skip to main content
10.1145/3661167.3661223acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageseaseConference Proceedingsconference-collections
extended-abstract

Design and Evaluation of High-Quality Symbiotic AI Systems through a Human-Centered Approach

Published: 18 June 2024 Publication History

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is significantly impacting foreseeing fields offering a better-automated decision making process and autonomous systems. Therefore, it is important to design high-quality AI systems that focus on the users’ priorities and avoid potential unethical and undesired behaviours. In the current scenario, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) and AI are not separate fields but they contaminate each other and, consequently, the symbiosis between humans and AI system is fostered. Ensuring that AI development benefits humans, while providing an high-level automation, remains a primary concern. For this reason, the human-centered design approach should be adopted to create systems that being trustworthy, safe, reliable, and governance compliant are able to enhance the user’s cognitive abilities and protect they from potential risks. In this context, it is fundamental to identify guidelines to follow while designing high-quality Symbiotic AI (SAI) systems and metrics for their appropriate evaluation. Assessing the empirical validity of the proposed solution is of crucial importance and the planning and execution of a user study is one of the main aspects of this work. The research project concerns the design of SAI systems, more specifically the definition of best practices and metrics to adopt while creating and evaluating these systems. This contribution presents the preliminary results obtained during the initial part of the research. The main opportunities and challenges in this new research field are also discussed.

References

[1]
2020. Artificial Intelligence (AI) Ethics: Ethics of AI and Ethical AI., 74-87 pages. https://doi.org/10.4018/JDM.2020040105
[2]
J. B. Brooke. 1996. SUS: A ’Quick and Dirty’ Usability Scale. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:107686571
[3]
The European Commission. 2024. Proposal for a Regulation Of The European Parliament And Of The Council Laying Down Harmonised Rules On Asrtificial Intelligence (Artificial Intelligence Act) And Amending Certain Union Legislative Acts. http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c102:H.CON.RES.1.IH
[4]
Maria F Costabile, Giuseppe Desolda, Giovanni Dimauro, Rosa Lanzilotti, Daniele Loiacono, M Matera, M Zancanaro, 2022. A Human-centric AI-driven Framework for Exploring Large and Complex Datasets. In CEUR WORKSHOP PROCEEDINGS, Vol. 3136. CEUR-WS, 9–13.
[5]
Gazzetta Ufficiale dell’Unione Europea. 2018. General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR): Regulation (EU) 2016/679.
[6]
Scott S. Grigsby. 2018. Artificial Intelligence for Advanced Human-Machine Symbiosis. In Augmented Cognition: Intelligent Technologies, Dylan D. Schmorrow and Cali M. Fidopiastis (Eds.). Springer International Publishing, Cham, 255–266.
[7]
David Gunning and David W. Aha. 2019. DARPA’s Explainable Artificial Intelligence Program. AI Magazine 40, 2 (2019), 44–58. https://doi.org/10.1609/aimag.v40i2.2850 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1609/aimag.v40i2.2850
[8]
Jonathan Lazar, Jinjuan Heidi Feng, and Harry Hochheiser. 2017. (second edition ed.). Morgan Kaufmann, Boston. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128053904/research-methods-in-human-computer-interaction#book-description
[9]
Roberto Polillo. 2010. Apogeo Education.
[10]
Jeff Sauro and James R. Lewis. 2012. Chapter 4 - Did We Meet or Exceed Our Goal? In Quantifying the User Experience, Jeff Sauro and James R. Lewis (Eds.). Morgan Kaufmann, Boston, 41–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384968-7.00004-7
[11]
Tjeerd A.J. Schoonderwoerd, Wiard Jorritsma, Mark A. Neerincx, and Karel van den Bosch. 2021. Human-centered XAI: Developing design patterns for explanations of clinical decision support systems. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 154 (2021), 102684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2021.102684
[12]
Ben Shneiderman. 2020. Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence: Three Fresh Ideas. AIS Transactions on Human-Computer Interaction (2020). https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:263911241
[13]
Ben Shneiderman. 2022. Human-Centered AI (1 ed.). Oxford University PressOxford. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192845290.001.0001
[14]
Rini van Solingen, Vic Basili, Gianluigi Caldiera, and H. Dieter Rombach. 2002. Goal Question Metric (GQM) Approach. John Wiley and Sons, Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471028959.sof142 arXiv:https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/0471028959.sof142
[15]
Liezhong Ge Wei Xu, Marvin J. Dainoff and Zaifeng Gao. 2023. Transitioning to Human Interaction with AI Systems: New Challenges and Opportunities for HCI Professionals to Enable Human-Centered AI. International Journal of Human–Computer Interaction 39, 3 (2023), 494–518. https://doi.org/10.1080/10447318.2022.2041900

Index Terms

  1. Design and Evaluation of High-Quality Symbiotic AI Systems through a Human-Centered Approach

    Recommendations

    Comments

    Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

    Information & Contributors

    Information

    Published In

    cover image ACM Other conferences
    EASE '24: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering
    June 2024
    728 pages
    ISBN:9798400717017
    DOI:10.1145/3661167
    Permission to make digital or hard copies of part or all of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for third-party components of this work must be honored. For all other uses, contact the Owner/Author.

    Publisher

    Association for Computing Machinery

    New York, NY, United States

    Publication History

    Published: 18 June 2024

    Check for updates

    Author Tags

    1. Human-centered design
    2. SAI metrics
    3. Symbiotic Artificial Intelligence (SAI)
    4. empirical study

    Qualifiers

    • Extended-abstract
    • Research
    • Refereed limited

    Conference

    EASE 2024

    Acceptance Rates

    Overall Acceptance Rate 71 of 232 submissions, 31%

    Contributors

    Other Metrics

    Bibliometrics & Citations

    Bibliometrics

    Article Metrics

    • 0
      Total Citations
    • 41
      Total Downloads
    • Downloads (Last 12 months)41
    • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)17
    Reflects downloads up to 01 Nov 2024

    Other Metrics

    Citations

    View Options

    Get Access

    Login options

    View options

    PDF

    View or Download as a PDF file.

    PDF

    eReader

    View online with eReader.

    eReader

    HTML Format

    View this article in HTML Format.

    HTML Format

    Media

    Figures

    Other

    Tables

    Share

    Share

    Share this Publication link

    Share on social media