Jump to content

Reiner Grundmann: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Browse history interactively
← Previous editNext edit →
Content deleted Content added
VisualWikitext
Line 51: Line 51:
</ref>
</ref>


Grundmann is married with two daughters and a cycling amateur.
Grundmann is married with two daughters and is a cycling amateur in his spare time.


=== Social theory ===
=== Social theory ===

Revision as of 15:06, 12 May 2015

Reiner Grundmann
Born (1955-09-29) 29 September 1955 (age 68)
Freudenstadt, West Germany
NationalityGerman
Alma materFree University Berlin
Scientific career
Fields
Institutions
ThesisMarxism and Ecology (1991)
Doctoral advisor
Websitenottingham.academia.edu/ReinerGrundmann

Reiner Grundmann, (born 29 September 1955) near Freudenstadt is Professor of Science and Technology Studies (STS) at the University of Nottingham and Director of its interdisciplinary STS Research Priority Group.[1] He is a German sociologist and political scientist who has resided in the UK since 1997. Previous appointments include Aston University and the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies.

His books about the relationship of Marxist thought and the enivironment, the power of expertise, and the role of experts in the public realm are of ongoing international academic and public interest.

Grundmann has contributed to four areas of research: social theory, sustainability topics, the relation between knowledge and decision making, and media analysis. In most of his work he uses a comparative methodology. He participated in larger research programs on topics such as urban habitat sustainability[2] cross border media reporting, transnational environmental policy (see ozone depletion and global warming) [3] and the future of the automobile.[4]

Life and academic career

Grundmann took his A-levels at Schelztor Gymnasium in Esslingen. He studied sociology in Berlin and received his doctorate 1989 at the European University Institute (EUI), Florence (Italy). His habilitation about environmental policy on the ozone layer challenge took place at the University of Bielefeld in 1998 under the auspices of Peter Weingart from the Center for Interdisciplinary Research, Bielefeld. Grundmann held post-doctoral positions, at the Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin, at the Graduate college Risk and private law at the University of Bremen, and at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies, Cologne. In 1997 he took up a position at Aston University and is since 2012 at the University of Nottingham.[5]

He has been influenced by Niklas Luhmann's system theory and Bruno Latour's Actor–network theory, but remains ambivalent about both. His position has been discussed on the theoretical level in a controversy with Klaus Peter Japp about Luhmann's system theory and Ulrich Becks risk sociology.[6] Renate Mayntz, the longtime head of the Max Planck Instítute for the Study of Society, was influential as well. [7]

Grundmann's interest in the role of expertise in modern society is influenced by frameworks such as Post-normal science and Roger Pielke Jr.'s Honest broker. Both are in line with basic works in the sociology of science and technology doubting a direct influence of "certain knowledge" or "settled science" on political decision making, which is being discussed as the linear model of science policy interaction. His work challenges widespread believes in global sucess or failure of environmental policy as result of scientific consensus, or as an outcome of corporate power.[8] In contrast, he shows the relevance of transnational policy networks.[3] Practical outcomes include contributions to a common proposal of Regional Climate Services as an alternative and expansion of the IPCC global approach[9]and contributions the Hartfield Paper.Other activities include e.g. contributions to Hans von Storch's Klimazwiebel blog.[10] and contributions e.g. to the British Science festival.[11]

Grundmann is married with two daughters and is a cycling amateur in his spare time.

Social theory

Marxist view on Ecology

Grundmann started his academic career with an analysis of the legacy of Marx’s theory for the understanding of environmental problems. This work was a direct product of his PhD research at the EUI in Florence, in the late 1980s under the supervision of Steven Lukes. Grundmann described ecology as being not longer confined to the realms of biology since the 1970ies. The term, as it had been coined in the 1870ies by Ernst Haeckel, a German biologist and monist, was about a branch of biology dealing with the interaction of organisms and their surroundings. The current use of the term started to put the interaction of pollution in a political context and was later to describe a political movement as well. The thesis was published by Oxford University Press in 1991 and a related article by Grundmann himself and an answer and review of the study appeared in the same year in the New Left Review.[12][13] The basic approach used Hans Magnus Enzenbergers Zur Kritik der politischen Ökologie[14] published in 1973 in the German Kursbuch[15] It has been translated in English in Ted Bentons Greening of Marxism in the 1990ies.[16]

Grundmann saw orthodox marxist thinking being caught between Marx disrespect for the idiocy of rural life and his believe in a resurrection of nature. He attempted to identify problems which could be still dealt with convincingly with Marx thought and approach. Grundmann dealt in detail with Marx and Engels discourse on the 'domination over nature’, which he claims of being of value. Grundmanns explicit advocacy of the term is exemptional [17] and his introduction into the topic has been quoted as late as 2010 by leading Chinese Scholars as being wonderful.[18] Grundmann avoided to depict the domination as being a precondition of desctruction, but allowed for interpretations as mastery or stewardship.[18] Grundmann' defence of ‘mastery over nature' as a metaphor in ecologically informed socialism was however not in line with Ted Benton interpretation of the domination term used by Marx. Benton was positive about Grundmann cutting through a lot of sloppy thinking in the ‘ecocentric’ camp. [13] He furthermore acknowledged that Grundmanns interpretation of Marx view of our relation to nature is insofar specific compared to e.g. Francis Bacon and Nietzsche, since in Marx’s view that ‘man should make an impact on the world’. Such mastery, according Grundmann, would better be interpreted as in mastering an musical instrument.[13] Grundmann concluded "that the pursuit of productivity and the development of a healthy environment need not be mutually exclusive," arguing that only specific technologies, not technology as such, lead to environmental degradation.[19] Whilst the book received some praise and critical attention at the time, it was published at a difficult historical juncture—after the fall of communism there was little enthusiasm for theoretical frameworks inspired by Marx. This has changed, and the forthcoming Chinese translation and recent reviews and papers about Grundmann's marxist ecology published in China[20][21][22][23] indicate an ongoing interest in the topic. [24]

Sustainability and Werner Sombart

In the years that followed, he moved away from social theory and started engaging with issues about environmental sustainability from the viewpoint of science and technology studies. This move was inspired by the insight of Karl Marx that technology reveals the active transformation of nature, performed by humans and their social forms of organization.[25]

A partial return to social theory was prompted by the co-operation with Nico Stehr with whom Grundmann worked since the late 1990s. Their common work on Werner Sombart led to a re-evaluation of the legacy of this pioneering German sociologist, examining in particular his low salience in the postwar period.[26] Reviewer Lutz Kaelber from the University of Vermont referred to Stehrs and Grundmanns edition of Werner Sombart's Economic Life in the Modern Age as a valuable and accessible addition to the Anglo-American literature on Werner Sombart.[27]

Sustainability and large technical systems

The study of science and technology related issues led him to research large technical systems, which he did during his time at the Social Science Research Center Berlin (WZB) in the early 1990s. His special interest was focused on the future of automobility.[4] In the mid 1990s he spent three years at the Max Planck Institute for the Study of Societies in Cologne where he studied the efforts to protect the ozone layer (see as well ozone depletion and global warming). Transnational environmental policy - reconstructing Ozone was published in German in 1999 and in 2001 in English. It challenged widespread historical accounts which tend to explain the policies either as a result of scientific consensus, or as an outcome of corporate power.[8] In contrast, it shows the relevance of transnational policy networks.[3] The successful Montreal Protocol is often taken as an exemplar case which serves as the model for an (so far elusive) climate treaty. Grundmann claims that several problematic lessons have been drawn from this case.[28] The book entry quotes Jim Lovelock stating This readable book is the best treatment of the subject published so far and F.Sherwood Rowland with Stimulating and thought-provoking. [29]

Science and technology Studies

Grundmann contributed to Science, technology and society (STS) with books about the role of experts and the power of scientific knowledge. He sees a role of science as agenda setter in the political process but stays in line with basice STS assumptions about the failure of the linear model of science and policy interaction.[30]. Roger Pielke's Honest Broker assumed with regard to climate studies, that the linear model still is overwhelmingly persistent. The assumption, that STS studies critical of the linear model would automatically translate into practice would echo the very linear model under scrutiny,[31] owever noted already 2015 that previous scholarly critiques already converted into governments attempting to manage of public expectations on technological risk asssumptions. [32]

Power of scientific knowledge

Together with Stehr, Grundmann published various pieces on the role of knowledge and expertise in modern societies, including two monographs in 2012.[33][34] In The Power of Scientific Knowledge three case studies are presented, Keynesianism, Race Science & Eugenics, and Climate change. Based on the conceptual distinction between knowledge for practice and practical knowledge the argument is made that scientists who were advancing practical knowledge were able to make a difference in policy. His work shows a stunning mismatch between Keynes's one man show and the huge enterprise of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), and an interesting parallel between the belief in science based policies in eugenics and climate change. With regard to his and Nico Stehrs comparison of the eugenic movement and climate change activism in Experts,[35] he sees a strong belief in science as being a base of politics in both cases. Grundmann states that the very base of sociology as a science was historically to fight different forms of naturalist determinism (environmental determinism, biological determinism) as of the likes of Herbert Spencer or, in Germany, Ferdinand Tönnies.[36] However, the sociologist standpoint, Grundmann calls it sociologism, itself an "ism", came at a cost, as sociology for a long time avoided discussions about the nature-human interaction at all or denied its relevance. Grundmann, as early as 1997, perceived a predominance of natural science in politics, as climate scientists used a successful framing strategy to connect relatively soft scientific findings with straightforward political goals.[36] He asks whether sociology would be in a position to examine ecological problems but avoid to "repolish soild naturalistic goods".[37] A contribution of Grundmann in a conference of the future of modern societies in Germany sees Marx's idea of a nature-society-dialectics as a base for a specific sociological answer, besides the analysis of networks and actors of scientists involved in such framings and to determine their interests and ideas.[36]

Role of Experts

In their book on expert knowledge (English translation in 2011: Experts: The knowledge and power of expertise),[38] Grundmann and Stehr develop a specific concept of expertise. Contrary to common definitions that stress the centrality of scientists as experts, expertise is defined as mediating between knowledge production and knowledge application. With the expansion of knowledge intensive professions, ever more persons move into positions of experts—for some issues, some of the time. The rise of the knowledge society leads to a proliferation of knowledge sources which has not been sufficiently acknowledged by some dominant theories of expertise. A review in the Canadian Journal of Sociology pointed out that the book was published as part of Routledge’s “Key Ideas” series and was among the best books in this series, which attempt to both critically review the field and present arguments that reach beyond existing works.[38]

Experts: The knowledge and power of expertise got positive reviews e.g. in socialnet.de.[39] Perlentaucher mentioned e.g. a positive review of Alexander Kissler in Süddeutsche Zeitung, stating Stehr and Grundmann would have successfully started to plough a new field.[40] Climate change is a prominent current case which highlights the question about knowledge and decision making. Grundmann thinks that there exists a mistaken belief that the presence of a scientific consensus will enable ambitious climate policies. He considers that a much praised study overstates the case for scientific consensus.[41] Grundmann is in line with main STS scholars view that science hardly determines policy outcomes.[30] Examples such acid rain ,[42] smoking regulations,[43] ozone depleting substances, genetically modified foods[44] show how cultural, economic and political issues exercised a strong influence. Conversely, the presence of an international science consensus (through the IPCC) has led to different national policies, none of which is on track to achieving the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions that the IPCC Summary for Policymakers postulate as necessary.[45][46]

Media analysis and cross-border public spheres

in 2000 Grundmann has provided a comparative analysis of media discourses in the Balkan wars. The study, a comparative survey of leading press organs in France, Germany and the UK during the Balkan war of 1999 tried to identify the political agenda and perception of the various elite readerships. Besides some synchronization in public attention mediated through the press marked differences among French, German and British contents and perspectives remained.[47][48] 2006 a meta-analysis of 17 studies of a similar kind confirmed Grundmanns findings about a small degree of transnational discourse and a ongoing fragmentation of the - then still disputed European Public Sphere. [49]The meta study noted little empirical research in the field so far, and asked for further systematization. [49] Research on the European Public Sphere increased in the later years, dealing especially with overall European issues like e.g. corruption or BSE.[50] Grundmann assumes that the synchronization of media attention on contentious ‘European’ issues is a more realistic prospect to provide a supranational identity than attempts through public education or the legal system.[51] Over the past years Grundmann has become increasingly interested in the media discourse on climate change. Together with computational linguists and sociologists he has started comparative analysis of climate change reporting in various countries.[7][52][53]

Climate change

He wrote about the legacy of the Climatic Research Unit email controversy and wether it revitalized or undermined climate science and climate policy.[54] His own experiences with peer review of another paper about the issue are described in an interview with Hans von Storch on Storch's Klimazwiebel blog.[55] According von Storch's intro, Grundmann's paper Climategate and The Scientific Ethos[56] faced severe resistance from social science journals before it was published in Science, Technology, & Human Values.[55]

Grundmann and Stehr had themselves a controversy in the peer revied literature, when they clashed with Constance Lever-Tracy about the role of sociology in climate affairs. Grundmann stated a politicization of climate science which makes science, technology and society (STS) scholars feel uncomfortable with the topic of climate change.[57] Grundmann identifies a problematic approach of climate scientists who believe to have a prerogative to make political suggestions in the field "which society at large should take up because scientists always know best"[55] combined with a basic lack of actual[57] feasible solution proposals.[55] He sees climate change as a long term issue requiring more public involvement and debate, not less[55] and asks social scientists to study the interaction between climate and society, Lever Tracy was more about letting the climatologists having the lead.[57]Research about the media reporting on climate change and Grundmann chairing a session titled Why we disagree about Climate Change by Mike Hulme[58] was as well part of Aston universities contribution to the British Science festival. [59]

Publications and books

  • (2011) Die Macht der Erkenntnis. Berlin: Suhrkamp. ISBN 978-3-518-29590-8 (with Nico Stehr).
    • In English (2012) The Power of Scientific Knowledge. From Research to Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107022-72-0 (with Nico Stehr).
    • In Russian: Власть научного значения, Aletheia Publishers, Sankt Petersburg,ISBN: 978-5-9905769-3-3[60].
  • (2010) Expertenwissen: Die Kultur und die Macht von Experten, Beratern und Ratgebern. Frankfurt am Main: Velbrueck. ISBN 978-3-938808-82-5 (with Nico Stehr).
    • In English: Experts: The knowledge and power of expertise. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-60803-9 (with Nico Stehr).[61]
  • (2008) Society: Critical Concepts (4 vols.) London: Routledge. ISBN 0415426561 (edited with Nico Stehr).
  • (2005) Knowledge: Critical Concepts (5 vols). London: Routledge. ISBN 0415317363 (edited with Nico Stehr).
  • (2001) Werner Sombart. Economic Life in the Modern Age, edited and introduced by Nico Stehr and Reiner Grundmann, New Brunswick, N.J.; Oxford: Transaction Books. ISBN 0765800306.
  • (1999) Transnationale Umweltpolitik zum Schutz der Ozonschicht. USA und Deutschland im Vergleich. Frankfurt a.M.: Campus. ISBN 3-593-36222-8
    • (2001) Transnational Environmental Policy: Reconstructing Ozone. London: Routledge. ISBN 0415224233
  • (1991) Marxism and Ecology. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0198273142
    • Korean (Dongnyok, Seoul 1995), Chinese translation is forthcoming

