User talk:Rusl
Hi, please write me messages here. Please add them at the end of the page and use the 4 tildas ~ to sign your name. Thanks. Rusl
Sometimes I've written a rant here or there late at night. If I did that and offended you, my apologies. Please don't take me too seriously. Also, some of my more idiotic rants are over a decade old but I just haven't removed them... Thank you for being a person who helps make wikipedia! It's an amazing, inspirational project. Don't be afraid to tell me I'm wrong, because I very often am ;-) and I do need to be reminded now and then.
inconvenient truth
[edit]Hey - the Al Gore presentation is already online in a legal form: http://www.thewatt.com/article-1156-nested-1-0.html The lorax 23:52, 5 June 2006 (UTC)
Ciclovia
[edit]Based on your edits, you seem more of the bike type than the Spanish speaker, but you made edits to an article recently, so I thought I'd point you to a question I had at Talk:Ciclovia--Fisherjs 14:37, 6 July 2006 (UTC)
USA influence
[edit]I am starting to get disallusioned by wikipedia. There is too much US viewpoints bias creeping in. I was looking up liberal and think tank. They are just so damn America. For instance, liberalism is only seperated from radicalism in France, according to this article. And the necessity of reference is so abused as being simply href to the mainsteam news trumpets. Stephanie McMillan is seen as a liberal somehow. There is no entry on her. But there is this BS think tank article about the great depression [1]...
Anyway I'm not giving up. But I'm becomeing dispirited by so much hubris on these articles. Before it was really a lot less people contributing to writing the articles and a much larger percentage were doing it from a basis of edumacation. Now, so much 'content' generation business comes from this thing that the right wingers are trying to take it over. They have and easy time making idiotic propaganda assumptions rule the day. It is subtle, but it is dispiriting.
I guess I am not seeing the big picture. Of well. Damn that idea of progress!
And all the fucking anal get-me-a-cheap-href-tags that are appearing. Some cleanup nazi robots are running wild. What purpose is there is banalising this entire thing so it does nothing more than refernce and bunch of trivial myopia from crappy 'newspaper' websites. Kill the message. Now even the article on progress is not very enlightening, instead it points to all sorts of trivial variants and is having a hard time questioning the basic word that it is meant to.
Serious insecurity
[edit]The idea of having a reference link for every single point of fact is absurd and new to wikipedia. When I first started looking at this thing - long before I because a registered user - the reference ephasis was not there. It seems the insecurity of a few to prove that wikipedia is indeed as good as Brittanica - that the subjectivity of open editing is absolutely countered by obcessive citation - that is pure insecurity. Not seeing the point. I don't know why we are trying to recreate this in the image of something it is not.
It's like the insecurity currently gripping my city of Vancouver about the 2010 Olympics making us 'world class' (like a 1980s airline commercial)... Or the Bushies cabal insecurity war on terrorism. A kind of overcompensation that is hidden by people never looking at the big picture - and getting away with it because it is an insecurity that pretends to be ABOUT the bigger picture. But frankly, having URLs for statements is not big imagination. Neither are 2 week sports events or police states/corporate welfare schemes. We as a species have a lot more potential in us.
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Pyslsk, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Pyslsk is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Pyslsk, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 04:34, 27 August 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Pyslsk screenshot.png)
[edit]
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 14:31, 9 September 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Nicotine Screenshot.png)
[edit]
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 15:16, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Maryleechan-takingoncityhall.jpg
[edit]Thank you for uploading Image:Maryleechan-takingoncityhall.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:19, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Source needed. Since you had some involvement with the Source needed redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). stanley bulgaria 04:37, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Suggested image change for - http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:RAID_60.png - RAID 60 image
[edit]I would like to point out that the image is not able to demonstrate the value of RAID 60 over RAID 10. The reason for this is that the demonstrated RAID 60 has 50% redundancy (2x 4-drive RAID 6 striped together, with 2 disks worth of parity per stripe). The same 8 disks could be used in a RAID 10 with the same level of redundancy, and possibly identical fault-tolerance (complex, and arguable. Faster rebuilds probably give 10 the edge), but with the definite downside of the RAID 6 of slower rebuilds, more processing necessary, more expensive controllers needed, and some other issues that I don't have the time to write at the moment, but that should be enough.
I suggest that this example be altered to use at least 5 drives per stripe in order to give it the edge in storage efficiency over RAID 10, otherwise the example shows no clear advantage of RAID 60 over RAID 10.
Thanks for your work on Wikipedia.
Octothorn (talk) 03:04, 2 September 2009 (UTC)
May 2010
[edit]
OK, sorry, I'm just a bit emotional on this topic because I have lived very close to it.Rusl (talk) 02:10, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Talkback
[edit]
Message added 02:17, 23 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Alan (talk) 02:17, 23 May 2010 (UTC)
Frank Luntz
[edit]Hey, Rusl. I was also struck on reading the Frank Luntz article that there was no mention of "death tax," so I added some information with too very good references. I think the article is much more complete now. What can we do to get the editors to upgrade it? A.T.S. in Texas (talk) 06:24, 24 May 2010 (UTC)
Your recent edit to Burj Khalifa
[edit]I have reverted your recent edit to the Burj Khalifa article. The place to ask questions like that is on the article's talk page. Astronaut (talk) 09:32, 23 July 2010 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 21
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Zenphoto, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page 3rd party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:03, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 28
[edit]Hi. When you recently edited Russell Indexes, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Benchmarks and Exposure (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:12, 28 June 2012 (UTC)
Leeenux Linux
[edit]You added few things in talk of Leeenux Linux page, stating that it is not an advert. However, one other admin has been eager to make the page deleted, saying that no matter what I do, the page will get deleted. After few arguments, he decided to put it here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Leeenux_Linux Can you please see to this? There is discussion between that other admin and myself here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Spiralciric Thanks, and sorry for bothering you. Spiralciric (talk) 19:44, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
RE your rant.
[edit]I spend a huge amount of time here cleaning up PR crap from articles - see for example what I've been doing to Starbucks [2]. As you can see on my userpage, I use Ubuntu and a lot of other free software, but that doesn't mean that Wikipedia should have an article on every single linux distro. SmartSE (talk) 10:14, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Deletion of RipLinuX page
[edit]Hey, I noticed your rant in the Leeenux deletion page and I was wondering whether you would like to give your opinion for or against the deletion of RipLinuX, another distribution that has also been nominated for deletion, see here. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by EvilKeyboardCat (talk • contribs) 06:56, 21 November 2012 (UTC)
- Looks like I am too late. It still exists: [speedydeletion.wikia http://speedydeletion.wikia.com/wiki/Recovery_Is_Possible] In principle I agree strongly, though I'm not personally familiar with that distro so I'm not sure what I could add specifically. It's really disheartening to see wikipedia go this direction and so fast. Frankly I think the anti-Linux wikipedia people should be rooted out as they seem to be advocating a policy antithetical to this site. However, I don't have the energy or time to spearhead that. Also, I really can't comprehend how someone who wants to be a wikipedia ultrageek administrator is going to feel like going on an anti-linux rampage. Maybe someone's personal computer crashed and they blamed the OS? Someone who really hates Linus? Anyway, keep fighting the good fight, whatever that means.Rusl (talk) 17:52, 27 November 2012 (UTC)
merger discussion of Jack (hero) and Jack tales
[edit]As one of a few editors with more than 2 edits to Jack_(hero), I urge you to please review Talk:Jack tales#Merge discussion for merger discussion of Jack (hero) and Jack tales.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 18:28, 8 February 2013 (UTC)
- Your comment did not make a clear statement at Talk:Jack tales on whether you support or oppose the merger.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 22:45, 12 February 2013 (UTC)
George Massey Tunnel
[edit]Rusl,
Please see George Massey Tunnel#Height Limit and Talk:George Massey Tunnel#Clearance and clarify on the talk page. Peter Horn User talk 01:11, 13 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 12
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tomboy (software), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ubuntu. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:40, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks Robot, but someone else fixed it before I bothered to read this LOL Rusl (talk) 23:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:58, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for February 9
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Suge Knight, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page D.O.C.. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:52, 9 February 2016 (UTC)
- I am tooo slow again LOL
Nomination for deletion of Template:Latest preview release
[edit]
- Thanks, sorry for slow reply. Whatever this was it wasn't important and I certainly don't remember creating it (I don't understand templates very well!) -- so much so in fact I was worried I got hacked given my old easy to guess password from 2006. Time to update password anyway I guess, LOLRusl (talk) 22:57, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Rusl. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
- too late for me! I always avoid reading these messages as I'm paranoid it's someone mad at me for writing something stupid late at night... but it never is that, I don't write as much stupid stuff as I use to and anyway no one cares they just change it which is better than arguing anyway. Resolution for 2017, respond to new messages in a timely fashion! Rusl (talk) 22:59, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Rusl. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Rusl. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Ways to improve Reclaim These Streets
[edit]Hello, Rusl,
Thank you for creating Reclaim These Streets.
I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:
I'd be worrying about notability under WP:GNG and WP:ONEVENT.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Alexandermcnabb}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.
Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.
Alexandermcnabb (talk) 12:38, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)