Generate and pray: Using sallms to evaluate the security of llm generated code
With the growing popularity of Large Language Models (eg GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, etc.) in
software engineers' daily practices, it is important to ensure that the code generated by these
tools is not only functionally correct but also free of vulnerabilities. Although LLMs can help
developers to be more productive, prior empirical studies have shown that LLMs can
generate insecure code. There are two contributing factors to the insecure code generation.
First, existing datasets used to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) do not adequately …
software engineers' daily practices, it is important to ensure that the code generated by these
tools is not only functionally correct but also free of vulnerabilities. Although LLMs can help
developers to be more productive, prior empirical studies have shown that LLMs can
generate insecure code. There are two contributing factors to the insecure code generation.
First, existing datasets used to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) do not adequately …
With the growing popularity of Large Language Models (e.g. GitHub Copilot, ChatGPT, etc.) in software engineers' daily practices, it is important to ensure that the code generated by these tools is not only functionally correct but also free of vulnerabilities. Although LLMs can help developers to be more productive, prior empirical studies have shown that LLMs can generate insecure code. There are two contributing factors to the insecure code generation. First, existing datasets used to evaluate Large Language Models (LLMs) do not adequately represent genuine software engineering tasks sensitive to security. Instead, they are often based on competitive programming challenges or classroom-type coding tasks. In real-world applications, the code produced is integrated into larger codebases, introducing potential security risks. There's a clear absence of benchmarks that focus on evaluating the security of the generated code. Second, existing evaluation metrics primarily focus on the functional correctness of the generated code while ignoring security considerations. Metrics such as pass@k gauge the probability of obtaining the correct code in the top k suggestions. Other popular metrics like BLEU, CodeBLEU, ROUGE, and METEOR similarly emphasize functional accuracy, neglecting security implications. In light of these research gaps, in this paper, we described SALLM, a framework to benchmark LLMs' abilities to generate secure code systematically. This framework has three major components: a novel dataset of security-centric Python prompts, an evaluation environment to test the generated code, and novel metrics to evaluate the models' performance from the perspective of secure code generation.
arxiv.org
Показан е най-добрият резултат за това търсене. Показване на всички резултати