References

  1. ^ STS. STS Priority Group "STS Priority Group Weblink". Retrieved 29 August 2014. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
  2. ^ "Leverhulme Project: Sustaining Urban Habitats - an interdisciplinary approach Programme Grant 2014 - 2019". {{cite web}}: line feed character in |title= at position 79 (help)
  3. ^ a b c "Walter Rösch: Review of Reiner Grundmann: Transnationale Umweltpolitik zum Schutz der Ozonschicht. Frankfurt a. M./New York: 1999, in: Portal für Politikwissenschaft (political science portal), http://pw-portal.de/rezension/9996-transnationale-umweltpolitik-zum-schutz-der-ozonschicht_11820, published on 01.01.2006". www.pw-portal.de. Retrieved 2015-05-09. {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help)
  4. ^ a b Grundmann, Reiner ; Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung gGmbH (Ed.): Kommunikation und technische Infrastruktur : über Schienen, Straßen, Sand und Perlen. Berlin, 1993 (Schriftenreihe der Forschungsgruppe "Große technische Systeme" des Forschungsschwerpunkts Technik - Arbeit - Umwelt am Wissenschaftszentrum Berlin für Sozialforschung 93-501). URN: http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0168-ssoar-30922
  5. ^ "Reiner Grundmann - The University of Nottingham". nottingham.ac.uk. Retrieved 2015-05-09.
  6. ^ Wo steht die Risikosoziologie? [ZfS, Jg. 28, Heft 4 (1999) [Wer hat Angst vor F. Nietzsche? Replik on Klaus-Peter Japp answer]
  7. ^ a b See the Foreword to Gesellschaftliche Komplexität und kollektive Handlungsfähigkeit (Social complexity and collective action), ed. Schimank, U. (2000). Frankfurt/Main: Campus, p.154-182 book summary at the Max Planck Gesellschaft which is being deemed as hommage to Renate Mayntz by her pupils and collegues, Grundmann contributed with a chapter on Technical troubleshooting and negotiating
  8. ^ a b Layzer, Judith A. (August 1, 2002). "Book Review Essay: Science, Politics and International Environmental Policy". Global Environmental Politics. 2 (3): 118–123. doi:10.1162/152638002320310554. ISSN 1526-3800. Retrieved 2015-05-09.
  9. ^ von Storch, H., Meinke, I., Stehr, N., Ratter, B., Krauß, W., Pielke, R., Grundmann, R., Reckermann, M., & Weisse, R. (2011): Regional Climate Services illustrated with experiences from Northern Europe. Zeitschrift für Umweltpolitik und Umweltrecht, 34(1), 1-15.
  10. ^ Thursday, September 19, 2013, The coming crisis of climate science? by Reiner Grundmann
  11. ^ University of Aston, Press department Powerpoint presentation on aston.ac.uk on the British Science Festival Birmingham 14-19th September 2010 Quote: 3 Aston academics have been appointed as president of their relevant scientific section of the British Science Association and will deliver prestigious presidential sessions at the Festival: Professor James Wolffsohn for Medical Sciences, Dr Reiner Grundmann for Sociology and Public Policy and Professor Andreas Hornung for Chemistry.
  12. ^ ‘The Ecological Challenge to Marxism’ New Left Review 187 (May–June), 103-120 [1]
  13. ^ a b c "New Left Review - Ted Benton: Ecology, Socialism and the Mastery of Nature: A Reply to Reiner Grundmann". newleftreview.org. pp. 62–64. Retrieved 2015-05-09.
  14. ^ A Contribution to the Critique of Political Ecology, the title being a pun on a famous Marx study
  15. ^ Hans Magnus Enzenberger (1973), Zur Kritik der politischen Ökologie', Kursbuch, 33 I
  16. ^ Enzensberger, Hans Magnus (1973): A Critique of Political Ecology, in: T. Benton (Hg.), The Greening of Marxism, New York, 1996, S. 17-49.
  17. ^ The Political Economy of Development and Environment in Korea, A new framework for environmental analysis Jae-Yong Chung, Richard J. Kirkby Routledge, 25.07.2005, p.10
  18. ^ a b Lixin Han: ‘Realisation of Purpose’ and ‘Domination of Nature’ What is ‘Domination of Nature’, in Q. Huan (ed.), Eco-socialism as Politics: Rebuilding the Basis of Our Modern Civilisation, p. 18ff DOI 10.1007/978-90-481-3745-9_2, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2010
  19. ^ Entry of the doctorate at Cadmus Reiner Grundmann: Marxism and Ecology Oxford, Clarendon Press/New York, Oxford University Press, 1991, Marxist introductions URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1814/24716 ISBN 0198273142
  20. ^ 控制自然与历史唯物主义的重构——格伦德曼的生态马克思主义思想述评 Cai Huajie, Lin Meiping: Reconstruction of nature control and historical materialism:a review of Reiner Grundmann’s ecological Marxist thought, Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition) , 2010(03), in Chinese
