skip to main content
10.1145/2470654.2466248acmconferencesArticle/Chapter ViewAbstractPublication PageschiConference Proceedingsconference-collections
research-article

The emotional wellbeing of researchers: considerations for practice

Published: 27 April 2013 Publication History

Abstract

As technology progressively pervades all aspects of our lives, members of the HCI community are engaging with increasingly sensitive contexts in their research - for example, end of life, genocide, computer-mediated communication under oppressive regimes. The considerations generated by research in such contexts can go well beyond those addressed by generic ethical approval processes and institutional practice. Whilst it is standard to ensure that the wellbeing of participants is taken into account in research design and the ethical approval process, it is much less common for the researcher's own emotional wellbeing to be considered explicitly. This paper describes the role that a researcher's emotions may play in research, and the impact which research in sensitive contexts can have on researchers' emotional wellbeing and on research validity. A qualitative survey is described which investigated the support mechanisms which HCI researchers have in place in case they are distressed/troubled as a result of their research. The results of the survey are used, in combination with insights into how other disciplines address the topic, to synthesize suggestions for ways in which the HCI community can proactively incorporate consideration for the emotional wellbeing of the researcher into the research process.

Supplementary Material

suppl.mov (chi0704-file3.mp4)
Supplemental video

References

[1]
ACM. Code of Ethics - Association for Computing Machinery. http://www.acm.org/about/code-of-ethics.
[2]
Atkins, S. and Murphy, K. Reflective practice. Nursing Standard 8, 39 (1994), 49--56.
[3]
Bardzell, S. Feminist HCI: Taking Stock and Outlining an Agenda for Design. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM (2010), 1301--1310.
[4]
Battarbee, K. and I., K. Co-Experience: User Experience as Interaction. Co-design 1, 1 (2004), 5--18.
[5]
Bloor, M., Sampson, H., and Fincham, B. Qualiti (National Centre for Research Methods, ESRC) commissioned inquiry into risk to well-being of researchers in qualitative research. Cardiff, UK, 2007.
[6]
Borning, A. and Muller, M. J. Next Steps for Value Sensitive Design. Proc. CHI 2012, (2012), 1125--1134.
[7]
British Computer Society. Code of Conduct for BCS Members. 2011.
[8]
Burns, S. and Bulman, C. Reflective Practice in Nursing. Blackwell Science Ltd., Oxford, UK, 2000.
[9]
Burr, G. Unfinished business: Interviewing family members of critically ill patients. Nursing Inquiry 3, (1995), 172--177.
[10]
Corden, A., Sainsbury, R., Sloper, P., and Ward, B. Using a model of group psychotherapy to support social research on sensitive topics. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 8, 2 (2005), 151--60.
[11]
Dearden, A. See no evil?: ethics in an interventionist ICTD. Proc. ICTD 2012, ACM (2012), 46--55.
[12]
Dimond, J. P., Fiesler, C., and Bruckman, A. S. Domestic violence and information communication technologies. Interacting with Computers 23, 5 (2011), 413--421.
[13]
Elias, N. Problems of Involvement and Detachment. The British Journal of Sociology 7, 3 (1956), pp. 226--252.
[14]
Ethics Committee of the British Psychological Society. Code of Ethics and Conduct. 2009.
[15]
Finlay, L. Negotiating the swamp: the opportunity and challenge of reflexivity in research practice. Qualitative research 2, 2 (2002), 209--230.
[16]
Friedman, B. and Nathan, L. P. Multi-lifespan information system design: a research initiative for the HCI community. Proc. CHI 2010, ACM (2010), 2243--2246.
[17]
Holland, J. Emotions and Research. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 10, 3 (2007), 195--209.
[18]
Hughes, D., Rayson, P., Walkerdine, J., et al. Supporting Law Enforcement in Digital Communities through Natural Language Analysis. In S. Srihari and K. Franke, eds., Computational Forensics SE - 12. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2008, 122--134.
[19]
Johnson, C. W. Applying the lessons of the attack on the world trade center, 11th September 2001, to the design and use of interactive evacuation simulations. Proc. CHI 2005, ACM (2005), 651--660.
[20]
Light, A. The unit of analysis in understanding the politics of participatory practice. Proc. 11th Biennial Participatory Design Conference, ACM (2010), 183--186.
[21]
