User talk:CFA


Wikipedia ads	file info – show another – #24

👤 User	💬 Talk	🗂️ Archives	✏️ Contributions	🔎 Articles created	🔧 Maintenance	✉️ Email me

Welcome to my talk page! Please remember to be civil.

My watchlist is large and sometimes hard to manage. Please ping me with the {{ping|CFA}} template if you're trying to get my attention on a page that isn't this one.
If you can't find a previous discussion, it was probably archived. Feel free to create a new section or rescue the old one from the archives.
I will happily review articles or drafts upon request. Not everyone does this, so please don't go around spamming other reviewers.
- If you have come here to ask for help because I declined your AfC submission, please leave a message with a clear format, like "Draft:Your draft's name", or click the "reviewer's talk page" link on the decline notice on your talk page, and it will do so for you.
- I will not re-review your article unless I've said otherwise. I'm happy to help answer any questions you have, but you'll have to wait for another reviewer to keep things fair for everyone.

Other talk page banners

CFA is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

This user is a regular and doesn't mind if you template him.

ChatGPT and the other user

I just wanted to ask you what telltale signs made you determine that user Raayaan9911 was using ChatGPT in responding to me. I certainly felt like I was talking to a brick wall because the responses were so off-the-wall and irrelevant to what I had said, but my initial inclination was to chalk that up to any or all of (a) someone for whom English may not be a first language, (b) someone who may have been using templated responses, (c) someone with "special needs" (I won't take that comment any further than that), or (d) someone who just plain wants to troll. I have some suspicions that Raayaan9911 might be a sockpuppet of (1) a user I reported earlier this summer who was then banned and (2) the user (now banned as a sockpuppet) who made the edit that prompted my edit summary about which Raayaan9911 was purporting to complain, but the usual investigative tools aren't turning anything up so far. As you will have seen from my comments, I found it puzzling and annoying that someone who's been a registered user for two weeks would adopt such a high-handed approach, but if it's a use of generative artificial intelligence that would explain a lot. Long way of saying, I'm interested in knowing what you looked for to identify such a use. Thanks! 1995hoo (talk) 16:04, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@1995hoo: I find it pretty easy to recognize at this point. Stuff like It's important to maintain a respectful and professional tone in all contributions to ensure a positive and collaborative editing environment and If you have any questions or need further assistance, please do not hesitate to reach out. We value your contributions and are here to support you in maintaining a positive and respectful editing environment. are classic ChatGPT responses. It just isn't natural. I imagine English isn't their first language judging by their responses (Ahh Okay i Type Myself) and otherwise poor grammar in articles. I only found this user because their grammar in articles was so poor that it was flagged as "potentially unconstructive" on Recent Changes. Now, there's not necessairly anything wrong with that in itself, but ChatGPT is certainly not helping. C F A 💬 16:19, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Most of what I know about ChatGPT comes from the stories in the legal press here in the USA about attorneys who have landed in hot water when they tried to use ChatGPT for legal research and it fabricated case citations (obviously a huge problem that will not get a happy response from a court). But I agree, the "We value your contributions" language was exceptionally strange for a single user to employ, especially a new user who is pretty obviously not an administrator. Incidentally, I would never have found this user but for a message the user left on my talk page complaining that I used "offensive language" in an edit summary, apparently referring to my use of a grawlix. Hopefully I won't have any further interactions with that user! Thanks for the information on ChatGPT. 1995hoo (talk) 16:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's also worth noting that GPTZero (an AI detector) returned "100% AI" for both of their responses, now that I've checked. It's pretty much guaranteed at this point. C F A 💬 16:34, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. All the more reason to delete the comment that started all this from my talk page, then. I very much appreciate your assistance! 1995hoo (talk) 16:42, 1 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CFA I Never Use a ChatGPT Again in Articles. If you think i made mistake? You can leave me in talk page Raayaan9911 (talk) 20:47, 5 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speaking of Raayaan9911, I noticed on my first day (two days ago) that he sent me a notice on my talk page. He accused me of vandalizing the Build.com page. However, all my edits were in good faith, attempting to make the page less of an advert. He also sent a warning about me to SHCarter, though I don't think he saw it. When I approached him about it, asking him for a good reason for the reverts, reminding him that his threats to suspend me were empty (he is not an admin), he simply reverted his reverts, and deleted everything related to the incident. However, you can still find the discussion on my talk page. He also edited my page without asking simply because I tongue-in-cheekly used the {user rickroll} template on my own page, which is really a nothing burger. Do you have any idea why he seems more concerned about policing me than actually helping the Wiki? Oxfordcommasaregreat (talk) 13:28, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 00:27:56, 9 August 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by 122.2.115.63

122.2.115.63 (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Tropical Storm Maria (2024) (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Hello CFA Government sources add Non-government Sources edit Contents: Preparations and See also use https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft:Tropical_Storm_Maria_(2024)&action=edit 122.2.115.63 (talk) 00:27, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Feedback on AfC Draft Submission

Hello C F A,

I am seeking your assistance with a draft I have been working on. Could you please provide feedback on [specific issues or aspects of the draft]?