  21. ^ 格伦德曼对马克思自然观的阐释——兼论马克思主义和生态学 Xiong Min (School of Marxism, Zhongnan University of Economics & Law, Wuhan 430073, Hubei,China) Grundmann’ s Interpretation of Marxist Nature-view Wuhan University Journal (2009/06)
  22. ^ 英国生态学马克思主义关于马克思的“自然极限”理论的阐释 [2]Ni Ruihua (Zhongnan University of Economics and Law) British Eco-Marxism Interpreting Marx’s Theory of Natural Limits, Conference, The National Research Base for World Marxism and Thought Trends at Fudan University, China 2010-11-18, in Chinese
  23. ^ "知识搜索". search.cnki.com.cn. Retrieved 2015-05-11.
  24. ^ "国外社会科学杂志-2010年06期-中国知网 Marx defended anthropocentrism - On Reiner Grundmann's Ecological Marxist Theory CNKI entry about a 国外社会科学 (Social Sciences abroad journal) 2010 06". mall.cnki.net. Retrieved 2015-05-11.
  25. ^ ‘Technology reveals the active relation of man to nature, the direct process of the production of his life, and thereby it also lays bare the process of the production of the social relations of his life and of the mental conceptions that flow from these relations.’ Footnote 4 in Karl Marx, Capital: A Critique of Political Economy, Volume 1, trans. Ben Fowkes, Penguin Classics (London, New York: Penguin Books, 1990), p. 493.
  26. ^ ‘Why is Werner Sombart not part of the core of classical sociologists? From fame to (near) oblivion’ Journal of Classical Sociology 1 (2): 257–287
  27. ^ "Book Review: Sombart, Economic Life in the Modern Age". www.cjsonline.ca. Retrieved 2015-05-09.
  28. ^ (2005) Ozone and Climate: Scientific consensus and leadership, Science, Technology, and Human Values 31(1): 73-101 [3].
  29. ^ Grundmann, Reiner:Transnational environmental policy: reconstructing ozone Routledge studies in science, technology, and society, ISBN 0-415-22423-3, http://samples.sainsburysebooks.co.uk/9781134592241_sample_543801.pdf Page ii
  30. ^ a b Compare the discussion of Collins and Evans "The Third Wave of Science Studies Studies of Expertise and Experience", Social Studies of Science, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 235–296, 04/01/2002, doi:10.1177/0306312702032002003, ISSN 0306-3127, retrieved 2015-05-12 {{citation}}: Check date values in: |date= (help) Cite error: The named reference ":6" was defined multiple times with different content (see the help page).
  31. ^ "Mark B. Brown: Review of The Honest Broker: Making Sense of Science in Policy and Politics by Roger S. Pielke, Jr., in Minerva: A Review of Science, Learning and Policy 46:4 (2008): 485-489" (PDF). www.csus.edu. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  32. ^ "Marc Brown: Review of Knowledge and Democracy: A 21st Century Perspective, edited by Nico Stehr, in Contemporary Sociology 38:5 (2009): 452-453" (PDF). www.csus.edu. Retrieved 2015-05-12.
  33. ^ Nico Stehr, Reiner Grundmann: The Power of Scientific Knowledge. From Research to Public Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107022-72-0
  34. ^ Nico Stehr, Reiner Grundmann: Experts: The knowledge and power of expertise. London: Routledge. ISBN 978-0-415-60803-9
  35. ^ Stehr/Grundmann. (2012). The Power of Scientific Knowledge. From Research to Public Policy. Cambridge. Cambridge University Press. ISBN 978-1-107022-72-0.
  36. ^ a b c Reiner Grundmann (1997). "Die soziologische Tradition und die natürliche Umwelt.". Verhandlungen des 28. Kongresses der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Soziologie in Dresden 1996. Hradil, Stefan (Ed.) ; Deutsche Gesellschaft für Soziologie (DGS) (Ed.): Differenz und Integration: die Zukunft moderner Gesellschaften. ISBN 3-593-35852-2, pp.333-550. Retrieved 1 September 2014. {{cite conference}}: Unknown parameter |booktitle= ignored (|book-title= suggested) (help)
  37. ^ Grundmann in DGS 1997, quote Wie kann die Soziologie ökologische Probleme thematisieren, ohne in den Verdacht zu geraten, naturalistische Ladenhüter aufzupolieren
  38. ^ a b Young, Nathan (2011). "Book Review/Compte rendu: Nico Stehr and Reiner Grundmann. Experts: The Know-ledge and Power of Expertise. Key Ideas. New York: Rout-ledge, 2011, 148 pp. $110.00 hardcover (978-0-415-60803-9)". CANADIAN JOURNAL OF SOCIOLOGY/CAHIERS CANADIENS DE SOCIOLOGIE 36(3). Retrieved 5.5.2015. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |access-date= (help)
  39. ^ Thorsten Benkel University of Passau) 10.15.2010 review of: Nico Stehr, Reiner Grundmann: Expertenwissen. Velbrück Wissenschaft (Weilerswist) 2010. In: socialnet Rezensionen, ISSN 2190-9245, http://www.socialnet.de/rezensionen/10190.php, access 09.05.2015
  40. ^ "Reiner Grundmann / Nico Stehr: Expertenwissen. Die Kultur und die Macht von Experten, Beratern und Ratgebern - Perlentaucher". www.perlentaucher.de. Retrieved 2015-05-09.
  41. ^ Cook et al., Quantifying the consensus on anthropogenic global warming in the scientific literature [4]
  42. ^ Maarten A. Hajer, The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process, 1995. ISBN 9780198293330
  43. ^ Debunking sceptical propaganda Book review by Reiner Grundmann, BioSocieties (2013) 8, 370–374. doi:10.1057/biosoc.2013.15
  44. ^ Susan Wright, Molecular Politics: Developing American and British Regulatory Policy for Genetic Engineering, 1972-1982 (1994). ISBN 9780226910659
  45. ^ Reiner Grundmann (2005) Ozone and Climate: Scientific consensus and leadership, Science, Technology, and Human Values 31(1): 73-101
  46. ^ Schwarz, Susanne (13 April 2014). "IPCC Working group III".
  47. ^ (2000) ‘National elites and transnational discourses in the Balkan war: a comparison between the French, German and British establishment press’ European Journal of Communication 15 (3): 299-320 (with Sue Wright and Dennis Smith).
  48. ^ Grundmann, Reiner; Smith, Dennis; Wright, Sue (2002-03-01). "La guerre des Balkans : élites nationales et discours transnationaux dans la presse française, allemande et britannique". Questions de communication (in French) (1). doi:10.4000/questionsdecommunication.6487. ISSN 1633-5961. Retrieved 2015-05-09.
  49. ^ a b Machill, Marcel; Beiler, Markus; Fischer, Corinna (03/01/2006). "Europe-Topics in Europe's Media The Debate about the European Public Sphere: A Meta-Analysis of Media Content Analyses". European Journal of Communication. 21 (1): 57–88. doi:10.1177/0267323106060989. ISSN 0267-3231. Retrieved 2015-05-10. {{cite journal}}: Check date values in: |date= (help)
  50. ^ Bärenreuter, Christoph; Brüll, Cornelia; Mokre, Monika; Wahl-Jorgensen, Karin (2008). "An Overview of Research on the European Public Sphere". Retrieved 2015-05-10. {{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  51. ^ "The European public sphere and the deficit of democracy - Grundmann - 2014 - The Sociological Review - Wiley Online Library". doi.wiley.com. Retrieved 2015-05-10.
  52. ^ Disputed climate science in the media: Do countries matter? Public Understanding of Science doi: 10.1177/0963662512467732
  53. ^ The Discourse of Climate Change: a corpus-based approach, Critical Approaches to Discourse Analysis across Disciplines 4 (2): 113 – 133 (with Ramesh Krishnamurthy) [5]
  54. ^ "The legacy of climategate: revitalizing or undermining climate science and policy? - Grundmann - 2012 - Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change - Wiley Online Library". doi.wiley.com. Retrieved 2015-05-09.
  55. ^ a b c d e Tuesday, May 29, 2012 Interview with Reiner Grundmann by Hans von Storch
  56. ^ Grundmann, Reiner (2012). "Climategate and the Scientific Ethos". Science, Technology & Human Values. doi:10.1177/0162243911432318.
  57. ^ a b c Reiner Grundmann and Nico Stehr (2010). "Climate Change: What role for Sociology? A Response to Constance Lever-Tracy'". Current Sociology. 58 (6): 897–910. doi:10.1177/0011392110376031.
  58. ^ BIRMINGHAM 14-19 SEPT 2010 Why we disagree about Climate Change Presented by Reiner Grundmann and The British Science Association Sociology Section Part of the British Science Festival in Birmingham from 14-19 September 2010. Aston University event announcement 14.9.2010
  59. ^ "The End of the World or Happy Ending: Media reporting of Climate Change Source http://www.britishscienceassociation.org/forms/festival/events/showevent2.asp?EventID=100 Part of British Science Festival". livebrum. 2010. {{cite web}}: External link in |title= (help); line feed character in |title= at position 72 (help)
  60. ^ "Publikation auf Russisch erschienen!". Zeppelin university.
  61. ^ Nathan Young (2011). "BOOK REVIEW/COMPTE RENDU. Nico Stehr and Reiner Grundmann. Experts: The Know- ledge and Power of Expertise". Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie (36(3)).

Template:Persondata

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Reiner_Grundmann&oldid=662010171"