Mackay, W. E. Ethics, lies and videotape. Proc. CHI 1995, ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co. (1995), 138--145.
[22]
Malacrida, C. Reflexive Journaling on Emotional Research Topics: Ethical Issues for Team Researchers. Qual Health Res 17, (2007), 1329--1339.
[23]
Massimi, M., Moncur, W., Odom, W., Banks, R., and Kirk, D. Memento Mori: Technology Design for the End of Life. Proc. CHI EA 2012, ACM (2012), 2759--2762.
[24]
McMurray, T. The changing face of research ethics. The Ulster Medical Journal 71, 2 (2002), 98--100.
[25]
Mitchell, W. and Irvine, A. I'm Okay, You're Okay?: Reflections on the Well-Being and Ethical Requirements of Researchers and Research Participants in Conducting Qualitative Fieldwork Interviews. International Journal of Qualitative Methods 7, 4 (2008).
[26]
Moncur, W., Bikker, J., Kasket, E., and Troyer, J. From Death to Final Disposition: Roles of Technology in the Post-Mortem Interval. Proc. CHI 2012, ACM (2012), 531--540.
[27]
Moncur, W., Mahamood, S., Reiter, E., and Freer, Y. Involving healthcare consumers in knowledge acquisition for virtual healthcare. AAAI Fall Symposium Series, AAAI Press (2009), 43--51.
[28]
Moncur, W., Vasalou, A., Jirotka, M., and Kirk, D. HCI Research in Sensitive Contexts: Ethical Considerations. Proc. BCS HCI 2012, BCS HCI (2012).
[29]
Moncur, W. Invoking emotional support in a health crisis. Proc. CHI EA 2008, ACM (2008), 2637--2640.
[30]
Moncur, W. A model for the provision of adaptive ehealth information across the personal social network. 2011. Unpublished PhD Thesis, University of Aberdeen.
[31]
Pennebaker, J. Opening Up: The Healing Power of Expressing Emotions. The Guildford Press, New York, 1990.
[32]
Prior, S. HCI methods for including adults with disabilities in the design of CHAMPION. Proc. CHI EA 2010, ACM (2010), 2891--2894.
[33]
Rabinow, P. Discourse and power: On the limits of ethnographic texts. Dialectical Anthropology 10, 1-2 (1985), 1--13.
[34]
Rager, K. B. Self-care and the qualitative researcher: When data can break your heart. Educational Researcher 34, 4 (2005), 23--27.
[35]
Sengers, P., Boehner, K., David, S., and Kaye, J. "Jofish". Reflective design. Proc. CC 2005, ACM (2005), 49--58.
[36]
Shklovski, I. and Vertesi, J. "Un-Googling": Research Technologies, Communities at Risk and the Ethics of User Studies in HCI. Proc. BCS HCI 2012 - Workshop on HCI Research in Sensitive Contexts: Ethical Considerations, eWiC (2012).
[37]
Social Research Association. Ethical guidelines. 2003.
[38]
Stahl, B., Eden, G., and Jirotka, M. Responsible research and innovation in Information and Communication Technology. In R. Owen, J. Bessant and M. Heintz, eds., Responsible Innovation. Wiley & Sons., Chichester, 2012.
[39]
Stahl, B. C. and Eke, D. Ethical reviews of information and communications technology research projects across UK computing departments: The state of the art. 10th Annual Conference of the Subject Centre for Information and Computer Sciences, (2009), 16.
[40]
Tracey, M. D. More effective supervision. Monitor on Psychology 37, 3, 2006, 48.
[41]
Whyte, W. F. Encounters with participatory action research. Qualitative Sociology 18, 3 (1995), 289--299.
[42]
Winograd, T. Bringing Design to Software. Addison Wesley, Reading Mass, 1997.
[43]
Woodthorpe, K. Reflecting on death: The emotionality of the research encounter. Mortality 14, 1 (2009), 70--86.
[44]
Woodthorpe, K. Researching death: Methodological reflections on the management of critical distance. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 14, 2 (2011), 99--109.
[45]
Wright, P. and McCarthy, J. Empathy and experience in HCI. Proc. CHI 2008, ACM (2008), 637--646.

Cited By

View all
  • (2024)Invisible Designing: Emotional and Affective Labour in Relational Participatory PracticesProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669872(67-72)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
  • (2024)Abusive Partner Perspectives on Technology Abuse: Implications for Community-based Violence PreventionProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36372928:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
  • (2024)Forms of Fraudulence in Human-Centered Design: Collective Strategies and Future Agenda for Qualitative HCI ResearchExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3636309(1-5)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
  • Show More Cited By

Index Terms

  1. The emotional wellbeing of researchers: considerations for practice

      Recommendations

      Comments

      Please enable JavaScript to view thecomments powered by Disqus.

