$X/ sounds like a FluidNC command. What version of FluidNC?

$X/ sounds like a FluidNC command. What version of FluidNC?

Assume this is the type of command specific to the xPro V5 controller (not generic grbl).

Xpro v5 can run either Grbl_Esp32 or its successor FluidNC. All of the Grbl_Esp32 developers have switched over to working on FluidNC. I am a lead developer on FluidNC. If you connect to XPro V5 with a serial terminal and reset the controller, you can find out which version of the firmware is running.

Xpro v5 can run either Grbl_Esp32 or its successor FluidNC. All of the Grbl_Esp32 developers have switched over to working on FluidNC. I am a lead developer on FluidNC. If you connect to XPro V5 with a serial terminal and reset the controller, you can find out which version of the firmware is running.

Is this what you've asked:
"

$Firmware/Info
FW version:1.3a (20220621) # FW target:grbl-embedded # FW HW:Direct SD # primary sd:/sd # secondary sd:none # authentication:no # webcommunication: Sync: 81:192.168.0.1 # hostname:CNC_xPRO_V5(AP mode) # axis:3
"

Consider upgrading to FluidNC. Grbl_Esp32 has at least one serious problem that can damage your hardware.

Another possible problem: # hostname:CNC_xPRO_V5(AP mode) . ESP32 can be unstable when using AP mode for a long time. The Espressif AP mode firmware appears to leak memory. The Grbl_Esp32/FluidNC developers recommend using AP mode only for initial setup, then switching to STA mode or radio-off mode for production use. If you need to use WiFi but do not have it in the machine area, one solution is to use a dedicated WiFi router that does not have to be connected to an internet backhaul. Old/slow routers are fine for this purpose. Many people have ones that have been removed from service that can be repurposed.

Unless someone breathes some life into CNCjs, you may want to start looking at other senders to meet your needs, especially when it comes to FluidNC.

OpenBuilds was working on providing FluidNC support for their "CONTROL" sender the last time I spoke with them as their new BlackBox X32 runs FluidNC better than the bundled version of GrblHAL they provide.

My own little Octoprint plugin "Better Grbl Support" also fully supports FluidNC.

And of course, the WebUI works just fine too and is getting a lot of support from the FluidNC team.

Hit me up on the side if you have any XPro specific questions as well. It is a "been there, done that" for me if you require assistance.

PS --- I love CNCjs if it is any consolation. It absolutely has the slickest UI out there. Maybe someone is breathing new life into it?

Maybe someone is breathing new life into it?

gSender is a maintained fork of CNCjs that, I think, has Cheton's blessing.

Consider upgrading to FluidNC

But how can I carry out it? Since, apparently Spark-Concepts has merely Grbl_Esp32 firmware options. Probably I need to wait FluidNC for them. I've inquired them about it, but the responce is yet pending.

My own little Octoprint plugin "Better Grbl Support" also fully supports FluidNC.<

I definitely should try it, thank you for advice!

Hit me up on the side if you have any XPro specific questions as well. It is a "been there, done that" for me if you require assistance.

I truly appreciate your help! If I can ask you here, I have at least one question with xPro. I am not certain about the possibility of setting one more supplementary rotary axis on my CNC which already uses 4 motors (due to the Y-axis is driven with two motors). So all 4 slots dedicated for motors on the controller are occupied, hence, apparently, I can't plug any more. But maybe there is a clever elegant solution without the need to replace the entire controller.

You could have a separate controller for the extra rotary axis, but it would not be possible to have coordinated motion with that axis and others. If you use the rotary to set an angle, then run a program, then change the angle, that might be okay.

Alternatively, you could do the dual-Y the old way by putting two motors on one driver. Separate drivers is better, but ganging motors on one driver does work and a lot of machines do it that way.

Alternatively, you could do the dual-Y the old way by putting two motors on one driver. Separate drivers is better, but ganging motors on one driver does work and a lot of machines do it that way.

Thank you very much! Cool to know it! I thought about it but I was not sure that it's right connection. Because this way there maybe not enough power on single slot. But you gave me confidence

If you use the rotary to set an angle

Sorry, I am not sure what do you mean here