Talk:Fake news

Skip to table of contents

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Fake news article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: Index, 1, 2, 3, 4: 90 days

This page is not a forum for general discussion about Fake news. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about Fake news at the Reference desk.

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

snow keep, 20 August 2018, see discussion.
merge and redirect to News management, 12 April 2005, see discussion.

Politics High‑importance

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism High‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Psychology Low‑importance

	Psychology portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Psychology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Psychology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PsychologyWikipedia:WikiProject PsychologyTemplate:WikiProject Psychologypsychology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Sociology Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet High‑importance

	Internet portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Internet on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.InternetWikipedia:WikiProject InternetTemplate:WikiProject InternetInternet articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Text and/or other creative content from this version of Fake news by country was copied or moved into Fake news with this edit. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists.

Section sizes

Section size for Fake news (95 sections)
Section name	Byte count	Section total
(Top)	8,459	8,459
Defining fake news	9,655	23,767
Roots	2,434	2,434
Popularity and viral spread	5,797	5,797
Its damaging effects	5,881	5,881
Types of fake news	1,902	1,902
Criticism of the term	5,436	5,436
Identification	4,069	6,445
Online identification	2,376	2,376
Tackling and suppression strategies	1,749	40,969
Strategies regarding the perpetrator	45	6,050
Promotion of facts over emotions	1,804	1,804
Technique rebuttal	1,053	1,053
Individual counteraction	1,790	1,790
Backfire effect	1,358	1,358
Strategies regarding carriers	38	22,084
Regulation of social media	1,787	1,787
General strategy	2,878	2,878
Fact-checking	2,286	2,286
Facebook	2,597	2,597
Google	1,902	1,902
Legal and criminal sanctions in general	10,596	10,596
Strategies regarding the recipient	42	11,086
Cognitive biases of recipient	2,059	2,059
Nudges as reflection prompts	2,518	2,518
Media critical thinking skills	515	515
Mental immune health, inoculation and prebunking	5,952	5,952
History	14	34,743
Ancient	3,878	3,878
Medieval	878	878
Early modern	3,108	3,108
19th century	3,799	3,799
20th century	7,505	7,505
21st century	15,561	15,561
Special topics	22	26,406
Deepfakes and shallowfakes	5,568	5,568
Bots on social media	9,783	9,783
Internet trolls	3,688	3,688
Fake news hoaxes	7,345	7,345
Donald Trump's misuse of term	11,813	11,813
By country	17	132,893
Europe	15	44,929
Austria	1,099	1,099
Belgium	941	941
Czech Republic	1,833	1,833
European Union	932	932
Finland	1,219	1,219
France	5,491	5,491
Germany	5,709	5,709
Hungary	1,153	1,153
Italy	2,043	2,043
Malta	2,841	2,841
Netherlands	1,384	1,384
Poland	2,164	2,164
Romania	750	750
Russia	3,252	3,252
Serbia	4,023	4,023
Spain	1,955	1,955
Sweden	1,660	1,660
Ukraine	2,575	2,575
United Kingdom	3,890	3,890
Asia	13	40,675
China	5,015	7,162
Hong Kong	2,147	2,147
India	1,064	1,064
Indonesia	7,505	7,505
Malaysia	3,619	3,619
Myanmar (Burma)	1,230	1,230
Pakistan	1,022	1,022
Philippines	6,779	6,779
Singapore	8,639	8,639
South Korea	1,669	1,669
Taiwan	1,973	1,973
Americas	18	25,987
Brazil	7,377	7,377
Canada	1,515	1,515
Colombia	4,600	4,600
Mexico	12,340	12,340
United States	137	137
Middle East and Africa	31	18,820
Armenia	961	961
Israel and Palestinian territories	5,101	5,101
Saudi Arabia	3,554	3,554
Syria	3,839	3,839
United Arab Emirates	868	868
Egypt	846	846
South Africa	3,620	3,620
Oceania	17	2,465
Australia	2,448	2,448
See also	1,828	1,828
Notes	26	26
References	30	446
Sources	416	416
Further reading	4,070	4,070
External links	3,306	3,306
Total	302,509	302,509

I made an account just to say this page needs work

Hello Wikipedia, normally your pages are easy to read. This one is very long and has no table of contents or way to easily navigate it. Sorry I can't help. HeretoCriticize (talk) 21:54, 26 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The History section is missing the Cold War entirely...

...and should be expanded. JackTheSecond (talk) 23:15, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Any ideas what should be added?--Jack Upland (talk) 23:26, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I've been working on the German Service of the BBC for a while and got the impression that the BBC was broadcasting much more reliable news segments than really anyone else. By my impression, Radio propaganda seems to have been a major facet of the Cold War and the truthfulness of the various broadcasts seems to have varied by a lot.

But maybe general propaganda is outside the scope of this article. I don't really know. JackTheSecond (talk) 11:59, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would say it is, its why we have a whole article on it. Slatersteven (talk) 12:02, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's more the amount of additional information that covering the Cold War as well that'd be a problem, probably. Though, because of how the definition at the top does include 'propaganda', maybe we can add a section and include a link to the relevant articles. JackTheSecond (talk) 12:27, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Fake News" as a thing hardly existed before 2017. There was a proposal in 2005 to delete Fake_News since "propaganda" said it all. IMO, most of the old anecdotes (history, propaganda) should be reduced to pointers to the incidents or general articles. This article should distinguish the SEVERAL usages that have emerged since November, 2016. RichardFloyd (talk) 04:18, 24 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"the House of Commons commenced an inquiry"

... and then what? Did anything come of it? What's the point of mentioning it? WP:NOTNEWS. 2601:642:4600:D3B0:56C:3F16:53EF:5265 (talk) 00:32, 2 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The quoted section is not in the article. Neither are similar statements. JackTheSecond (talk) 12:29, 4 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Marc Bloch

As you probably know, fake news was a topic this historian dealt with while he was in the trenches in the World War: as a historian he considered that it was not enough for his profession to dismiss them as "okay they are not true, so we are not interested in them," but that they themselves should be the subject of study. Perhaps this item could be related to "fake news" topic ? 151.49.40.45 (talk) 20:28, 30 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]