skip to main content
10.1145/3600100.3626344acmotherconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagessensysConference Proceedingsconference-collections
short-paper
Open access

Measuring Success, One Sensor at a Time: A Sensing Infrastructure for Longitudinal Workspace Behavior Monitoring

Published: 15 November 2023 Publication History
  • Get Citation Alerts
  • Abstract

    The development of built environments has expanded its focus beyond sustainability to health due to the potential to become a transformative health tool. Studies have shown that exposure to poor Indoor Environmental Quality (IEQ) can affect health and productivity, manifesting itself as sick building syndrome (SBS) and economic losses. Although previous studies have used wearables, mobile sensing, environmental sensing, and self-reports, none have utilized all four in a naturalistic environment. This study introduces a naturalistic multi-modal occupant state and behavior monitoring framework that (1) collects occupant and environment data through smart wearable devices, smartphones, environmental sensors, and self-reported surveys; (2) processes data to gain insight into participants. To assess the validity and ease of use of this framework, a pilot study was conducted with 13 participants, some in a smart office building space and others in their homes. This preliminary study confirmed the feasibility of employing surveys, smart wearable devices, environmental sensors, and passive smartphone sensing in a multi-modal approach to monitor occupant states and behaviors within smart office settings. The results revealed a positive linear relationship (r = 0.2497, 95% CI of [0.1502, 0.3493]) between subjective sleep ratings and total sleep time (TST). The reported sleep times were cross-validated with the identified sleep cycles, confirming the reliability of smart wearables in assessing sleep. Furthermore, in both the office and home participant data, noise levels exhibited a high incidence of coinciding change points with physical activity, suggesting a relationship between shifts in noise levels and changes in the physical activity of the occupant and vice versa. These findings further underscore the complex interaction between environmental factors and human behavior in the wild that can be closely examined in the proposed framework.

