Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NDF india
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Keep (Nomination Withdrawn). utcursch | talk 08:07, 31 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No notability - also, see Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Thejas_Online --Sigma 7 22:19, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Update: Nomination Withdrawn, as sufficient references have been recorded at http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=NDF_india&oldid=97115510. However, the page will still need to be watched for POV issues. --Sigma 7 14:17, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- If, as seems likely, this organization is pro-Muslim partisan, the page should say so and be category-classed accordingly. Anthony Appleyard 23:24, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. -- ⇒ bsnowball 10:26, 23 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Keep but needs extreme POV cleaning - They are notable yes, but they are a front for a terrorist organization, not a "Human rights" org. Their idea of human rights is letting Abdul Nasser Madani roam the roads of South India perpetrating the genocide of Hindus.Bakaman 18:34, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, If you have any questions, please contact me at my talk page. Ian Manka 23:36, 28 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep and rewrite. It's an organisation with news notability despite the POV issues. I've added a few sources that seem reliable, and deleted the unsourced sentence naming the person who founded it. Mereda 10:58, 29 December 2006 (UTC) Rewritten. --Mereda 15:54, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- Speedy keep. Highly notable organization in Kerala politics. The article should be thouroughly POV-checked though. They are accused of being communal, like their hindu counterparts (RSS, VHP, etc.), and a discussion about their role in communal clashes should be dealt with, but not necessarily in the intro. Same standards should be applied to NDF as to RSS, etc. to keep the articles on communal forces NPOV. --Soman 12:06, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.