Talk:Crane (machine)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Crane (machine) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
Archives: 1Auto-archiving period: 365 days |
This It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
This article is substantially duplicated by a piece in an external publication. Please do not flag this article as a copyright violation of the following source:
|
This page has archives. Sections older than 365 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 5 sections are present. |
Fabrication of a Crane
[edit]I work as a "Project Management" officer & I would like more about fabrication of cranes, WBS (Work Breakdown Structure) and so on.
Crane Design
[edit]I am interested in detailed engineering design of plate box girder used as a crane girder.
=Rajendra Sawant, email : rajsawant@mtnl.net.in
Please include the statics involved in the cranes design.
Holding area
[edit]This is a characteristic of a crane. what does exactly mean?
Nautical cargo handling gear
[edit]What is missing here, and as far as I can tell in all other articles, is a description of shipboard cranes. Mainly I'm thinking of loading booms and other cargo handling gear attached to a mast, as was standard on general freight ships before containerization came in the 1960s, as shown in this great old film: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0PJ4zTvNwwQ Cancun (talk) 10:28, 6 September 2020 (UTC)
Broken formatting
[edit]In viewing the section on Tower Cranes, which is a 4th level subsection, the sections below it (Components, Assembly, etc), which are 5th level subsections, are not properly formatted. It appears Wikipedia uses the same heading format for all headings at and below the 4th level (noting that this may depend on the platform you view it on - this is Firefox on Windows). The lack of distinction of the 5th level headings makes the article confusing to read.
Ideally someone will figure out a way to reformat the entire article, such that it can all be structured with no more than 4 levels of subsections (actually, what would be ideal would be for Wikipedia to correctly format all levels of subsections, but I wouldn't hold my breath waiting for that to happen). — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:589:300:C7C0:4CA8:7E8A:E16C:DD82 (talk) 14:37, 14 July 2024 (UTC)
- @2601:589:300:C7C0:4CA8:7E8A:E16C:DD82 I already added a tag concerning this, hopefully future editors might want to edit it. AsianStuff03 (talk) 13:45, 28 July 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia vital articles in Technology
- B-Class level-4 vital articles
- Wikipedia level-4 vital articles in Technology
- B-Class vital articles in Technology
- B-Class Technology articles
- WikiProject Technology articles
- B-Class Engineering articles
- Mid-importance Engineering articles
- WikiProject Engineering articles