    References

    [1]
    Michael F. Armey, Heather T. Schatten, Natasha Haradhvala, and Ivan W. Miller. 2015. Ecological momentary assessment (EMA) of depression-related phenomena. Current Opinion in Psychology 4 (8 2015), 21–25. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.COPSYC.2015.01.002
    [2]
    Mohamad Awada, Burcin Becerik-Gerber, Simi Hoque, Zheng O’Neill, Giulia Pedrielli, Jin Wen, and Teresa Wu. 2021. Ten questions concerning occupant health in buildings during normal operations and extreme events including the COVID-19 pandemic. Building and Environment 188 (1 2021), 107480. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2020.107480
    [3]
    AWARE. 2022. AWARE – Open-source Context Instrumentation Framework For Everyone. https://awareframework.com/
    [4]
    Daniel Barry and J. A. Hartigan. 1993. A Bayesian Analysis for Change Point Problems. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 88 (3 1993), 309–319. Issue 421. https://doi.org/10.1080/01621459.1993.10594323
    [5]
    Daniel J. Buysse, Charles F. Reynolds, Timothy H. Monk, Susan R. Berman, and David J. Kupfer. 1989. The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index: a new instrument for psychiatric practice and research. Psychiatry research 28, 2 (1989), 193–213. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
    [6]
    Matthew Caruso, Jason Jabbour, Caleb Neale, Alden Summerville, Avery Walters, Arsalan Heydarian, Arthur Small, and Mahsa Pahlavikhah Varnosfaderani. 2022. Developing a Dynamic Control Algorithm to Improve Ventilation Efficiency in a University Conference Room. In 2022 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS). IEEE, Charlottesville, VA, USA, 145–150. https://doi.org/10.1109/SIEDS55548.2022.9799313
    [7]
    J. G. Cedenõ-Laurent, A. Williams, P. MacNaughton, X. Cao, E. Eitland, J. Spengler, and J. Allen. 2018. Building Evidence for Health: Green Buildings, Current Science, and Future Challenges. Annual Review of Public Health 39 (4 2018), 291–308. https://doi.org/10.1146/ANNUREV-PUBLHEALTH-031816-044420
    [8]
    Giorgia Chinazzo, Rune Korsholm Andersen, Elie Azar, Verena M. Barthelmes, Cristina Becchio, Lorenzo Belussi, Christiane Berger, Salvatore Carlucci, Stefano Paolo Corgnati, Sarah Crosby, Ludovico Danza, Luiza de Castro, Matteo Favero, Stephanie Gauthier, Runa T. Hellwig, Quan Jin, Joyce Kim, Mandana Sarey Khanie, Dolaana Khovalyg, Carola Lingua, Alessandra Luna-Navarro, Ardeshir Mahdavi, Clayton Miller, Isabel Mino-Rodriguez, Ilaria Pigliautile, Anna Laura Pisello, Ricardo Forgiarini Rupp, Abdul Manan Sadick, Francesco Salamone, Marcel Schweiker, Marc Syndicus, Giorgia Spigliantini, Natalia Giraldo Vasquez, Donna Vakalis, Marika Vellei, and Shen Wei. 2022. Quality criteria for multi-domain studies in the indoor environment: Critical review towards research guidelines and recommendations. Building and Environment 226 (12 2022), 109719. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109719
    [9]
    Sheldon Cohen. 1994. Perceived Stress Scale. www.mindgarden.com
    [10]
    S. Cohen, T. Kamarck, and R. Mermelstein. 1983. A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of health and social behavior 24 (12 1983), 385–396. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404
    [11]
    Maarten De Groote, Jonathan Volt, and Frances Bean. 2017. Smart Buildings Decoded. Technical Report. Buildings Performance Institute Europe (BPIE). www.bpie.eu
    [12]
    Ed Diener, Derrick Wirtz, William Tov, Chu Kim-Prieto, Dong won Choi, Shigehiro Oishi, and Robert Biswas-Diener. 2010. New well-being measures: Short scales to assess flourishing and positive and negative feelings. Social Indicators Research 39, 2 (2010), 247266. https://doi.org/10.1007/S11205-009-9493-Y
    [13]
    Bing Dong, Romana Markovic, Salvatore Carlucci, Yapan Liu, Andreas Wagner, Antonio Liguori, Christoph van Treeck, Dmitry Oleynikov, Elie Azar, Gianmarco Fajilla, Ján Drgoňa, Joyce Kim, Marika Vellei, Marilena De Simone, Masood Shamsaiee, Mateus Bavaresco, Matteo Favero, Mikkel Kjaergaard, Mohamed Osman, Moritz Frahm, Sanam Dabirian, Da Yan, and Xuyuan Kang. 2022. A guideline to document occupant behavior models for advanced building controls. Building and Environment 219 (7 2022), 109195. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.109195
    [14]
    Fitbit. 2023. What should I know about Fitbit sleep stages?https://help.fitbit.com/articles/en_US/Help_article/2163.htm
    [15]
    Hagen Fritz, Kerry A. Kinney, Congyu Wu, David M. Schnyer, and Zoltan Nagy. 2022. Data fusion of mobile and environmental sensing devices to understand the effect of the indoor environment on measured and self-reported sleep quality. Building and Environment 214 (4 2022), 108835. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2022.108835
    [16]
    M. Frontczak, S. Schiavon, J. Goins, E. Arens, H. Zhang, and P. Wargocki. 2012. Quantitative relationships between occupant satisfaction and satisfaction aspects of indoor environmental quality and building design. Indoor Air 22 (4 2012), 119–131. Issue 2. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0668.2011.00745.X
    [17]
    Ana Allen Gomes, José Tavares, and Maria Helena P. de Azevedo. 2011. Sleep and academic performance in undergraduates: a multi-measure, multi-predictor approach. Chronobiol Int 28 (11 2011), 786–801. Issue 9. https://doi.org/10.3109/07420528.2011.606518
    [18]
    Milica Gomzi and Jasminka Bobic. 2009. SICK BUILDING SYNDROME - Do we live and work in unhealthy environment?Periodicum Biologorum 111, 1 (2009), 79–84.
    [19]
    Oliver P John and Sanjay Srivastava. 1999. The Big-Five Trait Taxonomy: History, Measurement, and Theoretical Perspectives. In Handbook of personality: Theory and research, Lawrence A. Pervin and O.P John (Eds.). Guilford Press, New York, 102–138.
    [20]
    Ruzena Kralikova and Emil Wessely. 2018. Impact of the Environmental Factors and its Effects on Productivity and Health. In 29th DAAAM International Symposium on Intelligent Manufacturing and Automation. DAAAM International, Vienna, Austria, 0119–0124. https://doi.org/10.2507/29th.daaam.proceedings.016
    [21]
    Kurt Kroenke, Tara W. Strine, Robert L. Spitzer, Janet B.W. Williams, Joyce T. Berry, and Ali H. Mokdad. 2009. The PHQ-8 as a measure of current depression in the general population. Journal of affective disorders 114, 1-3 (4 2009), 163–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAD.2008.06.026
    [22]