Thank you for your time and help.

Best regards, Arthur Watkins Arthurwatkins2904 (talk) 20:43, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Arthurwatkins2904:: Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! The main issue with your draft is that the references aren't formatted properly. See Help:Referencing for beginners to see how to add citations/footnotes in Wikipedia style. I also suggest taking a look at other articles to see how Wikipedia formats them. Let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing, C F A 💬 20:52, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Direct Listings

I hope that the main issue is that I had the link to the source of stock trading volume data in the text, rather than as a footnote (now footnote 4, I think, linking to BigCharts.com).

GNVquant (talk) 20:59, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@GNVquant: Thanks for the improvements. The fifth paragraph is still completely unsourced, so it is unclear where that information came from. Is direct public offering not the same topic? C F A 💬 21:07, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the prompt and useful feedback.

The Wikipedia entry on Direct public offering (DPO) is fine, except for the first sentence, which is completely wrong. A DPO is NOT a direct listing. Direct listings involve registered securities. The DPO Wikipedia entry should be altered to delete “or direct listing” from the first sentence. DPOs are essentially small private placements of unlisted securities, as the Wikipedia article correctly describes. Direct listings are the initiating of trading on Nasdaq or the NYSE by companies, many of which have market caps of tens of billions of dollars (such as Coinbase and Spotify), and are not private placements. Should I edit the DPO Wikipedia entry to remove the incorrect “or direct listing” phrase?

By way of background: I am widely viewed as the world’s leading academic expert on initial public offerings and direct listings. When Spotify did its direct listing, for instance, the CFO sought my advice. When Google decided to do an auction IPO in 2004, management sought my advice about the merits of an auction IPO versus a bookbuilt IPO.

For the fifth paragraph, the information about the reference prices mainly comes from the same source as footnote 3: My website, where I give the numbers for every direct listing. I didn't add a footnote because I didn't want to have too many references to my website, which is widely used by journalists, venture capitalists, money managers, and academics. Should I add a footnote linking to my "Direct Listings" page? GNVquant (talk) 21:32, 9 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BJavierPR

I have noted your warming to this user about adding information without a source (per Liv Morgan). This user I suspect is not well versed with the rules and I also suspect English isn't his first language. I have recommended to him that he seek help as I just reverted some original research from the Liv Morgan article. He may need to be watched. I think he's not trouble - just yet. Addicted4517 (talk) 09:39, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Lil RT for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Lil RT is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lil RT until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

CycloneYoris ^talk! 04:23, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Xylemenian (11:38, 11 August 2024)

Hi? I have a small doubt. How do I add references? --Xylemenian (talk) 11:38, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Xylemenian: Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! I suggest you check out Help:Referencing for beginners which shows you how to add references. Let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing, C F A 💬 14:50, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much Xylemenian (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Kgotso Lemonka on 2024 MTN 8 (16:40, 11 August 2024)

How do i create mtn8 results for quarter final --Kgotso Lemonka (talk) 16:40, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Kgotso Lemonka: Welcome to Wikipedia! Sorry, I'm not going to be much help here. I'm not really familiar with football article formatting. I think your best bet is to ask at the Teahouse or at WikiProject Football where other editors will be able to answer your question. Happy editing, C F A 💬 18:22, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Questions about IMBD, NY Post and Broadway World

Hi CFA, I'm helping to put up Darlinda Just Darlinda's wikipedia page and I'm curious why these links below aren't considered reliable link sources? Or are we linking them incorrectly? Any help would be appreciated! Thanks, Rebecca https://www.imdb.com/ https://nypost.com/ https://www.broadwayworld.com/ RebeccaMRosenthal (talk) 18:44, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RebeccaMRosenthal: Hi, IMDB is not reliable because it is user-generated content. The Wikipedia community decided the New York Post is not reliable because it has a history of publishing incorrect information and poor fact-checking (see WP:NYPOST). Broadway World was also deemed unreliable because it reposts press releases disguised as authentic content (see WP:RSP#BroadwayWorld). More importantly, who is "we" and how do you know Darlinda Just Darlinda? And who is Victorlewisg, who created and submitted the draft? Please not that this draft will not be accepted unless you disclose your conflict of interest or financial stake in the topic. Thank you. C F A 💬 22:18, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for clearing that up! I am Rebecca Rosenthal and I have been performing under the stage name Darlinda Just Darlinda in New York for the past 20 years. Victorlewisg is a friend.RebeccaMRosenthal (talk) 22:24, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RebeccaMRosenthal: Thank you for the response. You should follow the instructions on this page to properly disclose your conflict of interest. Note that Wikipedia editors are strongly advised against creating autobiographies, so you will have to make sure to follow all Wikipedia policies extra carefully (especially Neutral point of view and Verifiability). Let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing, C F A 💬 22:30, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for letting me know. To make sure I'm understanding you correctly, for future edits should I insert {{connected contributor}} at the top of the entry? RebeccaMRosenthal (talk) 22:45, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RebeccaMRosenthal: I've added it to the talk page for you. You and your husband should also add {{UserboxCOI|1=Draft:Darlinda Just Darlinda}} to your user pages. C F A 💬 22:54, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, much appreciated! RebeccaMRosenthal (talk) 22:56, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	For creation in Lil RT. I'm surprised it was never created before. Roasted (talk) 22:12, 11 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This week's article for improvement (week 33, 2024)

A fictional social network diagram

Hello, CFA. The article for improvement of the week is:

Social experiment

Please be bold and help improve it!

Previous selections: Happiness • List of public art in Chicago

Get involved with the AFI project: Nominate an article • Review nominations

Posted by: MusikBot ^talk 00:05, 12 August 2024 (UTC) using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of WikiProject AFI • Opt-out instructions[reply]

Question from Hana tanahana (10:43, 12 August 2024)

10091003172312560 --Hana tanahana (talk) 10:43, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Benforrester84 (19:12, 12 August 2024)

Hi I would like to add an article about my band The Gravity Drive --Benforrester84 (talk) 19:12, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Benforrester84: Hi, you can use the Article Wizard to submit a draft for inclusion. Note that your band has to meet Wikipedia's notability criteria in order for it to be considered eligible for an article. Please also see how to disclose your conflict of interest and Wikipedia's policy on autobiographies. Let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing, C F A 💬 23:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. We meet the criteria by having laods of Radio play on BBCRadio 2 and BBC 6 Music ad being reviewed in MOJO Magazine. I can link to DJ's and Radio stations and live BBCRadio 2 sessions with notable DJ's Benforrester84 (talk) 23:45, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tech News: 2024-33

Latest tech news from the Wikimedia technical community. Please tell other users about these changes. Not all changes will affect you. Translations are available.

Feature news

AbuseFilter editors and maintainers can now make a CAPTCHA show if a filter matches an edit. This allows communities to quickly respond to spamming by automated bots. [1]
Stewards can now specify if global blocks should prevent account creation. Before this change by the Trust and Safety Product Team, all global blocks would prevent account creation. This will allow stewards to reduce the unintended side-effects of global blocks on IP addresses.

Project updates

Nominations are open on Wikitech for new members to refresh the Toolforge standards committee. The committee oversees the Toolforge Right to fork policy and Abandoned tool policy among other duties. Nominations will remain open until at least 2024-08-26.
One new wiki has been created: a Wikipedia in West Coast Bajau (w:bdr:) [2]

Tech news prepared by Tech News writers and posted by bot • Contribute • Translate • Get help • Give feedback • Subscribe or unsubscribe.

MediaWiki message delivery 23:19, 12 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

General Note

CFA Please don't use a emojis like this from 02:11, 21 July 2024 can lead to confusing other users, If you have a question please leave me on my talk user page Raayaan9911 (talk) 01:49, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Why not? 🤔 C F A 💬 02:10, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Because this cause a confusing users, please don't use a emojis again Raayaan9911 (talk) 02:13, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry. I won't. 😄 👍 C F A 💬 02:15, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from ForFun1127 (17:33, 13 August 2024)

Hello! How are you today? I'm new to Wikipedia. I ended up putting a comment on an article that wasnt part of the article and facepalmed. Hopefully u can help me edit correctly? That was embarassing LOL --ForFun1127 (talk) 17:34, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@ForFun1127: Welcome to Wikipedia! Don't worry. It's not a big deal. Is there a specific topic you're interested in? The Task Centre has a list of tasks that might interest you and are a good way to get started. And if you're looking for an introduction, The Wikipedia Adventure is a game that shows you around Wikipedia. I'd recommend checking that out. Let me know if you have any questions. Happy editing, C F A 💬 18:01, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete article

Hi! I found this article when was reading about famous scammer. Looks like they made a easy-version of wikipedia. https://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Michael_Graziano#:~:text=Michael%20Graziano%20is%20a%20scientist,before%20the%20Covid%2D19%20pandemic.

