This talk page is intended for discussion of technical aspects of the Find sources template. For discussions relating to content and links, see Module talk:Find sources
Template:Find sources is permanently protected from editing because it is a heavily used or highly visible template. Substantial changes should first be proposed and discussed here on this page. If the proposal is uncontroversial or has been discussed and is supported by consensus, editors may use {{edit template-protected}} to notify an administrator or template editor to make the requested edit. Any contributor may edit the template's sandbox. Functionality of the template can be checked using test cases.
This template is part of WikiProject Reliability, a collaborative effort to improve the reliability of Wikipedia articles. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ReliabilityWikipedia:WikiProject ReliabilityTemplate:WikiProject ReliabilityReliability articles
This template was considered for deletion on 2017 May 14. The result of the discussion was "no consensus".
This page has previously been moved or merged. Before readjusting, review the moves listed below.
There has previously been discussion about what to do when an article is a member of two projects, e.g. Marie Curie is a member of WP:MEDICINE and WP:BIOGRAPHY. Previous discussion has centered upon the fact that the possible conflict between two projects is a negative, and how should we resolve it? It occurs to me that we needn't resolve it, and should reframe it as a feature, not a bug. The template could be modified to invoke the module twice, once for each project. This might raise additional questions, such as, should we throttle the max number of search domains for which a links banner could be generated, and if so, should that be a hard limit, or configurable (e.g., |maxdomains=2)? The way the template is currently designed, such a modification would be very easy to carry out. Mathglot (talk) 00:04, 19 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"FENS" is an internal term that would not be well known by the people who are the primary intended audience for the "find sources" bit, same with "TWL", though one does get the notification when they are eligible for that one so it's not quite as insider baseball. They have abbr annotations, but would it be that unreasonable to expand them to "Newspapers" and "The Wikipedia Library"? I don't think it would be a crime to have the section span two lines instead of one if need be. Remsense留16:49, 1 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
This discussion found consensus for changing the template to include search engines of news titles/scholarly articles, instead of listing them individually. I am looking forward to your proposals to implement it, or even replacing it with {{Search for}} and modifying it if needed. I don't know much about coding, but I am willing to help Szmenderowiecki (talk) 21:46, 20 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The core project WikiProject detection code takes place in subtemplates /proj/is med, /proj/is biography, /proj/is video. These subtemplates are working, but they are built using regular expressions and a stronger method is available now since the introduction of template {{HasTemplate}} based on new module functionality. The upshot of this, is that we now have a more powerful tool for determining the presence of the WikiProject templates, and all three subtemplates should be converted to use {{HasTemplate}}, and avoid use of regular expressions which by their nature are more fragile, as well as being more difficult to maintain. Another reason to use the new template is the redirects issue. The WP:MED WikiProject for example, has a dozen redirects, leading to more regex code in the subtemplate (/doc section proj/is med#Notes addresses this) and this could and should be replaced with {{HasTemplate}} as a robustness improvement which will also make future modifications easier and more bulletproof. Mathglot (talk) 20:49, 29 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]
(updated)
Change description of WP Refs from 'a Google search that only searches sites vetted by Wikipedians' to 'a Google search limited to hundreds of higher-quality sources'
Superb Owl (talk) 17:19, 12 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]