Wikipedia:Pro and con lists: Revision history

Filter revisionsshowhide

To date:

Tag filter:

Invert selection

External tools:

For any version listed below, click on its date to view it. For more help, see Help:Page history and Help:Edit summary. (cur) = difference from current version, (prev) = difference from preceding version, m = minor edit, → = section edit, ← = automatic edit summary

curprev 12:3212:32, 28 July 2024‎ Willthorpe talk contribs‎ 9,129 bytes +6‎ No edit summary undo Tag: 2017 wikitext editor

curprev 08:2308:23, 7 May 2024‎ Remsense talk contribs‎ 9,123 bytes −132‎ →‎Alternative forums: rm dead undo

curprev 15:5215:52, 3 March 2023‎ Senior Captain Thrawn talk contribs‎ 9,255 bytes +31‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 09:0409:04, 28 November 2021‎ Ymblanter talk contribs‎ 9,224 bytes +6‎ category moved undo

curprev 14:1614:16, 9 August 2021‎ Renamed user 5097696514 talk contribs‎ 9,218 bytes −520‎ →‎Example of a sensible pro and con list: Not sensible (see WP:NOTHOWTO) undo

curprev 06:5206:52, 8 February 2021‎ PohranicniStraze talk contribs‎ m 9,738 bytes +17‎ Reverted edits by 213.230.74.148 (talk) to last version by Joefromrandb undo Tag: Rollback
curprev 04:5604:56, 8 February 2021‎ 213.230.74.148 talk‎ 9,721 bytes −17‎ No edit summary undo Tags: Reverted Mobile edit Mobile web edit

curprev 07:2407:24, 12 July 2019‎ Cydebot talk contribs‎ m 9,690 bytes +3‎ Robot - Moving category Wikipedia essays on style to Category:Wikipedia essays about style per CFD at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2019 May 7. undo

curprev 22:4022:40, 25 November 2018‎ SMcCandlish talk contribs‎ 9,687 bytes +26‎ more specific cats. undo
curprev 18:5518:55, 25 November 2018‎ Jarble talk contribs‎ 9,661 bytes +140‎ linking undo

curprev 10:4210:42, 19 November 2018‎ 109.41.3.109 talk‎ 9,521 bytes +33‎ Added Kialo to the list of external debate sites undo

curprev 19:4919:49, 16 May 2018‎ BenTrem talk contribs‎ m 9,488 bytes +43‎ ProConLists yields 404. How to correct dead link? →‎Alternative forums undo
curprev 19:4619:46, 16 May 2018‎ BenTrem talk contribs‎ m 9,445 bytes +1‎ Updated to https://debategraph.org/home ... https://debategraph.org/ yields 404. →‎Alternative forums undo

curprev 03:4603:46, 12 May 2018‎ Voidxor talk contribs‎ m 9,444 bytes +5‎ →‎top: Simplify: The present-tense verb "contain" implies the condition as it stands today. Also, avoid ampersands per MOS:AMP. undo

curprev 16:1016:10, 13 March 2018‎ Gilliam talk contribs‎ m 9,439 bytes +107‎ Reverted edits by 205.155.46.100 (talk) to last version by Aircorn undo Tag: Rollback
curprev 16:0916:09, 13 March 2018‎ 205.155.46.100 talk‎ 9,332 bytes −49‎ No edit summary undo
curprev 16:0816:08, 13 March 2018‎ 205.155.46.100 talk‎ 9,381 bytes −58‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 21:5921:59, 15 January 2018‎ Aircorn talk contribs‎ 9,439 bytes −787‎ →‎top: Removeo old undiscussed tag undo

curprev 23:4323:43, 14 January 2017‎ Fixuture talk contribs‎ 8,122 bytes +29‎ added Category:Wikipedia lists using HotCat undo

curprev 14:1414:14, 2 February 2015‎ Jdaloner talk contribs‎ m 8,093 bytes 0‎ "{{t1" --> "{{tl" undo

curprev 17:5317:53, 18 November 2014‎ Jarble talk contribs‎ 8,093 bytes +26‎ linking undo

curprev 21:5821:58, 22 June 2014‎ Mr. Guye talk contribs‎ m 8,067 bytes −5‎ →‎So what's wrong with pro & con lists? undo

curprev 22:1422:14, 16 June 2014‎ 209.232.148.110 talk‎ 8,072 bytes −35‎ Removed previous troll edit undo

curprev 14:1214:12, 13 June 2014‎ 50.240.225.25 talk‎ 8,107 bytes +35‎ No edit summary undo

curprev 00:0100:01, 27 April 2014‎ Aquillion talk contribs‎ 8,072 bytes +78‎ Undid revision 605016306 by Thumperward (talk) -- this is clearly not an essay that enjoys any form of consensus, and it's important to make that clear at the top. undo

curprev 13:5313:53, 20 April 2014‎ Thumperward talk contribs‎ 7,994 bytes −78‎ rm stale, dud dispute tag undo
curprev 13:4213:42, 20 April 2014‎ Thumperward talk contribs‎ 8,072 bytes −1,345‎ reducing the overly-broad de-fanging of this template, especially the "it's fine in engineering" nonsense - this sort of thing is precisely why so many of our technical articles are so poor undo

curprev 19:3319:33, 14 March 2014‎ Aquillion talk contribs‎ 9,417 bytes +1,391‎ Toning down per what seems to be the general consensus talk; most people seem to think that pro-con lists are acceptable in eg. engineering contexts. undo

curprev 21:0021:00, 16 July 2013‎ GregorB talk contribs‎ m 8,026 bytes +1‎ Reverted edits by 2600:1008:B013:4AF3:2DB4:7C37:BD98:E560 (talk) to last version by 82.132.223.153 undo

28 July 2024

7 May 2024

3 March 2023

28 November 2021

9 August 2021

8 February 2021

11 August 2019

12 July 2019

25 November 2018

19 November 2018

16 May 2018

12 May 2018

13 March 2018

15 January 2018

19 March 2017

21 January 2017

14 January 2017

2 February 2015

18 November 2014

22 June 2014

16 June 2014

13 June 2014

27 April 2014

20 April 2014

14 March 2014

16 July 2013