All of the sources are not reliable. When you open them- you can see those are paid articles and interviews in Forbes and some random places in Africa. There are no real achievements. In fact the individual is sued for fraud in MA.https://caselaw.findlaw.com/court/app-crt-mas-ply/2033860.html

Also, he, his company and other other two co- founders is sued for fraud too- are sued for fraud in California https://www.thephoblographer.com/2023/06/27/photographer-sues-monopolize-for-50k-in-the-craziest-story-ever/

The third co-funder is a convicted pedophile wanted by the FBI https://www.siouxlandproud.com/news/iowa-news/las-vegas-man-wanted-for-sex-assault-of-minor-arrested-in-iowa/

https://www.messengernews.net/news/local-news/2022/09/fdpd-assists-in-apprehension-of-

Super dangerous.I believe wikipedia article was made on purpose. What do you think? J2009j (talk) 23:28, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@J2009j: I have no experience with Simple Wikipedia so I'm not familiar with their guidelines or how they work. There's an entry here at Michael Graziano that was accepted by Articles for Creation in 2010, likely because the subject met WP:NACADEMIC (see this section on the talk page) – which has different requirements than the General notability guideline. NACADEMIC is one English Wikipedia guideline that I'm not very familiar with. I tend to avoid academic articles at AfD and AfC unless they are an obvious fail. You are free to nominate it for deletion but I have no clue if the subject meets NACADEMIC so I won't be of much help. Happy editing, C F A 💬 15:51, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Those are two different people. The one on Wikipedia is a scientist, and on simple wikipedia- that is a scammer. Two completely different pages. So I do not understand what is happening here. When you remove "simple" from the link of scammer it takes you to the different wikipedia page of the scientist. J2009j (talk) 17:24, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@J2009j: Huh. You're right. They are both described as a "scientist and novelist" but are about different people. The Simple Wikipedia page was created last month by an IP and has not been edited since. Again, I'm not familiar with Simple Wikipedia's notability guidelines or deletion processes, but I assume they're similar to here. I suggest you nominate it for deletion over there if you don't think the subject meets their guidelines. C F A 💬 17:55, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 14 August 2024

In the media: Portland pol profile paid for from public purse

Recent research: STORM: AI agents role-play as "Wikipedia editors" and "experts" to create Wikipedia-like articles, a more sophisticated effort than previous auto-generation systems

In focus: Twitter marks the spot

News and notes: Another Wikimania has concluded

Special report: Nano or just nothing: Will nano go nuclear?

Opinion: HouseBlaster's RfA debriefing

Traffic report: Ball games, movies, elections, but nothing really weird

Humour: I'm proud to be a template

* Read this Signpost in full * Single-page * Unsubscribe * MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:47, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft article

Dear CFA, Due to your severe personal bias against the subject of the article "Kalin Stefanov (Backgammon player)", I kindly ask you to never again review, edit, or even open the said article! Kalinators (talk) 23:00, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your latest comment is "no improvements since last decline".

So, adding an additional 3 independent media reporting about the subject, to the already existing 3, adding a further achievement of the subject, is "no improvements"?

Mate, if you have any honor in yourself, you will not again touch the article. Otherwise, you are just telling clear lies which everyone can see are not true. Kalinators (talk) 23:02, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from MattStrube (15:59, 15 August 2024)

Hello, can i delete an old revision? I'd like to remove the first version from the history --MattStrube (talk) 15:59, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MattStrube: Hi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Administrators are able to hide revisions using a process called Revision Deletion. The criteria for doing so is outlined on this page and any administrator listed on this page is willing to handle requests. If the material is sensitive information, then you should directly contact Oversight instead. Happy editing, C F A 💬 18:15, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Draft : Michael Beil

Thank you for reviewing my draft article on Michael Beil (Draft:Michael Beil). I read that the submission was declined. Could you perhaps elaborate a bit on the two critiques? I have already, as you requested, removed the external links from the main text.

I've been working very hard on supporting every statement in the article with reliable sources. Could you please point out some examples of statements or passages that are not adequately supported and/or sources that are not considered reliable?

2. I've be sifting through the article (and had several colleagues of mine read it) in search for peacock terms, promotional tone or language that is otherwise not neutral, and I can't find out what seems to be so problematic. I do admit that the text isn't bone dry, but I've read many Wikipedia articles on classical composers and their music that aren't. If you see any problematic wording, could you please point out one or two examples?

As you can see, I've been working on the article for a very long time and I would really like to see it published.

Thank you for your advice!

