Jump to content

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anti-Cheat Expert

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎. Star Mississippi 13:43, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Cheat Expert (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. If sources are found, please ping me. Safari ScribeEdits! Talk! 04:23, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

https://intl.anticheatexpert.com/#/index (the official website-English version)
https://fairplayalliance.org/members/ (showing as a member of fair play alliance as many other notable gaming companies)
https://anticheatexpert.com/#/index (official Chinese website showing that ACE has passed ISO 27001 and ISO 27701)
https://www.cbinsights.com/company/anti-cheat-expert (introduction from cbinsights) Yogurt moon123 (talk) 05:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Tencent per zh:游戏安全专家. IgelRM (talk) 19:24, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Source assessment table: prepared by User:Aaron Liu, analyzing all sources in the Chinese article and the 4 sources that weren't official websites brought up here]]
Source Independent? Reliable? Significant coverage? Count source toward GNG?
https://www.sohu.com/a/803766128_120840 ~ Yes No No mention in original content No
http://youxichaguan.com/news/30343.html ~ Basically the Chinese industry's The Game Awards Yes No Only mentioned that it got a prize. May shakily contribute towards some subject-specific guideline. No
https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1715266563479839884&wfr=spider&for=pc ? ? published on Chinese Medium (website) No no mention No
https://www.cbinsights.com/company/anti-cheat-expert ? CB Insights is independent but writing looks like press-release copy Yes RSN discussion ~ one nothing-burger paragraph ? Unknown
https://web.archive.org/web/20191026133418/https://www.techweb.com.cn/onlinegamerim/2018-11-05/2710760.shtml ~ Source is aggregator, original source is independent & famous Chinese game hosting company "Four Three Nine Nine" Yes ditto Yes ~ Partial
https://news.sina.com.cn/sx/2022-04-15/detail-imcwiwst2031104.shtml No Straight up copies their press release. See Wikipedia:Independent sources#Press releases Yes Yes No
http://www.gamelook.com.cn/2017/11/311055 Yes Yes Yes Yes
https://cn.chinadaily.com.cn/a/202111/05/WS6184fb41a3107be4979f6d94.html Yes Yes WP:RSP: may be used, cautiously and with good editorial judgment, [...] as a source for facts about non-political events in mainland China Yes Yes
ded link ? Unknown
ded link ? Unknown
https://blog.csdn.net/AntiCheatExpert/article/details/126759959#:~:text=%E8%85%BE%E8%AE%AF%E6%B8%B8%E6%88%8F%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E5%8F%91%E5%B8%83 No literally from ACE Yes Yes No
https://www.prnasia.com/lightnews/lightnews-1-77-37383.shtml No 美通社=PR Newswire Yes Yes No
https://news.sina.cn/sx/2023-03-24/detail-imymycye3038331.d.html Yes Yes No n omention No
https://www.hankyung.com/article/202404227507i Yes Yes Korea Economic Daily is listed at WP:KO/RS#R Yes Yes
https://m.inven.co.kr/webzine/wznews.php?idx=298100 Yes ? no mention found anywhere on wikipedia Yes ? Unknown
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using {{source assess table}}.

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Doczilla Ohhhhhh, no! 05:40, 6 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.