Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Cheat Expert
Appearance
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was no consensus. Star Mississippi 13:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Anti-Cheat Expert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Doesn't meet WP:GNG. If sources are found, please ping me. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Video games and Software. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:29, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Actually Anti-Cheat Expert is a rather notable software in China and there are numerous resources about it in Chinese:
- https://www.sohu.com/a/803766128_120840 (ACE was reported by China Game Report)
- https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1715266563479839884&wfr=spider&for=pc (PR Newswire's report about the game security summit held by ACE)
- http://youxichaguan.com/news/30343.html (ACE was awarded as the best game service company in 2022)
- Many popular games had cooperation with Anti-Cheat Expert and lots of gamers know this software. Yogurt moon123 (talk) 06:36, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- https://intl.anticheatexpert.com/#/index (the official website-English version)
- https://fairplayalliance.org/members/ (showing as a member of fair play alliance as many other notable gaming companies)
- https://anticheatexpert.com/#/index (official Chinese website showing that ACE has passed ISO 27001 and ISO 27701)
- https://www.cbinsights.com/company/anti-cheat-expert (introduction from cbinsights) Yogurt moon123 (talk) 05:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Delete I am not convinced by the sources, simple announcements are insufficient to prove notability. The WP:SIGCOV doesn't seem to be there. ᴢxᴄᴠʙɴᴍ (ᴛ) 10:31, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
- Redirect to Tencent per zh:游戏安全专家. IgelRM (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Source assessment table: prepared by User:Aaron Liu, analyzing all sources in the Chinese article and the 4 sources that weren't official websites brought up here]]
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
https://www.sohu.com/a/803766128_120840 | ~ | No mention in original content | ✘ No | |
http://youxichaguan.com/news/30343.html | ~ Basically the Chinese industry's The Game Awards | Only mentioned that it got a prize. May shakily contribute towards some subject-specific guideline. | ✘ No | |
https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1715266563479839884&wfr=spider&for=pc | ? | ? published on Chinese Medium (website) | no mention | ✘ No |
https://www.cbinsights.com/company/anti-cheat-expert | ? CB Insights is independent but writing looks like press-release copy | RSN discussion | ~ one nothing-burger paragraph | ? Unknown |
https://web.archive.org/web/20191026133418/https://www.techweb.com.cn/onlinegamerim/2018-11-05/2710760.shtml | ~ Source is aggregator, original source is independent & famous Chinese game hosting company "Four Three Nine Nine" | ditto | ~ Partial | |
https://news.sina.com.cn/sx/2022-04-15/detail-imcwiwst2031104.shtml | Straight up copies their press release. See Wikipedia:Independent sources#Press releases | ✘ No | ||
http://www.gamelook.com.cn/2017/11/311055 | ✔ Yes | |||
https://cn.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202111/05/WS6184fb41a3107be4979f6d94.html | WP:RSP: may be used, cautiously and with good editorial judgment, [...] as a source for facts about non-political events in mainland China |
✔ Yes | ||
ded link | ? Unknown | |||
ded link | ? Unknown | |||
https://blog.csdn.net/AntiCheatExpert/article/details/126759959#:~:text=%E8%85%BE%E8%AE%AF%E6%B8%B8%E6%88%8F%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E5%8F%91%E5%B8%83 | literally from ACE | ✘ No | ||
https://www.prnasia.com/lightnews/lightnews-1-77-37383.shtml | 美通社=PR Newswire | ✘ No | ||
https://news.sina.cn/sx/2023-03-24/detail-imymycye3038331.d.html | n omention | ✘ No | ||
https://www.hankyung.com/article/202404227507i | Korea Economic Daily is listed at WP:KO/RS#R | ✔ Yes | ||
https://m.inven.co.kr/webzine/wznews.php?idx=298100 | ? no mention found anywhere on wikipedia | ? Unknown | ||
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}. |
- Weak keep. Aaron Liu (talk) 02:20, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
- Keep - I agree withe the source analysis above. Crosses the line, although the article needs a lot of work. Sirfurboy🏄 (talk) 07:24, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 05:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.