Jump to content

User talk:Alakazam/Archives/2006

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Alakazam/Archives/2006, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome! Karmafist 03:26, 11 August 2005 (UTC)

Edit summaries

When editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labelled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary for full information on this feature.

When you leave the edit summary blank, some of your edits could be mistaken for vandalism and may be reverted, so please always briefly summarize your edits, especially when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

Zzyzx11 (Talk) 07:23, 15 August 2005 (UTC)

NFL Capitol Division

I noticed that you are making edits on some of the NFL articles about the "Capital" division. Well I checked http://www.nfl.com/history/chronology/1961-1970, http://www.nfl.com/history/standings/1967, http://www.nfl.com/history/standings/1968, and http://www.nfl.com/history/standings/1969. They spell it "Capitol" with an "O" not an "A". Zzyzx11 (Talk) 20:41, 17 November 2005 (UTC)

Are you even reading this??? Apparently you are not. Have you even looked at the following web sites:
They all spell it as CAPITOL as in the building, not CAPITAL as in the principal city or town associated with its government. Zzyzx11 (Talk) 04:45, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
  • Ok, I am sorry I got a little upset at you. I guess it is not your fault after all, but it looks like your source, JT-SW.com, is the one that is wrong on this issue. If the NFL and all of its official publications spell it with an "O", then Wikipedia should do it too, right? Zzyzx11 (Talk) 05:05, 28 November 2005 (UTC)

Vandalism List of Super Bowl champions and the packers

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. Paul (talk+) 16:42, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

No problem. Everyone has to learn sometime.  :) Also, please sign your comments on user talk pages with ~~~~ (See the above welcome message). Thanks. Paul (talk+) 17:04, 7 December 2005 (UTC)

Radio Additions!

Guess What? I found out the Radio Stations and Announcers for each team on the NFL Section of sportsencyclopedia.com! Hope U like it! WOW

I noticed all the links you're adding to http://www.sportsecyclopedia.com/. These links have the appearance of spam, because you're adding them to so many different articles. Wikipedia is not a link directory, so we're trying to keep the number of external links to a minimum and only to the most very pertinent and informative (beyond what Wikipedia can provide). I think it would be helpful if you would first discuss these links on the respective talk pages to see if editors really deem it worth including in the external links section of each article? Thanks. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 19:49, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Please review the External links guidelines, particularly #5 of "What should be linked to".
  1. Sites that contain neutral and accurate material not already in the article. Ideally this content should be integrated into the Wikipedia article, then the link would remain as a reference. - I think your links might fit this criteria, but would be better if some of the information on sportsencyclopedia could be integrated into the article, with the link as a reference rather than an external link. Thanks. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 19:58, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Sports E-Cyclopedia's OK!

Dear Wikipedians, I got my recent message and I'm replying to all of you. I very sure that Sport E-Cyclopedia is very informative on every sports team in Major League Baseball, the National Basketball Association, the National Football League, the National Hockey League, and even Major League Soccer. It shows main/alternate logos, team history, team colors, best/worst team record, etc. Plus, on the main page, they show what recently happened in the world of sports and they also have a three stars section, where they highlight three players (no matter what league) that stood out last night. In the end, I hope you guys give this site a chance. -- Alakazam

I know you've been around for a while and haven't mass-added links before and the site has a decent Alexa rating, so not accusing you of spamming. But, the behavior is typical of those adding linkspam. I think the link needs consensus from more editors, before it's mass added to so many articles. Maybe Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Baseball or Wikipedia:WikiProject National Basketball Association are good places for suggesting and discussing it (they might very well agree with you, and then it's fine with me to add). Thanks. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 20:08, 20 January 2006 (UTC)
Okay, I just added a note at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_National_Basketball_Association#External_links and Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Baseball#External_links to get opinions and consensus from other editors. -Kmf164 (talk | contribs) 20:20, 20 January 2006 (UTC)

Patriots article

Hey, I was wondering if you are interested in taking a look at the article. I plan on starting a FA nomination sometime within the next week. Deckiller 23:20, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Alakazam here! Thanks. I'll look into it. P.S. It's spelled P-A-T-R-I-O-T-S. It's only one "R."

Yeah, it was a typo =P I haven't worked on cleaning up the history subarticle yet; I just moved it. Deckiller 23:27, 27 January 2006 (UTC)

Anyway, thanks 4 telling me about the New England Patriots article. I'm currently enjoying it, along with the recently made "History of the New England Patriots" article.

Back to the Future taglines

Hi, Alakazam. I noticed you put all of the taglines for all three Back to the Future movies. I don't think that's a very good place for them, if they need to be included at all. Especially on the first Back to the Future movie, a paragraph of taglines at the end of the intro really breaks up the article. Perhaps the main tagline for each movie could be added to the infobox and we could scrap the rest entirely. —Cleared as filed. 03:15, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

By the way, noticing that you did it to a bunch of other movie articles as well, I think the same applies. It really makes the articles look cluttered. Just my opinion. —Cleared as filed. 03:16, 31 January 2006 (UTC)

OK! I dig U on what U sayin'!

The Patriots are under attack!

I just went to the New England Patriots main article and some anti-Patriot goon messed up the picture of their team helmet by saying the "New England Patsies." The bum even called their mascot "Pat Patsie." The nerve of some people.

The names you are putting on the external links to various indoor football teams, while sometimes clever, are not appropriate for an encyclopedia. It is best to use something like "Official Site" instead. Cheers. Youngamerican 17:38, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

PS--Keep up the good work on the articles, indoor football is underlooked on wikipedia and it is always cool to have someone knowledgable on less-common topics add what they know. Cheers. Youngamerican 17:50, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

Thank You!

Barnstar

For all your work on the New England Patriots featured article. Deckiller 02:05, 3 February 2006 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! I would like to thank my parents, my family, my friends, and anyone else that wants to make sure that I'm a loving person. As Sally Field said (kind of), "You like me. You really like me." <lol>

Your recent edits to all of the NFL team articles

I have noticed that you capitalized all of the "Season-by-Season Records" headers. But it also seems that you are unaware of the policy written on Wikipedia:Manual of Style (headings):

Capitalize the first letter of the first word and any proper nouns in headings, but leave the rest lower case. Thus "Rules and regulations", not "Rules and Regulations".

Zzyzx11 (Talk) 01:38, 14 February 2006 (UTC)

-OK! I dig!

-No Prob!

Montreal Expos

  • Hi. I noticed you edited this article to change the first reference to the team to "Montréal Expos". You probably did not notice it, but there has been extensive discussion of this issue on the article talk page, and the consensus is to not use the accent. Skeezix1000 01:31, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

-OOOOHHHH!!!! My bad!

Request for edit summary

Hi. I am a bot, and I am writing to you with a request. I would like to ask you, if possible, to use edit summaries a bit more often when you contribute. The reason an edit summary is important is because it allows your fellow contributors to understand what you changed; you can think of it as the "Subject:" line in an email. For your information, your current edit summary usage is 0% for major edits and 0% for minor edits. (Based on the last 150 major and 0 minor edits in the article namespace.)

This is just a suggestion, and I hope that I did not appear impolite. You do not need to reply to this message, but if you would like to give me feedback, you can do so at the feedback page. Thank you, and happy edits, Mathbot 04:15, 23 February 2006 (UTC)

Taglines

Hi. Please don't add lists of taglines to film articles- It makes the intros look very cluttered. Also WP:NOT specifically cautions against "lists of quotations", which I think covers the taglines. The IMDb has taglines, we don't really need them here, again per WP:NOT, under "Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information". I've removed the taglines, please don't add them again. Thanks.--Sean Black (talk) 01:11, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

Copyrights

Please stop adding copyrighted content to Wikipedia. We do not have permission to re-publish copyrighted content, even lists such as VH1's I Love Toys list. Rhobite 05:18, 29 March 2006 (UTC)

indoor football

Again, great work on keeping all of these articles up-to-date. youngamerican (talk) 15:34, 1 May 2006 (UTC)

Could you please put it in? Thanks! M. Burmy 13:45 CDT 1 July 2006 (UTC)

NFL results tables

can you please not replace the defunct NFL team record tables with the modern table for current teams. Most of the defunct teams did not play in an era where they had any playoffs so to put in a table with playoff results is pointless. ie Oorang Indians. In the case of the Baltimore Colts (1947-50) you replace the table with the "playoff results" but did not put back into the article the head coach information. Please make sure any info that is in a table that you take out is re incorptated back into the article thanksSmith03 05:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

Neutral POV

Regarding your edits to various 2006 football team season articles: Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. As a member of the Wikipedia community, I would like to remind you of Wikipedia's neutral-point-of-view policy for editors. In the meantime, please be bold and continue contributing to Wikipedia. Thank you! ZimZalaBim (talk) 19:37, 22 September 2006 (UTC)

Yes please edit these individual seasons with a neutral point of view. Also right in an encyclopedic tone not one similar to a sports magazine. T REXspeak 00:24, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Basketball in Canada

I write some articles about Basketball. I can't find any information about basketball in canada, but I can't find any information about a basketball-league in canada. Have they no basketball-leagues?? What teams are playing in U.S. -BB-Leagues?? 87.123.192.233 18:09, 18 October 2006 (UTC) user:martinvoll @wikipedia.de

NPOV,encyclopedic

Please use an encyclopedic tone and write in NPOV. This edit shows me that you didn't read what I said above and that you need to look over WP:NPOV. T REXspeak 21:03, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

-What's wrong with it? It explains all of the scoring highlights of the game. What could be so wrong about it?

It is not factually wrong, but the tone of the writing is not encyclopedic and it uses weasel words and peacock terms. This is an encyclopedia so please try to write in a less sports journalistic tone and more an encyclopedic tone. T REXspeak 22:31, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

PS Look at this page to see what words should be avoided. T REXspeak 22:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

I usually think to myself; how would the opposite side write this? You wrote:

"Unfortunately, that would be the only highlight for the Jaguars, as in the fourth quarter, Houston managed to put the game away"

There's some POV to that statement. Keep a neutral attitude toward both teams and you should be fine. --aviper2k7 03:52, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

-OK, I'll try to find someway past "Unfortunately" and "Put The Team Away" as best as I can.

Highlight is also POV so just use score in its place, they mean the same thing here. T REXspeak 09:36, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

Rocky

http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rocky_Marciano&diff=84761896&oldid=84760741 This was most correct version, this idiot today reverted everything under umbrella of POV, which is not, go there and see what can be done to be reverted to this version. Everything has been deleted, the bio looks pathetic now, also, do you know any good sports administrators, so we can return to correct version? Today Nov 1st the page has been terribly vandalized. They do not know any history. This guy is still reverting you got to do something.

2006 Indianapolis Colts season

Thank you for your game summary of the New England game. While I'm a Colts fan (have been since the Jeff George days), I nonetheless believe that your summary was written in a tone inappropriate for an encyclopedia. For example, phrases such as "Fortunately, rookie RB Joseph Addai would answer right back with a 2-yard TD run." and "On defense, they did an incredible job" are clearly violations of Wikipedia's NPOV policy.

Also, and don't take this personally, but your writing style is rather choppy and immature. Perhaps you could take a look at some of the articles listed at Wikipedia:Featured Articles for some examples of the writing style we generally use at Wikipedia.

If you have any questions or would like help getting situated here, let me know! Kurt Weber 16:03, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

2006 Kansas City Chiefs season

Thank you for your game summary, but please do not delete the references from the Week 12 Denver Broncos game. Also please refrain from using so many capitalizations i.e. "The Offense Returns In October." is actually written as "The offense returns in October." "Returns" is not a noun, therefore it should never be capitalized. Conman33 19:54, 24 November 2006 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alakazam/Archives/2006&oldid=1146378115"