Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Need to add a comment on "console.redhat.com/api/ingress" from "Red Hat Telemetry and Red Hat Insights" section #120242

Closed
Xingbin-Li opened this issue Feb 27, 2024 · 3 comments

Comments

@Xingbin-Li
Copy link

[Enter feedback here]

Doc URL: https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/openshift/howto-restrict-egress#red-hat-telemetry-and-red-hat-insights

From "Red Hat Telemetry and Red Hat Insights" section in above doc, it says "console.redhat.com/api/ingress" should be allowed. In some case where using "URL filtering" from Azure firewall to whitelist the "console.redhat.com/api/ingress", the TLS-inspection must be enabled, and TLS-inspection feature from Azure firewall would prevent the outbound traffic from connecting to "console.redhat.com/api/ingress".

This issue was solved by whitelisting the "console.redhat.com" from Azure firewall without URL filtering feature.

So we may need to do some modification or add a comment to clarify that in some case where using "URL filtering" from Azure firewall, we need to allow the "console.redhat.com" instead of whitelist the URL "console.redhat.com/api/ingress".


Document Details

Do not edit this section. It is required for learn.microsoft.com ➟ GitHub issue linking.

@RamanathanChinnappan-MSFT
Copy link
Contributor

@Xingbin-Li
Thanks for your feedback! We will investigate and update as appropriate.

@SaibabaBalapur-MSFT
Copy link
Contributor

@Xingbin-Li
Thanks for bringing this to our attention.
I'm going to assign this to the document author so they can take a look at it accordingly.

@joharder
please review it.

@rayoef
Copy link
Contributor

rayoef commented Jul 12, 2024

Thanks for your dedication to our documentation. Unfortunately, at this time we have been unable to review your issue in a timely manner, and we sincerely apologize for the delayed response. The requested updates have not been made since the creation of this issue. We've created an internal work item to incorporate your suggestions. We are closing this issue for now, but feel free to comment here as necessary.

#please-close

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants