Skip to main content
Log in

Sampling animal association networks with the gambit of the group

  • Methods
  • Published:
Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ecologists increasingly use network theory to examine animal association patterns. The gambit of the group (GoG) is a simple and useful assumption for accumulating the data necessary for a network analysis. The gambit of the group implies that each animal in a group is associating with every other individual in that group. Sampling is an important issue for networks in wild populations collected assuming GoG. Due to time, effort, and resource constraints and the difficulty of tracking animals, sampled data are usually a subset of the actual network. Ecologists often use association indexes to calculate the frequency of associations between individuals. These indexes are often transformed by applying a filter to produce a binary network. We explore GoG sampling using model networks. We examine assortment at the level of the group by a single dichotomous trait, along with many other network measures, to examine the effect of different sampling regimes, and choice of filter on the accuracy and precision with which measures are estimated. We find strong support for the use of weighted, rather than filtered, network measures and show that different filters have different effects depending on the nature of the sampling. We make several practical recommendations for ecologists planning GoG sampling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
€32.70 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price includes VAT (Bulgaria)

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bejder L, Fletcher D, Bräger S (1998) A method for testing association patterns of social animals. Anim Behav 56:719–725

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cairns SJ, Schwager SJ (1987) A comparison of association indexes. Anim Behav 35:1454–1469

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clutton-Brock TH, Guiness FE, Albon SD (1982) Red deer: behaviour and ecology of two sexes. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft DP, Arrowsmith BJ, Bielby J, Skinner K, White E, Couzin ID, Magurran AE, Ramnarine I, Krause J (2003) Mechanisms underlying shoal composition in the Trinidadian guppy, Poecilia reticulata. Oikos 100:429–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft DP, Krause J, James R (2004) Social networks in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc R Soc London 271:S516–S519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Croft DP, James R, Ward AJW, Botham MS, Mawdsley D, Krause J (2005) Assortative interactions and social networks in fish. Oecologia 143:211–219

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Croft DP, James R, Krause J (2008) Exploring animal social networks. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Croft DP, Krause J, Darden SK, Ramnarine IW, Faria JJ, James R (2009) Behavioural trait assortment in a social network: patterns and implications. Behav Ecol and Sociobiol 63:1495–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cross PC, Lloyd-Smith JO, Bowers JA, Hay CT, Hofmeyr M, Getz WM (2004) Integrating association data and disease dynamics in a social ungulate: bovine tuberculosis in African buffalo in the Kruger National Park. Ann Zool Fenn 41:879–892

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsberg JR, Young TP (1992) Measuring association between individuals or groups in behavioural studies. Anim Behav 44:377–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granovetter M (1974) Getting a job. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Krause J, Ruxton GD (2002) Living in groups. Oxford University Press, Oxford University

    Google Scholar 

  • Lusseau D (2003) The emergent properties of a dolphin social network. Proc R Soc Biol Sci Ser B 270:186–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusseau D, Newman MEJ (2004) Identifying the role that individual animals play in their social network. Proc R Soc Biol Lett 271:S477–S481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lusseau D, Whitehead H, Gero S (2008) Incorporating uncertainty in the study of animal social networks. Anim Behav 75:1809–1815

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell M (1998) An introduction to genetic algorithms. MIT, Cambridge, Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Newman MEJ (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Review 45:167–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okubo A (1986) Dynamic aspects of animal grouping: swarms, schools, flocks, and herds. Adv Biophys 22:1–94

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sundaresen SR, Fischhoff IR, Rubenstein DI (2007) Network metrics reveal differences in social organization between two fission-fusion species, Grevy’s xebra and onager. Oecologia 151:140–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasserman S, Faust K (1994) Social network analysis: methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H (1999) Testing Association Patterns of Social Animals. Anim Behav 57:F26–F29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H (2008) Analyzing animal societies: quantitative methods for vertebrate social analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Whitehead H, Dufault S (1999) Techniques for analyzing vertebrate social structure using identified individuals: review and recommendations. Adv Study Behav 28:33–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf JBW, Mawdsley D, Trillmich F, James R (2007) Social structure in a colonial mammal: unravelling hidden structural layers and their foundations by network analysis. Anim Behav 74:1293–1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank two anonymous referees, Darren Croft, Jason Noble, and Jon Pitchford for their valuable input. DWF is funded by NERC grant NE/E016111/1.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Daniel W. Franks.

Additional information

Communicated by J. Krause

Electronic supplementary materials

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 1351 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Franks, D.W., Ruxton, G.D. & James, R. Sampling animal association networks with the gambit of the group . Behav Ecol Sociobiol 64, 493–503 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0865-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-009-0865-8

Keywords

Navigation