User talk:Chaotic Enby

CHAOTIC   

TALK

• USER
• AR
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
• CONTRIBUTIONS

Beautiful user page!!

Hello! I've fallen in love with your userpage! I'm nb too, is it alright if I use your user page as a base to work on mine? It'd be for eswiki. No problem if not!! It's very original and I even shared it with some friends haha

Have a good day!! ElleAnónime (talk) 17:30, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

@ElleAnónime Of course, it would be absolutely fine with me if you do so! Thanks a lot for the compliment! (also, non-binary solidarity, yay!) Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 17:56, 5 September 2024 (UTC)

Autopatrolled granted

Hi Chaotic Enby, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Elli (talk | contribs) 23:55, 10 September 2024 (UTC)

I'Nasah Kiam

fwiw I updated your post about this, which has archived. I sort of expected that to unarchived it but apparently Things Do Not Work That Way. Anyway, not sure how much time you have to spend on this but I gotta go.just wanted you to know that your suspicions were further validated. I can't do anything about the coordination, sorry. Maybe SPI? Elinruby (talk) 21:52, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

@Elinruby Thanks a lot for the reply! I think the post has to be unarchived manually, otherwise I can send it to SPI. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:39, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Also, quickly replying here to your ANI comment: several of the sources do in fact mention the subject, but under their birth name of I'Nasah Crockett instead, so that's why searching for the name directly didn't reveal much. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:42, 14 September 2024 (UTC)

Aha. That name did come up several times in searching Google News I think (through my dyslexia is worse that usual right now. If I am right then something I noticed was an obituary, so that might explain why the article at this particular time.

I probably need to re-look at the references then; but based on memory the Crockett name came up quite a bit and they probably are at least a GNG pass. The zero results on anything was one of the reasons I thought I might be missing something like a name variant. I am going to leave it archived myself, but that an issue of my time management more than anything. Feel free to unarchive if that will help with the SPI investigation or whatever. I am no SPI expert either but based on some time spent on topics where socks proliferate, I *think* the weirdnesses you described would probably be considered enough behavioral evidence. I will find some time in the next few days to recheck the references for the other name. Black Twitter itself is definitely notable and probably does have some gaps in our coverage. Two of the sources are blogs though, but the Slate and NPR articles are enough to stave off AfD if the subject is indeed mentioned in them as an example. Thanks for the thanks. Probably the lead needs a note about the names, btw, given the principle of least astonishment, but for all I know there is a standard about this when it is a trans subject. I don't usually edit on that area. Elinruby (talk) 00:24, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

They're still active on Twitter, so the obituary was probably for someone else. For trans subjects, if they were notable under their previous name (which appears to be the case here), it should be mentioned just once in the lead to clarify. I think I already added that to the article. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:35, 15 September 2024 (UTC)

Yer right, it was Shafiqah Hudson [1]. It is entirely possible that you did mention the name variant in the lede and I missed it. This is why I avoiding sharp objects for the next week or two; busy and ADD/dyslexia compound one another. I will still re-review the references though, and possibly even improve them, as that is a small compact task that I can get done between all of the other muchness that is going on over here.

References

Arbitration case opened

You recently offered a statement in a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Backlash to diversity and inclusion. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Backlash to diversity and inclusion/Evidence. Please add your evidence by October 10, 2024, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Backlash to diversity and inclusion/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Party Guide/Introduction. For the Arbitration Committee, SilverLocust 💬 12:21, 26 September 2024 (UTC)

Troll at ANI

As you can see in the history, there is no point at all in rolling back a troll unless you can block them. Next time you see them, because you will likely see them again somewhere, just report them, so they don't have the satisfaction of putting it in the history a half a dozen times. Thanks. Drmies (talk) 00:53, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

@Drmies Thanks a lot! I reported both IPs when I saw them, but didn't know I shouldn't have rolled back their edits. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 00:58, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

RFA2024 update: Discussion-only period now open for review

Hi there! The trial of the RfA discussion-only period passed at WP:RFA2024 has concluded, and after open discussion, the RfC is now considering whether to retain, modify, or discontinue it. You are invited to participate at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase II/Discussion-only period. Cheers, and happy editing! MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 09:38, 27 September 2024 (UTC)

Operation Identification Flag

Hi @Chaotic Enby. Thanks for your review of the new Operation Identification page. I revised the page attempting to respond to your {primary sources} tag: (1) I added a new secondary source (ref #1); (2) I added existing secondary sources as refs (from the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin journal) to some statements that were previously just see, e.g.-type citations to primary sources; and (3) I revised some of the article language to more accurately reflect analysis in the secondary source rather than relying solely on a primary source as a see, e.g.-type citation for analysis. I believe the article is now supported by appropriate secondary source citations and I tried to eliminate any analysis based solely on primary sources, but I welcome your additional discussion. If you still have concerns that prevent removing the {primary sources} tag, please help me understand which sections of the article you're concerned about. Thanks! Elindstr (talk) 16:57, 1 October 2024 (UTC)

@Elindstr Thanks a lot! This is definitely an improvement, although the FBI Law Enforcement Bulletin journal is still not fully independent (being also part of the FBI), and completely independent sources would be ideal. Also, the primary sources (for their respective claims) to the National Neighborhood Watch could be replaced by secondary ones, and it would be great to see if a published study reports the claim currently sourced to a letter by Allend Voss to the Attorney General. Still, it is already much better! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 22:24, 5 October 2024 (UTC)

wait wha

was i banned in the wikimedia discord server? sorry to bother you but i can't rejoin it tynjee 00:09, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi! I genuinely don't know if you are banned, and can't do anything about this either way, I am not a moderator of the Discord sever. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:46, 3 October 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

		The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
		For your kind comments at User talk:CKirby09. --DB1729talk 00:57, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! Happy to see Sawyer and PMC also got it, they really did a wonderful job! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 01:16, 7 October 2024 (UTC)

About recent speedy deletion.

I almost denied it for being a copyright violation but then I noticed it does have a link to the source it uses in the last line where it says "In the spirit of education, National Purebred Dog Day maintains a website and social media presence." the link is in the word website. Shadow311 (talk) 23:03, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

Hi! Linking the source website does not prevent it from being a copyright violation. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 23:26, 9 October 2024 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Graphic Designer's Barnstar
	That userpage is really something Dronebogus (talk) 21:08, 10 October 2024 (UTC)

Thanks!!! Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 21:09, 10 October 2024 (UTC)