    Tu Le, Alan Wang, Yaxing Yao, Yuanyuan Feng, Arsalan Heydarian, Norman Sadeh, and Yuan Tian. 2023. Exploring Smart Commercial Building Occupants’ Perceptions and Notification Preferences of Internet of Things Data Collection in the United States. In 2023 IEEE 8th European Symposium on Security and Privacy (EuroS&P). IEEE, Delft, Netherlands, 1030–1046. https://doi.org/10.1109/EuroSP57164.2023.00064
    [23]
    B. Li, A. Tavakoli, and A. Heydarian. 2023. Occupant privacy perception, awareness, and preferences in smart office environments. Scientific Reports 13 (2023), 1–11. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-023-30788-5
    [24]
    Dusan Licina and Serra Yildirim. 2021. Occupant satisfaction with indoor environmental quality, sick building syndrome (SBS) symptoms and self-reported productivity before and after relocation into WELL-certified office buildings. Building and Environment 204 (10 2021), 108183. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.buildenv.2021.108183
    [25]
    Rainer Lutze. 2018. Practicality of Smartwatch Apps for Supporting Elderly People – A Comprehensive Survey. In 2018 IEEE International Conference on Engineering, Technology and Innovation (ICE/ITMC). IEEE, Stuttgart, Germany, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICE.2018.8436370
    [26]
    Gonzalo J. Martinez, Ted Grover, Stephen M. Mattingly, Gloria Mark, Sidney D’Mello, Talayeh Aledavood, Fatema Akbar, Pablo Robles-Granda, and Aaron Striegel. 2022. Alignment Between Heart Rate Variability From Fitness Trackers and Perceived Stress: Perspectives From a Large-Scale In Situ Longitudinal Study of Information Workers. JMIR Hum Factors 2022;9(3):e33754 https://humanfactors.jmir.org/2022/3/e33754 9 (8 2022), e33754. Issue 3. https://doi.org/10.2196/33754
    [27]
    Institute of Medicine. 2006. Sleep Disorders and Sleep Deprivation. National Academies Press, Washington, D.C. 1–404 pages. https://doi.org/10.17226/11617
    [28]
    Jegar Pitchforth, Elizabeth Nelson-White, Marc Van Den Helder, and Wouter Oosting. 2020. The work environment pilot: An experiment to determine the optimal office design for a technology company. PLOS ONE 15 (5 2020), e0232943. Issue 5. https://doi.org/10.1371/JOURNAL.PONE.0232943
    [29]
    Stephen R. Porter, Michael E. Whitcomb, and William H. Weitzer. 2004. Multiple surveys of students and survey fatigue. New Directions for Institutional Research 2004, 121 (1 2004), 63–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/IR.101
    [30]
    R. Runeson, D. Norbäck, B. Klinteberg, and C. Edling. 2004. The influence of personality, measured by the Karolinska Scales of Personality (KSP), on symptoms among subjects in suspected sick buildings. Indoor Air 14, 6 (10 2004), 394–404. https://doi.org/10.1111/J.1600-0668.2004.00261.X
    [31]
    Daniel W. Russell. 1996. UCLA Loneliness Scale (Version 3): Reliability, Validity, and Factor Structure. Journal of Personality Assessment 66, 1 (1996), 20–40. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA6601_2
    [32]
    Stanislaw Saganowski, Przemyslaw Kazienko, Maciej Dziezyc, Patrycja Jakimow, Joanna Komoszynska, Weronika Michalska, Anna Dutkowiak, Adam Polak, Adam Dziadek, and Michal Ujma. 2020. Consumer Wearables and Affective Computing for Wellbeing Support. In MobiQuitous 2020 - 17th EAI International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Systems: Computing, Networking and Services. ACM, New York, NY, USA, 482–487. https://doi.org/10.1145/3448891.3450332
    [33]
    Mark Sherer, James E. Maddux, Blaise Mercandante, Steven Prentice-Dunn, Beth Jacobs, and Ronald W. Rogers. 1982. The Self-Efficacy Scale: Construction and Validation:. Psychological Reports 51, 2 (10 1982), 663–671. https://doi.org/10.2466/PR0.1982.51.2.663
    [34]
    Arash Tavakoli, Shashwat Kumar, Xiang Guo, Vahid Balali, Mehdi Boukhechba, and Arsalan Heydarian. 2021. HARMONY: A Human-Centered Multimodal Driving Study in the Wild. IEEE Access 9 (2021), 23956–23978. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3056007
    [35]
    Thuan Quoc Thach, Dhiya Mahirah, Gerard Dunleavy, Nuraini Nazeha, Yichi Zhang, Christina En Hui Tan, Adam Charles Roberts, George Christopoulos, Chee Kiong Soh, and Josip Car. 2019. Prevalence of sick building syndrome and its association with perceived indoor environmental quality in an Asian multi-ethnic working population. Building and Environment 166 (12 2019), 106420. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.BUILDENV.2019.106420
    [36]
    Sofia Triantafillou, Sohrab Saeb, Emily G. Lattie, David C. Mohr, and Konrad Paul Kording. 2019. Relationship Between Sleep Quality and Mood: Ecological Momentary Assessment Study. JMIR Mental Health 6, 3 (3 2019), e12613. https://doi.org/10.2196/12613
    [37]
    Mahsa Pahlavikhah Varnosfaderani, Arsalan Heydarian, and Farrokh Jazizadeh. 2021. Using Statistical Models to Detect Occupancy in Buildings through Monitoring VOC, CO2, and Other Environmental Factors. In Computing in Civil Engineering 2021. American Society of Civil Engineers, Orlando, FL, 705–712. https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784483893.087
    [38]
    Mengmeng Wang, Lili Li, Caixia Hou, Xiaotong Guo, and Hanliang Fu. 2022. Building and Health: Mapping the Knowledge Development of Sick Building Syndrome. Buildings 12, 3 (3 2022), 287. https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings12030287
    [39]
    Xiaofei Wang, Chandra Erdman, and John W Emerson. 2022. Bayesian Analysis of Change Point Problems.
    [40]
    Hongyi Wen, Michael Sobolev, Rachel Vitale, James Kizer, J P Pollak, Frederick Muench, and Deborah Estrin. 2021. mPulse Mobile Sensing Model for Passive Detection of Impulsive Behavior: Exploratory Prediction Study. JMIR Mental Health 8 (1 2021), e25019. Issue 1. https://doi.org/10.2196/25019
    [41]
    Yong Sook Yang, Gi Wook Ryu, Insu Han, Seojin Oh, and Mona Choi. 2018. Ecological Momentary Assessment Using Smartphone-Based Mobile Application for Affect and Stress Assessment. Healthcare Informatics Research 24 (10 2018), 381–386. Issue 4. https://doi.org/10.4258/HIR.2018.24.4.381
    [42]
    Serena Zheng, Noah Apthorpe, Marshini Chetty, and Nick Feamster. 2018. User Perceptions of Smart Home IoT Privacy. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 2 (11 2018), 1–20. Issue CSCW. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274469
    [43]
    Gregory D. Zimet, Nancy W. Dahlem, Sara G. Zimet, and Gordon K. Farley. 1988. The Multidimensional Scale of Perceived Social Support. Journal of Personality Assessment 52, 1 (1988), 30–41. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA5201_2

