User:Mnnlaxer
Appearance
- 2005 CIA interrogation tapes destruction August 2013
- Abu Doha February 2016
- Mohamed Alanssi June 2015
- Alfreda Frances Bikowsky February 2016
- Camp Chapman attack January 2016
- Robert Fuller (FBI) June 2015
- Interrogation of Abu Zubaydah February 2012
- David Kilcullen July 2013
- Deuce Martinez June 2015
- Mohammed Ali Hassan Al-Moayad July 2013
- Operation Dark Heart June 2015
- John A. Rizzo June 2015
- Mohamedou Ould Salahi December 2017
- Mahfouz Ould al-Walid February 2016
- Lacrosse December 2017
- Chesapeake Bayhawks December 2017
- Cornell–Hobart rivalry December 2017
- Major League Lacrosse December 2017
Biographies
- John Butkiewicz July 2019
- Andrew Goldstein November 2017
- Casey Powell December 2017
- Delby Powless December 2017
- Tim Soudan December 2017
International lacrosse
- Lacrosse in England
- England Lacrosse
- World Lacrosse
- Iroquois national indoor lacrosse team
- List of national lacrosse governing bodies
Lacrosse at the Summer Olympics
- Lacrosse at the 1904 Summer Olympics
- Lacrosse at the 1908 Summer Olympics
- Lacrosse at the 1928 Summer Olympics
- Lacrosse at the 1932 Summer Olympics
- Lacrosse at the 1948 Summer Olympics
World Indoor Lacrosse Championship
- 2003 World Indoor Lacrosse Championship
- 2007 World Indoor Lacrosse Championship
- 2011 World Indoor Lacrosse Championship
- 2015 World Indoor Lacrosse Championship
- 2019 World Indoor Lacrosse Championship
World Lacrosse Championship
- Carleton Knights October 2017
- Carleton Knights football December 2017
- 1992 Carleton Knights football team December 2017
- Cub Buck December 2017
Biographies
[edit]- Alexander the Alabarch June 2015
- Haleh Esfandiari June 2013
- Gian Gentile June 2015
- Hermann Gunkel June 2015
- Barry Lando July 2015
- Herbert London June 2015
- Lou Moro December 2017
- Steve Sampson October 2017
- Robb Stauber October 2017
Other
[edit]- Dartmouth Big Green women's ice hockey December 2017
- Minneapolis Park and Recreation Board January 2018
- NCAA Division III December 2017
- Parade Stadium December 2017
Links
[edit]- Mnnlaxer/common.css
- Mnnlaxer/monobook.css
- Everything you need to know
- Editing policy
- Simplified ruleset
- List of policies
- Arguments to avoid on discussion pages
- Arguments to avoid in edit wars
- Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions
- Reliable sources noticeboard
- Articles for deletion
- Extended image syntax
- Wiki markup
- Citation Style 1
- Cheatsheet
- Help:User style
- Wikipedia:Notable people who have edited Wikipedia
Some could profit by reading these statements
[edit]Neutral point of view - Bias in sources:
- "A common argument in a dispute about reliable sources is that one source is biased and so another source should be given preference. The bias in sources argument is one way to present a POV as neutral by excluding sources that dispute the POV as biased. Biased sources are not inherently disallowed based on bias alone, although other aspects of the source may make it invalid. Neutral point of view should be achieved by balancing the bias in sources based on the weight of the opinion in reliable sources and not by excluding sources that do not conform to the writer's point of view."
Identifying reliable sources - Biased or opinionated sources:
- "Wikipedia articles are required to present a neutral point of view. However, reliable sources are not required to be neutral, unbiased, or objective. Sometimes non-neutral sources are the best possible sources for supporting information about the different viewpoints held on a subject. Common sources of bias include political, financial, religious, philosophical, or other beliefs. While a source may be biased, it may be reliable in the specific context."
Neutral point of view FAQ - Lack of neutrality as an excuse to delete:
- "It is a frequent misunderstanding of the NPOV policy, often expressed by newbies, visitors, and outside critics, that articles must not contain any form of bias, hence their efforts to remove statements they perceive as biased. The NPOV policy does forbid the inclusion of editorial bias, but does not forbid properly sourced bias. Without the inclusion and documentation of bias in the real world, many of our articles would fail to document the sum total of human knowledge, and would be rather "blah" reading, devoid of much meaningful and interesting content."
- "The reliable sources guideline refers to a source's overall reputation for fact-checking and reliability--not the source's neutrality. Reliable sources may be non-neutral: a source's reputation for fact-checking is not inherently dependent upon its point of view."
Other
[edit]From Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions.