skip to main content
10.1145/3611659.3615680acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PagesvrstConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article
Open access

Ready Worker One? High-Res VR for the Home Office

Published: 09 October 2023 Publication History

Abstract

Many employees prefer to work from home, yet struggle to squeeze their office into an already fully-utilized space. Virtual Reality (VR) seemingly offered a solution with its ability to transform even modest physical spaces into spacious, productive virtual offices, but hardware challenges—such as low resolution—have prevented this from becoming a reality. Now that hardware issues are being overcome, we are able to investigate the suitability of VR for daily work. To do so, we (1) studied the physical space that users typically dedicate to home offices and (2) conducted an exploratory study of users working in VR for one week. For (1) we used digital ethnography to study 430 self-published images of software developer workstations in the home, confirming that developers faced myriad space challenges. We used speculative design to re-envision these as VR workstations, eliminating many challenges. For (2) we asked 10 developers to work in their own home using VR for about two hours each day for four workdays, and then interviewed them. We found that working in VR improved focus and made mundane tasks more enjoyable. While some subjects reported issues—annoyances with the fit, weight, and umbilical cord of the headset—the vast majority of these issues seem to be addressable. Together, these studies show VR technology has the potential to address many key problems with home workstations, and, with continued improvements, may become an integral part of creating an effective workstation in the home.