    Cited By

    View all
    • (2024)Human Behavior Adaptability in Responsive Buildings: An Exploratory Study in Workplace SettingsBuildings10.3390/buildings1406183014:6(1830)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2024
    • (2024)Comparative Analysis of Productivity Methods to Evaluate Thermal Comfort in Classrooms through Hierarchical ClusteringBuildings10.3390/buildings1403069814:3(698)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024

    Index Terms

    1. Measuring Success, One Sensor at a Time: A Sensing Infrastructure for Longitudinal Workspace Behavior Monitoring

          Recommendations

          Comments

          Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

          Information & Contributors

          Information

          Published In

          cover image ACM Other conferences
          BuildSys '23: Proceedings of the 10th ACM International Conference on Systems for Energy-Efficient Buildings, Cities, and Transportation
          November 2023
          567 pages
          ISBN:9798400702303
          DOI:10.1145/3600100
          This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

          Publisher

          Association for Computing Machinery

          New York, NY, United States

          Publication History

          Published: 15 November 2023

          Check for updates

          Author Tags

          1. indoor environment
          2. productivity
          3. smart buildings
          4. smart wearables
          5. well-being

          Qualifiers

          • Short-paper
          • Research
          • Refereed limited

          Funding Sources

          Conference

          BuildSys '23

          Acceptance Rates

          Overall Acceptance Rate 148 of 500 submissions, 30%

          Contributors

          Other Metrics

          Bibliometrics & Citations

          Bibliometrics

          Article Metrics

          • Downloads (Last 12 months)252
          • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)39
          Reflects downloads up to 14 Aug 2024

          Other Metrics

          Citations

          Cited By

          View all
          • (2024)Human Behavior Adaptability in Responsive Buildings: An Exploratory Study in Workplace SettingsBuildings10.3390/buildings1406183014:6(1830)Online publication date: 16-Jun-2024
          • (2024)Comparative Analysis of Productivity Methods to Evaluate Thermal Comfort in Classrooms through Hierarchical ClusteringBuildings10.3390/buildings1403069814:3(698)Online publication date: 6-Mar-2024

          View Options

          View options

          PDF

          View or Download as a PDF file.

          PDF

          eReader

          View online with eReader.

          eReader

          HTML Format

          View this article in HTML Format.

          HTML Format

          Get Access

          Login options

          Media

          Figures

          Other

          Tables

          Share

          Share

          Share this Publication link

          Share on social media