Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ma Chak Shun

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Not sure why this was relisted, but there's clear consensus to keep this. (non-admin closure) —VersaceSpace 🌃 13:41, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Ma Chak Shun

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GNG and WP:SIGCOV. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Women, Football, and Hong Kong. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 23:53, 17 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Not enough sources are available. Sources are profiles. Lovewiki106 (talk) 00:15, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Meets WP:GNG:

"港隊後防百搭馬澤純靠睇直播偷師" (in Chinese (Hong Kong)). Oriental Daily News. Retrieved 2022-08-18.
"【香港足夢・馬澤純】以足球讓父母自豪快樂富足" (in Chinese). Sportsroad [zh]. Retrieved 2022-08-18.

Jumpytoo Talk 04:22, 18 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Besides the sources Jumpytoo found, I found sources like [1] and [2], among many many other sources. She is clearly significant figure in Hong Kong women's and international football with an ongoing career. I look at the other Sports WikiProjects (or any WikiProject) and they don't nearly have an article deleted per day, let alone 20. By the time I finish writing this, another 20 will probably be deleted. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Thanks, Das osmnezz (talk) 00:15, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
A youtube video by an association the subject is associated too is a primary source. Regardless, this is an interview and is not independent of the subject. Sportsfan 1234 (talk) 00:48, 20 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 22:45, 19 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per sources above which show notability. Giant Snowman 18:13, 22 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:17, 24 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.