You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I think I would be ok to make it public, but in general it would be good to rethink some of the ultratb code, it could take the style as a configuration option in the constructor, and could use a lot of new CPython new features like actually use annotations, and also implement the "did you mean" when there are typoes.
In general it is also emitting directly ascii code; in a perfect world I'd like to return more structered data at at least a number of token, style pairs so that rendering could be better handled on a per-frontend basis.
Even in html we could make use of hover to see variable values; or collapse frames.
But all that needs time, and I barely have a few hours a month on IPython, so no no short term plan to change.
If you send a PR that make this value public (with I guess a property to warn of deprecation of the private attribute I'm happy to merge.
Hi! Over QtConsole we are doing some work to use the changes done at #14138 to customize traceback syntax highlighting (see jupyter/qtconsole#608).
Following jupyter/qtconsole#608 (comment) and jupyter/qtconsole#608 (comment), wanted to check if making
VerboseTB._tb_highlight_style
a public attribute makes sense/could be possible.Also, are there any plans related with changing the traceback syntax highlighting logic in the future? Any in info is greatly appreciated!
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: