Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Computing/Assessment

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Shortcut: WP:COMP/A
Assessment links

Welcome to the assessment department of WikiProject Computing. This project aims to assess articles under the scope of WikiProject Computing and help improving Wikipedia.

Assessment requests

[edit]

If you have encountered an article that you believe has been sufficiently improved, please list it here and, if possible, a reviewer will reassess the article and leave comments.

Quality assessment procedures

[edit]

Open requests

[edit]

Some articles are of interest for both this project and WikiProject Computer Security. While assessing, please update both projects Quality and Importance, if you can.

  1. Tapas (website) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) — requested by HenryCrun15 (talk · contribs) 03:14, 5 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Vector processor (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) requested by lkcl (talk · contribs) have spent some considerable time updating it, correcting some serious *industry-wide* misassertions (yes, really, not "mistakes by other wikipedia editors", actual misleading misassertions by major processor manufacturers). i'm also recommending that the page be upgraded to "Top" or, at a push, "high", because Vector processing is over 60 years old and is the core fundamental basis of all GPUs on the planet and the majority of supercomputers as well. in talk page. Lkcl (talk) 17:09, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    holy cow! 477 pages link to this one! Lkcl (talk) 18:01, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    also having read the critera i would advocate it seems to meet the criteria for a "B" class. i don't think it meets "GA" or "A" criteria. Lkcl (talk) 18:05, 10 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
    I have some concerns with the direction this article has taken. I have started a discussion at Talk:Vector_processor#Discernable_features. ~Kvng (talk) 14:28, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  3. .internal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) — requested by 3aec04 (talk · contribs) New article about a reserved top-level domain, currently a stub. 22:15, 10 August 2024 (UTC) Start rating ~Kvng (talk) 19:32, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Transcluded requests
[edit]

The following list is transcluded from Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer Security/Assessment#Open requests of the related project Wikipedia:WikiProject Computer Security, that recently has created the Assessment department.

You can join that department, if you like, here.

Please, review them and update the transcluded page accordingly.



Recent assessment changes

[edit]

How to assess an article

[edit]

Anyone can assess a listed article.

  • Study the quality guidelines. Carefully determine which class applies.
  • Leave comments about your assessment on the talk page.
  • Edit the class= parameter on each relevant project banner.
  • Edit this page to remove the request.
  • Include in the edit summary e.g.:
    Assessed [[ArticleName]], changed from Start-class to C-class

Quality

[edit]

Importance

[edit]

Quality statistics

[edit]

The statistics below are from the last time the assessment tool scanned the WikiProject Computing articles. To see the latest results, have the assessment tool update the data, then reload this page.



Project participants interested in assessment

[edit]
  1. -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 15:54, 23 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  2. Phillip A (talk)
  3. SOL Basic 00:55, 28 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  4. -- Logical Premise Ergo? 13:46, 22 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  5. Message From Xenu (talk · contribs)
  6. Josemanimala (talk · contribs)
  7. Some Old Man (talk) 11:09, 6 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  8. C21Ktalk 14:35, 17 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  9. Daydreamer302000 (talk · contribs) 14:51, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  10. decltype (talk · contribs) 11:18, 6 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  11. Andy Chat c 22:48, 17 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  12. --Michaelkourlas (talk) 22:05, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  13. Airplaneman (talk · contribs) 7:37, 12 November 2009 (UTC)
  14. -- Eraserhead1 <talk> 14:18, 24 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  15. § Music Sorter § (talk) 06:37, 18 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  16. Kvng (talk · contribs) --Kvng (talk) 21:57, 19 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  17. Nullw0rm (Talk? - Contribs?) 18:45, 8 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  18. Dexp (talk) 13:58, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  19. --Pastore Italy (talk) 17:37, 29 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  20. Pnm (talk) 18:18, 4 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  21. Jamesrules90 (talk) 17:57, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  22. ebraminiotalk 17:32, 8 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  23. Enfcer (talk) 00:40, 9 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  24. Ankit Maity (talk) 06:48, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  25. --Ourhistory153 (talk) 14:56, 11 November 2011 (UTC) Cloud_computing[reply]
  26. Bardi1100 (talk)
  27. Diego (talk) 09:04, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  28. -- Trevj (talk) 10:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  29. Simon Bramfitt talk
  30. Enrique Villar 13:00, 25 January 2015 (UTC) (St. Paul's Fall)[reply]
  31. Seba5tien (talk/contribs) 08:10, 29 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  32. MBlairMartin (talk) 22:27, 14 September 2016
  33. Jamesp88 (talk | contribs) 17:50, 16 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  34. OvalCheese (talk) 00:35, 10 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  35. Lkcl (talk) 11:20, 8 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  36. ClockworkSoul 17:55, 30 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  37. Gluonz talk contribs 21:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]