasetProceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mining Software Repositories10.1109/MSR.2019.00030(138-142)Online publication date: 26-May-2019
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1109/MSR.2019.00030
Abramatic JDi Cosmo RZacchiroli S(2018)Building the universal archive of source codeCommunications of the ACM10.1145/318355861:10(29-31)Online publication date: 26-Sep-2018
https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/3183558

View Options

Get Access

Login options

Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution to get full access on this article.

Full Access

Get this Publication

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

eReader

View online with eReader.

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

View Table of Contents