User talk:Neonorange

This is Neonorange's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Archives: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7: 90 days

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it. If I have been active and have not yet responded, please place {{Talkback|your username}} on my page as I may have missed your response.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, so please add it to your watchlist. If I notice that you have been active but have not responded, I may place {{Talkback|Neonorange}} on your page in case you have missed my response.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:Biographies of living persons on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Buffy Sainte-Marie on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 17 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 60

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 60, November – December 2023

Three new partners
Google Scholar integration
How to track partner suggestions

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --13:36, 24 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback requests from the Feedback Request Service

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Max Mallowan, Wikipedia:Reliable sources/Noticeboard and Talk:Ram Mandir on "All RFCs" request for comments. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 07:36, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 61

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 61, January – February 2024

Bristol University Press and British Online Archives now available
1Lib1Ref results

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --16:32, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia:Village pump (proposals) on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 19:30, 15 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Robert F. Kennedy Jr. on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 04:31, 6 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:Tesla, Inc. on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 02:30, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 62

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 62, March – April 2024

IEEE and Haaretz now available
Let's Connect Clinics about The Wikipedia Library
Spotlight and Wikipedia Library tips

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --11:02, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:New York City on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 10:31, 28 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder to vote now to select members of the first U4C

You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to other languages.

Dear Wikimedian,

You are receiving this message because you previously participated in the UCoC process.

This is a reminder that the voting period for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) ends on May 9, 2024. Read the information on the voting page on Meta-wiki to learn more about voting and voter eligibility.

The Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) is a global group dedicated to providing an equitable and consistent implementation of the UCoC. Community members were invited to submit their applications for the U4C. For more information and the responsibilities of the U4C, please review the U4C Charter.

Please share this message with members of your community so they can participate as well.

On behalf of the UCoC project team,

RamzyM (WMF) 23:09, 2 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:SpaceX Starship flight tests on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 13:31, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Talk:SpaceX Starship flight tests on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:30, 23 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment

Your feedback is requested at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball on a "All RFCs" request for comment. Thank you for helping out!
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name.

Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 16:31, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Revert on URL shortening

Hi Neonorange. Are you sure about this revert? The summary of the edit I reverted was "added content" but the edit removed useful wikilinks and altered a sentence such that it no longer makes sense. I don't believe "added content" can be considered an explanation. Squeakachu (talk) 05:00, 15 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for stepping on your toes. Evidently we were both working on the same pending changes simultaneously.

think the changes by the IP were a valid tightening of the leading paragraph. Bringing up the World Wide Web there is unnecessary, for example. I agree with you that sentence you pointed out did not quite make sense. It would have been better if I had fixed that sentence after accepting the pending edit.

I believe in accepting pending edits that are mainly an improvement, are not vandalism, are not unsourced when that is required, and are not messing with sourced information. Especially with fairly new editors. BLPs require extra scrutiny since most of those pending changes are likely to be Dead On Arrival. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 03:02, 16 June 2024 (UTC) —[reply]

== Reverting editing and adding unreliable sources ==eman waten

Hello, you reverted my editing and added a non-reliable source aiming just to defame a living person. Would you explain what is your interest in doing so? 177.9.253.224 (talk) 22:57, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. I was reviewing your changes to an article under pending changes protection. I have fixed the error, reinstating your changes. Somehow I misread your changes as adding the extraneous name rather than deleting them.

The edits we did were edits to information, not to sources. The two names were a type of vandalism and you were correct to delete as you did. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 23:27, 27 June 2024 (UTC) —[reply]

Books & Bytes – Issue 63

The Wikipedia Library: Books & Bytes
Issue 63, May – June 2024

One new partner
1Lib1Ref
Spotlight: References check

Read the full newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery on behalf of The Wikipedia Library team --12:15, 18 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mathematics is not an opinion

Wikipedia's attitude is clearly skeptical and hostile towards Nostradamus. Invented prophecies, wrong solutions or forcing by some interpreters are highlighted. The blame for all this is subtly placed on Nostradamus and it is stated that his prophecies can only be identified after the events have occurred. Which is completely normal. Never has a cryptic prophecy been correctly exposed before it occurred. Prophecy is the message that God entrusts to the prophet to make known to men. There are two types of prophecies: explicit and cryptic. The explicit one is for example when God entrusts the tables of the law to Moses. The cryptic one is John's prophecy of the apocalypse, full of symbols, codes and figures that can hardly be interpreted before the events stated happen and in fact almost two thousand years have passed since its enunciation. My contribution is based on scientific and mathematical evidence specifying the source for which it can be objectively assessed. There is no adequate justification for removing it. It means wanting to also deny the Pythagorean theorem without giving a rational justification. 151.50.94.171 (talk) 06:24, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Help request for Historical rankings of presidents of the United States chart

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

In this article Historical rankings of presidents of the United States, the first big chart shows major errors, In the 2024 survey, the source does not support the ranking. Abraham Lincoln is in the middle of the pack, Teddy Roosevelt is in the lower third, Andrew Jackson is #7. In additional to the factual errors, there are technical problems with the charts. I believe the rest of the charts and columns also may have problems. I could not find edits that changed the charts for the last four months.

I am not competent to fix such large charts. The errors are going to confuse a lot of readers. Please fix the charts or blank them until the problem are fixed.

Or just point me to a good chart editor. — Neonorange (talk to Phil) (he, they) 23:51, 24 July 2024 (UTC) —[reply]

If you are saying that the given source does not support the information as written, that is an issue to discuss on the article talk page. 331dot (talk) 00:28, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

August music

Thank you for explaining for a new editor how to slow down! - I have three "musicians" on the Main page, one the topic of my story today, like 22 July but with interview and today's music at the Proms. -- Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:12, 8 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

On 13 August, Bach's cantata was 300 years old, and the image one. The cantata is an extraordinary piece, using the chorale's text and famous melody more than others in the cycle. It's nice to have not only a recent death, but also this "birthday" on the Main page. And a rainbow in my places. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:41, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]