-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 395
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Support compound stream matchers #1460
Draft
nevinera
wants to merge
6
commits into
rspec:main
Choose a base branch
from
nevinera:nev--1391--handle-compound-stream-matchers-correctly
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Draft
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
cda1c90
Add tests for compound matching on Output matchers
nevinera 1bc9e69
Pass output along, if not in the outer matcher
nevinera 7e7d458
Nearly support compound matchers on CaptureStreamToTempfile
nevinera 4175430
Add a changelog entry
pirj 829f7fe
Mark the two compound-stream matcher tests pending for jruby
nevinera d44f61f
Use 'captured_stream' instead of 'strm' (avoid abbreviations)
nevinera File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Is there not a way to assert against one of our internal classes here? checking to see if we're already in a splitter etc
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Only in some of the cases. We're interacting with whatever's in
$stderr
and$stdout
, so I think we're reliably getting an internal class for the former but not the latter. Wrapping with an internal class for the latter as well did occur to me as a potential solution, but it was large and involved enough that I wasn't willing to attempt it for such a minor issue :-\ (also I'm scared)