All the best RDiependaele (talk) 20:28, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@RDiependaele: Hi, right now your draft reads like an essay. Personal interpretations and analysis do not belong in Wikipedia articles (e.g.: The realization of such compositions also requires complex production conditions, and very disciplined actions and skilled theatricality on the part of the musicians. Therefore, they are usually created in close collaboration with the performers., Recognizable quotations from existing works by other composers are inspiring building blocks for Beil because of the emotional charge or the references already attached to them. It is those connotations that the composer uses as material – a new meaning that can fade or appear subsequently by incorporating the quotations in new musical contexts., Those compositions, which were in line with the usual conventions of their genres, at the same time sharpened his interest in the visual dimensions of concert performance. In this sense, they helped create the ground for Beil's later artistic work, which focuses on the interaction between sound and image., etc. Some parts are also blatant advertising (e.g.: Beil makes his own scores, MAX patches and tapes available simply and free of charge through his website.). Wikipedia does not care about what the subject says about themself (ex: through their own website). The majority of the references I spot-checked do not verify the information provided either. Original research does not belong on Wikipedia. You should only summarize what reliable, secondary sources have said him.

Those were the blatant fails I declined your draft for. I also don't see how the subject meets either the notability guideline for musicians or the general notability guideline for people, which is something you'll have to prove in order for your draft to be accepted. C F A 💬 02:32, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Did you earn a barnstar a few days ago? Yes. Is another one still deserved for your consistent quality work all around Wikipedia? Absolutely. LR.127 (talk) 22:47, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Article Review/Edit Request

Hi @CFA: I am a COI editor connected to the long-term biobank study UK Biobank and I have suggested some improvements to the article. My ideas include changing the layout, updating the page with recent discoveries and missing information, and removing any information which is irrelevant.

I have created both a draft of how I think the article should look in my sandbox, and a section by section explanation of each change as a request on the UK Biobank talk page. When you have the time, would it be possible to please receive your advice on the article in my sandbox, and maybe implement some of the changes which you feel are appropriate on the current existing page?

Thank you! Burchrusks (talk) 12:47, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

BIOGRAPHY OF TOBISWURLD

OLUWATOBILOBA, known professionally as TOBISWURLD, is a talented all round creative, photographer, videographer, artist based in LAGOS, NIGERIA. With a passion for capturing the raw beauty of life, compelling stories, passion, art. TOBI has been in the industry for some time now building a reputation for creativity, attention to detail, unique perspective.

Example.jpg|bCaption1bv Example.jpg|Caption2 </gallery> Over the years, TOBISWURLD has worked on various projects including weddings, corporate videos, and personal portraits, video shoots, documentary showcasing a deep understanding of colouring, editing, lighting, composition, storytelling. HE is particularly known for being one of the best representatives. When not behind the camera, [Your First Name] enjoys music, which often inspires his creative work. he is always eager to explore new ideas and collaborate with others to bring visions to life. TOBI$WURLD (talk) 13:18, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from TOBI$WURLD (13:25, 16 August 2024)

How do i write a proper biography on wikipedia --TOBI$WURLD (talk) 13:25, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TOBI$WURLD: You can submit a biography for inclusion using the Article Wizard. Please see Wikipedia's policy on autobiographies and make sure to disclose your conflict of interest first. In order for it to be accepted, the subject will have to meet Wikipedia's notability guideline for people. Happy editing, C F A 💬 16:59, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Request on 16:48:29, 16 August 2024 for assistance on AfC submission by Bodhipup

Bodhipup (talk · contribs)
- Draft:Cristina Eisenberg (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs)

Two responses: (1) Eisenberg meets the notability criteria #5 at WP:NACADEMIC: she holds a named chair at a major institution. (2) What does this mean: "please remove external links from the article body"? Thank you!

Bodhipup (talk) 16:48, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Bodhipup: You are free to resubmit if you disagree with my assessment of notability. Her position is not exactly clear in the article. Wikipedia articles should only have external links in the "References" and "External links" sections. They do not belong in the body of the article, where wikilinks should be used instead. C F A 💬 17:03, 16 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Panderbear01 (02:11, 17 August 2024)

Hello, I was wondering, should an article on a location include access points? --Panderbear01 (talk) 02:11, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Panderbear01: Welcome to Wikipedia! If you think it's relevant, and there are reliable sources that support the claims, then I don't see an issue with it. Is there a specific example you'd like me to take a look at? Happy editing, C F A 💬 03:06, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I just someone to talk

I’m not sure if I like wiki anymore not the same like it was and it was like a safe place for me but now it’s just like toxic 67.5.8.16 (talk) 02:48, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]