مندرجات کا رخ کریں

Wikipedia talk:Local Embassy

صفحے کے مندرجات دوسری زبانوں میں قابل قبول نہیں ہیں۔
Wikipedia سے


Help to translate English into real Italian and French on any potential drought, motion pictures' articles

[ترمیم]

I'm needing/wanting to translate two drought articles on Italian Wikipedia and several movie articles on the French; I've only fluency in between 416 and 480 Italian words, 133 to 395 French words. I'm gonna need serious help from whosoever can translate these pages' words to natural French and Italian with no manual translation (forbidden on those Wikipedias). Angela Kate Maureen Pears 16:25, 24 May 2022 (UTC)[جواب دیں]

هل يمكن أن يترجم هذه الشعر للأنجليزي؟ Could anyone translate this poem into English

[ترمیم]

The poem in this article Ahmad Bin Aiba Al Maqdsi الشعر في مقال أحمد بن عبية المقدسي Chacabangaso (talk) 21:01, 5 May 2023 (UTC)[جواب دیں]

Shin'ichi Sakuraki

[ترمیم]

Would anyone be able to add this academic's name in Japanese to the English article? There are a small number of English sources, so adding others would be very welcome. Many thanks Lajmmoore (talk) 07:00, 12 December 2023 (UTC)[جواب دیں]

 Done Ansony89🎩 19:39, 18 January 2024 (UTC)[جواب دیں]
[ترمیم]

Campaign(s) of cross-wiki spam? If the following links turn blue, then the article has been created (again),
"This person".--It seems that that at least one campaign, has made an advance, that will lead to another push here, c. year 2024. 2001:2020:305:A2BF:68C5:9632:4821:1B06 (talk) 10:05, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[جواب دیں]

弥助問題の日本での現状

[ترمیم]

弥助問題が英語版でも論争になっていると聞いたので、日本での現状を知らせにきました。

日本では、参議院議員のja:浜田聡が現在調査しているところです。 浜田議員の活動はこちらで確認できます。 https://x.com/satoshi_hamada/status/1811235337655783533?t=DrjEYCzpAkDLQcAs9SenHQ&s=19

日本で弥助について疑問視されているのは主に次の3点です。

1.弥助はこれまで一次ソースがほとんどない謎の人物だった。新たな一次ソースは何なのか?そもそも新たな一次ソースは実在するのか?

2.日本の武士はfamily nameを持っているが、弥助はfamily nameが知られていない。それなのになぜ弥助が武士だといわれているのか?

3.弥助のエピソードでは織田信長が登場することがあるが、一般に知られてる信長の人物像と矛盾する。信長は比叡山焼き討ちなど既存の宗教勢力に厳しい対処をしたことで知られている。だから、信長が弥助を宗教的理由により厚遇したというのは、我々日本人にとっては納得できない。

ほかにも、弥助についての書籍では日本文化についての重大な誤りがいくつも指摘されています。

弥助問題の議論をしているページに伝えてくれませんか。お願いします。 SilverSpeech (talk) 15:43, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[جواب دیں]

and inflame an already terrible discussion? no thanks. ltbdl (talk) 00:32, 17 July 2024 (UTC)[جواب دیں]

Can anyone with Chinese language proficiency help find sources and resolve the discrepancy in pennant numbers / 舷号 between the English- and Chinese-language articles? In English, the numbers are said to be 8xx; in Chinese, "851" is mentioned for the lead ship of the series, but then there is a table where all ships (including the lead one) are listed with 7xx numbers. Did the ship numbers change over time?

Also, on Commons there is Category:PLANS Polaris (AGI-851)‎ and Category:PLANS Polaris (AGI-791) – are the photos there showing the same ship bearing different pennant numbers in different times, or are these different ships? The only external page I could google that mentions both numbers for this ship is here (archive), but it doesn't seem to explain the discrepancy (as far as I could understand using Google Translate).

Thanks! DmitTrix (talk) 20:24, 6 August 2024 (UTC)[جواب دیں]