References

[1]
2022. Workstation Dataset. https://github.com/vcuse/workstation-setups. [Online; accessed 2022-10-14].
[2]
Erik M. Altmann, J. Gregory Trafton, and David Z. Hambrick. 2014. Momentary interruptions can derail the train of thought.Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 143, 1 (2014), 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0030986
[3]
James Auger. 2013. Speculative design: crafting the speculation. Digital Creativity 24, 1 (2013), 11–35.
[4]
Verena Biener, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, Per Ola Krisftensson, and Jens Grubert. 2021. Extended Reality for Knowledge Work in Everyday Environments. https://doi.org/10.48550/ARXIV.2111.03942
[5]
Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using Thematic Analysis in Psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3 (Jan 2006), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
[6]
John Brewer. 2000. Ethnography. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
[7]
Amy Bruckman. 2002. Studying the amateur artist: A perspective on disguising data collected in human subjects research on the Internet. Ethics and Information Technology 4, 3 (Sept. 2002), 217–231. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021316409277
[8]
A. Chandwani, MK Chauhan, and A. Bhatnagar. 2019. Ergonomics assessment of office desk workers working in corporate offices. Int J Health Sci Res 9, 8 (2019), 367–75.
[9]
Yumiao Chen, Xin Wang, and Huijia Xu. 2021. Human factors/ergonomics evaluation for virtual reality headsets: a review. CCF Transactions on Pervasive Computing and Interaction 3, 2 (2021), 99–111.
[10]
Ernest Cline. 2011. Ready Player One. Random House, Manhattan.
[11]
Space Exploration Technologies Corp.2022. SpaceX Interplanetary Transport System. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0qo78R_yYFA. [Online; accessed 2022-10-14].
[12]
Emily Dao, Andreea Muresan, Kasper Hornbæk, and Jarrod Knibbe. 2021. Bad Breakdowns, Useful Seams, and Face Slapping: Analysis of VR Fails on YouTube. In Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Yokohama, Japan) (CHI ’21). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 526, 14 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3411764.3445435
[13]
Joni Delanoeije, Marijke Verbruggen, and Lynn Germeys. 2019. Boundary role transitions: A day-to-day approach to explain the effects of home-based telework on work-to-home conflict and home-to-work conflict. Human Relations 72, 12 (2019), 1843–1868.
[14]
Vittorio Di Martino and Linda Wirth. 1990. Telework: A new way of working and living. Int’l Lab. Rev. 129 (1990), 529.
[15]
Pouya Eghbali, Kaisa Väänänen, and Tero Jokela. 2019. Social Acceptability of Virtual Reality in Public Spaces: Experiential Factors and Design Recommendations. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Mobile and Ubiquitous Multimedia (Pisa, Italy) (MUM ’19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 28, 11 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3365610.3365647
[16]
Ruvimova et al.2023. Study Materials, Open Science Framework. https://osf.io/28fer/?view_only=2cd2a0bf8a9640788dae4e940256139f. https://osf.io/28fer/?view_only=2cd2a0bf8a9640788dae4e940256139f
[17]
Denae Ford, Margaret-Anne Storey, Thomas Zimmermann, Christian Bird, Sonia Jaffe, Chandra Maddila, Jenna L. Butler, Brian Houck, and Nachiappan Nagappan. 2021. A Tale of Two Cities: Software Developers Working from Home during the COVID-19 Pandemic. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 31, 2, Article 27 (dec 2021), 37 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3487567
[18]
Jens Grubert, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2019. The Office of the Future: Virtual, Portable, and Global. IEEE Computer Graphics & Applications 38, 6 (January 2019), 125–133. https://doi.org/10.1109/MCG.2018.2875609
[19]
Jens Grubert, Lukas Witzani, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, Matthias Kranz, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2018. Text entry in immersive head-mounted display-based virtual reality using standard keyboards. In 2018 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, IEEE, New York, USA, 159–166. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR.2018.8446059
[20]
Eleonora Gullone. 2000. The Biophilia Hypothesis and Life in the 21st Century: Increasing Mental Health or Increasing Pathology?Journal of Happiness Studies 1 (09 2000), 293–322. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010043827986
[21]
Jie Guo, Dongdong Weng, Hui Fang, Zhenliang Zhang, Jiamin Ping, Yue Liu, and Yongtian Wang. 2020. Exploring the differences of visual discomfort caused by long-term immersion between virtual environments and physical environments. In 2020 IEEE Conference on Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). IEEE, 443–452.
[22]
Jie Guo, Dongdong Weng, Zhenliang Zhang, Haiyan Jiang, Yue Liu, Yongtian Wang, and Henry Been-Lirn Duh. 2019. Mixed Reality Office System Based on Maslow’s Hierarchy of Needs: Towards the Long-Term Immersion in Virtual Environments. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). IEEE, New York, USA, 224–235. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR.2019.00019
[23]
Christine Ipsen, Marc van Veldhoven, Kathrin Kirchner, and John Paulin Hansen. 2021. Six key advantages and disadvantages of working from home in Europe during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 18, 4 (2021), 1826.
[24]
Shamsi T. Iqbal and Brian P. Bailey. 2006. Leveraging characteristics of task structure to predict the cost of interruption. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montréal, Québec, Canada) (CHI ’06). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 741–750. https://doi.org/10.1145/1124772.1124882
