Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

VSCode #3

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

VSCode #3

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

leonyu
Copy link

@leonyu leonyu commented Nov 6, 2016

No description provided.

@madbob
Copy link
Owner

madbob commented Nov 6, 2016

Non-free software.
https://code.visualstudio.com/License/

@madbob madbob closed this Nov 6, 2016
@leonyu
Copy link
Author

leonyu commented Nov 6, 2016

The source code is MIT, you are free to download it and make your own build of it as any OSS product.

The license you linked is for the binary distributed by them, which contains autoupdate/usage/bug report settings pointed at Microsoft servers. This is the same procedure followed by Java and Chrome.
microsoft/vscode#60 (comment)

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 7, 2016

@madbob will you reconsider reopening pull request for VSCode? It's a great app, similiar to Atom but way faster and more responsive. I would say it's an awesome application for developers (and this list is about awesome dev tools, right?). It's open source and free, MIT licensed.

If you are not ok with a description @leonyu made in his pull request (mentioning evil MS) you can use my pull request. Or maybe a pull request with a link to the source code, not to (so evil) MS download page, will satisfy you?

Papa bless.

@ndbeals
Copy link

ndbeals commented Nov 8, 2016

@leonyu And @edwinjablonski then he'd have to maintain an OSS build of VSCode, I don't think he wants to do that. You're asking him to do a lot of work just to get an editor on a list.

@leonyu
Copy link
Author

leonyu commented Nov 8, 2016

In open source, there are people who are against corporate interest (RMS, GNU, Debian), there are people who tolerate it (Linux, LLVM, Java, etc). Everyone's free to pick their sides. Author appears to be in former camp.

Since this project is in itself a open source project, if this project was really useful, someone would've forked it for real (not Github fork) and added to it. But this project is just a list of bookmarks, so makes no difference.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 12, 2016

@ndbeals I think he just don't want to add it because it's a MS product. It's open source, MIT licensed, whole source code is here on github, easy to compile, make patches and so on and on. It's just an open source project like million of others similar projects. Nothing scary.

@leonyu Yeah, the only reason @madbob rejected it it's because it came from MS.

But this project is just a list of bookmarks, so makes no difference.

Yup.

@ndbeals
Copy link

ndbeals commented Nov 12, 2016

@edwinjablonski It is not MIT licensed, the source code behind may be, but the compiled release certainly is not. Did you even read the authors first reply? Did you read what the Visual Studio Code License requires?

https://code.visualstudio.com/License/

But as you said, it's just a list of bookmarks, don't know why you care so much about getting an editor on "just a list".

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants