Talk:Maverick Hunter

Maverick Hunter has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: April 9, 2016. (Reviewed version).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Maverick Hunter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 21:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looks interesting. I'll have this finished soon. JAGUAR 21:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Initial comments

"and Adi Granov was responsible for X's new design" - this is the first mention of X, and for readers unfamiliar with Mega Man lore (especially me), it might be best to mention that he is the protagonist here. I realize that it's mentioned in the sentence after, but I think it would be less confusing to mention it in this sentence. Also, X should be linked here and not in the sentence after
"The redesign for the Mega Man character was to be done" - link Mega Man (character)
"Instead of his arm transforming into a cannon, his armour transforms to create a gun" - armor? I'm not picky, just checking that one spelling variation is used consistently
"The game also was planned to have branching paths" - The game was also
"It was going to build upon the mythology and feature characters" - best to start the paragraph with Maverick Hunter was going to build upon
"They compared the direction to that of Metroid Prime by developer Retro Studios (from which Armature Studio spun out)" - 'spun out'(?) sounds informal
"He compared it to Metroid Prime's design by noting that the art style didn't change much" - did not
The reception section could do with splitting into two paragraphs
No dead links
No dab links

Sorry for the delay in reviewing this. It was an interesting read. Once all of the above have been clarified then this should be good to go. JAGUAR 17:38, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@GamerPro64: I noticed the bot didn't leave you a notification. JAGUAR 12:12, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done everything. GamerPro64 00:16, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for addressing them. I've checked the article and this looks like it's good to go

JAGUAR 18:58, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Put date in lead

Article looks good but I came here really quick to see when the game was in development/canceled and it wasn't anywhere in the lead. I had to look deep within in the body of the article before I saw that one 2010 date in the cancellation section. TarkusAB 00:23, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Added that information in. GamerPro64 00:39, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]