[25]
Shamsi T. Iqbal and Eric Horvitz. 2007. Disruption and recovery of computing tasks: Field study, analysis, and directions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems(CHI ’07). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 677–686. https://doi.org/10.1145/1240624.1240730
[26]
Helena Jahncke, Staffan Hygge, Niklas Halin, Anne Marie Green, and Kenth Dimberg. 2011. Open-plan office noise: Cognitive performance and restoration. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31, 4 (2011), 373–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.07.002
[27]
Verena Biener Snehanjali Kalamkar, Negar Nouri, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, John J. Dudley, Jinghui Hu, Per Ola Kristensson, Maheshya Weerasinghe, Klen Čopič Pucihar, Matjaž Kljun, 2022. Quantifying the Effects of Working in VR for One Week. arXiv preprint arXiv:2206.03189 (2022).
[28]
Stephen Kaplan. 2001. Meditation, Restoration, and the Management of Mental Fatigue. Environment and Behavior 33, 4 (2001), 480–506. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973106 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973106
[29]
Pascal Knierim, Valentin Schwind, Anna Maria Feit, Florian Nieuwenhuizen, and Niels Henze. 2018. Physical Keyboards in Virtual Reality: Analysis of Typing Performance and Effects of Avatar Hands. In Proceedings of the 2018 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Montreal QC, Canada) (CHI ’18). ACM, New York, NY, USA, Article 345, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3173574.3173919
[30]
Cheuk Ming Mak and Y. P. Lui. 2012. The effect of sound on office productivity. Building Services Engineering Research and Technology 33, 3 (2012), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624411412253 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1177/0143624411412253
[31]
Shady Mansour, Pascal Knierim, Joseph O’Hagan, Florian Alt, and Florian Mathis. 2023. BANS: Evaluation of Bystander Awareness Notification Systems for Productivity in VR. https://doi.org/10.14722/usec.2023.234566
[32]
Gloria Mark, Daniela Gudith, and Ulrich Klocke. 2008. The cost of interrupted work. In Proceeding of the twenty-sixth annual CHI conference on Human factors in computing systems - CHI ’08. ACM Press, New York, New York, USA, 107. https://doi.org/10.1145/1357054.1357072
[33]
Annette Markham. 2012. Fabrication as Ethical Practice. Information, Communication & Society 15, 3 (2012), 334–353. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.641993 arXiv:https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2011.641993
[34]
Mark McGill, Daniel Boland, Roderick Murray-Smith, and Stephen Brewster. 2015. A Dose of Reality: Overcoming Usability Challenges in VR Head-Mounted Displays. In Proceedings of the 33rd Annual ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (Seoul, Republic of Korea) (CHI ’15). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 2143–2152. https://doi.org/10.1145/2702123.2702382
[35]
Mark McGill, Stephen Brewster, Daniel Pires De Sa Medeiros, Sidney Bovet, Mario Gutierrez, and Aidan Kehoe. 2022. Creating and Augmenting Keyboards for Extended Reality with the Keyboard Augmentation Toolkit. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 29, 2, Article 15 (jan 2022), 39 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3490495
[36]
Mark Mcgill, Aidan Kehoe, Euan Freeman, and Stephen Brewster. 2020. Expanding the Bounds of Seated Virtual Workspaces. ACM Trans. Comput.-Hum. Interact. 27, 3, Article 13 (may 2020), 40 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3380959
[37]
Ryan McMahan, Chengyuan Lai, and Swaroop Pal. 2016. Interaction Fidelity: The Uncanny Valley of Virtual Reality Interactions. In 2016 International Conference on Virtual, Augmented and Mixed Reality (VMR), Vol. 9740. 59–70. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39907-2_6
[38]
D. Medeiros, M. McGill, A. Ng, R. McDermid, N. Pantidi, J. Williamson, and S. Brewster. 2022. From Shielding to Avoidance: Passenger Augmented Reality and the Layout of Virtual Displays for Productivity in Shared Transit. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 28, 11 (nov 2022), 3640–3650. https://doi.org/10.1109/TVCG.2022.3203002
[39]
Dhiraj Murthy. 2008. Digital ethnography: An examination of the use of new technologies for social research. Sociology 42, 5 (2008), 837–855.
[40]
Alexander Ng, Daniel Medeiros, Mark McGill, Julie Williamson, and Stephen Brewster. 2021. The Passenger Experience of Mixed Reality Virtual Display Layouts in Airplane Environments. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 265–274. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR52148.2021.00042
[41]
Eyal Ofek, Jens Grubert, Michel Pahud, Mark Phillips, and Per Ola Kristensson. 2020. Towards a Practical Virtual Office for Mobile Knowledge Workers. arxiv:2009.02947 [cs.HC]
[42]
Joseph O’Hagan, Mohamed Khamis, Mark McGill, and Julie R. Williamson. 2022. Exploring Attitudes Towards Increasing User Awareness of Reality From Within Virtual Reality. In ACM International Conference on Interactive Media Experiences (Aveiro, JB, Portugal) (IMX ’22). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 151–160. https://doi.org/10.1145/3505284.3529971
[43]
Joseph O’Hagan, Julie R. Williamson, Mohamed Khamis, and Mark McGill. 2022. Exploring Manipulating In-VR Audio To Facilitate Verbal Interactions Between VR Users And Bystanders. In Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces (Frascati, Rome, Italy) (AVI 2022). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, Article 35, 9 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3531073.3531079
[44]
Werner Osterhaus, Hillevi Hemphälä, and Per Nylén. 2015. Lighting at computer workstations. Work 52, 2 (2015), 315–328.
[45]
Varjo Technologies Oy. 2023. Varjo XR-3. https://varjo.com/products/xr-3/. [Online; accessed 2023-08-14].
[46]
Joseph O’Hagan, Julie R. Williamson, Mark McGill, and Mohamed Khamis. 2021. Safety, Power Imbalances, Ethics and Proxy Sex: Surveying In-The-Wild Interactions Between VR Users and Bystanders. In 2021 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality (ISMAR). 211–220. https://doi.org/10.1109/ISMAR52148.2021.00036
[47]
Leonardo Pavanatto, Chris North, Doug A. Bowman, Carmen Badea, and Richard Stoakley. 2021. Do we still need physical monitors? An evaluation of the usability of AR virtual monitors for productivity work. In 2021 IEEE Virtual Reality and 3D User Interfaces (VR). 759–767. https://doi.org/10.1109/VR50410.2021.00103
[48]
Malcolm H. Pope, Kheng Lim Goh, Marianne L. Magnusson, 2002. Spine ergonomics. Annual review of biomedical engineering 4, 1 (2002), 49–68.
[49]
Paul Ralph, Sebastian Baltes, Gianisa Adisaputri, Richard Torkar, Vladimir Kovalenko, Marcos Kalinowski, Nicole Novielli, Shin Yoo, Xavier Devroey, Xin Tan, Minghui Zhou, Burak Turhan, Rashina Hoda, Hideaki Hata, Gregorio Robles, Amin Milani Fard, and Rana Alkadhi. 2020. Pandemic programming. Empirical Software Engineering 25, 6 (sep 2020), 4927–4961. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10664-020-09875-y
[50]
Falko Rheinberg, Regina Vollmeyer, and Stefan Engeser. 2003. Die Erfassung des Flow-Erlebens [The assessment of flow experience]. Technical Report. University of Potsdam.
[51]
Taehyun Roh, Chukwuemeka Esomonu, Joseph Hendricks, Anisha Aggarwal, Nishat Tasnim Hasan, and Mark Benden. 2023. Examining workweek variations in computer usage patterns: An application of ergonomic monitoring software. PLOS ONE 18, 7 (07 2023), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287976
[52]
Catherine A. Roster, Joseph R. Ferrari, and M. Peter Jurkat. 2016. The dark side of home: Assessing possession ‘clutter’ on subjective well-being. Journal of Environmental Psychology 46 (2016), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2016.03.003
[53]
Anastasia Ruvimova, Junhyeok Kim, Thomas Fritz, Mark Hancock, and David C. Shepherd. 2020. "Transport Me Away": Fostering Flow in Open Offices through Virtual Reality. Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1145/3313831.3376724
[54]
Daniel Schneider, Alexander Otte, Travis Gesslein, Philipp Gagel, Bastian Kuth, Mohamad Shahm Damlakhi, Oliver Dietz, Eyal Ofek, Michel Pahud, Per Ola Kristensson, Jörg Müller, and Jens Grubert. 2019. ReconViguRation: Reconfiguring Physical Keyboards in Virtual Reality. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics 25, 11 (October 2019), 3190–3201.
[55]
Valentin Schwind, Jens Reinhardt, Rufat Rzayev, Niels Henze, and Katrin Wolf. 2018. Virtual Reality on the Go? A Study on Social Acceptance of VR Glasses. In Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services Adjunct (Barcelona, Spain) (MobileHCI ’18). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 111–118. https://doi.org/10.1145/3236112.3236127
[56]
Ruiying Shen, Dongdong Weng, Shanshan Chen, Jie Guo, and Hui Fang. 2019. Mental fatigue of long-term office tasks in virtual environment. In 2019 IEEE International Symposium on Mixed and Augmented Reality Adjunct (ISMAR-Adjunct). IEEE, 124–127.
[57]
Ashraf A. Shikdar and Mahmoud A. Al-Kindi. 2007. Office ergonomics: deficiencies in computer workstation design. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics 13, 2 (2007), 215–223.
[58]
Belinda Smart. 2020. Just add space: Sustainable, prefab options for backyard offices and studios. Sanctuary: Modern Green Homes 53 (2020), 64–67.
[59]
Cheri Speier, Joseph S. Valacich, and Iris Vessey. 1999. The influence of task interruption on individual decision making: An information overload perspective. Decision Sciences 30, 2 (1999), 337–360. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1999.tb01613.x
[60]
Alicja Sroka. 2018. Is telecommuting the future of business. In 9th International Scientific Conference Analysis of International Relations 2018. Methods and Models of Regional Development. Winter Edition. 147–153.
[61]
Krsna Das Thoondee and Clifton Lane. 2017. Using Virtual Reality to Reduce Stress at Work. In Computing Conference. IEEE, New York, USA, 492–499. https://doi.org/10.1109/SAI.2017.8252142
[62]
Deltcho Valtchanov. 2010. Physiological and affective responses to immersion in virtual reality: Effects of nature and urban settings. Journal of Cybertherapy & Rehabilitation 3 (01 2010), 359–373.
[63]
Deltcho Valtchanov, Kevin R. Barton, and Colin Ellard. 2010. Restorative effects of virtual nature settings. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 13, 5 (2010), 503–512. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2009.0308
[64]
Alladi Venkatesh and Nicholas P. Vitalari. 1992. An emerging distributed work arrangement: An investigation of computer-based supplemental work at home. Management Science 38, 12 (1992), 1687–1706.
[65]
Peter Vink and Michiel A. J. Kompier. 1997. Improving office work: a participatory ergonomic experiment in a naturalistic setting. Ergonomics 40, 4 (1997), 435–449.
[66]
Edward O. Wilson. 1984. Biophilia. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
[67]
Richmond Y. Wong and Vera Khovanskaya. 2018. Speculative design in HCI: from corporate imaginations to critical orientations. In New Directions in Third Wave Human-Computer Interaction: Volume 2-Methodologies. Springer, 175–202.

Recommendations

Comments

Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

Information & Contributors

Information

Published In

cover image ACM Conferences
VRST '23: Proceedings of the 29th ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology
October 2023
542 pages
ISBN:9798400703287
DOI:10.1145/3611659
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution International 4.0 License.

Sponsors

Publisher

Association for Computing Machinery

New York, NY, United States

Publication History

Published: 09 October 2023

Check for updates

Author Tags

  1. Field Study
  2. Remote Work
  3. Virtual Reality
  4. Workstations

Qualifiers

  • Research-article
  • Research
  • Refereed limited

Funding Sources

  • NSERC

Conference

VRST 2023

Acceptance Rates

Overall Acceptance Rate 66 of 254 submissions, 26%

Contributors

Other Metrics

Bibliometrics & Citations

Bibliometrics

Article Metrics

  • 0
    Total Citations
  • 546
    Total Downloads
  • Downloads (Last 12 months)546
  • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)62
Reflects downloads up to 24 Oct 2024

Other Metrics

Citations

View Options

View options

PDF

View or Download as a PDF file.

PDF

eReader

View online with eReader.

eReader

HTML Format

View this article in HTML Format.

HTML Format

Get Access

Login options

Media

Figures

Other

Tables

Share

Share

Share this Publication link

Share on social media