Automating code review activities by large-scale pre-training
Proceedings of the 30th ACM Joint European Software Engineering Conference …, 2022•dl.acm.org
Code review is an essential part to software development lifecycle since it aims at
guaranteeing the quality of codes. Modern code review activities necessitate developers
viewing, understanding and even running the programs to assess logic, functionality,
latency, style and other factors. It turns out that developers have to spend far too much time
reviewing the code of their peers. Accordingly, it is in significant demand to automate the
code review process. In this research, we focus on utilizing pre-training techniques for the …
guaranteeing the quality of codes. Modern code review activities necessitate developers
viewing, understanding and even running the programs to assess logic, functionality,
latency, style and other factors. It turns out that developers have to spend far too much time
reviewing the code of their peers. Accordingly, it is in significant demand to automate the
code review process. In this research, we focus on utilizing pre-training techniques for the …
Code review is an essential part to software development lifecycle since it aims at guaranteeing the quality of codes. Modern code review activities necessitate developers viewing, understanding and even running the programs to assess logic, functionality, latency, style and other factors. It turns out that developers have to spend far too much time reviewing the code of their peers. Accordingly, it is in significant demand to automate the code review process. In this research, we focus on utilizing pre-training techniques for the tasks in the code review scenario. We collect a large-scale dataset of real-world code changes and code reviews from open-source projects in nine of the most popular programming languages. To better understand code diffs and reviews, we propose CodeReviewer, a pre-trained model that utilizes four pre-training tasks tailored specifically for the code review scenario. To evaluate our model, we focus on three key tasks related to code review activities, including code change quality estimation, review comment generation and code refinement. Furthermore, we establish a high-quality benchmark dataset based on our collected data for these three tasks and conduct comprehensive experiments on it. The experimental results demonstrate that our model outperforms the previous state-of-the-art pre-training approaches in all tasks. Further analysis show that our proposed pre-training tasks and the multilingual pre-training dataset benefit the model on the understanding of code changes and reviews.