Talking, Correcting, Ranting
Published 21 years, 6 months pastThe files I used for last Thursday’s presentation are now available on the Speaking page. The presentation space that COMMUG uses is, in a word, awesome. Picture a large lounge-type setup with three wall-height projection screens, each of which can be devoted to any of the video input signals. I was able to set it up so the slides (an OperaShow document running on my Windows laptop) were in the center screen, and the examples (which came off the TiBook) were on the left and right screes. Beforehand I decided to have some fun; running three fifteen-foot-tall iTunes visualizations of “Block Rockin’ Beats” is a sight to behold. I felt like a real rock star for a moment there.
In my post last Thursday, I referred to the XHTML 2.0 element nl
as meaning “nested list,” when in fact it stands for “navigation list.” My bad. I’ve corrected the original entry as well. It’s another data point in the topic of markup, semantics, and semantic overloading, but not one I’m currently prepared to explore in detail. Meanwhile, I’ll just increase my Buzzword Rating by saying “Semantic” a lot. Semantic semantic semantic.
So it looks as though the Northwest Passage will open up in our lifetimes, but I’m sure there’s no such thing as global warming. After all, the Republican News Cha—er, I mean, Fox News Channel said so. It’s all just a fantasy of radical environmentalists who don’t have anything better to do, apparently. Which makes sense, because obviously there isn’t anything else to get upset about, like widespread deformities in amphibians. Oh wait! Sorry, the FNC gurus have said that last one is all made up as well. Too bad nobody told Scientific American before they published an article about an eight-year scientific investigation of amphibian deformations. Oh, those wacky scientists. When will they learn that science is only valid if its conclusions agree with certain political agendas?
Which, oddly, reminds me: ever noticed how when a judge rules in a manner favorable to conservatives, it’s hailed as respect for the rule of law, but when the ruling leans to the left, that’s called judicial activism? Maybe it’s time to turn the terms around, just to see how the right wing likes it. After all, there’s nothing like extremist apoplexy to brighten one’s day.