      Information & Contributors

      Information

      Published In

      cover image ACM Conferences
      CHI '13: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 2013
      3550 pages
      ISBN:9781450318990
      DOI:10.1145/2470654
      Permission to make digital or hard copies of all or part of this work for personal or classroom use is granted without fee provided that copies are not made or distributed for profit or commercial advantage and that copies bear this notice and the full citation on the first page. Copyrights for components of this work owned by others than ACM must be honored. Abstracting with credit is permitted. To copy otherwise, or republish, to post on servers or to redistribute to lists, requires prior specific permission and/or a fee. Request permissions from [email protected]

      Sponsors

      Publisher

      Association for Computing Machinery

      New York, NY, United States

      Publication History

      Published: 27 April 2013

      Permissions

      Request permissions for this article.

      Check for updates

      Author Tags

      1. emotion
      2. end of life
      3. ethics
      4. methodology
      5. participatory design
      6. qualitative research
      7. reflection
      8. research governance
      9. thanatosensitive design
      10. validity

      Qualifiers

      • Research-article

      Conference

      CHI '13
      Sponsor:

      Acceptance Rates

      CHI '13 Paper Acceptance Rate 392 of 1,963 submissions, 20%;
      Overall Acceptance Rate 6,199 of 26,314 submissions, 24%

      Upcoming Conference

      CHI '25
      CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems
      April 26 - May 1, 2025
      Yokohama , Japan

      Contributors

      Other Metrics

      Bibliometrics & Citations

      Bibliometrics

      Article Metrics

      • Downloads (Last 12 months)225
      • Downloads (Last 6 weeks)32
      Reflects downloads up to 05 Nov 2024

      Other Metrics

      Citations

      Cited By

      View all
      • (2024)Invisible Designing: Emotional and Affective Labour in Relational Participatory PracticesProceedings of the Participatory Design Conference 2024: Exploratory Papers and Workshops - Volume 210.1145/3661455.3669872(67-72)Online publication date: 11-Aug-2024
      • (2024)Abusive Partner Perspectives on Technology Abuse: Implications for Community-based Violence PreventionProceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction10.1145/36372928:CSCW1(1-25)Online publication date: 26-Apr-2024
      • (2024)Forms of Fraudulence in Human-Centered Design: Collective Strategies and Future Agenda for Qualitative HCI ResearchExtended Abstracts of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613905.3636309(1-5)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)Understanding fraudulence in online qualitative studies: From the researcher's perspectiveProceedings of the 2024 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems10.1145/3613904.3642732(1-17)Online publication date: 11-May-2024
      • (2024)SoK: Safer Digital-Safety Research Involving At-Risk Users2024 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (SP)10.1109/SP54263.2024.00071(635-654)Online publication date: 19-May-2024
      • (2024)Reflections beyond the thesis—exploring wellbeing, emotional work and research identity following a PhDThe Design Journal10.1080/14606925.2024.2419189(1-20)Online publication date: 24-Oct-2024
      • (2024)Conclusion: Researching Hate as an ActivistResearching Hate as an Activist10.1007/978-3-031-57089-6_8(159-174)Online publication date: 1-Jun-2024
      • (2023)Time to Reflect. Exploring wellbeing, emotional work and research identity following a PhD.Blucher Design Proceedings10.5151/ead2023-5GLA-02FULL_TimetoReflect_Robertson_Lim(893-903)Online publication date: Dec-2023
      • (2023)Digital Health Technologies for Maternal and Child Health in Africa and Other Low- and Middle-Income Countries: Cross-disciplinary Scoping Review With Stakeholder ConsultationJournal of Medical Internet Research10.2196/4216125(e42161)Online publication date: 7-Apr-2023
      • (2023)Of Newcomers and Supervisors: Ethical Issues in Supervising Newcomers in Qualitative Health ResearchInternational Journal of Qualitative Methods10.1177/1609406923117110522Online publication date: 17-May-2023
      • Show More Cited By

      View Options

      Get Access

      Login options

      View options

      PDF

      View or Download as a PDF file.

      PDF

      eReader

      View online with eReader.

      eReader

      Media

      Figures

      Other

      Tables

      Share

      Share

      Share this Publication link

      Share on social media