Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

BUG: Setting a DataFrame as rhs with loc on a single column does not align in the single block case #47578

Closed
3 tasks done
phofl opened this issue Jul 1, 2022 · 1 comment · Fixed by #47581
Closed
3 tasks done
Assignees
Labels
Bug Indexing Related to indexing on series/frames, not to indexes themselves Regression Functionality that used to work in a prior pandas version
Milestone

Comments

@phofl
Copy link
Member

phofl commented Jul 1, 2022

Pandas version checks

  • I have checked that this issue has not already been reported.

  • I have confirmed this bug exists on the latest version of pandas.

  • I have confirmed this bug exists on the main branch of pandas.

Reproducible Example

result = pd.DataFrame({"var": [1, 2]}, index=[1, 2])
rhs = pd.DataFrame({"var": [10, 11]}, index=[2, 3])
result.loc[:, "var"] = rhs

returns

   var
1   10
2   11

This does not align, because it runs through the single_block_path, while non-matching dtypes do align

result = pd.DataFrame({"var": [1, 2]}, index=[1, 2])
rhs = pd.DataFrame({"var": ["a", "b"]}, index=[2, 3])
result.loc[:, "var"] = rhs

   var
1  NaN
2    a

Issue Description

Should be consistent

Expected Behavior

Both should align. First one should return

   var
1   NaN
2   10.0

Installed Versions

commit : 55d9dcf
python : 3.8.13.final.0
python-bits : 64
OS : Linux
OS-release : 5.15.0-40-generic
Version : #43 SMP Wed Jun 15 12:54:21 UTC 2022
machine : x86_64
processor : x86_64
byteorder : little
LC_ALL : None
LANG : en_US.UTF-8
LOCALE : en_US.UTF-8

pandas : 1.5.0.dev0+1066.g55d9dcf47d
numpy : 1.22.4
pytz : 2022.1
dateutil : 2.8.2
setuptools : 62.3.2
pip : 22.1.2
Cython : 0.29.30
pytest : 7.1.2
hypothesis : 6.47.0
sphinx : 4.5.0
blosc : None
feather : None
xlsxwriter : 3.0.3
lxml.etree : 4.9.0
html5lib : 1.1
pymysql : None
psycopg2 : None
jinja2 : 3.1.2
IPython : 8.4.0
pandas_datareader: None
bs4 : 4.11.1
bottleneck : 1.3.4
brotli :
fastparquet : 0.8.1
fsspec : 2021.11.0
gcsfs : 2021.11.0
matplotlib : 3.5.2
numba : 0.53.1
numexpr : 2.8.0
odfpy : None
openpyxl : 3.0.9
pandas_gbq : None
pyarrow : 8.0.0
pyreadstat : 1.1.7
pyxlsb : None
s3fs : 2021.11.0
scipy : 1.8.1
snappy :
sqlalchemy : 1.4.37
tables : 3.7.0
tabulate : 0.8.9
xarray : 0.18.2
xlrd : 2.0.1
xlwt : 1.3.0
zstandard : None
None

@phofl phofl added Bug Indexing Related to indexing on series/frames, not to indexes themselves labels Jul 1, 2022
@phofl phofl self-assigned this Jul 1, 2022
@jreback jreback added this to the 1.5 milestone Jul 3, 2022
simonjayhawkins added a commit to simonjayhawkins/pandas that referenced this issue Jul 9, 2022
@simonjayhawkins
Copy link
Member

First one should return

   var
1   NaN
2   10.0

This was the case in pandas-1.3.5

first bad commit: [03dd698] BUG: DataFrame.setitem sometimes operating inplace (#43406)

@simonjayhawkins simonjayhawkins added the Regression Functionality that used to work in a prior pandas version label Jul 10, 2022
@simonjayhawkins simonjayhawkins modified the milestones: 1.5, 1.4.4 Jul 10, 2022
simonjayhawkins added a commit to simonjayhawkins/pandas that referenced this issue Aug 8, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug Indexing Related to indexing on series/frames, not to indexes themselves Regression Functionality that used to work in a prior pandas version
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants